Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

18 September 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< September 17	September 19 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

2024–25 Taça da Liga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. Draftify until something happens, like the event at all. WP:TOOSOON 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroflot Flight 112

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT: A search reveals that there exists no (significant) news coverage of the event, no secondary sources, no in-depth coverage, no (sustained) continued coverage, no demonstrated lasting effects and no long-term impact on a significant region of the world that would make this event notable enough for a stand-alone article. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation, Transportation, and Turkmenistan. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Steuart Campbell

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO without independent sources. User:Namiba 16:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. User:Namiba 16:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Macliver

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for BLP sourcing issues since 2020. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of ballroom and social dance albums

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pointless, neglected unreferenced list of redlinks --Altenmann >talk 15:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. In theory this could be a successful list. There are plenty of sources in google books to compile such a list, and properly source it. In other words, it is rescuable if someone feels like rescuing this list. It also wouldn't be a tragedy to let this one go until someone want to recreate it and work on it.4meter4 (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I very much doubt that any of them have reasonable coverage of ballroom dance albums. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate catalog. Unless it is a glossary, we don't list redlinks. What really have a chance is List of salsa albums. For it, there is even Latin Grammy Award for Best Salsa Album. And there are plenty of album articles such as Salsa Big Band. I very much doubt that ballroom music has a comparable level of coverage. --Altenmann >talk 16:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CRDB Bank DR Congo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS. Brand new org. scope_creep^Talk 15:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armagh Cricket Club

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe the article fails notability. The article cites only a single non-independent source. A search has revealed only non-significant coverage in reference to games or the grounds and such (with the possible exception of this book page I found).
It was previously proposed for deletion in 2011, with the result being a weak keep with the expectation that user:Brocach would try to add sources. It had been more than a decade and the article has not been improved. Lenny Marks (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Donaldson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for BLP sourcing issues since 2018. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 15:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 3622

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO as a galaxy in the IC (historically non-notable in deletion discussions), and discovered post-1850. Could not find any significant coverage that would make the galaxy pass WP:GNG. Sir MemeGod  15:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to list of IC objects ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 15:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 142

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO as a galaxy with little to no independent coverage. Sir MemeGod  15:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Sir MemeGod  15:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of NGC objects (1–1000). Reywas92^Talk 15:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 135

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even though this is one of the 7,000 NGC objects, it was discovered after 1850 and does not seem to have any coverage (failure of WP:NASTRO). Sir MemeGod  15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Sir MemeGod  15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of NGC objects (1–1000). Reywas92^Talk 15:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 2955

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO, no individual coverage. Object also first observed after 1850. Sir MemeGod  15:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 4516

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, failure of WP:NASTRO, discovered after 1850, and no individual coverage. Sir MemeGod  15:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to list of IC objects. ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 15:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 4026

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The main reasoning is a failure of WP:NASTRO, but I could also find no significant of individual coverage of this object. Also discovered after 1850. Sir MemeGod  15:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Sir MemeGod  15:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to list of IC objects. ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 15:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 3078

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, all searches led me to a vast list of astronomical objects. Fails WP:NASTRO for this reason. Sir MemeGod  15:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Sir MemeGod  15:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to list of IC objects ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 15:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LCE (automobile)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any sources supplying notability. Most sources I've found that even mention it, mention it trivially. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 15:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 15:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zhejiang Normal University East Stadium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any sources conferring notability. Most mentions in any sources appear trivial. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 15:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and China. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 15:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Venues of the 2022 Asian Games#Outside Hangzhou

Lâm (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 4651

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No individual coverage, ails WP:NASTRO. Sir MemeGod  15:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Sir MemeGod  15:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OvalX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than routine coverage like [1], [2], there is nothing significant about this forex broker to pass WP:NCORP criteria. Gheus (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 15:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IronFX

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks independent coverage outside of WP:TRADES. Fails WP:NCORP. Gheus (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Cyprus. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MRC Markets

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. At least, there is no coverage in Australian publications per my checks. Gheus (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 15:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Connecteam

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The first AfD was... somewhat disrupted, but the rationale is substantially the same as that one, I just kinda forgot to renominate after the DRV (oops). In my judgement, there is no way in hell the subject in question meets ORGCRIT, whether in english or non-english sources, and nothing I've seen since the aforementioned discussions move the needle in the slightest. Here's hoping if anyone brings up new sources that they're at least vaguely plausible in therms of meeting WP:SIRS? Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Israel. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hirose Financial

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:CORP. I tried to locate references in the UK newspapers/magazines but couldn't find any. Gheus (talk) 14:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Integral Forex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Lacks in-depth independent coverage outside of WP:TRADES. Media covered the death of Integral Forex founder but they are not useful to prove notability of his company. Checked Turkish Wikipedia article, same case, a lot of citations from unreliable trade publications. Gheus (talk) 14:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Turkey. Skynxnex (talk) 14:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verum Coin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of coverage in real media. The Guardian article, for example, does not mention the article subject. I'd almost A7 it. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FXOpen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Forex-related references are not useful per WP:TRADES. Gheus (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Egypt, Cyprus, United Kingdom, and Australia. Skynxnex (talk) 14:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 4141

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No individual coverage in scientific journals were found after a Google search. Most of the references to this galaxy seem to be large-scale catalogs, such as TheSkyLive or Seligman. Sir MemeGod  14:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Sir MemeGod  14:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PSS J0248+1802

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO, too scientific for the average reader. Sir MemeGod  13:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's no evidence of real notability here, and much of the text of the article consists of irrelevant details about measurements that aren't needed or useful in a WP article. Aldebarium (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PKS 0805-07

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO, no independent coverage. Sir MemeGod  13:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Sir MemeGod  13:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 state visit by Kais Saied to China

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication of notability for this visit. The sources are almost entirely government press releases and should be more WP:DIVERSE for independent notability. The page should be deleted and perhaps parts merged into the main Kais Saied article. Amigao (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, Events, Tunisia, and China. Skynxnex (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Darrell Castle

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL, WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Routine coverage, interviews, profiles, election news. No indication of signficance. scope_creep^Talk 08:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Law, and Tennessee. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to notability issues. If there is an appropriate article, then redirect. 21 Andromedae (talk) 14:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, As a presidential nominee, Castle did better than any other Constitution Party candidate in both of his runs, winning nearly 200k votes each time. He was endorsed by Glenn Beck in 2016 and got some meaningful coverage [3][4][5][6]

As a lawyer, he founded Darrell Castle & Associates and has been interviewed by the New York Times earlier this year relating to the sale of Graceland. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 22:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - besides being on the ballot in multiple states, there is significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reliable sources in this discussion and in article. If not kept, all content should be merged to Darrell Castle 2016 presidential campaign.--User:Namiba 14:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fatoora Platform

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic in question lacks sufficient notability to warrant a standalone article. It does not meet the necessary criteria for independently significant under Wikipedia's notability guidelines WP:GNG or WP:SNG. Either the article should be deleted or merge with with the relevant parent article, Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority. Charlie (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Websites, and Saudi Arabia. Charlie (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dholakia Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The organization in question does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria for corporations, as outlined in WP:NCORP and WP:ORGCRIT. Charlie (talk) 13:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Gujarat. Charlie (talk) 13:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rayleigh (unit)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doing a Google search I cannot find more than a couple of papers where this unit is mentioned, and it is not part of any of the unit standards I can find. Rather than a PROD I am doing an AfD just in case it is used somewhere. If it is, then please add sources and description to that context to demonstrate why it should be retained. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Astronomy, and Engineering. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One straightforward way to check for usage is to look at papers that cite a paper establishing a term, in this case "The rayleigh: interpretation of the unit in terms of column emission rate or apparent radiance expressed in SI units" [7]. Checking citing papers [8] gives a good long list, of which I checked the first 10. Of these, 8 make explicit use of the unit, and devote at least a short passage to defining it, so I think we are good. Of particular note is p. 22 of this thesis [9] which gives an in-depth definition that we should adapt for the article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal potatoes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of very few pages which soft redirect to Wikibooks and the only such page about a food item. Besides this isn't a famous dish either. Kumar Dayal (talk) 13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Kumar Dayal (talk) 13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plush's Corner railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "railway station" on South Australian railway line that closed in 1956. Surely does not meet, and is incapable of meeting, WP:N. Cabrils (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Barossa Valley railway line. Several of the sources actually refer to this as a siding, not a station, and none are more than a few sentences except the last which I question the reliability of as it's just a person's reminisces. Does not appear notable. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus–Saudi Arabia relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted under looser notability standards at AfD in 2009. Not every country A and country B combination is notable. Very poorly sourced, no secondary sources at all. Contains wild claims such as "political relations are close due to similarities between the 2 countries on historical, geographical and economical issues." AusLondonder (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Saudi Arabia, and Cyprus. AusLondonder (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is based on 2 sources, 1 of which is primary. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 11:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added more sources and encyclopedic context. Bilateral relations between two nations should not be considered irrelevant, and without notoriety, the two countries have mutual cooperation agreements, and like all articles of embassies, consulates and diplomatic relations with the exception of a diplomat Ghirmai Ghebremariam, who opened a query of deletion because it does not meet expectations, the other previous ones could have relevance in the future, and if they should be maintained and improved, not redirected or merged, much less eliminated. Alon9393 (talk) 21:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Indefinitely blocked for disruptive behaviour. Geschichte (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Sagra

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources (he is affiliated with GMA Network). No major roles to meet WP:NACTOR (mostly "guest" roles according to the article). C F A 💬 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Philippines. C F A 💬 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence that he became more notable since the last AFD. All sources in this article are primary. Ping me if any secondary sources are found. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Left-wing coalition (Italy)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very weird incomplete disambiguation page (WP:INCDAB). (1) There is no general/international Left-wing coalition dab page where this could be merged, and I can't find other WP pages listing left-wing coalitions. (2) Maybe there is potential for a WP:BROADCONCEPT article like Left-wing politics in Croatia, but the notability of the topic is unclear: There is no interwiki link (including Italian); List of political parties in Italy mentions "left-wing" once, and List of political coalitions in Italy none. So: Should this page even exist? – sgeureka ^t•c 12:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Disambiguations. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not technically "create" the article, it was created [10] by @Nick.mon: when there was a coalition of left-wing parties in Sicily which eventually became Free and Equal (Italy) and thus redirected there. It wasn't accurate since there are/were other coalitions before and after. I wouldn't mind a WP:BROADCONCEPT article or maybe something like Centre-right coalition (Italy) (the latter would have the problem that multiple coalition compete, in 2018 there were three coalitions) Braganza (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shun Kumagai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His claim to notability, playing 154 minutes in the J League and 12 matches in Singapore, is weak. An absence of sources with significant coverage means that he fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Cambodia, Japan, and Singapore. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shunkun Tani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His claim to notability, playing 5 matches in the Japanese third league as well as some amateur competitions, is very weak. An absence of sources with significant coverage means that he fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Spain. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shunsuke Sunaga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His claim to notability, playing 18 matches in Singapore, is weak. An absence of sources with significant coverage means that he fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 12:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aaragan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG as no in-depth coverage of the subject has been found from reliable independent sources. The cited sources are mostly unreliable, and the reliable sources only provide passing mentions. Additionally, the article fails to meet WP:NFILM. It could potentially be recreated if multiple reviews from reliable independent sources are published after its release. GrabUp - Talk 12:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and Tamil Nadu. GrabUp - Talk 12:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no issue i will move draft Monhiroe (talk) 12:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: kindly move to draft Monhiroe (talk) 13:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Polygon (blockchain)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't quite come close to the generally accepted in-depth, reliable, independent, secondary sources required to satisfy WP:ORG plus I believe WP sets the bar a little higher for crypto companies does it not?

Please see below for the source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://github.com/maticnetwork/whitepaper	White paper written by the company	~ There may be some element of informal peer review	~ In-depth? Maybe but because it's a white paper it is not independent	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20210209221131/https://polygon.technology/lightpaper-polygon.pdf	Company website	Not subject to editorial oversight	Plenty of depth but obviously not independent	✘ No
https://www.livemint.com/companies/people/meet-india-s-first-crypto-billionaires-11622112486971.html	~ The publication appears independent and reliable but the majority of the article consists of an interview with the founders with little to no editorial oversight and interviews are primary sources	~ Just how reliable can an interview with the organisation's founders published in a local newspaper be?	Interview aside there is some depth of coverage here.	~ Partial
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-09/crypto-firm-polygon-makes-500-million-buy-for-ethereum-push	~ Routine coverage possibly based on a press release	RSP says that Bloomberg is reliable for business coverage although I have noticed some churnalism in its output.	? Hard to say as the article is paywalled	? Unknown
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/polygons-value-grows-as-its-apps-grow-in-usefulness-and-popularity	Company profile on NASDAQ	~ If it's just being used to verify the ticker symbol then yes this is reliable	Some depth of coverage present	✘ No
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/polygon-matic-reveals-hacked-earlier-103532665.html	Yahoo finance is different to Yahoo News and the content appears to be aggregated from a source for which there is no consensus on reliability	No consensus on FXEmpire's reliability	Yes, there's depth but it reads like a press release	✘ No
https://www.reuters.com/markets/funds/polygon-raises-450-mln-sequoia-capital-india-softbank-vision-fund-2-others-2022-02-07/	~ Source is independent but the nature of the content is just a routine funding announcement	? Press releases published by Reuters are not automatically reliable. - WP:RSP	~ It does just look like a press release about a routine funding announcement	? Unknown
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-02/jpmorgan-executes-its-first-defi-trade-using-public-blockchain	Appears to be written independently	RSP says that Bloomberg is reliable	~ The article appears to focus on JPMorgan's adoption of the blockchain and not the blockchain itself	~ Partial
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mitchellmartin/2022/12/15/trump-nfts-offer-adoring-45000-views-of-former-president/	Appears to be written by a former staff member but curiously the only mention of Polygon is at the top of the page. Did they perhaps sponsor this article? Some clarity is needed here.	~ Former Forbes staff so maybe	This doesn't seem to be about the company	✘ No
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/dec/15/trump-mocked-superhero-digital-card-collection	Definitely independent	Publication has a good track record	Doesn't mention the subject	✘ No
https://www.axios.com/2023/12/04/polygon-blockchain-draftkings-partnership	Most likely independent	Reliable per the consensus at RSP	~ Focuses on one event but not the organisation as a whole	~ Partial
https://venturebeat.com/games/alethea-ai-debuts-generative-ai-on-polygon-blockhain/	~ Appears to be closely aligned with a routine press release/announcement	Reliable per the consensus as WP:RSP	It's just a few sentences and appears to be a routine press announcement	✘ No
https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/02/25/what-is-polygon-ethereum-layer-2-starbucks-mastercards/	? Can't see the whole article because it's paywalled	? To the best of my knowledge a consensus on Fortune's reliability has yet to be reached	? Can't see the whole article because it's paywalled	? Unknown
https://techcrunch.com/2024/01/09/2648953/	TechCrunch isn't independent	Reliable for some things but not notability	Routine press announcement	✘ No
https://techcrunch.com/2024/03/14/blockchain-tech-could-be-the-answer-to-uncovering-deepfakes-and-validating-content/	TechCrunch again	Reliable for some things but not notability	Routine press announcemet based on an interview	✘ No
https://time.com/collection/time100-companies-2023/6285165/polygon-labs/	? Hard to say with these listicles. Perhaps it's a little independent but not entirely	~ ime's magazine blogs, including Techland, should be handled with the appropriate policy. - WP:RSP	Theres a few lines there but nothing appraoching WP:SIGCOV	✘ No
https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/01/tether-had-record-breaking-net-profits-in-q4-polygon-labs-does-layoffs-and-hackers-steal-112m-of-xrp/	TechCrunch again	I don't think WPs consensus has changed as far as I am aware	General news article	✘ No
https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/01/polygon-labs-lays-off-60-employees-about-19-of-its-staff-ceo-says/	Appears to be published relatively independently	For some things maybe. For verifying notability, no.	~ Perhaps but it does seem like a routine press announcement	✘ No
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/09/17/4-trillion-reasons-blackrock-changed-its-mind-on-digital-assets/?	~ Former staff writer so it's anybody's guess	~ Perhaps, the line between staff writer and contributer appears blurry here	As far as I can tell it doesn't mention Polygon directly	✘ No
https://www.indiatoday.in/cryptocurrency/story/firozabad-police-to-use-polygon-blockchain-to-register-complain-2284524-2022-10-12	~ One can't be sure with local news articles	India Today is reliable, I think.	Appears to be a routine press announcement	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Signal Crayfish (talk) 11:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Companies. Skynxnex (talk) 14:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ottawa Charge draft picks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not persuaded that this qualifies under WP:NLIST. There are also only two years here so far. In a few years this will be unmanageable, and doubtless better handled by a category, and conceivably a navigation template for each year, with a link to the next and previous years. Here for discussion. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Ice hockey, and Canada. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep List of New York Rangers draft picks. It's a new league; there have only been two years worth of drafts so far. Let the maintainers of the page determine what's manageable or not. --Mike Vitale 11:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Draft picks are typically very well covered for professional sports leagues and are often considered a defining aspect of a player's career. Additionally, organization draft picks are typically discussed in a fashion that would meet WP:NLIST. I recognize the list isn't very large right now, but I believe it still meets NLIST and it will continue to grow so long as the league doesn't fold. As for manageability, that's certainly not a concern, as we actually have quite a few list of players drafted that make it to featured list status, 7 of which are for NHL team draft histories. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The only other place for this would be on the Ottawa Charge article itself, and I can see this list as getting long and unwieldy over time. If the league doesn't last long, then I'd support merging the content, but in the meantime I don't think it's necessary. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Jammu (1808)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

KM Panikkar is the only reliable source presented here. Autar Singh Sandhu is not a reliable source as there is only one book that can be traced to him which was written in 1935; there are zero mentions of his educational credentials, bibliography, or reviews of scholarly work available, and he was deprecated by an admin in the RSN-[11]. The link to GULAB SINGH (1792-1857) is broken. Panikkar does make some mention of this battle (in page 15 and 16), but the information is not sufficient enough to warrant an article.

Note: Two Sikh nationalist sockmasters have been undermining my AFDs, one is the Truthfindervert, the second is an unrelenting sockmaster who has been stalking me for 3 years now-HaughtonBrit. His two most recent sockpuppets, Alvin1783 and Festivalfalcon873 were sabotaging my AFDs and making multiple votes in AFDs to retain articles which aggrandized their religion. Even after their blocks, HaughtonBrit has been continuing his campaign against me-here he deleted my PROD; 2 admins have said that this was clearly HaughtonBrit block evading-[12] and [13]. Even after that, he didn't stop and made an illegitimate vote in my AFD-[14]. Please be weary of any suspicious new/burner accounts or proxies who vote here as they are almost certainly going to be HaughtonBrit. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Sikhism, and Jammu and Kashmir. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rajarsi Janakananda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, not covered in reliable sources independent of the subject. Polygnotus (talk) 10:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Hinduism, Spirituality, California, Louisiana, and Missouri. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject received significant coverage by NPR, the Kansas City Star/Times, and the Kansas City Business Journal. The article also cites a 1952 book by Richard Fowler, Leaders in Our Town. Perception312 (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that book is described as "The Inspiring Stories Of 116 Leaders In Our Town." and it is only 77 pages so I don't think that means much if anything. 1.5 inspiring stories per page! And the Kansas City Business Journal is physical spam. So what you have is a short article in a 1959 local newspaper and the NPR piece. Polygnotus (talk) 15:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are two articles, one from 1959 and one from 1966. Perception312 (talk) 15:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean when you say that the Kansas City Business Journal is spam? Is American City Business Journals not a reputable publisher? Perception312 (talk) 16:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Murad Ramazanov (fighter)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to fulfill WP:MMANOT with no wins over significant opponents, bouts only in the second tier organizations and FightMatrix ranking of #65 at highest. Also, does not seem to fulfill WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Ticelon (talk) 10:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, Wrestling, and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St Andrews University Canoe Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. The most significant source among the references is the two-minute BBC clip, where the club was mentioned in passing in an episode of a TV series about the east coast of Scotland. This university sports club lacks the sort of in-depth, national-level coverage required for WP:ORG. I had boldly redirected this to University of St Andrews Athletic Union, but this was revereted. Mz7 (talk) 09:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Sports, and Scotland. Mz7 (talk) 09:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NSCHOOL. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. There is no independent coverage. Delete or merge with Visvesvaraya Technological University or NITTE as per the existing affiliation. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Karnataka. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dinesh Kanabar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Also, Wikipedia is not a resume hosting site WP:NOTRESUME. His company is also nominated for deletion. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and India. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 11:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Totally promotional content, clearly failed WP:GNG. Youknow? (talk) 12:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dhruva Advisors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A purely promotional page WP:PROMO for a company with no credible sources WP:RS. It does not meet the standards of WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIGCOV. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 11:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature Global

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The primary citations center around the IPO listing and fundraising efforts. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. At the time of this nomination, an agency had withdrawn a credit rating, and no analyst reports existed on the web. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Darpan Sanghvi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Also, Wikipedia is not a resume hosting site WP:NOTRESUME. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and India. TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Singapore, Maharashtra, Spain, New York, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of the Central African Republic, Washington, D.C.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The one source provided merely confirms who the ambassador is. No third party coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Central African Republic, and United States of America. LibStar (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tagged for notability for several years without improvement. Article entirely relies on primary government sources. No indication secondary sources exist providing significant coverage. AusLondonder (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kailash Waghmare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bit-part actor. Fails WP:NACTOR. scope_creep^Talk 08:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, Theatre, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Healthera

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it does not provide sufficient independent, reliable sources that prove the company's notability according to Wikipedia's guidelines. Loewstisch (talk) 08:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loewstisch (talk) 08:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Medicine, Websites, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Table of bases

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This table of base conversions has been unsourced since its creation in 2003. Most of its bases are themselves non-notable and its digit systems for them unstandardized. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a repository for mathematical tables, which in general have become obsolete since the widespread availability of computers. Some entries in Category:Mathematical tables have prose and references; this one is pure calculation. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Malhan

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Runner up of the show and doing lots of music video is not enough for notability. Xegma(talk) 04:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Television, Internet, and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is not only a runner up of a show, but a very popular indian youtuber too. Columbidae5 (talk) 06:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Stay, you have reliable sources The Times India, The Hindustan News, News18, among others, it also has encyclopedic development and maintains relevance in what it does as a video blogger. Alon9393 (talk) 22:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central Library, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no non-primary sources found. Sohom (talk) 04:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify it for now, need to add more independent sources. Xegma(talk) 04:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Education, and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - to the associated educational institution. It's history will still be there in the unlikely event independent sources can be found. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 13:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify that is still possible, it is not too late. Give the originator a chance to find true secondary sources. I think they should exist, but they might not be in english. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The original creator has had two months to add such sources. Sohom (talk) 02:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obed Yeboah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable football player. Completely lacking WP:RS, and none would likely exist. Fails WP:SPORTBASIC, WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 06:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Ghana, and Netherlands. Shellwood (talk) 07:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Océan/Atlantic 2000

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable defunct radio station. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 05:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Andorra, and France. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MP Port Dickson F.C.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No-notable sports club. Fails WP:NTEAM, WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 05:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Malaysia. Shellwood (talk) 07:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Deus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable rugby player. No sigcov. Fails WP:SPORTBASIC. Cabrils (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Uruguay. Shellwood (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chicas Terremoto del Folklore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable music band. fails WP:BAND. Cabrils (talk) 05:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article already includes one Spanish-language reference, https://rpp.pe/musica/conciertos/chicas-terremoto-del-folklore-parten-de-gira-a-chile-noticia-204114 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Peru. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jonas Becker (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable German DJ/songwriter. Nothing to indicate he meets WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG, and would seem unlikely to be able to. Cabrils (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Briars Rugby

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sub-district rugby club. Zero WP:RSs. Fails WP:NTEAM, WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 05:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby union and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minecraft@Home

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited, and this article is entirely sourced to tangential trivial mentions in articles about Pack.PNG and Herobrine. However the Minecraft@Home team is not independently notable or GNG-passing. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral – I am left a bit confused by the sources. It is unclear to me whether Minecraft@Home is the name of the group of people who are undertaking these projects, or whether it is merely the name of the tool they have developed to make their discoveries. If it's the former, then this would be a good little article, but if it's the latter then I don't think it works. Regardless, the sources are giving very scant information about the people who made these discoveries happen, which is really sad... ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 09:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Kyong-il (footballer, born 1988)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 13:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2010 FIFA World Cup squads#North Korea where his name is mentioned. Corresponding article on Korean Wikipedia is an unsourced stub. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. Lâm (talk) 16:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evelyn Tubb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for BLP sourcing issues since 2010. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 04:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and England. Shellwood (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sada-e-Umeed

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Faila NORG. The article contains WP:OR and appears promotional. This was an AfD'd in 2020 that closed as non-consensus. The only vote to keep the article had a counterargument that wasn't addressed. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 04:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 04:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability, Organizations, and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St. Vincent's Home for the Aged

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NORG. The article contains WP:OR and appears promotional. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 04:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Christianity, and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 07:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'Opus Dei: enquête sur le "monstre"

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only usable source here is La Libre, which is not sigcov and is not enough. Found 1 other journal source that looks good (though I question its independence). Redirect to author Patrice de Plunkett? PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Christianity. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gillespie Cave

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable cave, has no sources. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 04:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Tennessee. Shellwood (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prairie Fever

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single source article, showing no RS or SIGCOV. Film was direct-to-DVD and has no visible cultural impact. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Film. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Entries in the following books including critical assessment: https://archive.org/details/videosourcebookg0005unse/page/2460/mode/2up?q=%22Prairie+Fever%22+%22Stephen+Bridgewater%22 ; https://archive.org/details/radiotimesguidet0000unse_n4y0/page/954/mode/2up?q=%22Prairie+Fever%22+%22Stephen+Bridgewater%22 and in Western Movies: A Guide to 5,105 Feature Films, 2d ed. - Page 254; and in Catálogo Do Cinema Faroeste - Vol. 2 - Page 82 and Movies Made for Television: 2005-2009 - Page 82 AT LEAST. Has a BEFORE been performed? -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 07:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Clarke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2018. Not clear whether the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Austria, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly Fire: The Illusion of Justice

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One review (which is questionable reliability wise), nothing else found in a search. Self-published. Does not pass NBOOK. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, Sexuality and gender, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Found this work used as reference in others: here, here and here. Scholar doesn't bring up much more. Also listed here. Not much else. --Ouro (blah blah) 05:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Taitano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No longer meets WP:NMMA or WP:GNG Nswix (talk) 03:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Martial arts. Nswix (talk) 03:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Veleva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for BLP sourcing issues since 2007. Not clear that the subject meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 02:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Bulgaria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black Silence: the Lety Survivors Speak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found no reliable, significant sources. This recent source does call it "controversial", but does not specify why. That does indicate that there may be coverage I was unable to find. There is discussion about the author's investigation into this topic but the author has written several books on it and the coverage isn't about this one specifically, so imo it should go on the author's page if there aren't sources about this book specifically. The one source in the ELs might be coverage of this book, or it might not, could not find it. Redirect to author Paul Polansky? PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Military. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VTES 3rd Edition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outside MtG, individual sets of CCGs are almost never notable, and I don't see why this should be an exception. Maybe merge the mention of awards to Vampire: The Eternal Struggle if it is not there and redirect this per WP:ATD-R? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of North American regions by life expectancy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested. List is original research and synthesis - extracted data in form not present in secondary, reliable sources. Fails WP:NLIST. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 02:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists, Canada, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, United States of America, and North America. Goldsztajn (talk) 02:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've stated my point of view at the article's talk page. Though the data in the source database were filtered and simple calculations were made, these transformations are obvious and easily verified. All data in the Wikipedia's page are in the source database or can be easily obtained by an obvious mathematical operation.

It's like retelling a text in your own words. When a Wikipedia editor retells a text, he does not retell the whole text but only a part of it. The same way, a Wikipedia editor has not obligation to use necessarily all records in an original dataset - only a part of it can be used. — Lady3mlnm (talk) 07:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't see any need for this type of list . Agletarang (talk) 12:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Major League Baseball career double plays as a right fielder leaders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looked at the sources, and besides baseball-reference, there isn't much to justify the list as a group. If this included all double plays, then it might be more notable as a group, as Baseball Almanac covers it. Since it is only the one position, I think WP:NOTSTATS comes into play. Edit Including the bottom two for the same reason. Conyo14 (talk) 03:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Baseball, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SALAT: too narrow. Now if it had included only blonds born in January ... Clarityfiend (talk) 06:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, far too specific to be notable. Esolo5002 (talk) 21:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep - To repeat my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Major League Baseball career double plays as a center fielder leaders: There are too many other DP articles. If anything all three OF (LF/RF/CF) DP lists should be merged/redirected to List of Major League Baseball career double plays as an outfielder leaders. I don't see why RF is targeted over CF or LF. Rgrds. --BX (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Noting here the rationale used for closing the CF AFD:
  - The result was no consensus‎. NLIST states, "There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists..." This AfD reflects the present lack of consensus on this wider issue.
- Rgrds. --BX (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  I can add those to the AfD, I see no problem with merging/redirecting to them. This one was just part of my patrol. Conyo14 (talk) 04:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  It would probably be a more productive discussion, yes. Rgrds. --BX (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  
  Clarifying my !vote now stands at Merge & redirect to List of Major League Baseball career double plays as an outfielder leaders after all 3 were nom'd. Rgrds. --BX (talk) 04:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or at least partially merge to the outfield double play article. I am not sure that double plays by right fielders is inherently notable, but double plays by specific position is relevant to the general outfield article. Although maybe limit the specific position lists to 10 or 20 players. Rlendog (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Notice I have updated the AfD to include List of Major League Baseball career double plays as a left fielder leaders and List of Major League Baseball career double plays as a center fielder leaders. Also pinging original !voters if they want to update their !vote. @BX:, @Clarityfiend:, @Esolo5002:, @Rlendog: Conyo14 (talk) 05:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge: I agree that the split by position is largely the issue, which is why I support a merge that may allow the list to pass WP:NLIST. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: No indication that WP:NLIST is satisfied here, which requires in-depth coverage from independent secondary reliable sources collating an article's list entries together as a group. All three articles fail that standard at present. Left guide (talk) 17:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I oppose any merge or redirect to List of Major League Baseball career double plays as an outfielder leaders since that page is an equally problematic failure of WP:NLIST that will inevitably be deleted soon anyways. That's just kicking the can down the road and creating more unnecessary administrative and editorial work in the future for no real gain. Left guide (talk) 09:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opposition to the merger has been raised, and to allow a full week for the added articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Baramova

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tag and BLP sourcing issues have been tagged for the last eleven years. No sources have been added in that time. Despite two previous AFDs, the article is still not referenced. Given the change in attitude towards needing sources on BLPs since the last AFD in 2009, it is time to look at this again. 4meter4 (talk) 02:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Bulgaria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Eichhorn Young

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2013. Time to decide one way or another as a community if this meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, Theatre, Canada, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Little significant coverage. Seems to be a WP:MILL voice teacher with an unremarkable performing career. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemary's Baby (franchise)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After consideration and researching the article myself, I can not find signifigant coverage of Rosemary's Baby as a franchise with a any serious depth. Despite the large amount of citations found in the lead and the amount of content within the article. MOS:FILMSERIES says series and franchise articles would "benefit from coverage that discusses the series as a whole", but we have only been pulling from individual film/tv/work reception and are lacking in material that discusses the entirety of the work. This is predominantly material repeating information already available on the unique film/TV/novel articles.

Two articles are primarily about the 50th anniversary of the first film. There is little discussion of it as a series or a franchise outside other briefs about the development of the film.
- Woman's World has little discussion other than a sequel was made to the film, a follow-up was made to the first book, and a television series was adapted. But there is no real discussion of the franchise from a critical, analytical, or business matter. The articles does not refer to it as a franchise, series, or anything.
- Mental Floss Similarly, is a list of 13 facts about the first film, some tangentially related to the other material related to either the film or novel.

Articles that praise the first film, and the announcement of a sequel/prequel/remake.
- Collider and The Guardian articles primarily praise the first film, and announce a follow up is being developed. There is little discussion about the whole thing as a series/franchise, while boasting the quality of the first film.
- Screencrush is probably the closest in detail to anything, but barely traces it mentioning the tv sequel and a miniseries version. No critical analysis, no history of the film's production as a series or franchise with just a brief mention of the cast returning or not returning for 1970s tv-entry.

Sources that call it a franchise fail WP:SIGCOV, as they are trivial mentions, that fail to "address the topic directly and in detail."
- Comicbook.com states "The movie successfully launched a titular franchise, which includes a 1976 made-for-TV sequel, an upcoming streaming exclusive prequel (2024), and a television series adaptation." this is the only amount of depth applied and like the Guardian and Collider sources, are presented as press releases for sequels to give them prestige, there is no context to it as a series.
- Sportskeeda seems to fail WP:RSP, and can be seen here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sportskeeda.

The rest of the article generally rehashes the history of the production of individual items. occasionally peppering in that Rosemary's Baby has been called the greatest [horror] film ever a few times and regurgitates material that is already available in the individual articles for the books, series and novels, and places them side by side with no commentary to why we are comparing them. This goes against WP:UNDUE as we have a lack of "depth of detail, the quantity of text, prominence of placement, the juxtaposition of statements, and the use of imagery. In articles relating to a minority viewpoint, such views may receive more attention and space." In this case, we have barely anything discussing it as a franchise and run with content that is just discussing one film or another and places no information on why we have to know this info or how it relates to each or if it was even important to this group of works. The same goes for the film gross, which lists the first film's gross, then restates it as a "Total" for the series and has no information on how much the novels or TV series, in terms of cost, production or anything. This is just regurgitating information from the first article.

Beyond this, the article presents original research such as an "Official Franchise Logo". At the same time, the logo in question on [on Wikimedia] refers to it as just the films logo, not a series or franchise. From my search, I've only seen it used for the TV adaptation and the original.

On searching books, websites, and the Wikipedia Library, I have found tons of content discussing the novel and first book, but nothing outside spare mentions like the above. I propose that the article be deleted or merged with a legacy section on the first novel and first film respectively for their respective content. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as a WP:SETINDEX. Discuss renaming on TP. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not every apparent franchise or film series needs to have its own article, and all of this information is just a compiled WP:CONTENTFORK of the individual articles which can easily be accessed by the appropriate lead mentions, categories, and navbox template for this material. Because this "franchise" lacks significant coverage from reliable sources (and the WP:RECENT upcoming prequel series not really adding much else in addition to a TV movie, 1 feature film, and the 2 novels), there is really nothing this article can add that is not already adequately covered by the corresponding articles themselves. Wikipedia is WP:NOTADIRECTORY. As for the set index idea, I would suggest to WP:Blow it up and start over for that. Trailblazer101 (talk) 08:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep To me this nomination reeks of being a continuation of Andrzejbanas problems with similar articles such as Universal Monsters. ★Trekker (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Wikipedia:Civility, comment on the content. Not how many you feel about an editor. @StarTrekker: Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that this is a continuation of a problematic pattern of behavior on your part.★Trekker (talk) 20:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I'm breaking rules, present it. I've made my points here and if you address them directly, we can probably work it out. Not sure what you want and it specifically asks to not makes comments like this during these discussions. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that Universal Monsters is a more established brand in its own right than a Rosemary's Baby franchise. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep More than enough sources to establish its notability. Dimadick (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dimadick:, its not a discussion on notability, it's a discussion of having enough content about the franchise as a whole, not individual works, which is currently the issue. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus here yet. I'm surprised to have so many participants in this AFD given one of the longest deletion nomination statements I've come across. Glad it didn't discourage editors from voicing their arguments. I'm not chiding the nominator, it's just an observation. I see a lot of "Fails WP:GNG" or "Notability issues" deletion rationales so the fuller explanation is appreciated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, "franchise" enough. Plus one forthcoming. Hyperbolick (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hyperbolick: the deletion suggestion is not enough that it exists, the commentary is about if there is enough discussion on whether there is enough signifigant coverage of the topic as a franchise, which this topic fails per the discussion above. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kumar Anish

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. Only 1 article links to this, the school he attended. A google news search seems to come up with mainly namesakes. LibStar (talk) 02:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Health and fitness, and Karnataka. LibStar (talk) 02:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony McCall: The Solid Light Films and Related Works

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one reliable source, I think. Only other thing I found is a few sentences from Reference & Research book news, which like that publication always does is more about the book's publication and carries no evaluative material on its content. There's also the kultureflash review which I am very uncertain of the reliability of, can't find any indications. If it is reliable I guess that makes two? Can anyone find anything else? PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joanna Burt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ONEEVENT and WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 02:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BASIC and WP:HEY. Have expanded article and added more sources. There is enough WP:SUSTAINED coverage over time, including her 2006 performance after winning an anthem idol competition at age 13 and her long track record as a child singer in Lindsay, Ontario, prior to her big break on the national stage in 2017 as the first Indigenous singer in Canada to be cast by the Canadian Opera Company, which was covered in Maclean's, Toronto Star , University of Toronto Quarterly, and others. Added a mention of her 2018 performance of an original work about the Mississaugas' creation story as well as review mentions in Opera Today on her portrayal of Sarah Riel in the Louis Riel opera, and opera critic John Gelks on her performance of an aria from La Cecchina at the Glenn Gould vocal showcase. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Fête Worse Than Death

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was able to find a single review from the Daily Mail on ProQuest and nothing else to pass WP:NBOOK. The Daily Mail is the Daily Mail and is not usable. This looks like a review but I can't tell how long it is, and even if it is that's only one source. Redirect to author Iain Aitch (his article is bad but from the sourcing I found while searching for this, is probably notable)? PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Travel and tourism. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boma Obi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only source she was mentioned was this. Aside that nothing else. The rest are just school profile while some of the source like the 4th one has nothing to show about than a home page of the site. Gabriel (……?) 01:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Women, Education, and Nigeria. Gabriel (……?) 01:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article calls her "a Fellow of the International Federation of Library Association (IFLA)". I cannot verify this and do not know what it means; maybe the IFLA/OCLC Early Career Development Fellowship? Honorary Fellows of IFLA [15] would be notable through WP:PROF#C3 but she is not listed there, so it must mean something different. The early career one would definitely not pass that criterion; it is a different meaning of fellowship. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The biography has a lot of statements with no source to back them up. Which fails to meet WP:PROOF and could end up be a WP:NOR. Just checked the reference on ref 2 and it says 404 page not found. Gabriel (……?) 05:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing to establish notability here. Fails WP:NACADEMIC, I can't even verify that she's a fellow of the claimed organisations. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina Gallardo-Domâs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP. Not clear that subject meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Spain, and Chile. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Sober

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Been tagged for sourcing issues since 2011. Not clear if subject meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 01:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Croatia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scribe (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails demonstrate notability under WP:NCORP. Both TechCrunch articles are about routine fundraising events (WP:ORGTRIV). And not that it matters but the article was created by a now-blocked SPA. Brandon (talk) 00:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Softball, and California. Brandon (talk) 00:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Mok

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for sourcing issues since 2006. Not clear the subject meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 00:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, Women, Poetry, Ireland, and Netherlands. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Finding sources was really easy for this person, they have multiple books with multiple reviews, and numerous interviews. I removed a lot of the material that I couldn't find sources for other than her website and CV. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After rereading that I wanted to clarify that I'm not being snippy with @4meter4 I'm just so used to having to do deep dives into archives at AfD that this was a welcome change of pace. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]