Draft:International Tramp

International Tramp OÜ
Company type	Private Limited Company
Industry	Information Technology (IT)
Founded	26 May 2021
Founder	Vikas Tanwar
Headquarters	Tallinn, Estonia
Services	Graphic Designing, Digital Marketing Services, Website development & Applications.
Owner	Vikas Tanwar
Number of employees	2-10
Website	https://internationaltramp.com/

Submission rejected on 10 January 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Rejected by DoubleGrazing 4 months ago. Last edited by DoubleGrazing 4 months ago.

Ask for advice

Submission declined on 10 November 2023 by Timtrent (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

Declined by Timtrent 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 10 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by WikiOriginal-9 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 20 October 2023 by Johannes Maximilian (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Johannes Maximilian 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 28 July 2023 by Greenman (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Greenman 9 months ago.

Submission declined on 25 February 2023 by Silikonz (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Silikonz 14 months ago.

Comment: Zero evidence of notability, or even any real claim of noteworthiness. Given this, and the multiple earlier declines, I can only conclude that the subject is not notable enough to warrant inclusion, and to prevent further reviewer time being expended on this I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this draft. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Comment: This is a directory entry. WP:NOTDIRECTORY applies. Yes, there are references, but where are the facts that you are using them to verify. References tell you facts, then you can write them in your own words and use the reference tl cite the fact 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Comment: We need independent, significant coverage that discusses the subject in detail. Please read the advice. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)