Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2024/1

< Wikipedia:Articles for improvement‎ | Nominations‎ | Archives


Valve edit

  Valve – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 282 daily hits

  • A level 4 vital article for a very important vital device in plumbing, irrigation, and a surplus of other fields. Contains a lot of pictures and a lot of text, but the 2 references and tags have been in a sorry state since 2011, and could very much use a tune-up from AFI I feel. Utopes (talk / cont) 10:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, vital article in need of improvement. SVcode(Talk) 01:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Axle edit

  Axle – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 220 daily hits

  • A popular and level 4 vital article that has relevance in nearly all engineering and technological fields... yet 83.3% of the paragraphs are completely unreferenced, as there are only 4 references across this whole article. They are used once each, despite the ~24 or so blocks of text which are usually lengthy. The original research needs addressing as well as just general cleaning. Tagged since 2018. Utopes (talk / cont) 10:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, level 4 vital article in need of citations and little bit of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 01:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - level 4 vital article. Could need our help.BabbaQ (talk) 09:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Ratchet (device) edit

  Ratchet (device) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 210 daily hits

  • A level 5 vital article that is very underworked. Besides one parenthesis sentence that is double-referenced, the rest of the article is unsourced. As a whole, the page is just... empty, or at least a lot emptier than I expected. Just needs a heap of work that I think AFI would be able to provide. Utopes (talk / cont) 10:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Rake (tool) edit

  Rake (tool) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 163 daily hits

  • After the first run-on sentence which constitutes the entire lead, the rest of this 5k byte article is completely unsourced. Only one reference exists from the first paragraph/single sentence, and needs a lot of language clean-up. This is a level 4 vital article in Technology and a highly prevalent topic. Utopes (talk / cont) 10:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, per nom.BabbaQ (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Pirn edit

  Pirn – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 369 daily hits

  • This is a stub. This stub is a Level 5 vital article in Technology, and has received 11,000 pageviews this month (not a day under 200). It also has no photograph (despite the talk-page request for one), has been completely unreferenced, and orange-tagged since 2010 for the last 13 years. I couldn't think of a better AFI candidate if I tried. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - article in need of projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Mechanism (engineering) edit

  Mechanism (engineering) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 132 daily hits

  • This is the titular article of a 63-page block of Level 5 vital articles, with this page being a Level 5 vital article itself and top importants to WP Engineering and WP Robotics. But, due to the scope this general topic, and the fact that this page's six sources are doubled up into four sections, the remaining six of ten sections (including the lead) are completely unreferenced and exist as original research. Due to this page's function as the top of the mechanism hierarchy, it could go for some worthwhile organization. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Jersey (clothing) edit

  Jersey (clothing) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 371 daily hits

  • This is an article which reads very confusedly, organization-wise. It's not a vital article, but gets a good chunk of page views, and only contains 3 citations, with 67% of these citations being related exclusively to Australian football. A more worldwide view of this topic feels like it is appropriately necessary. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per AFI. SVcode(Talk) 23:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - - needs our help.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kufi edit

  Kufi – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 385 daily hits

  • While not a vital article, this would be an important article to cover as a relevant topic in an under-represented subject matter with a high number of hits. Has a good handful of references, but many more citation-needed tags in quantity. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Cap edit

  Cap – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 198 daily hits

  • Another level 5 vital article in Life (beyond just cape), but this one has no inline citations outside of the lead paragraph. Which, as this only has three citations to begin with, means there's a lot of material lacking in any verifiability. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved


Cape edit

  Cape – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 257 daily hits

  • A level 5 vital article in Life which only has 2 citations despite the several sections of unreferenced content. Has a good chunk of pageviews to boot as well, and is need of overall tuning. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above.SVcode(Talk) 23:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - In need of projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Geopoetics edit

  Geopoetics – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5 daily hits

  • I wasn't sure if geography, arts, or language and literature would be an appropriate category, but I believe this topic can fit into all three. This article was previously a redirect to the originator of the term Kenneth White and has existed as such since 17 May 2007, so it's page views are pretty abysmal. While it has low views, it is referenced on the main geography page as one of the few qualitative methods. Geopoetics is growing in popularity from what I've seen in the literature, so I changed the article from a redirect and expanded upon it with textbooks and peer-reviewed sources I could find. At this point, I would personally place it between start and C class. Unfortunately, geopoetics is a bit out of my area of expertise, and I would like to see if others could help flush it out and improve it. I think this methodological approach has much to offer the discipline regarding science communication, outreach, and general geography awareness. The sources already within the article are probably enough to get someone interested started. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, article has no hits and not strong indicators of high notability. SVcode(Talk) 23:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, very low hits and not even assessed yet. Too early at best. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 04:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. oppose - not at this moment.BabbaQ (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved SVcode(Talk) 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Ravine edit

  Ravine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 206 daily hits

  • This article needs lots of expansion, and is a vital article. SVcode(Talk) 01:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support article in desperate need of expansion. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Navy edit

  Navy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 398 daily hits

  • Vital article in need of more citations. SVcode(Talk) 00:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, a lot of orange sections which could definitely look a lot nicer. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - definitely in need of help from the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Internet research edit

  Internet research – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 61 daily hits

  • A large article with only 1 reference. Its history is troublesome and only gets 61 daily hits. Yet it is an article that WP should have.Richard Nowell (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, an important article with the need for more improvement. SVcode(Talk) 23:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Breaking wave edit

  Breaking wave – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 158 daily hits

  • Tagged with original research concerns since 2017 (rightfully so), this medium length article is absolutely in need of more work. In its current state, it only has 4 references, yet entire chunks of text are missing citations and written quite unencyclopedically at that. The page does a lot of editorializing and talks about what "surfers say" about the topic (without any reference to such surfers). Utopes (talk / cont) 07:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, important article in need of AFI help. SVcode(Talk) 23:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - In need of projects help. Definitely.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Longshore drift edit

  Longshore drift – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 88 daily hits

  • This is a page that is about a pretty recognizable phenomenon with a lot of bytes (18k), yet not a lot of unique sources to go along with it. It seems to need a general structure overhaul, especially when there's a lot of quality source material out there. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, even though it has less hits, it's still an important article in need of more citations. SVcode(Talk) 01:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - article needs improvements.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Authentication (law) edit

  Authentication (law) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 9 daily hits

  • Despite the low hits, the article is a stub-class level 5 Vital article that does not cite any sources. Equalwidth (C)
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, vital article, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support -Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Jetty edit

  Jetty – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 256 daily hits

  • This page has a lot of lengthy prose and sections are quite long... yet the overall sourcing is pretty abysmal for a topic with great potential. By this, I mean that there are only three references, but one of the references is the dictionary and the other appears to be clickhole "5 Insane Waves that are Now Extinct". The final source is Encyclopædia Britannica, which is slapped on the end of every section on the page. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, worthy topic needs a firm edit. Wil540 art (talk) 00:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kidnapping edit

  Kidnapping – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 631 daily hits

  • An article about an important crime that needs to be more updated and expanded. SVcode(Talk) 23:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom plus need for internationalizing, I expect more coverage from such a key, level-4 vital topic. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 03:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - need our help.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dissenting opinion edit

  Dissenting opinion – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 67 daily hits

  • This article, although having the number of average daily hits lower than 100, should still be an AFI since it is a crucial topic in jurisprudence and the section "Dissenting opinions by region" requires expansion.--RekishiEJ (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, looks important but doesn't have much importance or hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, defines an important component of legal decisions. Ooo Salt ooo (talk) 01:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support, per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 00:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pneumatics edit

  Pneumatics – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 340 daily hits

  • A very large branch of engineering with thousands of applications and would theoretically have a very large spread of discussion points. When coming across this level 5 vital article with over 10 thousand monthly pageviews, "shocked" is an understatement when I saw the state of the article's references, which is just one reference located in the fifth and final section on the page. Utopes (talk / cont) 10:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, article with lots of hits that needs lots of improvement. SVcode(Talk) 01:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Needs the projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, needs attention. 23:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 00:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Flail edit

  Flail – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 139 daily hits

  • This is a highly underdeveloped level 5 article on a very well known tool. While its "counterpart" article of Flail (weapon) attracts far more attention which is derived from the original agricultural flail's design, the base article is just as important yet only exists as a little more than a picture gallery in its current state, with a measly two references and some external links. I think this would be worth improving here. Utopes (talk / cont) 10:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - level 5 article in need of projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, needs attention. Wil540 art (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 00:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Cut bank edit

  Cut bank – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 41 daily hits

  • The hits may be less than ideal, but this is a level 5 Vital article on an important topic for rivers everywhere, being about the cliffs on rivers that are subject to continuous long-term erosion. There's a lot of potential here due to this article's Vital status, but its shortcoming is that this page is entirely unreferenced beyond the first sentence, being the only reference this page has. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, vital article in need of serious expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, interesting relevant article needs attention. Wil540 art (talk) 23:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 00:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Bulls edit

  Chicago Bulls – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,088 daily hits

  • Chicago Bulls is rated a Class B article for 3 categories; Chicago, the NBA and Illinois, however, that rating may need to be re-examined. One of the most prominent and historic teams in National Basketball Association history, the article suffers from almost the entire history section being completely or near-completely uncited. This includes subsections detailing the 1990s Michael Jordan era of the team. A reasonable argument can be made that, during that era, the team was one of the most prominent sports on Earth at that point. As a sports team in a highly prominent league, the article has and will continue to maintain an extremely high daily hit rate. I've never nominated an article for improvement before but I strongly feel this must meet the criteria. I feel like an article this prominent yet so poorly sourced is a bad reflection on Wikipedia. Because of the scale of the article, a team effort rather than a solo attempt, I would think, is advisable. CeltBrowne (talk) 06:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, good candidate for AFI. B rating is out of date. Wil540 art (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 22:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - needs projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 00:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Park (franchise) edit

  South Park (franchise) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 158 daily hits

  1. Neutral, important article with high hits but I'm not sure if it needs more expansion or not. I think most of the information is covered by other articles. SVcode(Talk) 23:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose; no problematic tags (currently), with seemingly many sources. Does not appear as if it would need the attention of AFI right now. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Not the right fit for AFI. South Park fans will get to the article, which doesn't look bad. Wil540 art (talk) 00:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 21:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved SVcode(Talk) 12:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Motherboard edit

  Motherboard – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,569 daily hits

  • A very large and important article that has 12 inline citations. For an article with more than 1600 daily hits it is poorly sourced and unimpressive at best. (In fact, even worse...) Richard Nowell (talk) 12:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 22:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, needs informed editing. Wil540 art (talk) 23:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 21:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wonder how a large article like this can be 'saved'. As above, it needs a lot of informed and sometimes complex references which it is unlikely to get. Otherwise, it just remains one of those poorly-sourced articles people complain about. Richard Nowell (talk) 11:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 12:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Microsoft Office 2021 edit

  Microsoft Office 2021 – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 724 daily hits

  • An article about a frequently used current office suite yet is a mere stub, meaning it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, lots of hits, needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 21:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - needs expansion.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 21:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 12:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epidemic edit

  Epidemic – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 485 daily hits

  • I think this article needs more expansion based off how notable this article is. SVcode(Talk) 02:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support could use an update via AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 21:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 00:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Sports governing body edit

  Sports governing body – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 156 daily hits

  • Though it doesn't have lots of hits this is an important article that most major sports in the world have. SVcode(Talk) 21:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - important article topic. In need of help.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, needs informed editing. Wil540 art (talk) 23:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 00:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coif edit

  Coif – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 151 daily hits

  • While not a vital article, this is an important type of cap that has historical significance. Yet, with only 2 references to begin with, half of the page exists sourceless. Seems to be worth the development. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, it seems important but I'm not sure. SVcode(Talk) 01:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved Withdrawn. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Happiness edit

  Happiness – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 812 daily hits

  • An important article that needs some cleanup and focus. SVcode(Talk) 20:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Clean-up needed indeed.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 06:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Headquarters edit

  Headquarters – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 254 daily hits

  • Even though the article is labelled as C-class, I believe that it needs more expansion based off how notable the article is. SVcode(Talk) 00:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - in need of expansion.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 06:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Reef edit

  Reef – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 246 daily hits

  • While Coral reef gets a lot of attention as a level 4 Vital Article, the coral-less variant still is very important, yet still requires a lot of work in its current state. Given its status as a Level 5 Vital Article in science, this page tries to cover a lot of ground, yet only has 5 citations for use on all the variations of reefs. More references are definitely needed, and content expansion seems helpful. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 21:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. Youprayteas (talk) 06:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 06:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Infantry edit

  Infantry – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 860 daily hits

  • An level 4 vital article that has very few citations and other citation related problems. SVcode(Talk) 02:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, important military article needs attention. Wil540 art (talk) 23:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, Agree with above reasons given. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 06:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Consonant edit

  Consonant – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 749 daily hits

  • Level-4 vital article and very high hits. The article could use more citations and copyediting. BorgQueen (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, needs informed editing. Wil540 art (talk) 23:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 06:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Swift Aircraft Swift edit

  Swift Aircraft Swift – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2 daily hits

  • The article describes an aircraft proposed in 2012, yet nothing seems to have come of the project in the past 11 years and even a quick Google search doesn't yield much. The proposed project may be notable enough to have its own article on Wikipedia, but the article as it currently stands is definitely outdated. Cyan22 (talk) 21:43, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, AFI only accepts popular articles that are notable which means that many people view that article (ie: Airplane, any notable article in need of help). SVcode(Talk) 23:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, 2 daily pageviews is not going to be the best need for AFI here. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved WP:SNOWball's chance. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Corel VideoStudio edit

  Corel VideoStudio – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 28 daily hits

  • A Windows-only video editor that no doubt has been used by many.--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, isn't an important article but needs help. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, low pageviews and too niche of a topic area to need AFI. Better left for interested parties. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Needs our help. Expansion, c/e.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved WP:SNOWball's chance Utopes (talk / cont) 07:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


FK Mladá Boleslav edit

  FK Mladá Boleslav – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 181 daily hits

  • This Czech association football club has some recent history of getting to European football and managed to get 7th place in the 2021-22 Fortunaliga, but it has a bad article, at least in my opinion. SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 14:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, article looks fine but can do with a bit more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, no glaring issues, just few sources (which is understandable); doesn't seem like AfI is necessary here. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved WP:SNOW, nominator WP:CIR blocked in 2022, pretty much not happening. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2024/1&oldid=1198626595"