TakeDealyo

This is TakeDealyo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidananda Kangovi (November 8)

Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This looks like an ad. There's not any independent, significant coverage on this subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TakeDealyo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, WikiOriginal-9. 2600:4040:7D3A:C100:316D:F33D:FFCC:99EF (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, WikiOriginal-9. TakeDealyo (talk) 19:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidananda Kangovi (November 9)

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need to be properly referenced. Also, don't add too many citations in one place.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Kilaseell - Message me! - 19:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi has a new comment

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi. Thanks! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidananda Kangovi (November 10)

Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://24img.com/challenges-faced-by-the-aerospace-industry.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Significa liberdade, Thank you for your feedback. I have revised the language to address your concern. Hope it is now Ok with you. TakeDealyo (talk) 04:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi! The copyright issues look good now! Thanks for making those updated :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Significa liberdade, Thank you so much. TakeDealyo (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidananda Kangovi (November 10)

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

See WP:BLP. All statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. For example, the entire Education section is unsourced.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidananda Kangovi (November 10)

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Whole sections of the article go uncited. Please add citations for the following sections: Patents, Personal life, Awards and recognition

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 15:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

microbiologyMarcus, Thank you for your feedback. i have now added patent numbers and proper links/citation for them In addition I have created External links section and given couple of links for verification purposes. Hope these changes address your concerns. Thank you. TakeDealyo (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidananda Kangovi (November 12)

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fade258, Thanks for your feedback. I have now added additional citations. Hope it addresses your comments. TakeDealyo (talk) 15:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidananda Kangovi (November 13)

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lizthegrey were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Evidence of sustained notability as shown by reliable secondary sources needs to be shown. There's a large amount of reference to primary sources (e.g. patents) and top book lists in very narrow categories, but the news coverage is a bit thin. Stylistically, see WP:NORESUMES and WP:AUTOBIO - this reads a lot like a CV and needs significant stylistic cleanup even if shown notable to comply with WP:NPOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachidananda Kangovi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

lizthegrey (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic