Southern Min

edit

Please present your evidence for reclassifying Min, and discuss rejected changes on the talk page per WP:BOLD. If you continue to WP:EDITWAR, you may be WP:BLOCKED from editing. — kwami (talk) 19:09, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bak Kut Teh

edit

Please do not give any name just because someone claimed to have invented the dish. I have seen as least 4 or 5 other different claims over the years, this is just the latest one to claim to have invented the dish. We do not give prominence to a person or shop for simply making a claim, we only do so when there is independent research that says it is so. Anyone can make claims, but without some kind of independent research it is largely worthless.

This one is particularly dubious for claiming that the Teh comes from the name of the person. The derivation barely makes sense linguistically. Hzh (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A friendly advice, there are rules about civility in Wikipedia per WP:CIVIL, calling people trolling is considered incivility, particularly so when the source you demanded is already given, therefore you have no reason to complain. If you wish to participate in Wikipedia please heed this rule. Hzh (talk) 00:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
I see you remove the source you demanded. Not only are you accusing people not giving source, you actually remove the source that give an earlier claim. We are required to assume good faith, however, your action is inexplicable, and I would strongly advise you not to do that again. Hzh (talk) 00:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please don't do edit wars. I've watched many Chinese programmes from Singapore and Malaysia over the past decades and this is the most authentic version.

The name 'teh' is from his name. I've also visited Klang many times and talked to the locals.

It doesn't make sense linguistic to you because you're not even a Chinese Hokkien.

Apparently you are supposed to report me to ANI, given that you have sent me a notice about it at ANI. However I don't see it there. At the moment your actions are strange to say the least, please do not issue spurious notices. There are also guidelines on discussion, please reaad WP:BRD. Given that you are the one reverting all my edits, I don't think you should accuse me of edit warring. Hzh (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I will give you a friendly warning first so that you can stop the edit wars. If you have a specific inventor name with a reliable source, please quote it and name the shop and inventor. If not, don't put some ambiguous unreliable words like 'some shop in Klang'. Nobody likes ambiguity, it means you're not sure about the shop so that people can go to the shop to verify themselves.

December 2016

edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Chinese Malaysian. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Do not call people troll disagreeing with you, on edit summary or elsewhere. Hzh (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you don't want to be called a troll. Comment on a specific shop name and give a reliable source like TheStar who has done their homework and research rather than any Singaporean blog. Also give the reason why Bak Kut Teh is named Bak Kut 'Teh' by that inventor.

  Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Hzh (talk) 01:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Chinese Malaysian#Bak Kut Teh. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Hzh (talk) 01:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit