Your submission at Articles for creation: Piglet in Bed (November 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Novo Tape were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 17:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, WW AA 1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 17:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piglet in Bed (December 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 19:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit
 

Hello WW AA 1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WW AA 1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WW AA 1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, we do not have any financial benefit from the company to add this page to Wikipedia. I work on behalf of an agency of Piglet and we simply just want to create a Wikipedia page for them. I have a new link (reference which I want to add and replace with the others - which we haven't gained ourselves through sponsorship). WW AA 1 (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @WW AA 1. You work on behalf of an agency of Piglet? You therefore absolutely do have a conflict of interest and likely need to make a paid editing disclosure immediately. That should be your next step, please let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 11:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, sorry I thought I already disclosed it in this draft. I'll add this in now. WW AA 1 (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry- you are right you did in the draft talk page. We usually want to see this on your userpage.
Regarding the draft though: I still see zero indication this company is yet notable under WP:NORG, sorry. Qcne (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piglet in Bed (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 11:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piglet in Bed (June 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 20:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piglet in Bed (July 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, in this case is it that we need more content on the page or references, or both? thank you WW AA 1 (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@WW AA 1 we need to see significant coverage of the company in multiple (at least three) reliable, independent, sources. Qcne (talk) 12:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply