This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitedantitrolls (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe I am unjustly blocked from wikipedia

I request my indefinite ban to be lifted. I was unjustly and unfairly banned indefinitely for the reason of: sock puppetry, which is untrue. This is the only account that I have made. And the sole purpose was to stop the trolls from vandalizing pages, such as the edits by user Cfls which consists of replacing the president of hkust (Hong Kong University Of Science and Technology) as "Emperor Xi" and "gastapo"

And my edits were unfairly reverted by the same user that banned me, for absolutely no reasons. (My edit got stolen by another user called JBW, that came in roughly 10 minutes after my first edit ever on wiki, correcting my edit for no reasons and then just showing reverting vandalism instead of giving credits to my edits)

And my page was unfairly removed by the same user that banned me, for misuse of wikipedia. I saw every single user making and editing their own page. And i do not understand how is that a misuse of wiki page. I am adding my user description to my own page.

TL;DR:

-unfairly reversion of my edits when I corrected vandalism that was not discovered for the entirety of half a month -indefinite ban for alleged "sock puppetry", when I only have this account, and I made it to correct vandalism. Name and description could raise suspicion, but that is not important in this regard.


Unitedantitrolls (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Good block. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I should have blocked the user for a username violation as well.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Me: that looks like an absolutely unnecessary escalation of the incident. The subject of the report is not only my appeal, but also you - Your abuse of power. Your statement is VERY UNPROFESSIONAL compared to the wiki policies.

I may have got my username wrong, but at least I tried to correct a vandalism (Benefit of the doubt for not knowing the policies, but you know you are an admin and you still make statements like this)

Someone responded good block, and I want to know why. I have no further comments. I am unfairly treated and misidentified as trolls.

Make a new unblock request if you want to, but don't just edit the existing one to say it hasn't been reviewed. --AntiDionysius (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I will make a formal one. Two admins unfairly treated me for absolutely no reasons. They are simply going on a power trip. Unitedantitrolls (talk) 17:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Re: unfairly blocked and treated by admins edit

I already filed a direct complaint to the UTRS 2, in the hope that someone would handle this matter justly.

This is a formal revision of my original unblock appeal:

On the same day I made this request, an admin called Bbb23 blocked me for sock puppetry, which is obviously not true. This is the only account I have for wiki, and that does not match the definition of sock puppetry. In case it does, please feel free to let me know.

I believe I was unfairly and unjustly banned for the following reasons: -This is my first edit and first ever account on wiki, he banned me for sock puppetry. -he banned not only my account, but also my entire IP for account creation, for that one incident on wiki, where I was stolen credit for discovering obvious vandalism in a page about a university. -he responded poorly in my unblock appeal, escalating the issue by saying "I should have banned you for name violation too", when he could have addressed my issue and justify his reasons. -another admin came in and said "good block" and then turned down my request.

I request for justice to be upheld, and I only hope for account creation block to be lifted at best. Please help me against admins that are abusing their power. Thankyou. Unitedantitrolls (talk) 17:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitedantitrolls (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I already filed a direct complaint to the UTRS 2, in the hope that someone would handle this matter justly. But I would still hope to address this directly on my page. This is a formal revision of my original unblock appeal: On the same day I made this request, an admin called Bbb23 blocked me for sock puppetry, which is obviously not true. This is the only account I have for wiki, and that does not match the definition of sock puppetry. In case it does, please feel free to let me know. I believe I was unfairly and unjustly banned for the following reasons: -This is my first edit and first ever account on wiki, he banned me for sock puppetry. -he banned not only my account, but also my entire IP for account creation, for that one incident on wiki, where I was stolen credit for discovering obvious vandalism in a page about a university. -he responded poorly in my unblock appeal, escalating the issue by saying "I should have banned you for name violation too", when he could have addressed my issue and justify his reasons. -another admin came in and said "good block" and then turned down my request. IMPORTANT: IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT IN THE GUIDELINE, Any review will be carried out by an administrator other than the one who blocked you. It means that the one who blocked me that attempted to escalate the issue, may have violated the admin guideline (conflict of interest by replying to the review made by whom the admin blocked. I already justified my initial edit in my previous unblock appeal, which was also the edit that got my whole account and IP terminated. So I hope you do understand that I have indeed made solid contributions, despite my mocking username and account (that I created unknowingly, thought it was just a temp edit). Though I achieved the goal of reverting vandalism caused by the user known as Clfs, I still want justice to be upheld because I was terminated for unfair reasons and that I still want to contribute in the future. I request for justice to be upheld, and I only hope for account creation block to be lifted at best. Please help me against admins that are abusing their power. Thankyou.

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.