Your submission at Articles for creation: Results of the 2024 Democratic presidential primaries (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 20:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Wowizowie57! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 20:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Frost. I noticed that in this edit to 2024 Democratic National Convention, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Frost 11:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I moved it to further up in the article. It was no mistake. The stuff is still there, just in a different place. Wowizowie57 (talk) 11:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
You shouldn't delete a section in order to move it, especially without an edit summary as explained; you should simply move the section, explaining why in the edit summary. CNC (talk) 11:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
That is what I believe i did. If you look at the article, it is more coherent. Wowizowie57 (talk) 11:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Assuming good faith, that's not what you twice did. [1][2] CNC (talk) 11:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Considering that the situation’s in flux and that the DNC has announced that rules change, it is important that the article reflect that. Wowizowie57 (talk) 12:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
We're not talking about what the article should and shouldn't include, the original warning is about removing entire sections without explanation in the edit summary, as referenced above with the relevant diffs. Why you did this, and whether it was in good faith or not, isn't relevant. Please don't do this again. CNC (talk) 12:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I won’t. Wowizowie57 (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply