User talk:You've gone incognito/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

The Blair Witch Project

Thanks for your great work in this article! AldezD (talk) 14:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

@AldezD Thanks for noticing my effort. I'm actually nominating the article for GA status which is why I'm performing a major cleanup. It was formerly good article but got demoted many years ago. Bluesphere 14:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Battle Royale

Hello! Your submission of Battle Royale at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:The-Lover-poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The-Lover-poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm here because I added quotes from two reviews to the page on "Rambo: Last Blood" and they were taken down. I also made a change to the "Jack and Jill" review that has been left up. My only reason for coming here was to add those quotes to the "Last Blood" review because they involved the pro-Trump agenda in that movie and they were both from articles that had been previously cited here. Why were they removed?

I wanted to send you a direct message about this but I couldn't figure out how to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RamboLastBloodHater (talk • contribs) 03:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Ghostbusters

Thank you for your time and for your promotion of the article. --3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

It's gonna cost you a Barnstar. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:James Woods has been nominated for discussion

Category:James Woods, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 14:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vince & Kath & James poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vince & Kath & James poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Darna (upcoming film)

Here is my source of confirmation: https://www.msn.com/en-ph/entertainment/celebrity/pia-wurtzbach-to-play-valentina-liza-soberano%E2%80%99s-nemesis-in-%E2%80%9Cdarna%E2%80%9D/ar-BBSerg1?li=BBr8Mkn&surveyprime=true. It says at the end of the article

@Marcolacson: A better source is needed for this claim, as it's likely false and none of the mainstream sources have reported on the actual start of production for the movie. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Please remove the filming section since filming won't start until they get an actress for the role

@Marcolacson: No. The source says filming is scheduled to start in 2nd quarter of this year, so if it's not July then probably August. Until August ends, info should still be included in the article. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry if i'm being so disruptive. The source https://www.philstar.com/pilipino-star-ngayon/showbiz/2019/07/18/1935723/jane-de-leon-bagong-darna-coco-tumanggi-sa-cameo-role had in the article saying that another source told them that it's confirmed. I thought it was official since the article is also a reliable source. But I was wrong. I hope you can accept my apology and I'm giving the best resources I can give.

Talk

I have started a conversation on Trey Parker’s talk page. Feel free to discuss. Lysol Swiffer (talk) 06:42, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Rearrangement occupations on Trey & Matt

I was curious as to why you have the occupations in that order. They have always been known as actors first since they’ve done other stuff besides animating South Park. I know the source has them in that order but why did you keep reverting it? The occupations are still there, I didn’t take them out I just arranged them in a different order. I would like to know why? Lysol Swiffer (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

@Lysol Swiffer: The TV Guide source automatically arranges occupations based on which the subject is best known for. So in Trey and Matt's case, it's animator. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

But that’s just the way the source listed it off. It just comes across as you copying and pasting them. I’m not deleting any of them just put them in different positions, the jobs the sources say will still be there. Lysol Swiffer (talk) 04:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Maybe it's copy and pasted. So what? It's not like there's borderline copyright violation here. The important thing is that the source supporting the content is reliable per Wikipedia's standards. But that's not to say the site does not condemn copying directly from sources. Whether or not Trey and Matt are really known for being actors should be discussed further in their talk pages for a consensus; personal thoughts from editors are rarely helpful in building consensus. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:14, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

WP:COPYOTHERS Lysol Swiffer (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Oh believe me, I have far more grasp of Wikipedia's policies than you. The text does not violate copyright because it's simply listing what has been stated by the source, okay? Please familiarize yourself with this site's guidelines because clearly you seem unfamiliar with most of it. I'm done here. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Apology

I am sorry for giving unsourced claims. I will make sure that I give the right sources.

Film: "50 First Dates"

Hello. As a native English speaker who attended an English grammar school (many years ago!), I am curious to know why you think my sentence contained a comma splice and a run-on. All you have done with your edit (apart from the additional four words) is replace the conjunction "and" between the two independent clauses with a full stop. There is nothing wrong with that, but I believe joining the two independent clauses with a conjunction also reads perfectly well. The essence of a comma splice is the failure to use either suitable punctuation or a conjunction between two independent clauses.

Incidentally, I see that your User page contains this sentence: "I helped promote 5 Good Articles, 2 Featured Articles, and has written and expanded 6 articles in the Did You Know section on the Main Page." You may wish to correct the typo. Blurryman (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

I stand corrected. You're welcome to fix the typo I may have made on my userpage, but I feel like that was only intended to spite me. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for accepting that my original sentence was grammatically correct. Re the typo, I thought it would be inappropriate for me to edit another person's User page. Blurryman (talk) 17:39, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TBA Studios logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TBA Studios logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:23, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Block Z

Please add september 13 as the release date for the movie thank you

Nope Marcolacson. I don't know where you got this information, but according to ABS-CBN News the movie has no official release date yet: [1]. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Please change the date to January 29 since there’s already an official poster with the official release date on it via social media since there was a block screening of the movie on December 21 at Gateway Cineplex and a Philippine movie doesn’t show on a Tuesday it’s always a Wednesday.

Here’s one link: https://www.facebook.com/1432681420/posts/10215669103507277/?d=n — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.207.107.253 (talk) 00:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Marcolacson, if this is you commenting, could I please advise you not to edit Wikipedia using different computers? You've been indefinitely blocked from editing by administrators due to copyright violation as well as disruptive editing; your editing from different devices may be seen as an attempt to circumvent a block: sock puppetry. In response to your edit request, however, I have changed the official release date citing the FB source. Again, I'd like you to refrain from editing Wikipedia again, what you're doing is clearly against Wikipedia's policy. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Unplanned

Please see the talk page, Talk:Unplanned, you are currently in violation of the discretionary sanctions put out by the arbitration committee. Might I suggest you self-revert? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Derp. Then that would be my fourth revert which will exacerbate my violation. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Self-reverts don't count, and show good will.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your intent to revert after 24 hours might be seen as gaming the system. I would encourage you to discuss on the talk page before you. While I agree with part of your edit, I also disagree with inserting a label on the author, which is definitely pov, as that would not be the term the author would use. I'm posting on the talk page as well.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

If you want better communication.......

Feel free to start a conversation with me on my profile regarding the article of the film 28 Weeks Later. The conversation might bring a better understanding between us. I'll try to reply asap, but I'm still new and unfamiliar with the displays and messy menus here — Preceding unsigned comment added by SondreDrakensson (talk • contribs) 04:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

@SondreDrakensson: As per WP:BRD, editors whose edits have been reverted are obliged to initiate a discussion in the article's talk page for conflict resolution; otherwise, it will cause an WP:EDITWAR, which can be pretty disruptive in the project. What you did in the 28 Weeks Later article was a clear violation of this policy since you resorted to revert my edit (without explanation) instead of starting a discussion in that article's talk page. Likewise, WP:3RR requires no more than three reverts in articles, which you violated here. While the site encourages bold editing, at least familiarize yourself with its policies so that future conflicts among editors would be prevented. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

I don't know how to make replies here yet but hopefully this will work as one. I did two edits to the article with an explanation, but the second explanation doesn't seem to have gone through. There I explained that the reason I called the film a British-Spanish production was because the location of the studios were in those countries. It's worth to mention that using IMDB and the AFI (as you did) can lead to misleading information.

For example IMDB and AFI, they don't seem to make a distinction between filming-location and nationality even though IMDB claim not to. An example is the Taken movies. They are fully French productions by EuropaCorp and other french ones, but since some scenes were filmed in USA, these websites list that country in the credit, which can be misleading.

Anyway, feel free to comment on my profile ifyou have questions — Preceding unsigned comment added by SondreDrakensson (talk • contribs) 05:57, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

@SondreDrakensson: Actually, the AFI Catalog of Feature Films is vetted as a reliable source by WP:FILM/R, while the IMDb is not since it's a user-generated site and there's no professional editorial control. This is your personal gripe with the AFI source, so it's not a valid reason to remove it from the article. If you feel strongly about it, however, you should start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Film. Will you please indent your replies with the colon, and sign your post with four tildes (~~~~)? Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:36, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

I suppose I have as much "gripe" with it as you have with me. Anyway, I shall not pollute your profile with arguing. But we will probably clash together in the future again. We don't have a good chemistry. Thrilling isn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SondreDrakensson (talk • contribs) 09:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

That's funny, because I'm not demanding any chemistry from you, someone who cannot even follow simple instructions like signing his own post and indenting his replies. That, to me, is someone you shouldn't have a collaboration with. Get lost. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:58, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

:)

ok sorry

Rambo...

Ok sorry i just want it symmetrical pages of Rambo --2A00:4802:2800:0:0:0:0:95 (talk) 14:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:54, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Warning acknowledged, SNUGGUMS. However, be careful with templating the regulars. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

I'll keep that page in mind for later. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

The Getaway (1972 film) and film critic John Simon

Just a heads up. I don't know what publication John Simon wrote his review for. Prior to 1978 when he began reviewing for The National Review, Simon wrote for New York and Esquire mostly but sometimes for other publications. I have copies of his two film criticism books, covering 1970-2001. I have been adding his reviews into articles and have started doing the same for Stanley Kauffmann of the New Republic. I read these two critics for around 20 years. If I ever find Kauffmann's review of The Getaway, I'll add it too....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beerfest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Heffernan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rambo: Last Blood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

IP vandal

bringing the discussion here, because the SPI case is closed

First up, the disclosure - I'm not an admin, just an SPI clerk. The Navigation popups tool helps tell who's got what rights.

If the vandal reappears after the 2 weeks of semi protection, then you can request another 2 weeks. If they persist then pending changes protection may be needed. Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection explains it better tha I can. I'd guess the vandals interest will decline as the film moves on from its first-run at the cinemas.

Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 07:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Celdran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quiapo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

I added the numbers reference for Rambo: Last Blood because it has more foreign box office than box office mojo. Box Office Mojo and The Numbers sometimes contradict each other on grosses for films. --Evope (talk) 04:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Anon ipv6

FYI this guy User_talk:2A00:4802:2800:0:0:0:0:255B who you said was making disruptive edits to the Rambo article doesn't bother to follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and provide edit summaries or discuss changes or respond to talk page messages and will probably come back with a different IP and keep repeating the same changes. He's been making the same dumb disruptive edit to Transformers_(film_series) for quite a while now. It's annoying but I haven't been bothered enough to try and get his IP range blocked yet. -- 109.79.166.202 (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:XX (2017) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XX (2017) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Jordan Peterson

Regarding your astute comment Talk:Jordan Peterson#Chompsky's back-patting of Current Affairs, they've made the statement even more disdainful (diff). Just FYI. I would write an objection on the Talk page but I lost the last debate, and fear they will cause problems for me if I object.   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.) 01:06, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

I changed my mind. I had to at least point out the bias, even though I'm sure they will revert my edit. I changed the sentence to: "Prominent intellectual and libertarian socialist Noam Chomsky has described Peterson as "far on the right", and shares the critique by Nathan Robinson of Current Affairs magazine."   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.) 01:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Boo! Happy Halloween!

Happy Halloween

Hello! Wishing you a Happy Halloween on the behalf of WikiProject Holidays and WikiProject Horror.

Trick or treat

Trick or Treat! Happy Halloween You've gone incognito! I hope you have a great day and remember to be safe if you go trick-or-treating tonight with friends, family or loved ones. Happy Halloween!

What is this?

Halloween is a celebration observed in several countries on 31 October, the eve of the Western Christian feast of All Hallows' Day. Halloween activities include trick-or-treating (or the related guising and souling), attending Halloween costume parties, carving pumpkins into jack-o'-lanterns, lighting bonfires, apple bobbing, divination games, playing pranks, visiting haunted attractions, telling scary stories, as well as watching horror films.

What can you do!

• Improve the quality of existing Halloween-related articles.
• Identify Halloween topics that are encyclopedic and currently not covered in Wikipedia.
• Return Halloween to Good article status.
• Expand the articles listed at WikiProject Halloween articles.
• Participate in Wikiproject Holidays, Wikiproject Halloween and Wikiproject Horror.
• Place the {{WikiProject Halloween}} banner on all article talk pages that fall within the scope of these project

Similar events

• Ghost Festival
• Martinisingen
• Neewollah
• St. John's Eve
• English festivals
• Allantide
• Beggars Night
• Devil's Night
• Dziady
• Eid il-Burbara
• Old Halloween
• Saci day
• Superstition
• Walpurgis Night
• Will-o'-the-wisp

See also

• List of fiction works about Halloween
• List of films set around Halloween
• List of Halloween television specials

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe links: Horror, Holidays
• Noticeboard

---

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Holidays and its related projects.

• Wikiproject Holidays
• Wikiproject Horror
• Wikiproject Halloween

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, You've gone incognito. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

——SN54129 16:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - November 2019

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Roe v. Wade (film)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Roe v. Wade (film) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any issues or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia neutrality

Wikipedia authors are frequently non-neutral. The Rebecca Kiessling page is a perfect example, as is the Anti-abortion movement page, upon which the justification of the intentionally negative connotation is based. The bias is clear and obvious. I don't know anyone in the pro-life community who advertises themselves as "Anti-abortion", which is nothing more than a political leftist pejorative used to denigrate those with whom they disagree. The evidence is in how staunchly abortion advocates insist upon referring to their opposition in the negative, rather than the positive "pro-life", which is how the overwhelming majority of such people self-identify (to wit - the protection levied against the "pro-life" correction of the "Anti-abortion movement" page). There is no neutral ground on the intentional killing of innocent human beings. It is binary. That said, let us discuss the facts.

There are five criteria which distinguish living organisms from non-living matter: Growth Cellular Development Metabolism Autonomous movement Reaction to stimuli

The instant a single celled zygote subdivides into two cells, it satisfies all five of those criteria.

The offspring of human parents has - in every instance of recorded human history - been themselves human, by virtue of their DNA.

An unborn human being is therefore, both fully alive, and fully human from the moment of conception until natural death. The pro-life community advocates for the protection of such lives. It is not limited to abortion. The movement also endeavors to protect innocent born human beings from infanticide. To infer that pro-life people are "anti-abortion" is both an intentionally negative pejorative, but also artificially limits the scope of their interests. "Anti-abortion" is not neutral and to claim that it is, is simply dishonest as it artificially limits the scope of pro-life advocates.

VOR707TRX (talk) 04:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)VOR707TRX

@VOR707TRX: Your personal views on the subject does not belong in this site. I've therefore reported you at WP:AN/3 for disrupting the article by edit warring and making more than three reverts (especially on a highly controversial article). You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

'Wikipedia detests the labels "pro-life" and "pro-choice" '. . . the word "detests" is emotional, not empirical and has no place on Wikipedia. 'more neutral and straightforward alternatives such as "anti-abortion advocate/movement" and "abortion rights advocates/movement" ' . . . those are not "neutral". If you're that concerned about it, stick to a truly neutral phrase, such as "legal activism", which is both correct and impartial. It is so impartial in fact that one would have to read further to determine on which side of the issue one advocates, which would let the text of the articles cited speak for themselves rather than having Wikipedia editors speak for them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VOR707TRX (talk • contribs) 18:38, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Your latest unsubstantiated assertion requires evidence. You merely claimed "massive non-neutral edits" yet you failed to cite even one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VOR707TRX (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Reverted picture of Rebecca Kiessling for dubious copyright permission

I'm new here, still trying to figure out the ropes. So I have a question about how to navigate some strange waters. My specific question here is about Rebecca's picture. Rebecca sent me this picture and asked me to update her Wikipedia page. You reverted the picture due to dubious copyright. Your "Alfred Neumann" told us that the copyright belongs to the person who took the picture. Ordinarily that is understandable. But to me, this is not ordinary. Congressman Steve King of Iowa used the camera on Rebecca's phone to take the picture. Rebecca permitted the Congressman to use the phone for that purpose. According to the context of Alfred Neumann's email, Rebecca's permission is irrelevant on two counts. The first count is that the Congressman owns the picture's copyright because he took the picture. The second count is that anyone - including a janitor passing by and picking up the phone and taking the picture - would own the copyright. For that matter, a logical conclusion is that the copyright could be the property of heirs of the person who may have randomly taken the picture.

I really don't mean to sound disrespectful, but simply want to get a handle on the facts. I'm already sitting out my 4 days of waiting to become an editor. Until then, I'm not even able to make the logical edits that Rebecca has asked of me.

Part of my new arrival is that I haven't figured out the syntax of the four tildes required to sign this. Hopefully, one of these is correct. Fr Charles 18:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC) Bizchaplain Fr Charles 18:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Bizchaplain ~~Bizchaplain~~

Anger Management (film)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy editors of the article Anger Management has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

13 Assassins edits

Curious why you would consider completing a cast list as an "unnecessary inclusion". They are verifiable when clicked on each cast members' links to their pages. Also, I did not delete previous entries to the plot in their entirety, only added detail. I consider the description "miraculous recovery" in Koyata's case to be entirely inaccurate, as no human being would recover from a such a sword wound through the throat in that time period.

@24.190.7.250: Per WP:FILMCAST, not every starring roles in the movie (including supporting roles) have to be included in the Cast section, only those that are top-billed in the poster. And your expansion of the plot summary does not adhere to the required 700-word limit as per WP:FILMPLOT. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas everybody!!!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Chris Troutman (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - December 2019

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Marcolacson socks

In response to the block evasion by Marcolacson (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), I've placed 2-week semi-protection at Block Z and List of Philippine films of 2020. Let me know if you spot any other articles this user frequents. Mz7 (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Re: Kung Mangarap Ka't Magising

Good day! My apologies for the mistake I made on linking Manuel de Leon to Mike de Leon. It was a misreading as I thought he was being billed as Miguel, his given name, didn't realize it was Manuel until it was corrected. However, as for the translation of the title, that was deliberate on my part because the word "kung" literally means "if". I checked your notes on the revision of my edits, you mentioned that the source says that "kung" translates to "when", but I've checked the same source and it says nothing about the translation. At the very least, it only mentions the international title and not the translated title. Also, I've taken the liberty of confirming the translation via this link: https://www.google.com/search?q=kung+tagalog+to+english&oq=kung+tagalog+to+english&aqs=chrome..69i57.5983j0j7&client=ms-android-samsung&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 Warmest regards.

Gardo Versace (talk) 06:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

• @Gardo Versace: Read the complete transcript in the source carefully, you may be suffering from a temporary blindness: https://web.archive.org/web/20180115074107/http://www.fareastfilm.com/easyne2/eng/film/moments-in-a-stolen-dream.aspx?IDLYT=7505. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

@You've gone incognito: saw it, but that's still a mistranslation. You could be a little more polite, I still haven't forgotten you calling me "fuck face" the other day. I try to act professionally with you as much as possible. Gardo Versace (talk) 06:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

@Gardo Versace: Then consider this conversation over. Everything is in the source, and that should be included in the article. You insisting that the title was mistranslated is against the site's "verifiability, not truth" policy, which basically means that WP doesn't give a shit about what you say is the truth; they would only care if the claim was backed by a reliable, independent source. And wow, you remembered how profane I was!? Good for you, fruitcake. Now go away and stop pinging me in my own talk page. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)