User talk:Universal Hero/Archive 6

Typo redirect Template:Dasavatharaam character edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Dasavatharaam character, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Dasavatharaam character is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Dasavatharaam character, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry ! edit

Sorry ! Actually , i don`t mean to do that ! It was accidentally ! I was looking to make my user page ok ! Then , evrywhere , i search u are the popular . So , i tried to click edit on your page and tried to copy the whole page , but then i press a button accidentally , then it deletes all of them ! I dunno what to do ! Sorry ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thulasi12345 (talkcontribs) 06:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Varnam Ayiram edit

The film Character is directed by Mike Van Diem and is a Dutch film, not Russian. Please stop correcting this all the time. You can check the IMDB link.

Thanks for your cooperation and understanding.

Dfiga (talk) 02:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC) DfigaReply

Aadu Puli Attam edit

Hi. Could you expand this? CheersBlofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I miss having you about to talk to these days too as well as BollywoodDreamz and Pa7 and soon enoguh Shahid too. Any GA's in the pipeline or still trying to get content on here on a whole industry single-handledly? You could sure use some wiki elves to help! Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey edit

How've you been? I must leave. Circumstances force me to. If it is to check pages monthly or so, so yes - I will be coming from time to time. But I can't afford myself more than that... Regards, Shshshsh2 (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

I intend to see "Dasavatharam" as a GA article too. I was just trying to help. I will stop helping if you are planning to take ownership of the article.

Bharathprime (talk) 03:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aegan-Stills-51.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Aegan-Stills-51.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Anandha Jodhi edit

 

A tag has been placed on Anandha Jodhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of Magalir Mattum edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Magalir Mattum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Verbal chat 16:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's been a long time edit

Hey buddy.. It's been a long time since I last talked to you!! How's it going?? =D I have been really busy with University and hence I haven't been that active on Wikipedia. I am temporarily back though I won't be on as regular as I used to. Looking forward to hear from you again!! :)) Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 02:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Marudha.jpg} edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Marudha.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aegan edit

"It become a major hit at the South Indian box office". Can you please provide a reference to support this? Thanks Count Blofeld 18:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request to move article Dasavathaaram (film) incomplete edit

 

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Dasavathaaram (film) to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

  1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
  2. Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
  3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 18:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I moved the article back to its original name and removed your WP:RM request, as well as the poll at the article's talk page. Concerning your comment at WP:RM and the user's talk page, I see no reason to assume that the page move was vandalistic, in fact I see nothing but good faith edits in the user's contributions. What made you think so?
Cheers, AmaltheaTalk 19:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Could you come to the talk page and discuss it? Changing it back and forth is not really helpful. Cheers, AmaltheaTalk 17:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sura (film) edit

You tagged Sura (film) because you claim it has been cancelled. Can you provide some evidence to support that? - Mgm|(talk) 23:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vaaranam Aayiram edit

You removed the trivia section I added for Vaaranam Aayiram.Can you tell me the reason. I have started out on Wikipedia,is there a particular policy I violated. Sumant81 (talk) 06:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aegan`s Wrong Story edit

Dude , your story in Aegan was totally wrong. There is no such thing as Project Milaap in the story of Aegan. There is only a such thing called Project Milaap in Main Hoon Na. The story is not fully same !

Thulasi12345 (Talk) 13:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Citing sources edit

I believe you but wikipedia is still an encyclopedia and legit sources have to be cited. No original research. Count Blofeld 18:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with User:Universal Hero/Marmayogi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


Aegan edit

Yeh , you`re right ! But when I saw your writing about story of aegan, i don`t care. Then , I saw another guy cancelled your story and write the story within 2 lines only. I had no patitent that time so I wrote the story correctly. I know the story because I watch it in theatre !

Thulasi12345 (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sultanwarrior.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Sultanwarrior.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Dashaavataramlaunch-1.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dashaavataramlaunch-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aegan edit

Just checked again on the article and I'm impressed by its progress. I am upset that you no longer wish to talk to me. I always considered you a friend on here. Check your user page you evne have a barnstar awarded by me congratulating you on your much needed work. I feel though that you taken my requests for you to reference certain articles to heart as serious criticism and a result no longer feel the wish to speak to me. P.S I always though you were living in India, didn't know you were in London! Please stop by when you have a mo as there are a few things I'd like to discuss. You can also email if you'd rather. Best Count Blofeld 12:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry to hear that you are not as into wiki at the present but I always thought you were of vital importance for Indian cinema articles on here because very few editors edit SOuth Indian ones and the ones that do either barely speak a word of English, or add ridiculous POV to articles or include nothing to verify them. I know its a tall order to try to contribute a film industry or two on wikipedia almost solely but don't think for a second that your contributions are not much appreciated. My only concern was that some of the articles need a link to verify it as often many of the films don't exist on english speaking sites so they are oftne difficult to find. Undoubtedly the telugu, tamil and malayalam articles are in great need of devleopment as do most of the Hindi films but I have seen a gradual improvement in many of the articles so if I click one at random in a category oftne I find an article with the required content these days. If you think you can develop some to GA level I think this would be a fantasitc achievement and will try to help out if you require it. Articles like Dasavathaaram, Vaaranam Aayiram really are very good and on par with evne some of our better Hindi articles. The major problem of course is uneveness in quality. If we can ge tmost of the articles even up to start class with the basic requirements I'll be more than pleased with progress. Count Blofeld 12:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I reckon I get Dasavathaaram up to GA with a little work. First stage the plot section needs condensing a little. Could you help? Count Blofeld 13:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:Universal_Hero/Marmayogi edit

The MfD discussion for the above userpage has closed as "No consensus for deletion"; therefore, the page has been retained. Kind regards, Lazulilasher (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of En Thangai edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article En Thangai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Templated stub on a film. Two sentences, no sources, and not even an exact year of release.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 10:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Asin In Kettavan???????? edit

Hi Universal hero, is proven that leKha Wasshington is out of Kettavn.So it is Asin? I have done some research, and only to say it its Asin Kettavan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay Histon (talkcontribs) 21:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kettavan edit

hello, Everone wants Asin to be in that film. Where do you get all these sources. Dount you live in London? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay Histon (talkcontribs) 23:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do you have Simbu's email address or his phone number? Lets wait and see what is going to happen in Kettavan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay Histon (talkcontribs) 23:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Simbu edit

I know that is not the real simbu. is it? Are you joking with me? Unviveral Hero, Im so confused! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay Histon (talkcontribs) 23:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Simbu edit

I know you are a trust worthy person, but I want to tak to Simbu. Is there some way to get his email or number(Jay Histon (talk) 23:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC))Reply

Simbu edit

I do no have facebook!! plz just give me his email, or email his email to me please(Jay Histon (talk) 23:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)) I dont have a facebook!!!! please email me his email or phone number.(Jay Histon (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC))Reply

AfD nomination of En Thangai edit

 

I have nominated En Thangai, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/En Thangai. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. CalendarWatcher (talk) 17:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey... edit

Yo, how have you been? Seems like you have been working hard? Need any help on articles? Been bored, so I started a blog for Endhiran information over here. ~~ Sintaku Talk 00:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kettavan to begin after Pooda Poodi edit

Kettavanis going to begin after Pooda Poodi is completed. Is that true?(Jay Histon (talk) 22:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC))Reply

NowCommons: Image:Shriya istanbul.jpg edit

Image:Shriya istanbul.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Shriya Saran.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Shriya Saran.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Shriya istanbul.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Shriya Saran.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is quite coincidentally similar don't you think? With the exact same bag and trees and plants behind. The Bald One White cat 11:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Veerasamy edit

 

I have nominated Veerasamy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veerasamy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tan | 39 15:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sonnal Thaan Kathala edit

Hi Mr.Universal Hero, the movie I mentioned about was deleted because somebody moved the page to Sonnal Thaan Karadiya. As you know this movie was not a big hit but its songs were, and that makes it notable. I'm trying to convince those guys but they clearly don't know and think it's a hoax because actor, producer, director etc. are all the ame person i.e. T. Rajendar (which is the fact as you know!). Also it may have been deleted because in the cached version, somebody has written Karadi everywhere. Can you please help me with this case to explain to them this is not a hoax? You can refer to it here: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 December 14. I look forward to your support.

Like you wrote on your page, I also believe all movies by notable actors / directors deserve a page on Wiki, and TR is no exception. Please help me convince them this isn't a hoax movie/topic so they can restore the page so that the collection of A-Z Tamil movies on Wiki is not compromised. Thanks. Selvaraaj (talk) 13:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


Villu looks empty edit

What did u done to Villu article, Mr.Universal Hero ? It looks empty !

Thulasi12345 (talk) 22:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Plot of Aegan edit

Dude, the plot of movie Aegan is totally unture. John Sinnappa is a Rowdy and Ajith comes as CB CID officer.. it should be fixed.. Story of Aegan is not same as "Main Hoon Na". The only similarity is both heros go to college again. moreover, Ajith nor Navdeep is a child from illicit relationship.. Ajith is an orphan and adopted my Nassar and Suhaasini..

-BiLLa- 04:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Nava Vasantham edit

Please do not remove the tags from articles until the issues are resolved. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

This also applies to Adivishnu. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
...and Murattu Kaalai (2009 film. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
...and Kadhir (film)ttonyb1 (talk) 17:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
...and Bhavani IPS. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mattoru Seetha edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mattoru Seetha, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

not needed,not much infomation

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SaiyanEmperor2008 (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Murattu Kaalai edit

You have been asked not to remove tags from articles until the issues have been resolved. Please stop doing that. You are not improving the quality of Wikipedia by doing so. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure what you mean useless tags. The tags are specific to issues in the article. Also, I have not removed any of your references, so I am not sure what you mean by your comments. My original statement still stands as valid. 03:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Please note that no one removed your references. YOU need to add the reflist tag to the article for them to appear. I have added it for you; however, I suggest you review the edit to see what needs to occur to have your references appear in an article. In addition, please review the Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_templates to correct the format for your reference. Thanks and good luck... ttonyb1 (talk) 03:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Adem Ljajic edit

And this reliable source states that there is merely "an agreement" in place that Ljajic will stay at Partizan for the rest of 2009. This is just a case of the BBC getting its terminology wrong again and people taking their word as law. – PeeJay 12:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Jeans4rajathiraja.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Jeans4rajathiraja.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from File:Jeans4rajathiraja.jpg. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

A note from the GACC edit

Hi there Universal Hero!
  The Good Article Collaboration Center has been restarted, and since you are a member, we are asking for your help in making the articles Seinfeld, Sarah Palin, and President of the United States good articles. We hope to see you there. Cheers. --LAAFansign review 19:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Remove Parent's name from Genelia's article edit

I see that you have removed genelia's parent's names from her page. Why? Isn't that allowed? I just inserted a small information with a link too how she got her unusual name. From history log, I got to know that you removed that portion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Navjotjsingh (talkcontribs) 11:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The 19th step edit

Hello,

I observed, that you quite often revert "The 19th step" to "19th step" in the Asin Thottumkal article. I have provided a clear source for the correct title. It would be nice of you, if you explain your reverts. Thanks, --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 17:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I didn't move Meena edit

I didn't move the page to Meena Durairaj. The page was already moved. I was only fixing the links. --இளைய நாயகன் Eelam StyleZ (talk) 16:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dude hes right it wasn't him who moved it, it was User talk:Gaius Cornelius. --Xxxsacheinxxx (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Sasi (director) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Sasi (director) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Jonobennett (talk) 09:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sasi (director) edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sasi (director), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails to assert subject's notability other than by listing films; provides no references to back up same; films listed all have unsourced articles with notability issues. Little coverage found in English-speaking media.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jonobennett (talk) 08:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Question about a Tamil film producer edit

Hi, I have a question about the Tamil film producer/distributor Venu Ravichandran. Specifically, about his name. His imdb.com page calls him Oscar Ravichandran [1] with Venu Ravichandran and Oscar V Ravichandran as alternative names. Recently, Wikipedia articles about this guy and his production company Aascar Films (previously Oscar Films) have been edited to insert promotional stuff, which is how I noticed him - I know nothing about Tamil films really. In any case, most WP articles have his name as either Oscar Ravichandran or Oscar V Ravichandran, and I just noticed that the article about him used to be at Oscar Ravichandran. You moved it to Venu Ravichandran last summer, and now I'm wondering if you can recall anything about it - why did the article change names? I got a question about it on my talk page, and thought I'd better relay it to somebody who might know :-)
The issue is further confused by the fact that there is a V. Ravichandran as well, an entirely different person. --Bonadea (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Sikandar (2009 film) edit

 

I have nominated Sikandar (2009 film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikandar (2009 film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 14:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply