WellnessOne

This is WellnessOne's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harmony (blockchain platform) (September 9)

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harmony (blockchain platform) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Harmony (blockchain platform), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude talk 03:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, WellnessOne! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ––FormalDude talk 03:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Harmony (blockchain platform) has a new comment

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Harmony (blockchain platform). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellnessOne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block appears to be a misunderstanding as the contributors of this Wikipedia article were 4 different authors/entitities, not all multiple accounts under the control of a single entity. We all came together to try to write a cryptocurrency article to help create more trusted sources to learn about the project. I was specifically recruited by RockTheBlockchain due to my familiarity with the technical aspects of this project. RocktheBlockchain has also appealed his ban with some legitimate concerns and proof that different people were collaborating to make this wikipedia page. Some of his references to highlight... Initial telegram conversation with David Bugallo to create this Wikipedia page took place on august 13th. This would very odd to do if we were all under 1 entity: 1 --- https://imgur.com/73xrJIf 2 --- https://imgur.com/9CllGgI 3 --- https://imgur.com/B2ye1w0 4 --- https://imgur.com/hx4aRzK Here are my social media profiles and website. Twitter: https://twitter.com/WellnessOneNode (made in April 2021 over 400 tweets) Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/WellnessOneShawn (made in March 2021 -- 919 comments, 37 posts) Website: https://wellnessonestaking.com/ RocktheBlockchain's social media profiles for reference Twitter: https://twitter.com/RockTheBlockchn (made Jan 2021 over 600 tweets) Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/RockTheBlockchain/ (made Jan 2021 -- 859 comments, 160 posts) Website: https://www.rocktheblockchain.com/ I don't see it to be feasible or the most likely situation that David Bugallo would be able to upkeep RockTheBlockchain and my social media sites on his own. While I am not as willing as Daniel to disclose my identity on a public forum, I would be willing to do so through private means (some sort of private messaging or audio call). Please let me know what else I can provide to prove that I am not David Bugallo.

Decline reason:

See WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic