User talk:TheMandarin/Archive 2

Bubble Tea

Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

License tagging for File:Stamp Ranganathananda 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stamp Ranganathananda 2008.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the barnstar! J04n(talk page) 18:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Ramprasad Sen

Hi, I am reviewing your article Ramprasad Sen for GA. It is an interesting article. I have left some questions at Talk:Ramprasad Sen/GA2 and have meanwhile placed the article on hold. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 23:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Stamp Ranganathananda 2008.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stamp Ranganathananda 2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Britannica's online quote

I have updated Britannica's online quote on Lingam. Please check [1] to confirm that I have entered the quote correctly. There it is mentioned:

in Hinduism, symbol of the god Shiva, worshipped as an emblem of generative power. The linga is the main object of worship in Shaivite temples and in private shrines throughout India.

Before editing the section confirm my edits in Lingam with Britannica [2]. -- Truth only truth (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

If you scroll down the page, you shall find it; There is a huge empty space after the first para. Nvineeth (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Ramayana image

As It becomes a FP on Commons, do nominate it for FPC here. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations!

On getting Ramprasad Sen to GA! He is a worthy subject for a Good Article. Best regards, Priyanath ^talk 23:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, it wasn't just me alone! --Nvineeth (talk) 07:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I know, but you did most of the heavy lifting—and it's so good to see an article like that as GA that I had to share my enthusiasm. Priyanath ^talk 15:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Essay Tag

Essay tag not required for S.N.Balagangadhara. No O.R. expressed there. Acclaims are criticisms of various writers are mentioned which are properly footnoted. fodderlinks (talk) 12.45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, This section has problems with original research, tone and words to avoid. I suggest you read these articles. One Ex : "This makes Balagangadhara’s claims about his “theory” being empirically verifiable a false claim." should probably reworded as " so and so argues that Balagangadhara's claims.... ". So is "While these definitions are poor, Balagangadhara believes that they are theories"--this requires attribution. Did anybody say this? Then mention so, or else this is plain original research. I have fixed few things, if you want add anything back, raise them on the article's talk page. --Nvineeth (talk) 16:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

GAR notification of Real-time Transport Protocol

Real-time Transport Protocol has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.. TwilligToves (talk) 04:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

pl note

hi, it'll be nice if you can visit the wiki admin noticeboard site [3] where i've requested administrators to give their view on the tag removal. cheers Wireless Fidelity Class One 06:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wifione (talk • contribs)

LGBT_themes_in_Hindu_mythology

Thanks for balncing the POVs at the article. See Template_talk:Did_you_know#LGBT_themes_in_Hindu_mythology. Nominate any alternate hook, if you find a better one. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thou are welcome, I still feel there are other POVs that need balancing, will look into it when I get time. Probably I should not be added in DYK hook, since I did not add the particular piece of information. --Nvineeth (talk) 05:39, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks for the details on how to sign Wireless Fidelity Class One 05:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wifione (talk • contribs)

Vithoba

I noticed you reverted some anon's comment/edit, the edit is not exactly vandalism. Actually I quite agree with his/her point. There is inconsistency in rating of WikiProject Hinduism about regional deities. What do you think? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

The funny thing is Vithoba temple, Pandharpur is assessed high, Vithoba is mid. If you feel revert your edit completely? I doing it would not be termed as Neutral. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Kanhopatra

I have nominated the article for GA, please take a look and suggest any improvements needed. I do not a jstor account. Is it possible for you to search jstor for article related to Kanhopatra (kanhupatra). --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 07:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Actually one have already given me that article at the time of Vithoba, there is anything else available? That article does not have much about Kanhopatra. Also, if you have time, the journal article has a layout of the temple with deities (p 191) and maps of Pandharpur and Maharashtra on p 187, can you create them in SVG. They can be used in Varkari, Vithoba temple, Pandharpur, Pandharpur.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

[4] has info about Marathi literature and feminism, useful for articles of all Varkari female saints.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

I saw it, looks good. Acknowledge the source on wikicommons page with link and author name. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Point 6 should be Gopalakrishna, misspelt--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

If the image is cropped more and the headings and nos. bolded, it may look better. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for jstor pdf, it would be useful Bahinabai, Any improvement needed in Kanhopatra. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 07:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

"It will be good we can get a picture / painting or rather of a statue in any of Pandharpur's temples" sry I did not get the context. Like most major Hindu temples, it is not allowed to photograph in the Vithoba temple. Cameras and mobiles are not allowed. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Since it is copyrighted, we can-not the image as it is. The image should be based on the copyrighted image. I also suggest we colour it for originality. If you send me the svg - boundary line img, I can paint some colours in MS Paint and you can do the same in Inkspace. Thanks--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

User:TheMandarin/Sandbox1

Sorry to poke my nose in this, but I stumbled across this. One thing I noticed is that Dakshineswar Temple Banglapedia link is dead. दक्षिनेश्वर is spelt inaccurately. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the corrections, this was created based on the main-space article. I will correct these. --TheMandarin (talk) 03:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Kanhopatra/archive1

Please comment about Kanhopatra, in in consideration FA criteria. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Wow, it looks great, crop a bit. Though I have some suggestions:

• some ornaments in the feet and fish-shaped earrings on Vithoba
• The uparna on the hands of Vithoba can be a diff colour, it may be confused as the part of the yellow dhoti.
• creases on upper saree part.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Please change change of uparna (cloth on the hands of Vithoba) to differentiate from his dhoti. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Ramakrishna photo

Hi. I tried to enlarge the first photo on the page and lost it within my edits. Can you go and reverse my edits (but in the last one I caught a misspelling which can be corrected again if that edit is reverted as well). Maybe you can enlarge the photo a bit if you think it's appropriate. Thanks Randy Kryn (talk) 23:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Trailanga Swami

Some comments on the talk await you. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TheMandarin. You have new messages at Wifione's talk page.
Message added ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 07:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Battle at Lanka, Ramayana, Udaipur, 1649-53.jpg

IMO, you should nominate it for WP:FP. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Why don't you also try a GA nomination (WP:GAN) for Swami Vivekananda? It seems close to GA. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 03:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Somewhat busy now, will check this later. Thanks anyway. --TheMandarin (talk) 08:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

What about a renomination?? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

OK. What are you currently working on. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Sources about Somnath Bhattacharyya

Hi, about the press source you pointed out: there are similar descriptions of SB (almost with the same words) in other sources cited in the KC article. However, IMHO these sources are not enough to support a Wikipedia article. For one thing, there is a good chance that the reporter of the source you cited did not interview SB but instead got his opinions from some other book or article. Methinks that we need at least one source that can be trusted, such as a university's official website, an academic society's membership list, a biography in an academic journal, etc.. In other words, a source where any incorrect statements about SB are likely to bring trouble for the source or for SB. ALl the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 13:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hanuman and Shani

The Mandarin, I would like to help, but unfortunately, I don't know much in this area. I felt that it is important to add because many Hindus pray to Hanuman to alleviate effects of Saturn. Let's see if I can find something. We owe this to Shri Hanuman. Raj2004 (talk) 14:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I did check some sources on Google Books; I didn't find any particular section that was helpful yet/

Raj2004 (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Citations I found some. I asked ArbitrailyO, to fix the citations with this message to him:

I am editing the article on Hanuman. Can you please remove footnotes 15 and 17 referring to Catherine Ludvik without destroying footnotes 14 and 17 referring to Philip Lutgendorf? Also I would like to actually insert this correct page link at pg. 141, " http://books.google.com/books?id=fVFC2Nx-LP8C&pg=PT155&dq=hanuman+shani+Ravana&cd=1#v=onepage&q=hanuman%20shani%20Ravana&f=false "

Thanks, Raj2004 (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

1. ^ Lutgendorf, Philip (2007). Hanuman's tale: the messages of a divine monkey. Oxford University Press US. p. 141. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=fVFC2Nx-LP8C&pg=PT333&dq=avatara+Hanuman&lr=&client=firefox-a&cd=1#v=snippet&q=avatara%20%20Shiva&f=false.
2. ^ Catherine Ludvík. Hanumān in the Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki and the Rāmacaritamānasa of Tulasī Dāsa. pp. 10-11. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=KCXQN0qoAe0C&pg=PA10&dq=Hanuman+Rudra&client=firefox-a&cd=2#v=onepage&q=Hanuman%20Rudra&f=false.
3. ^ Lutgendorf, Philip (2007). Hanuman's tale: the messages of a divine monkey. Oxford University Press US. p. 141. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=fVFC2Nx-LP8C&pg=PT333&dq=avatara+Hanuman&lr=&client=firefox-a&cd=1#v=snippet&q=avatara%20%20Shiva&f=false.
4. ^ Catherine Ludvík. Hanumān in the Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki and the Rāmacaritamānasa of Tulasī Dāsa. pp. 10-11. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=KCXQN0qoAe0C&pg=PA10&dq=Hanuman+Rudra&client=firefox-a&cd=2#v=onepage&q=Hanuman%20Rudra&f=false.

Thanks! Raj2004 (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I will also look into it. Thanks a lot. --TheMandarin (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

New Proposal

Hi Vineeth, i've posted a new proposal for suggestions here. If poss, drop by and give your views. Thanks ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 04:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to say this, but I think the proposal will be rejected. All the best. --TheMandarin (talk) 07:08, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. It's not just about the proposal getting selected or rejected, but the discussions which throw up so many newer facets of policy. Quite an experience :) Thanks again. Tc ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 19:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Varahi

I have already a lot of links on the goddess at User:Redtigerxyz/Matrikas. Would you like to collaborate on the article. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Writing the article in User:Redtigerxyz/Shanti Stupa as User:Redtigerxyz/Matrikas has become too crowded with links. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

see User_talk:Redtigerxyz/Shanti_Stupa--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Do you have access to jstor

• [5]
• [6] ?

If I complete putting in the jstor links' info today, I move the article to mainspace and move a joint DYK nom. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

I have moved Varahi to mainspace and added most iconography info from the jstor paper. I will take some leave from Varahi for a few days and return to it after a few days. Nominating it for DYK. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Well done, thanks! --TheMandarin (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

For the barnstar. I have to wonder about all the time/effort spent on people's proposals/reasoning on that page - if that had been used on the unref'd BLPs, we'd be down to about 20,000! I did my bit today by ref'ing the article for legendary film director Jacques Rivette. Lugnuts (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Glad you like! Click the link at the foot of my user page titled "A Piece for Assorted Lunatics" - some people take things too seriously! Lugnuts (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Hehe - a barnstar back to you too!:

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		...for informing on me to the admins. Have you thought about joining the WP:PRISON-SNITCH project?! Lugnuts (talk) 19:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Karma in Hinduism

The planets are not affecting me, for your information. But some Hindus do believe that ups and downs in life are linked to planetary influences, which they believe are tied to past karma. You can criticize the academic source, that's okay, but nothing is wrong with me. Thank you. Raj2004 (talk) 21:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry if I offended you, the cmts were added on a humorous note, don't take it seriously , I was alluding to the general belief. --TheMandarin (talk) 03:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

No, you did not. I knew it was a joke but I am just writing on a belief of some Hindus who believe in this and added this info Since astrology is not scientific, no one can every know whether their beliefs are true or false. Raj2004 (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Great suggestions. I added this. Raj2004 (talk) 13:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Varahi

On February 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Varahi, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waterstalk 06:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Battle at Lanka, Ramayana by Sahibdin

Hi TheMandarin! I saw that you previously nominated the image Battle at Lanka as a valued picture and it was not promoted for lack of quorum. I think is indeed a valued image and I would like to suggest to re-nominate it, as currently four supports would be sufficient for promotion. If you have time, your oppinion on the other current nominations would be also appreciated. Elekhh (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Will do, thanks. --TheMandarin (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Cheers, thanx alot

Positive reinforcement for Avadhuta Gita is lovely but where is my bloody barnstar! I am only in this gig for the accolade, public acclaim and limitless wealth. I am not finished yet, this is just a beginning. Collaboration is more than welcome by an inclusionist. If you have some leverage with any of the Dharmic Traditions task forces, is it possible to give the article on Brahma a bit of lovin'? At minimum just flagging it's refinement for a giddy-up as it is in such a sorry state.
*winX*
B9 hummingbird hovering ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the Bhagavad Gita quotation. Do you chant it in Sanskrit? The meter is so lovely. The English translation to which you reference is rather neat but I hold that meditating on the Sanskrit is imperative. That said, with devotion the knowledge beyond the words dawns in the heartmind regardless of translation and language of rendering. Sacred Texts is a wonderful resource. You deleted the "Nomenclature, orthography and etymology" section within Avadhuta Gita which shows a very limited understanding of the purpose of an Encyclopedia. Etymology is a traditional way to enter a text in the Tradition. Entering a different orthographical representation was only the first population of this section. Importantly, if you understand and meditate on the title through Samyama there is no requirement to read the text.

Blessings

B9 hummingbird hovering ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to add the section "Nomenclature, orthography and etymology" back, the section had only a line, so thought of merging it with the lead. cheers --TheMandarin (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

1. Proposal to Close This RfC
2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, yes it is! Lugnuts (talk) 12:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Daśāvatāra#Move_to_which_name

Thanks for giving your comments at Talk:Daśāvatāra#Requested_move. As per the consensus: The result of the proposal was move to nondiacritic for the article. Several alternatives have been presented for this particular article (Dashavatara, Dasavatara, Dashavatar) so please help pick an appropriate one. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Iravan

Hi. I am planning a FAC for this article about a regional Hindu village god - shortly. As such, I request you to please give constructive criticism on article as you gave before my prev. FAC Vithoba. To point any issues (actually I request all issues you see) on article talk in consideration of FA criteria. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Will add my 0.2 cents! --TheMandarin (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Successful nomination of File:Battle at Lanka, Ramayana, Udaipur, 1649-53.jpg

Hello TheMandarin, I thought you might like to know that File:Battle at Lanka, Ramayana, Udaipur, 1649-53.jpg was renominated for FP here and passed. Thank you for making the original nomination! Maedin\^talk 21:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Congrats. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Had no idea about renom and had apparently forgotten about it, great news! A very worthy FP. --TheMandarin (talk) 04:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Reply

• File:Narasimha oil colour.jpg: Good one. Nominate for FP for commons
• File:Ganesha miniature painting.jpg: IMO, can not be used in Ganesha. Tigers not common
• File:Sapta Chakra, 1899.jpg: Good one. Nominate for FP for commons
• File:Chaitanya sankirtan.jpg: not sure--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:34, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Aravan map

Is it possible for you to create a map in Inkspace depicting the location of temples of Aravan? I am mailing you the link. Please let me know. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Can you please number the temples district wise as done in Iravan temples section? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for all your hard work. But I agree with you, it is best to stop rather than create an erroneous work. Anyway, I have already posted the article for FAC. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2 results

Hi TheMandarin, because you contributed to FPC's recent review, I'm letting you know that the results of the poll have been posted. We appreciate your contributions to the first stage and hope you take part in this next step, here, to move towards implementing several changes to the process. Regards, Maedin\^talk 18:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Failed verification at Swami Tyagananda

Hi, I thought that I would let you know that a claim which you made with this edit has failed verification. I have corrected the claim so that it adheres to what is contained in the cited source. Best wishes, — goethean ॐ 15:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Well thanks. This was fixed quite some time back in article Kali's Child by myself[7], but this possible copy paste was missed out. BTW I had even corrected a failed verification of yours[8] here[9]. Best wishes, --TheMandarin (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, thanks. --TheMandarin (talk) 07:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

VPC

— raekyT 00:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Patience

Hello, Mandarin. Just to say, I admire your patience in dealing with a certain editor on the Ramakrishna etc. pages. If you look at his talk page, you find he's argumentative at many places, often insulting etc, and has even been blocked several times. I guess there's nothing to do but forbear, or else put warning after warning and finally have him blocked... On his user page, he insults Ramakrishna devotees at the very top of the page! Oh, my patience is tried. The irony is, he calls others narrow minded fanatics, and fails to see his own narrow-minded fanaticism. I suppose that's the problem for all of us: we easily see other's faults, not our own. Probably he will read this; if so,G, realize that your actions not only poison the usually civil atmosphere at Wikipedia, but also poison your own heart with the venom of anger and hatred. Devadaru (talk) 14:21, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

First thing, I am not a "devotee", nor do I think are the other editors, User:Ludwigs2, User:Redtigerxyz who have been abused, but I am very well aware of the studies related to Ramakrishna, Bengal, post-colonialism., As far as the behavior and incivility goes, there comes a point after which you can no-longer bear and I am not a soft editor. If situation demands I am not even hesitant to approach WP:ARBCOM, I am very well aware of cases where there were contentious, misrepresentation of sources and ARBCOM's ruling. Second thing, "Pest" borders personal attack and you as a editor who has been abused from the editor, I understand your mental attitude but would recommend you to remain calm, take it easy. Read BG 12 --TheMandarin (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I have pretty much stopped editing, partly due to time constraints, and partly because I simply don't enjoy the nasty spirit that entered the Ramakrishna discussion. Every now and then I venture into the fray again, only to regret it.

I don't quite understand what you mean about my comment not being part of WP policy. Was it inappropriate? I am not too familiar with policy; I was trying in my own way to reduce the level of argumentation by suggesting that time will tell. You are right, "pest" is a kind of personal attack. Shall I change it? (I edited it). Devadaru (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the change, appreciate it very much. While the discussions can be full of "nasty spirit" / personal attacks, its important not to loose the focus, and sometimes even to see the humorous side[10]. I didn't mean it was inappropriate, it was simply a unnecessary distraction, esp where is no such WP guideline. I think you are a fine editor, and you can definitely contribute to other articles without boring discussions. --TheMandarin (talk) 05:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, theMandarin I, too, appreciate your firm yet patient approach on the Ramakrishna page. I might comment that the blanket accusation that editors of a certain persuasion there were all working for the Ramakrishna mission was perhaps the most outrageous and amusing claim I have ever seen on a WP discussion page. I do think this particular ongoing dispute there shows a basic weakness in the ability of WP to disseminate truth: truth is not democratic, it is not by consensus, and it cannot be voted into existence. But Wikipedia thinks truth is by consensus. That said, WP is still quite a phenom and a really interesting project. Jack B108 (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Buddhism and Hinduism article

Would you also be able to take a look at Buddhism and Hinduism article? It contains lot of WP:UNDUE violations that distort Hindu textual sources and their history.

An example of this is , "The Bhagavad Gita is a post-Buddhist text, and some scholars believe it was composed as part of the Hindu reaction to Buddhism." This is a statement of few scholars , mostly Marxist and those with evangelical leanings like Zaehner. There are also other sources which say that Bhagvad Gita is pre-Buddhist and organic part of the epic Mahabharata. But the editors keep deleting the sources which state the opposite. The current set of editors seem to be biased against Hindu sources and may have used [WP:GAME]] to project a particular view of them, or to discredit them.

If your time allows, please take a look at that article. Thanks--History Sleuth (talk) 13:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

In reference to Bhagvad Gita following edit is repeatedly deleted by the cabal which is currently editing the article:

While there are no direct references to Buddhism in the Bhagavad Gita, leading some scholars to consider it a pre-Buddhist text, others believe it may have been composed as part of the Hindu reaction to Buddhism. Other scholars, however, see the Bhagavad Gita as rather the product of intellectual currents then prevalent in India that pre-dated the emergence of Buddhism and consider it to have been conceivably composed in the pre-Buddhist period as a part of the epic Mahabharata.

--History Sleuth (talk) 13:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I am busy these days with limited wiki activity, I will look into it during the weekend. I think the above material above represents a valid POV in the section which discusses date of composition, but it needs to be reworded to avoid weasel words. May I recommend you also to ask User:Abecedare, who is very knowledgeable. --TheMandarin (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2010 (UTC)