V Verweij

Welcome

Salam V Verweij! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Don't worry about following lists of links. It's not necessary to read all of them immediately. You can get information whenever you need. Happy editing! Sa.vakilian(t-c)--13:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Basic information What wikipedia is What Wikipedia is not The five pillars of Wikipedia Statement of principles Explore wikipedia Contents articles about wikipedia Getting Help Help:Contents Help Desk Reference desk Where to ask a question Frequently Asked Questions Request administrator attention Editing an article Wikipedia Tutorial Be bold in editing How to edit a page Starting a new page Edit toolbar Categories reverting Moving a page Footnotes upload an image Manual of Style Build the web Cite your sources How to write a great article Getting technical backlog Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Wikipedia:Basic navigation Utilities Village pump Resolving disputes Resources for collaboration Deletion of articles Policies and Guidelines Policies and guidelines Policy Library Guidelines Library Wikipedia:Verifiability No original research Neutral Point of View Copyrights Biographies of living persons Talk page guidelines Wikipedia Community Glossary of wikipedia Community Portal WikiProjects Wikipedians Administrators IRC channels Mailing lists Community noticeboard Administrators' noticeboard Mediation Committee Arbitration Committee Wikipedia Ethics Assume good faith Etiquette Civility Avoid Harassment Consensus building Prevent Profanity Ownership of articles Sign your posts Wikipedia 7 Sins Blocking policy Wikipedia:Disruptive editing Vandalism 3RR Edit war Abuse sock puppets personal attacks Copyright violation

Hammers of Misfortune

Hi. I don't know if you're still around here on Wikipedia, but hopefully you are.
I saw that you created a page for Hammers of Misfortune back in October 2007, and that basically nobody else has paid attention to it other than you. I've tried to revise the page and to add more info. I've had trouble finding sources for everything, so I am not entirely sure of some of the details. I'm probably going to do some more work on it sometime later. I just thought that, as the original author and sole contributor to the page, you might like to know. BecauseWhy? (talk) 22:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Dalek Gutter Tactics.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Dalek Gutter Tactics.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Dalek Gutter Tactics.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Dalek Gutter Tactics.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Dalek Gutter Tactics.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Dalek Gutter Tactics.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Album Agalloch-Marrow Of The Bone.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Album Agalloch-Marrow Of The Bone.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Carol Ruckdeschel was accepted

Carol Ruckdeschel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker^talk 04:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inter Arma (Band) (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inter Arma (Band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 00:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, V Verweij! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 00:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Inter Arma (Band) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Inter Arma (Band). Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 23:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inter Arma (Band) (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cambalachero was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inter Arma (Band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cambalachero (talk) 16:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)