User talk:The4lines/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 9 |
GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter
  Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box. Current events
Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here. June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June. Drive and blitz reports
January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results) February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results) March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results) April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results) May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results) Other news
Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).
A barnstar for you!
|
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | |
| Thank you very much for helping out at CCI. Your help is greatly appreciated! Keep up the good work :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Thank you for participating in my RFA
Thanks for your early support and trust. The process turned out to be a very welcoming one as opposed to my last try. If I can be helpful in your work, or if you see me make an error, please feel free to call on me. I can't and wouldn't do any of this by myself. BusterD (talk) 21:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- BusterD, Hey! No Problem. I'm glad the RFA and everything went well! I'll be sure to ask you if I need any help, or if I see you make an error! Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 22:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Dixon Reservoir (Escondido)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Dixon Reservoir (Escondido) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
An article's lede normally does not contain citations unless there is a statement included in it that is contentious or been the subject of much debate. With this in mind, I moved the citations in the lede's first paragraph into the body of the article and deleted them from the lede.
Information included in the lede must also appear in the body of the article. Most of the information in the lede's second paragraph is not included in the main article. You should incorporate this information into the article with the citations and then delete the citations from the lede.
Best of luck with the GA nomination if you decide to move ahead.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
| Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021. Current and upcoming events
September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Drive and Blitz reports
June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news
June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive). Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
REFACTORING POSTS
Why did you remove posts of mine without explanation?Slatersteven (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Slatersteven That's quite odd, must of been a misclick, sorry. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 20:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Technical news
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
Arbitration
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2021
- In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
- Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained
- From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
- Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
- Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent
- Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?
- WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
- Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior
- Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
| Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021. Current and upcoming events
Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports
September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news
It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for visiting the Guest Room!
I hope you enjoyed your stay in my Guest Room.
Here is an ice-cold soda as a thank you, complimentary.
Visiting my Guest Room also means you've gained a new talk page watcher! ––FormalDude 
talk 06:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Spectre DAO Feedback
Hey 4,
I am getting acquainted with Wikipedia contributions and I wanted to contribute projects in the decentralized finance realm, more specifically defi 2.0. I want to know what I can do to fix my article so I can continue to upload content and post information on that can help educate our viewers in an area very little know a lot about.
Looking forward to your feedback! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roaring30s (talk • contribs) 01:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Roaring30s Hey! The main problem I'm seeing with your article is that its not supported by Reliable Sources. The only source I'm seeing is from the company itself which isn't allowed and isn't considered a reliable source. You should look for trusted sources of info like the NYT, WSJ, US.GOV pages. Read the page I linked for info on reliable sources. Good luck fixing your article and happy editing! Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 15:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
2020–21 United States election protests
Hey, I was in the middle of checking those diffs but got an edit conflict and saw you'd removed the rest saying the CV was gone. Were you talking about my edits to the page? Because I wasn't done removing stuff, and I was finding plenty. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, I checked I found cv in past diffs but not in the current. Feel free to rv if I'm wrong. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 16:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Were you checking manually or just hitting Earwig? I find it doesn't do well on big pages with lots of sources and small copyvios from each. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos Both, but sometimes not on the same page. That could be why. Again feel free rv and recheck them. I'll help you if you want. Best. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 16:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting, I'm going to just quickly check the rest :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos Np, ping me when you're done so I can close it. Any other CCI you need help in, or would recommend I do? Thanks and Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 17:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting, I'm going to just quickly check the rest :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos Both, but sometimes not on the same page. That could be why. Again feel free rv and recheck them. I'll help you if you want. Best. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 16:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Were you checking manually or just hitting Earwig? I find it doesn't do well on big pages with lots of sources and small copyvios from each. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
- @CAPTAIN RAJU Thanks! Merry Christmas to you too! Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 19:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia copyright and original research policy
Hello there, I'm an editor whose addition to People's Liberation Army Navy Surface Force was recently removed because of copyright violation. I'm looking for guidance on how to better edit Chinese military-related pages, especially around citation, original research, and now copyright.
I would really like to contribute, but I've been referred to pages about the importance of not doing original research and including citation when adding a revision, so I'm under the impression that I should just put the article's content on the page and cite the article so it's not considered original research. Is there anything I'm missing here?
Also, from my experience, Chinese military-related pages, in general, have a big citation problem as a lot of the information in there isn't cited/the citations are coming from unreliable sources.
At the same time, some cited content has problems with its factual reliability, even though it is citing generally accepted as reliable sources (as AFAIK there isn't a definitive list of reliable sources for Wikipedia).
So... more questions.
Do we have to remove the uncited content and/or content with unreliable source citation?
If a generally accepted as reliable source consistently make factual mistakes, does it disqualify that source from being generally accepted as reliable?
Thanks for the clarification in advance - TypingTyper (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @TypingTyper When you cite the article, make sure its reliable. If you can't find a reliable source for the unsourced/unreliable content, yes feel free to remove it. If a source makes constant mistakes, it would probably be unreliable. If you think a source made a mistake, then don't use it and find another. If all the sources say the same thing and you think its wrong, then there is nothing you can do about it. Also for reliability, I recommend looking at this list for the reliability of the biggest sources. If you still have a question, feel free to ask. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 00:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
I have another question. Is it okay to paraphrase and cite copyrighted content found on reliable sources like Janes? I'm completely unsure of what's permitted and what isn't on this paraphrase and citation issue. TypingTyper (talk) 10:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- @TypingTyper Try to put it in your own words if you can, but if you paraphrase, don't paraphrase too closely as that could be considered copyright and be removed. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 15:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello The4lines: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
--MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333 Thanks! I wish you Happy Holidays as well! Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 21:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
_(14573454469).jpg)
.jpg)
_(14752756965).jpg)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
- @CAPTAIN RAJU Thanks! Happy New Year you as well! :) Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 03:08, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
Miscellaneous
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Your GA nomination of Deep Blue (chess computer)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deep Blue (chess computer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bwoodcock -- Bwoodcock (talk) 03:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Deep Blue (chess computer)
The article Deep Blue (chess computer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Deep Blue (chess computer) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bwoodcock -- Bwoodcock (talk) 04:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Deep Blue (chess computer)
The article Deep Blue (chess computer) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Deep Blue (chess computer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bwoodcock -- Bwoodcock (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Quarter Million Award
|
The Quarter Million Award |
| For your contributions to bring Deep Blue (chess computer) (estimated annual readership: 251,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for your work on this vital article! – Reidgreg (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Looks like you need help
I saw you on Wikimedia discord asking for help at Saturn V. Looks like my GA at SpaceX Starship is sufficient, so feel free to ask me anything! (I know nothing) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @CactiStaccingCrane Responded on discord. Thanks for your willingness to help. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 15:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Deep Blue (chess computer)
Hello! Your submission of Deep Blue (chess computer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
DYK for Deep Blue (chess computer)
On 29 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deep Blue (chess computer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Garry Kasparov thought that a move by chess computer Deep Blue demonstrated its "superior intelligence", but the move was in fact caused by a software bug? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deep Blue (chess computer) 2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Deep Blue (chess computer)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
- Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
- News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election
- Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"
- Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?
- WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
- Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021
- Obituary: Twofingered Typist
- Essay: The prime directive
- In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing
- Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"
- Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword