Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of 1924 Winter Olympics medal winners/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 14:45, 24 October 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Geraldk (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
This list is modeled after the 2006 Winter Olympics medals winners FL. It's been a while since I've nominated a list, so I'm sure I must have made a mistake somewhere, and you should feel free to go to town. Geraldk (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The alt text needs some work. Ideally, alt text should describe the content of the image itself For example, what does the poster look like? I'll be happy to help if necessary. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm happy to do it, it's certainly something I need to learn, but do you have a good example you can point me to? Geraldk (talk) 11:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it turns out the image is non-free, and using to illustrate this article is not appropriate. I'll hunt for an image we might be able to use, but I suspect it will be difficult to find one. Can a list pass FLC without an image? Geraldk (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Found a replacement. Geraldk (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I fixed the two redirects in the toolbox.BLUEDOGTN 21:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: This meets FL list criteria, and I agree it should be promoted. Good Job.BLUEDOGTN 21:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I appreciate the review. Geraldk (talk) 22:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: This meets FL list criteria, and I agree it should be promoted. Good Job.BLUEDOGTN 21:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I fixed the two redirects in the toolbox.BLUEDOGTN 21:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Found a replacement. Geraldk (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it turns out the image is non-free, and using to illustrate this article is not appropriate. I'll hunt for an image we might be able to use, but I suspect it will be difficult to find one. Can a list pass FLC without an image? Geraldk (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from KV5
Just a few minor things:
A couple of uncapitalized Olympics/Olympic Games here and there (image caption and footnote, specifically)"The inaugural 1924 Winter Olympics were held in Chamonix, France, from 25 January to 4 February 1924" - I feel like saying 1924 twice is redundant. How about piping "inaugural Winter Olympics" to 1924 Winter Olympics instead; that way, you only say 1924 once.- Ref section:
General reference, instead of "references""Notes" should probably be its own section, before references, instead of a subhead under references.
That's all from me for now; well done! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 15:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review. All very helpful suggestions, all implemented as suggested. Geraldk (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A well-done list. Support – KV5 (Talk • Phils) 14:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments – First off, an FL does not require images, although they should be provided when practical. If there had not been a free image avaliable for the lead, it would not have caused the FLC to fail (at least I hope not).
Here's a tip on the alt text: it shouldn't just be a restatement of the caption. Chop the part that copies the caption and begin the alt text with "A male figure skater performing...", and it would be ideal."in the count of total medals, with fourGiants2008 (17–14) 19:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]medalseach." Removing this unneeded duplicate word would serve to tighten this sentence.
- Thanks for the review. Have fixed both. Still on the learning curve for alt text, so I appreciate the tip. Geraldk (talk) 22:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Very good list. Giants2008 (17–14) 19:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 09:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comment I notice that "games" here is in lowercase (e.g. "dominated the games") while the 2006 list uses uppercase. Please make it consistent. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done and done. How's that for quick response? Geraldk (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.