Image tagging for Image:Liv-1.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Liv-1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


The article Liv E. Kellgren has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 23:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Encinitas, California, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Fritz Theater

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Fritz Theater, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Marasmusine (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chris Morrow

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chris Morrow, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The various references mostly point to the same article in a San Diego newspaper, part of which is about her. She is or was a self-webcammer: fine, but WP isn't a guide to websites.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hoary (talk) 11:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worfpoe for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. VQuakr (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Perversions of Polk County

edit
 

The article The Perversions of Polk County has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references. it doesn't seem to be an important book

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PTJoshua (talk) 01:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Kynn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Elizium23 (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply