July 2023 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of wars involving Morocco. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bahironga per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bahironga. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 01:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Wikipedia Administrator's

I am writing to request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, [Thomas162354], which has been blocked due to actions originating from our shared IP address. I am a resident of a student dormitory, where multiple individuals have access to the same IP address, and it appears that one of the users associated with this address has engaged in inappropriate activities on Wikipedia.

I want to emphasize that I personally had no involvement in the actions that led to the block. I am an avid Wikipedia contributor who values the principles of accuracy, neutrality, and reliable sourcing. I have always strived to contribute constructively to the community by editing and improving articles within my areas of interest and expertise.

To prevent any further misuse of our shared IP address, our dormitory's network administrators have taken appropriate measures, including educating residents about responsible internet usage and implementing stricter network monitoring protocols. These actions will help ensure that such incidents do not recur in the future.

I kindly request that you review my account's contributions and take into consideration my commitment to upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am more than willing to provide any additional information or clarification that might assist in the evaluation of my unblock request.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I sincerely hope that you will reconsider the block and grant me access to resume my valuable contributions to the Wikipedia community.

Yours faithfully,

Thomas162354