Hello

edit

Please anybody do correct in highest grossing indian bengali movies section because somebody do wrong edition there Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 18:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dwitiyo Purush (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 09:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello DarkAudit thank you for your contribution But could you lock this page because I have a complaint that most of the persons do wrong edits sk could you check this. It would be good for all users for Wikipedia members. Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease. Stop making repetitive requests. You've had your answer. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry for my behaviour @Favonian Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove the {{copyvio/core}} template from articles. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at a temporary subpage linked from the article. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates will be blocked from editing. VickKiang (talk) 09:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Atanka moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Atanka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Josey Wales Parley 21:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atanka (October 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Vidyasagar (1950 film) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Vidyasagar (1950 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Atanka

edit
 

The article Atanka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidyasagar (1950 film) (October 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 12:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest domestic net collection of Hindi films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naseeb. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Indian Bengali films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suhaag.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shatru (1984 film) moved to draftspace

edit

  An article you recently created, Shatru (1984 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 18:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shraddhanjali moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Shraddhanjali. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 07:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Srikanta Guha Thakurata moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Srikanta Guha Thakurata, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Srikant Guha Thakurata moved to draftspace

edit

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Srikant Guha Thakurata, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Srikant Guha Thakurata moved to draftspace

edit

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Srikant Guha Thakurata, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shraddhanjali

edit
 

The article Shraddhanjali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vidyasagar (1950 film)

edit
 

The article Vidyasagar (1950 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vidyasagar (1950 film) moved to draftspace

edit

  An article you recently created, Vidyasagar (1950 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 13:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shraddhanjali moved to draftspace

edit

  An article you recently created, Shraddhanjali, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 13:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shraddhanjali

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shraddhanjali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shatru (1984 film) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Shatru (1984 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 06:17, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Vidyasagar (1950 film)

edit

  Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vidyasagar (1950 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Jawan userbox

edit

You can use this userbox

 This user is eagerly waiting for Shah Rukh Khan's Dunki.

if you want by using this code

{{User:Tousif.15/Userboxes/Jawan}} Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 04:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bees Saal Baad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ghayal, Bang Bang and Deewana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Regarding List of highest-grossing films in India

edit

In the highest-grossing films by year you have made many changes which is not required..as only one movie should be there in one year....so kindly revert those edits. Harshit Kumar (talk) 19:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dharam Veer and Mard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

About the table "Highest-grossing films by year"

edit

In the table "Highest-grossing films by year", you have made many changes which is not required..as only one movie should be there in one year....so I had to remove all your changes. I also added in the "See also" section a link to the article "Lists of Hindi films" - in it you can see the 10 highest grossing films of each year SatyamevJayate (wd) (talk) 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ok as your name is satyamevJayate , very good that you are close to your nation , I like that fact , I just want to add all blockbuster movies , that's it if you thought that every year 1 movie is blockbuster then wrong , I don't the person who edit very silly in List of highest-grossing Indian films section where he/she add 2 movies in the year 2009 , you can see it - 3 idiots & Magadheera , so this is wrong na , very wrong, at that year 2009 only 3 idiots did very well. Okay what you thought do it . Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The HIGHEST- GROSSING FILM of the year, as a rule, is only one. And there can be several blockbusters in a year - for example, in 2006 there were four blockbusters - Dhoom 2, Lage Raho Munna Bhai, Krrish, Vivah. The table you edited contains information about the highest - grossing film of each year, not about the blockbusters of each year. These are different concepts. Devdas (2002), for example, is not a blockbuster - it was only a hit at the box office, but it was the highest grossing film of the year, so it made it into this table.
If you feel like making a list of all the blockbusters of the year, you can create a new article. But please do not distort the correct information available. Thanks for answering.:-) SatyamevJayate (wd) (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
ok
I apologize for my this , for now onwards this fact is correct that in every year only 1 movie did well. You are wrong , raaz was blockbuster in Bombay itself
But devdas is hit all over the india. I did worng don't you In 2006 only dhoom 2 did well in all over india . Not other 3. Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 01:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The name of the table we're talking about is "Highest-grossing films by year", not the blockbusters by year, and not the list of movie did well by year.
If you look at this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hindi_films_of_2006, you will see that Dhoom 2 is the highest-grossing movie of 2006.
Maybe the thing is that in your language there is no concept of superlative adjectives (high - the highest, big - the biggest etc)? SatyamevJayate (wd) (talk) 06:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I also say that only dhoom 2 is blockbuster in 2006 , others are flop. basically wikipedia is used by "leftist" Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes

edit

Basicslly satyamev jayate reality is Wikipedia is used by leftists. They did wrong edit to The Kashmir Files Theboywonder2001 (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Srikant Guha Thakurata

edit

  Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Srikant Guha Thakurata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Vidyasagar (1950 film) 2

edit

  Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vidyasagar (1950 film) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Shatru (1984 film) 2

edit

  Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shatru (1984 film) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Shraddhanjali 2

edit

  Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shraddhanjali 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Rajan51. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Schminnte (talk contribs) 16:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

hey I didn't attack rather he delete the entire wiki page of List of highest-grossing films in India this . please check this man he just destroy the page man !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! how can I stay calm Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Personal attacks and swearing don't solve anything: please stay civil during content discussions. Schminnte (talk contribs) 16:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
then you solve this page again please Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 16:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The page is still there? Schminnte (talk contribs) 16:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Am I done joke to u man just solve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! it please Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
"Destroyed"? What are you on about? This was my edit on that page. I merely corrected the numbers used in the table based on the respective sources. -Rajan51(talk) 16:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
listen fucker u just remove the highest Grossers by year completely remove the table why? Why?
What I did is nothing wrong ok Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 12:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
That was not me. And the user who made that edit provided a reason in the edit summary. Check the page's edit history before talking nonsense. As for what you did, it was wrong. Don't abuse anyone or delete their pages. -Rajan51 (talk) 12:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey, knock it off with that attitude or your block may be extended by the admins. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 13:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at User:Rajan51, you may be blocked from editing. Schminnte (talk contribs) 16:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Whatever you may have against other editors, blanking their user page is not the way to go. Schminnte (talk contribs) 16:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Srikanta Guha Thakurata

edit

  Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Srikanta Guha Thakurata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sumancranebuddy21q00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been block for unkonwon reasons

Decline reason:

The reason is stated in the notice above. Please make a new request and place it below, discussing that reason. 331dot (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2023

edit

Because you persisted making profane personal attacks after being blocked, your block is now indefinite and your talk page access has been revoked. Please read WP:UTRS for your unblock options going forward. Cullen328 (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #77303

edit

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Shatru (1984 film)

edit

  Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shatru (1984 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply