January 2016 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Titanfall has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Titanfall was changed by TotalTarkus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893225 on 2016-01-26T18:51:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Titanfall. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Titanfall shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- ferret (talk) 17:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

You are blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia's rules against edit warring and WP:3RR for 31 hours. When you return, please discuss issues on talk pages, and only make changes if there is consensus to do so. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 17:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply