Your submission at Articles for creation: Pressure Gradient Elastic Wave (September 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ldm1954 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This page might be appropriate on the Russian version, but it is not how pages are constructed here. The current page is a long essay with vast unsourced sections, and much of it looks like your opinion (original research). Please look carefully at how pages are written here, then rewrite completely.
Ldm1954 (talk) 17:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Yanbel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 17:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello Yanbel! Your additions to Draft:Pressure Gradient Elastic Wave have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tornado and hauses 21.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Tornado and hauses 21.jpg

edit

For the section (Tornado energy) of my page (Pressure Gradient Elastic Wave) I need a nice photo of a tornado. I chose a photo (File:Lincoln, NE EF3 tornado-1-.jpg) in Wicipedia Common imagies.

I am a new member of Wikipedia and I am 76 years old. I spent a significant amount of time downloading this file. That being said, I was able to download this file only by following Wikipedia's recommendations to rename it.

I apologize if I violated copyrights. I will delete this photo immediately and use another one (can you recommend me one?)

Yanbel

Yanbel (talk) 08:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply