Your submission at Articles for creation: Kajal Srivastava (September 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Thevikastanwar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kajal Srivastava (September 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kajal Srivastava (January 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LordVoldemort728 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 15:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Tramp (February 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Silikonz was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Silikonz💬 22:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Thevikastanwar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:International Tramp, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Silikonz💬 22:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kajal Srivastava (March 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Edward-Woodrow was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Edward-Woodrow (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Tramp (July 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kajal Srivastava (August 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 11:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kajal Srivastava (October 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: You didn't bother to add sources to anything after the lead?
Qcne (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
What we can update on it Thevikastanwar (talk) 18:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Tramp (October 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 23:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Tramp (November 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Tramp (November 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Tramp (January 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Zero evidence of notability, or even any real claim of noteworthiness. Given this, and the multiple earlier declines, I can only conclude that the subject is not notable enough to warrant inclusion, and to prevent further reviewer time being expended on this I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this draft.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit
 

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:International Tramp, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Thevikastanwar, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thevikastanwar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit
 

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Era Tak for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Era Tak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Tak (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply