Thadius856

If you return to editing please remove the above template.

NOTE: I will almost always respond to inquiries which originated on my talk page here. If I initiated the conversation by posting on your talk page, I'll typically respond there.

Lindsay Fully Loaded

Could you add a link from the Lindsay Lohan page to the Lindsay Fully Loaded page? I went there but had no edit link. ThanksMoonkissed9999 (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Response: Sorry, but I think I'll leave that to you. I know nothing of the subject matter. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 08:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Removal of stub template?

Was there a reason that you removed the {{statistics-stub}} template from stochastic ordering? The article is clearly a stub, since most of the subheadings don't have any information in them yet. Cheers, LachlanA (talk) 01:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Response: Personally, I would contend that the article is not a stub. Per WP:STUB:

“ A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. ”

“ Many articles still marked as stubs have in fact been expanded beyond what is regarded as stub size. If an article is too large to be considered a stub but still needs expansion, replace the stub template with an {{expand}} template (no article should contain both a stub template and an expand template). Be bold in removing stub tags that are clearly no longer applicable. ”

thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 01:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. I replaced it with an {{expand}} template. I still feel that it "is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject", but won't make a fuss :) LachlanA (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Response: You're most welcome. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 08:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Alabama - Roll on.jpg

source added for picture —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hman333 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Response: Thank you. It's very much appreciated. I've removed the template. :) thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 18:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your tremendous antivandalism work which has been keeping me busy at WP:AIV today. Trusilver (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

P.S. I read your user page and hope that you keep going with your interest in aviation. Once you finish your degree, have you given any consideration to joining the Air Force?. Trusilver (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Response: Much thanks! I'll place it proudly on my userpage. :) thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 04:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Olympic pictogram conversion

Hello Thadius856. Following a request, I've redesigned the Olympic pictogram for Sailing (from this to this). Since I don't know how to convert PNG to SVG files, I'd kindly ask you to update the SVG file you created, from the older PNG version, with the newer version of the pictogram. The filenames are not to be touched. I'd appreciate very much! Parutakupiu (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Your badlinks templates

I like them. I just found them today and have already found an opportunity to use one. However, it just occurred to me that you cite the WP Style guideline for external links as "Wikipedia policy", which it is not. How do you reconcile/justify this? More importantly, how will I reconcile/justify it when I'm challenged?  ^{.`</sup>^) Paine Ellsworth<sup>diss`cuss} (^^`.  06:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

hi, I nominated Ergogenic aid for speedy deletion.

Best wishes,Rich (talk) 04:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 05:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Constellation-svg

Template:Infobox Constellation-svg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 23:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Titin redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

I've started a discussion to address the redirects associated with Titin. Since you edited one or other of the redirects at some point, or discussed it on one of the talk pages, I wanted to notify you of the redirect discussion. Carcharoth (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AmarilloVenom.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AmarilloVenom.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cheetah Energy.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cheetah Energy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Imageshack.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imageshack.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. gwickwire^talk_editing 21:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Imageshack.png

A tag has been placed on File:Imageshack.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 22:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

O21 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect O21. Since you had some involvement with the O21 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UBStalk 05:01, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

RfC: New helper policy

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help ^connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Brown Field listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brown Field. Since you had some involvement with the Brown Field redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Fbdave (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thadius856. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thadius856. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

"Lift plus" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lift plus. Since you had some involvement with the Lift plus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Tsla1337 (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shingletown Airport

The article Shingletown Airport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boonville Airport (California)

The article Boonville Airport (California) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Shingletown Airport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shingletown Airport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shingletown Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AusLondonder (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox nutrition facts

Template:Infobox nutrition facts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)