Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2016/9

< Wikipedia:Articles for improvement‎ | Nominations‎ | Archives


External border of the European Union edit

  External border of the European Union – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 24 daily hits

  • Important article, but little more than a list. Could be easily expanded.--CSJJ104 (talk) 12:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral - Despite the article having a semi-low page views (like the other article nominated), this is a top importance article that also needs major fixing. Due to these problems, I remain neutral... for now. Redolta📱 Contribs 01:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC) (updated 9 August 2016, at 21:55 (UTC))[reply]
  2. Oppose Call me the "pageviews guy", but I firmly believe this figure should be play a large role in deciding if it's worth a week's time of collaboration. I already proposed a minimum pageviews of several hundred, and I stand by it. I realize the subject may have been assessed as top-importance, but the backlog of pending TAFIs is quite long; Surely we can find more popular articles are worth our while? — MusikAnimal talk 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose per MusikAnimal - Personally I don't think anyone's going to have interest in this and plus I'd imagine any UK editors would rather not have anything to do with this article (myself included!), There's better articles on here that deserve our time. –Davey2010Talk 12:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zulu mythology edit

  Zulu mythology – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 53 daily hits

  • Important article for the area. Could be easily improved by editors of any ability. --CSJJ104 (talk) 13:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose I agree it certainly could use improvement but this article does not receive sufficient exposure to warrant a week's effort, in my opinion — MusikAnimal talk 01:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per MusikAnimal - Won't attract many editors so IMHO would be a waste of a week. –Davey2010Talk 12:19, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adult edit

  Adult – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 821 daily hits

  • Nominating adult for TAFI because of high page views, high importance to several WikiProjects, and certainly will not be a waste of a week for TAFI. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Is listed as a vital article --CSJJ104 (talk) 14:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simón Bolívar edit

  Simón Bolívar – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,603 daily hits

  • Nominating Simón Bolívar for being a famous man in Latin American history (high importance), high page views, high/top importance to several WikiProjects, and a week spent on this article would be very useful and time well spent. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom--CSJJ104 (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getúlio Vargas edit

  Getúlio Vargas – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 285 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3 Musketeers (chocolate bar) edit

  3 Musketeers (chocolate bar) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 265 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural institution edit

  Cultural institution – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 33 daily hits

  • Top importance to multiple projects. Needs expansion and could be improved by any level of editor. --CSJJ104 (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose Pageviews count too low, and I often find articles merely documenting a "term" to be difficult to expand on — MusikAnimal talk 01:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - It gets 30-40 views a day which I personally believe is great however again I don't think this will gain many editors so again think this would be a waste of a week. –Davey2010Talk 12:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2016/9/TOC   Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Book edit

  Book – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,626 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Board game edit

  Board game – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 807 daily hits

  • Nominating board game for being well known to families, high page views, top-importance to two separate WikiProjects, and can improve by adding inline citations and removing any OR in the article. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 10:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juice edit

  Juice – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 363 daily hits

  • Nominating juice for being a popular drink, semi-high page views, and is only start class. With a week of collabs, it should be sufficient to bring the article at least to C-Class. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - needs juicing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 14:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Redolta📱 Contribs 15:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Sudan edit

  Sudan – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,232 daily hits

  • Nominating Sudan for being a well known country, high importance to multiple WikiProjects, extremly high number of page views, and it's only C-class. One week of improvement can be very good for this article, so consider well. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luxembourg edit

  Luxembourg – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5,765 daily hits

  • Nominating Luxembourg for being a (highly) known developed country, unbelievably high amount of page views, and it would not be a waste for one week in TAFI. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fortaleza edit

  Fortaleza – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 534 daily hits

  • Nominating Fortaleza for being a famous city in Brazil, high importance to several WikiProjects, high page views, and can use improvement. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Berners-Lee edit

  Tim Berners-Lee – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,445 daily hits

  • Nominating (Sir) Tim Berners-Lee for being a famous and knighted man in the UK, the inventor of the World Wide Web, high page views, high-importance to many WikiProjects, and... the article is C-Class. Time can be well spent on this article, and would benefit TAFI and the article itself. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom, and I am glad this article receives such high interest. The average person seems never to have heard of him. --CSJJ104 (talk) 10:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Java (programming language) edit

  Java (programming language) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,232 daily hits

  • Nominating Java (programming language) for being well known (as a coding language), high page views, and this article was once a featured one. Downgrading to C-Class, this article needs attention to bring the class back up. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 10:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Volt edit

  Volt – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 990 daily hits

  • Nominating Volt for being an important unit in physics/electricity, high page views (almost 1,000 per day), and only being start class for an important unit. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - pernom. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 14:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Redolta📱 Contribs 15:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Calorie edit

  Calorie – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,319 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Suppport - can't keep up the energy to keep supporting! Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Redolta📱 Contribs 15:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Newton (unit) edit

  Newton (unit) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,609 daily hits

  • Nominating Newton (unit) for being important in mechanics, and also having very high page views. One week on this wouldn't hurt, too. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - also per nom. Many secondary school students important too. Many do mechanics compulsary science/physics subject too (depends on junior/senior). Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Redolta📱 Contribs 15:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


China Airlines Flight 120 edit

  China Airlines Flight 120 – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 258 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 12:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2016/9/TOC   Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla (unit) edit

  Tesla (unit) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 809 daily hits

  • Nominating Tesla (unit) for being a start class article with high page views. Because of the article being start-class, the article can be improved heavily in one week. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom. Have no understanding tesla. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ohm edit

  Ohm – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 883 daily hits

  • Nominating Ohm for having high page views and can be improved from just start class. Redolta📱 Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - I guess I cannot "resist" this need for improvement. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald and Charlene Gallego edit

  Gerald and Charlene Gallego – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 300 daily hits

  • Nominating Gerald and Charlene Gallego because the article could really benefit from being part of the project. Needs expansion, better sourcing, c/e. Plenty of material is available. --BabbaQ (talk) 09:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per nom. Redolta📱 Contribs 15:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per nom. Lbertolotti (talk) 22:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, per nom. –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Redolta📱 Contribs 14:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2016/9/TOC

August 2016 Aden bombing edit

  August 2016 Aden bombing – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 253 daily hits

  • Terrorism editors are leaving because of the volume of new content lately and it is now impossible to keep up with all of the attacks. The lists are no longer properly updated, and articles such as this one have recently only been improved by myself. Unfortunately, my life is getting busier and busier, and do not have much time. It would be great if someone could improve this article in the fashion that other terrorism articles are written, while also considering helping out on other terrorism articles. These articles cover very notable events and get a lot of his daily. Not to mention that I have seen these articles as top trending subjects on social media, and are referenced to by notable news outlets and even politicians. Thanks. Beejsterb (talk) 07:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 17:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom--CSJJ104 (talk) 11:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Weak Support - I don't really like these types of articles, as they will get noticed for a short period of time, but they lose sufficient page views. However, due to the reason given by the nom, I weakly support this article. - Redolta📱 Contribs 12:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Redolta📱 Contribs 12:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2016/9&oldid=1136106723"