Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Dave Gahan discography

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 00:56, 28 December 2007.

David Gahan discography edit

This is the discography for Depeche Mode frontman David Gahan. I believe it to be complete. It includes all his albums, singles, appearances on compilations, etc. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 03:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Though I have refrained from commenting on it before, I've been iffy from the start with the inclusion of the explanation for the m-dahh inside the table: It's not tabular data as such, so IMHO it doesn't really belong. I don't reallyhave muchmoreto say. (For the record, I'm not supporting or opposing discogs anymore, just making comments or direct edits like the small fixes I just did to the article). Circeus (talk) 03:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support with two questions/concerns: a) {{reflist|2}} would make the References section a bit neater. b) The tables that are somewhat wide, like "Singles", "Miscellaneous", "Other appearances" - to make the page standard - would look better if you add "width='100%'" to it. Just a couple cosmetics :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(blushes) I'm not exactly sure what your asking me to do with the table sizes. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the change for you :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 19:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree with SatyrTN, I cannot support though until the cosmetics are finished. The info is good, but the list looks a little messy. If you can change the reflist and make the tables the same size I would be glad to support.
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 19:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Crzy cheetah 21:34, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mainly because of the above-mentioned stylistic/cosmetic issues. Why is the font small? Why is one of the singles centered? Why is the em-dash note part of the table? Why are the cart position columns so wide? Why do all the cells have extra space to the right of the text? Why are FRA and U.S. blank in the Live albums section? etc. On a non-cosmetic level, Discogs is not considered a reliable source. Drewcifer (talk) 02:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tidied up the page and the font is no longer small. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 04:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking better, but there's still the issues of the wide chart columns, the em-dash note being in the table, and I also noticed that the countries are bolded in the Singles section, but not in the other sections. These are all fairly minor things, but the most important issue I still see is using discogs.com as a source. It is user-generated, and therefore not a reliable source. Drewcifer (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Since the cosmetics are fixed. The lead is good also. Hpfan9374 (talk) 09:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.