Welcome edit

Hello, Tradelady2, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Women in Red edit

Hi there, Tradelady2, and welcome to Women in Red. I see that over the years you have created four detailed biographies of women. I hope there will be many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Essays, perhaps starting with our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if your run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have been trying for over a year to have a Wikipedia biographic article approved about Suzane Reatig. Since she is currently one of the most prominent female architects in the eastern United States, I have been very surprised by the negative responses by some Wikipedia editors. Attached is the latest draft with the rejections. Sorry the footnote numbers don't come out in this copy/paste version and the last footnote dropped out. They are all in the posted drafts and properly numbered. I just wanted to give you a flavor for the submission.
Perhaps you could assign someone to advise me.
Tradelady2
Submission rejected on 12 December 2023 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk).
This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Rejected by MicrobiologyMarcus 4 months ago.
Last edited by Tradelady2 30 days ago.
Ask for advice
Submission declined on 4 September 2023 by Greenman (talk).
This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article
. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view
, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources
. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms
that promote the subject.
Declined by Greenman 7 months ago.
Submission declined on 7 June 2023 by Pbritti (talk).
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement
than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view
, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources
, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy
and the
notability
of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Declined by Pbritti 10 months ago.
Submission declined on 20 April 2023 by Theroadislong (talk).
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article
—that is, they do not show
significant
coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in
published
,
reliable
,
secondary
sources that are
independent
of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people
). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help
and learn about
mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Declined by Theroadislong 12 months ago.
----
Suzane Reatig FAIA (born 1949) is an Egyptian-born, Israeli American architect and designer. A number of her buildings have become architectural landmarks. Reatig designed the Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C. which was completed in 1992 and was the first ground-up, new construction sanctuary built for an LGBT congregation in the United States.
Her works are considered important examples of contemporary architecture in Washington DC, leading the New York Times architecture critic, Herbert Muschamp to compare her design to Maya Lin, “Ms. Reatig yearned to make an honest building. No frills, no pretensions, just the simple art of building well. Together, architect and client have produced a prodigy of Washington’s cityscape, a building that recalls Maya Lin’s Vietnam Memorial in its enlargement of emotional impact through reduction of formal means.”
Reatig’s design and development of modern infill housing in historic Shaw (Washington, D.C.) was also a catalyst for change in this rapidly growing neighborhood in Northwest D.C. In 2010, Washington Post architecture critic Benjamin Forgey, referred to Reatig, as the “best least-known architect in Washington.”. Forgey described her work as, “Modern reinterpretation of historic DC row house typologies and a creative response to the site’s zoning and historic preservation restrictions....Reatig has made modernism an integral part of a residential D.C. neighborhood for the first time since I.M. Pei came to Southwest in the 1960s.”
Professional Practice & Recognition
The following are among the awards Reatig's architectural designs have received from the District of Columbia (DC) and Maryland (MD) chapters of the American Institute of Architects (AIA):
Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C.: AIA DC Merit Award in Architecture (1993)
Lakeforest Transit Center, Lakeforest, MD: AIA MD Public Project of the Year (1998)
Ward Studio, Montgomery County, MD: AIA Potomac Valley Citation for Architectural Excellence (1999)
7th Street Mixed Use Project, Washington, DC: AIA DC Merit Award in Architecture (2002)
N Street Duplexes, Washington, DC: AIA DC Merit Award in Architecture (2006)
Ashland Avenue Project, Montgomery Country, MD: AIA Baltimore, Residential Award (2007)
506 O Street, Washington, DC: AIA DC Merit Award in Architecture (2008)
442-444 N Street Project, Washington, DC: AIA DC Merit & Excellence Awards in Architecture (2008 & 2009)
1713 7th Street Project, Washington, DC: AIA DC Merit Award in Architecture (2009)
625 Rhode Island Avenue, Washington, DC: AIA DC Honor Award in Architecture (2013)
Augusta Housing Project, Augusta, Georgia: AIA DC Chapter Award in Urban Design (2016)
446-452 Ridge Street Project, Washington DC: AIA DC Chapter Award in Architecture (2019)
Architectural critics and commentators have recognized Reatig’s work, including Herbert Muschamp of the New York Times and Benjamin Forgey of the Washington Post.
In 2003 Reatig was elected a Fellow of the national American Institute of Architects (FAIA), its highest honor for a member, in recognition of her “distinguished work that has been broadly recognized for its design excellence.”
Publication
Reatig, Suzane, A Clear View: How Glass Buildings in the Inner City Transformed a Neighborhood, Oscar Riera Ojeda Publishers, 2017. ISBN-10 9881224934 (Small scale urban infill housing in the neighborhood of Shaw (Washington, D.C.)
References
External links
Categories:
Tradelady2 (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Suzane Reatig moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Suzane Reatig. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it lacks inline citations. Attribute a reliable source to every statement for verification. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzane Reatig (April 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tradelady2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzane Reatig (June 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzane Reatig (September 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 13:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzane Reatig (December 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: WP:ISNOT a resume.
microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 15:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply