Richard Nowell

Great work!

Richard, I really like the work you've done on Citizen science, expanding it and working on the citations. I think the article is significantly better thanks to your contributions. Well done! 1bandsaw (talk) 16:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! No worries! There are still some odd bits in the article and info that could be added. Some citations need work on... Richard Nowell (talk) 16:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Update of Savile Row tailoring

Hi, I noticed that you were responsible for starting the article Savile Row tailoring. I've been editing it some and will continue to do so, but I thought you might like to glance over it. There appears to be a lot of repetition and dead links. Also, a lot of self-referencing seems apparent.Richard Nowell (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Well done. Keep up the good work! SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

English South Coast Meetup

Hi Richard, you are hereby invited to the South Coast Meetup.

Kind Regards -- Marek.69 ^talk 23:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Image options

Hello, Richard Nowell. You have new messages at Mike Peel's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tololo-1247-232 has been accepted

Tololo-1247-232, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haro 11 has been accepted

Haro 11, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radio Galaxy Zoo has been accepted

Radio Galaxy Zoo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kerry (talk) 22:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Although the comment above was an automated one, I do agree with its suggestion that you don't need to use Article for Creation. Just "move" your sandbox into the main article space to publish. Clearly you know how to write an article and AfC is pretty backlogged so your article could have languished there for months. Kerry (talk) 22:42, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

OK thankyou for your help. New articles can always be problematic and are not usually given the nod so quick. Worth a beer... Richard Nowell (talk) 06:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Ah, you had the magic word Australia in the article. I do a more-or-less daily sweep through the Articles for Creation to push all the Australia-related articles into a dedicated reviewing queue, so I tend to notice any "no brainer" acceptances and act immediately. Kerry (talk) 07:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For your commitment to excellence when writing/editing Wikipedia articles.   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 01:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Re: k2-18b

I think the material you’ve added about the Planetary Society podcast already duplicates information in the article. Maybe take a closer look? Viriditas (talk) 02:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

• Thankyou for interest. Sure there are references to these results in a nearby paragraph, but I think that the interview merits a paragraph in Wikipedia: a NASA astrophysicist talking about planetary science and K2-18b. It would be good to find out whether the image of spectrum could be uploaded to Wiki Commons and so to this article. (BTW, other information in the article is also duplicated).Richard Nowell (talk) 10:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

  Noting here that I opened a discussion about the addition at Talk:K2-18b#Online radio interview, my concern being that one particular podcast isn't really something so important that we'd give it an entire paragraph in a Wikipedia article. Regarding the spectrum, is it on a webpage anywhere so that we can see its licence and format? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)