User talk:TheMandarin/Archive 1

Spam links

I just spotted that particular batch of spam links by chance, someone had added a rather unnecessary link to a watched page of mine, so I just checked the user for more contributions and saw that adding links to one website was all he had done.

The easiest way to find spam would probably be to monitor Special:Recentchanges for changes made by IP addresses, they tend to do shady stuff sometimes :) If you see one doing bad stuff, just check its history, and you might just find something sneaky, it happens every once in a while. Obli (Talk) 07:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

India related links

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Newcomers: Welcome kit | Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard (WP:INWNB) Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions Contribute content: Wikiportal India - Indian current events (WP:INCE) India collaboration of the week (WP:INCOTW) - Category adoptions

Hi Vineeth, welcome!! Pl. use Show preview button more often. btw, good work on Mother Teresa, --Gurubrahma 09:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Amazon spam links - you can help

I see you commented on User talk:Cmdrjameson about the amzon spam links. Amazon isn't the only site with a referral program, if you know of any other sites that provide relevant information but contain referral IDs, don't hesitate to tell! Obli (Talk) 23:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

---

Unless I'm mistaken, User:Cmdrjameson has already cleared the Amazon and Allmusic links by looking through a database dump locally, on his computer. There are still other pages that use reference IDs, though.

As for the harm caused by them; the effects aren't really *that* noticeable. First of all, someone might be making money from people clicking those links, we won't have that (for obvious reasons). Secondly, if we don't remove them people will think it's OK to stuff WP with spammy ref ID links. Obli (Talk) 17:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Powershot A95

I own a Powershot A95 myself, and I'm curious how to take a picture like Hibiscus Petal. Disavian 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

AIV vs VIP

Hi TheMandarin/Archive 1. I noticed you added an entry to Vandalism in Progress. That page is only for very specific cases, as described by the page's guidelines. Your alert would be better placed on Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), where it will usually be processed within minutes. Many alerts that are incorrectly placed on Vandalism in Progress are never dealt with, simply because they become old before an administrator gets to them. Thanks for your efforts. :) --lightdarkness ^(talk) 06:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Didnt know, thanks for the info --vineeth 06:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your kind words! Nach0king 09:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Redirect

Yay! thanks for the redirection info, it was very helpful :-D --TheAlphaWolf 00:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

WP:PIN

Hi, Portal talk:India (see pending tasks)"Editors needed for sections" says:

Featured pictures - <volunteer needed>

At Portal:India Picture of the week, 2006 shyam seems to be the only one taking care of archiving. At Portal:India Selected picture candidates someone needed to help, i think. are you aware of this? Thanks-Pournami 05:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

also see Wikipedia_talk:Notice_board_for_India-related_topics#Featured_pic_candidate -Pournami

Hi pournami, i will be glad to help in archiving, can you let me know how and where to proceed? vineeth 09:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Added the first nomination for India FP. >> vineeth 16:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello: I'm as much in the dark as you. And there's nothing to archive. Portal india is undergoing development. Pls see my reason for objecting at FP candidate. You might want to offer to help at the portal talk page. (At your convenience). It's only recently that india portal will have an FP each week. User:Urshyam's page says he selects the pics. Regards, Pournami

shouldnt have nominated a fairuse image, my fault --vineeth 13:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Greetings

Holi greetings. --Bhadani 13:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Important Calvin and Hobbes Discussion

Hello. Would you mind coming down to Talk:Calvin_and_Hobbes to engage in the debate of whether to keep fan sites in the article? I have posted what I hope to be a good compromise, but opinion at the moment seems divided. Please come and share your opinions. :) Mjg0503 20:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Sure will do, :) currently very busy, need some time --vineeth 17:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Menace

Dear Sir If you receive a threat, how you must proceed? thanks --Eduardo Corrêa 13:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

You can also discuss it here >> Admin intervention. Also you can let me know by mail. Dont worry, pls continue your contributions, dont bother about these silly things. We are always there to help you. --vineeth 18:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

This happen in Portuguese language site, I need save a page, where is my article that is be deleted for an other person. The page is: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samnito

I need save page for use it in the court. Could you help me? Thanks.

--Eduardo Corrêa 11:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Cayce's beliefs

Just curious.. Your recent addition to the Cayce page was good. If a woman was one of three sisters to a warrior in Persia in the 1920s; that Persian warrior MUST have three sisters in the 1940s, not two sisters as you have stated... I'd recommend a fixup before the skeptics just on you for inconsistency... Just trying to help the article be top notch.

Its cool, dont worry; anyone trying to improve the Cayce article makes my heart sing! Just wanted to inspire you to do what you were thinking with the article, just get some facts straighter, so we can get Cayce looking far more professional thatn some pseudoscientific illusionist obsessed with Millenium prophecies (which he most certainly want, but many writers of books on Cayce seem very good at promoting). In my mind, Cayce was a medical clairvoyant, whose many diagnoses for thousands of people, has improved amny peoples lives immensely - physically, intellectually, emotionally, and spiritually. Best of luck. Keep editing. Be Bold - as the wikipedia originators seem to want us to be! Drakonicon 13:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Peace, Drakonicon 05:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Userpage

I think that your old version was better :-) - Mike 22:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Haha, I have reverted it back, :) --vineeth 16:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:On leave

Haha. I know the feeling. I'm not totall on leave as I said I was....but I'm trying to cool it down a bit. I'm sure I will and then when I do I can tae that notice down :-). I have already added a notice above that saying that I am still checking my talk page. Nice job on the userpage too! - Mike 19:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Just removed the notice as for he last few days I have been able to contain myself. Hopefully I can contribute more productively now! - Mike 19:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Vivekananda at wikisource

Great job in bringing complete works and biography to wikisource! I've been planning to do this for a long time. You beat me to it :-) ~ srini 14:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

That's fantastic. I'm aware of this annoying javascript problem with ramakrishnavivekananda.info, in addition, some pages there just won't show up. If you need any help, just give me a buzz, I'm willing to help in whatever way I can. Also, you may want to see this and make sure such things doesn't happen with Vivekananda's biography. ~ srini 09:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure, I will continue adding the sanskrit text, but please proofread and check for mistakes everytime I add them : ). I removed the 'br' tags because I thought they are not required in those places in that particular page, but I'll make sure I don't remove the tags from poems. -srini 05:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Re:TODO page

Yes, I had a feeling that it was you, but when an anon IP blanks a userpage it's a good idea to make sure anyway ;-). - Mike | Talk 01:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm back.

I'll just try to cut down ;-). - Mike1 03:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

You really deserve this...

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For all of the fantastic pictures you have taken for Wikipedia, especially the one that is feautured at the commons. Mike 04:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

POTY 2006 competition

The arrangements for the Commons:Picture of the Year 2006 competition are almost complete, and voting will take place between 1st and 28th Feb. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 23:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bhagavad Gita Arjuna Krishna.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bhagavad Gita Arjuna Krishna.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/L'Innocence

Thanks. I hope the nomination comes through: when I first saw the image, I was surprised that no one had nominated it. I suspect that there are many more images of artworks such as L'Innocence that have potential as FPs. I might have to have a look around... Thanks again, Jordan ^Contribs 08:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Ramakrishna

Sorry, caught in FAC of Vithoba and GAN of Manasa, will not able to review the article now, but will give a peer review on the talk of the article after the FAC and GAN ends.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 09:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I am a new comer at Wikipedia. I am not sure what I am doing is appropriate-- please don't mind if I am wrong. I was reading the article on Ramakrishna and I downloaded one picture from wikimedia commons. It said that you have uploaded it and they would be helped if you can put it into a category. {{subst:Please link images|Image:Ramakrishna Monastic Disciples 1899.jpg}} Jyoti (talk) 09:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

IMage link

The image link one provided can not be used as the Wikipedia:Non-free content policy, "No free equivalent" is not fulfilled. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Vithoba

Thanks for the links. I will use them while developing Varkari article. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Do you have a link to the August issue too as the first part of the article starts there and is continued further in Sept and Oct issues. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 14:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

All three articles are great reads. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 16:09, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Nice to see your edits on the article. Even without a single edit, you had plenty for the article, by providing those links. I have used them in the article now. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 09:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, i have no jstor account to read though the Raeside and Karve link is being used in the article using secondary sources. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 09:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Great find. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 09:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Marie Louise Burke.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Marie Louise Burke.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Vithoba images

I had uploaded images of Vithoba and Rakhumai with fair use, but were deleted, the rationale being there are other images of the deities, why do we need the photos of Pandharpur images. Will try OTRS? I wanted to contact the Pandharpur temple itself, but their site has no email to contact you, but a written address. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

This image seems to be good, and the site has a contact us email. --Nvineeth (talk) 06:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Vithoba is FA

This barnstar is from Vithoba to Nvineeth, to acknowledge Nvineeth's helpful nature. Nvineeth graciously found reliable sources for Vithoba, when the article failed a FAC due to sources. This barnstar also recognizes Nvineeth's contributions to Ramakrishna and other Hinduism related articles. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I noticed your work at Shiva and Swami Vivekananda. Great work. Hinduism wikiproject needs diligent editors like you. I have also nominated the Swami Vivekananda's infobox for a valued pic nominee, at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Swami Vivekananda --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

The valued picture is quite new. There are very few valued pics at the moment. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 07:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Help

I could not understand,

brahmā viṣṇustathā cendro vidyādharagaṇaiḥ saha // KūrmP_2,38.38 // pradakṣiṇaṃ tu yaḥ kuryāt parvataṃ hyamarakaṇṭakam /

pauṇḍarīkasya yajñasya phalaṃ prāpnoti mānaḥ // KūrmP_2,38.39 // kāverī nāma vipulā nadī kalpaṣanāśinī /

tatra snātvā mahādevamarcayed vṛṣabhadhvajam / saṃgame narmadāyāstu rudraloke mahīyate // KūrmP_2,38.40 //

can you translate it in English and What's "ṛ"--Powerprowess (talk) 06:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, You added the reference, so I hope you know how to translate, for my translation will be considered original research. If you want a reliable translation look for some scholarly books or best look it up in your favorite Monier Williams dictionary. --Nvineeth (talk) 08:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I could translate. But what "ṛ" mean.--Powerprowess (talk) 08:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Look it up here : IAST --Nvineeth (talk) 08:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Fine!--Powerprowess (talk) 09:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Trailinga Swami article

I've started an article on Trailinga Swami in my userspace, here. Since it was deleted at least once before, I want to get it to a point where that won't happen again. Please feel free to edit it. I'll publish it in another day or two. Priyanath ^talk 06:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Good stuff - I've done some copy editing, and deleted a sentence I had originally added from Ramakrishna, since the quotes you found were better. I'm trying to make it sound 'encyclopedic', so describing him as a 'yogi' rather than a 'saint' may be better for Wikipedia. This article has some parallels to the Mahavatar Babaji article, where people were trying to describe him as a 'culture hero', imaginary person, etc., so I put the actual first hand encounters with Mahavatar Babaji right at the beginning. Once that happened, the article became stable. That's why I put the meetings and first hand accounts of Trailinga in the very beginning. I also stuck with "Varanasi", rather than "Kashi", since the article is at "Varanasi".

I think this could be a fun DYK, and it's probably ready to go into article space at any time. Should it be at "Trailinga Swami" or "Trailanga Swami"? I'll go with your call on that. Thanks, Priyanath ^talk 02:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. For the naming confusion, lets go with what Google Book says: Trailanga->243 results, Trailinga->220 results. Also Trailanga resulted in more accurate searches, than Trailinga. I have never worked with DYK before, but I strongly feel this can be a very and amazing DYK of a yogi who lived for around 300 years!!!! --Nvineeth (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Great, I'll move it to article space at Trailanga Swami, and then submit it to DYK after a day or two. There's a bit more polishing I'd like to do, since it's a little unusual for DYK. They might have some disbelief at first..... Priyanath ^talk 05:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Now that it's moved to article space, do some more edits so your contributions are more official. When I submit it to DYK, you'll be included as one of the creators of the article. Priyanath ^talk 06:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I am planning to write a small bio but I am slightly busy now., if it gets late, pls go ahead and submit for DYK, doesn't matter if I get or do not get the credit :) whats important is that we have added a nice ( and surprising ) article! --Nvineeth (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I noticed File:Trailanga Swami Math.jpg uploaded from the Ramakrishna mission journal. Kow did you acquire the permission? Have you used OTRS system? Can you please obtain permission for Vithoba and Rakhumai images too? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I will write to them regarding the permission, I uploaded the image (without OTRS) because I had seen the images being used for educational purpose somewhere, but ideally I should be obtaining the permission and its a mistake on my part., I will definitely contact them regarding the pictures of Vithoba and also Trailinga Swami. Thanks for pointing this out. --Nvineeth (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I have noticed Trailanga Swami is not nominated for DYK yet, it is a good nominee: an appropriate DYK (just a suggestion) will "...that Trailanga Swami (pictured), an Indian yogi, is believed to have lived 300 years and reportedly "read people’s minds like books."?" --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Please forward the email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, with names of the images uploaded. Add OTRS pending tag to all images you upload, til then. A OTRS holder will confirm the email (permission) and add an OTRS tag to the image. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Can you please forward me a copy of the mail? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

It might be best to take the images off the article if this isn't straightened out soon, since it may well appear on the main page in a few days time. Priyanath ^talk 16:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the forwarded email by publisher as requested by me. The publisher has put the " non-profit educational purpose only" clause, which is not excepted at wiki. So requesting speedy deletion of all images by PB.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Views on Ramakrishna: Failed DYK

The hook should have the name of article linked through it. Also "For purposes of DYK, a "new" article is no more than five days old. This does not include articles split from older articles." Read Wikipedia:Did you know for more info about DYK. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Trailanga Swami

On January 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Trailanga Swami, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 02:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring

Post my joining the discussion, you have reverted the article on Ramakrishna twice, both times to remove tags notifying individuals reading the article about the dispute on the talk page. Is there any tag that we could put on the front of the article that would alert readers to the fact that a dispute exists that you would not object to? Hipocrite (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Hipocrite, find my reply here. Nvineeth (talk) 08:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:Email

I will look over the discussion this weekend and try to add my 2 cents. But since, my time on wikipedia is quite limited nowadays due to real life engagements, I may not be able to participate in the whole follow up debate.

I notice though that Redtigerxyz has commented on the page, and with his experience he might be able to help resolve the dispute. Another idea would be to seek a Third Opinion; or contact someone like User:RegentsPark who I expect to be able to both understand the debate and offer an outsider's view. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 19:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

PLease see Talk:Vithoba#Desecration_of_the_Pandharpur_temple_by_Muslims for my reply.

Compliments

You and I live in exalted company! Abecedare (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Vithoba

PLease see Talk:Vithoba#Desecration_of_the_Pandharpur_temple_by_Muslims for my reply. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 02:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

My user page

Just wanted to say thanks for the revert to the vandalism on my user page! Camw (talk) 21:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Sister Nivedita

Thank you for cleaning up the citations. But I still do not understand the concept properly. Can you give me some links where I may read it. DO you actually type all citation by hand? How do you remeber all the syntax? Or do you use some tool? --Jyoti (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

"Protocol Stack" comments

Hi Nvineeth,

When rearranging the sentence "In addition to RTP, a complete system typically uses other protocols and standards for session announcement, initiation, and control like Session Initiation Protocol, Real Time Streaming Protocol, H.225, H.245 etc., codecs for media compression; and network transport." I deleted "network transport" feeling it was redundant (you already discussed that RTP typically runs on top of UDP earlier in the article and most people reading the article would be familiar with protocol layers). My comment was just pointing out if you really wanted to discuss how RTP runs on top of other protocols like UDP/IP you could do that at the end of the paragraph rather than string it onto the end of that already lengthy sentence. However I would personally leave discussion of protocol layers out of that paragraph completely.

Cedars (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Reply to your post here Yogesh Khandke (talk) 03:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

GA Topic

Can't find a common link in topics, as needed in the criteria. Tell me if you find any.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Vyadha Gita

On April 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vyadha Gita, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Ramprasad Sen

Do you have anything (more than the little snippets I could find) about Ramakrishna and his fondness for singing Ramprasad songs? It seems that Great Swan by Hixon might have something, but I don't have the book, and Google books doesn't have it. best regards, Priyanath ^talk 23:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Greetings. I will add stuff I can find from Great Swan and other books. Thanks. --Nvineeth (talk) 10:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

The Bio is incomplete, I will update it over the next few days. Thanks. --Nvineeth (talk) 12:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Priyanath ^talk 15:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Removing Critics

Hi, I would like to solicit your input regarding the criticism section of Paramahamsa Hariharananda. These criticism may be true or false but, regardless, the sources for the criticism, namely the two books by Satyeswarananda and the website of Kriyananda, are self-published. According to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Self-published_sources "Self-published sources are largely not acceptable, though may be used only in limited circumstances, with caution, when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." If we remove the sources without deleting the entire section, then the article will be criticizing a dead person without basis. Please let me know whether you agree with this or not in my talk page. – Shannon Rose (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Appreciation

		The Hinduism Award
		An acknowledgment of your contributions to expand and improve Hinduism related articles on wikipedia, as well as your calm and collaborative approach to editing. Regards. Abecedare (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot; But I still have a long way to go! --Nvineeth (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Way to go ? Where ?! You, as an editor on BG, should know better :)

Happy editing! Abecedare (talk) 17:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Bhakti

Hi Vineeth, I'm rewriting Bhakti (old version[1]) hoping to make it more encyclopedic and less sectarian. If you can, please give it a look. And great work on the Ramayana article. Thanks, Priyanath ^talk 04:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I will add my 2 cents in days to come. Thanks. --Nvineeth (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Ramprasad Sen

Hi, Nvineeth. You asked me to look over the Ramprasad Sen article.

1. The scholar Krishnananda Agamavagisha is referred to as famous. Is there any source confirming this?
2. In the Early Life section, there are two sentences side by side that start w/ "According to". Maybe reword?
3. Also, the sentence "Ramprasad later came into contact with the famous Tantrik yogi and scholar Krishnananda Agamavagisha and became his disciple" has two "ands" in it. (I know, this really is just nit picking.)
4. "popular stories" in the Employment seems POV
5. What is the difference between the sources used in the References section and the ones in the Bibliography section?

This article has improved since I last looked at it. :) The picture at the beginning of the article is very pretty and helps to illustrate it. The POV is mostly gone, except where "popular" stories and legends are referenced. (But that really is debatable what is popular and what isn't. I'm not that familiar w/ Indian poets, so I can't say.) However, you should probably request a peer review before you renominate the article. That way, somebody new can take a look at it and offer suggestions on things others may have overlooked. Good work on the article so far. (I'm not sure where to put this review, so I'll leave on your talk page. Hope you don't mind.) Kaguya-chan (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

No problem. :) I agree that adding in Bengal should make it more neutral. Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Norton LiveUpdate

Can you please do a re-peer review of Norton LiveUpdate --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 13:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Added my 2 cents --Nvineeth (talk) 13:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Iravan

Thanks for the suggested journals. Please take a look at the current article and suggest improvements. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Sure and welcome. --Nvineeth (talk) 10:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:26, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Please take a look at the article and give your suggestions. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello, sure, I will do my small wikignomish changes :) --Nvineeth (talk) 11:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Ramayana

Wanted your suggestions for creation of family tree on the talk? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ramprasad-sen-shyama-sangeet.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ramprasad-sen-shyama-sangeet.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Iravan

On May 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iravan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 23:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Popular pages

You'd probably want to ask User:Mr.Z-man about how to access the information, as he is the one who set up the program so he probably best knows how to access it. John Carter (talk) 14:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)