< Archive 24    Archive 25    Archive 26 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  10 -  11 -  12 -  13 -  14 -  15 -  16 -  17 -  18 -  19 -  20 -  21 -  22 -  23 -  24 -  25 -  26 -  27 -  28 -  29 -  30 -  31 -  32 -  33 -  34 -  35 -  36 -  37 -  38 -  39 -  40 -  41 -  42 -  43 -  44 -  ... (up to 100)


DYK for Kitsap Fast Ferries

On 12 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kitsap Fast Ferries, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Seattle's passenger-only ferries, blamed for beach erosion, were forced to slow down because of a class-action lawsuit? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kitsap Fast Ferries. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kitsap Fast Ferries), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Imperial Triple Crown

 
It gives me great pleasure to upgrade you to the Imperial Triple Crown for your continued contributions to Wikipedia. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel

On 15 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel is the only tunnel with stations shared between trains and buses in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Douglas County Library System

On 15 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Douglas County Library System, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the final hours of operation for the Douglas County Library System, supporters held a wake? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Douglas County Library System. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Douglas County Library System), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SoWhy 12:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bellevue City Hall

On 16 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bellevue City Hall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the city hall of Bellevue, Washington, was previously a Qwest telecommunications office? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bellevue City Hall. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bellevue City Hall), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eitel Building

On 16 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eitel Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Eitel Building was nominated for historic landmark status by nearby condominium owners to prevent the construction of a 22-story tower? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eitel Building. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Eitel Building), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chinatown station error

You wrote "east towards Kirkland (routes 41, 74 and 255)" but only 255 goes to Kirkland. Not sure what you meant to say here. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Bri: The entire sentence is meant to be read together (Bay A [routes 41, 74 and 255] [head] north toward Northgate and the University District and east towards Kirkland)...perhaps it's a little confusing. SounderBruce 23:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I see ... I think I'll try to reword that just a bit. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of International District/Chinatown station

  Hello! Your submission of International District/Chinatown station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mackensen (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Not sure why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Seattle_Department_of_Transportation was lagging in draftspace, so I published it to mainspace. Looks good enough to serve readers. Ethanbas (talk) 23:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Ethanbas: It's not complete and not high on my priority list. Please do not move drafts without consulting the author first. SounderBruce 23:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Why do you believe it to be incomplete? Ethanbas (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) @Ethanbas: whole sections of the article are just bulleted lists that comprise notes for the future prose that has yet to be written. Once that is expanded into prose, it looks like it will be ready. Imzadi 1979  17:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Well whatever. I just hope this draft does get published within say, a year from now. If SounderBruce doesn't think this article is worth his time any longer, I support publishing! Ethanbas (talk) 18:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Flag of Washington

  Hello! Your submission of Flag of Washington at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Flag of Washington

On 26 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flag of Washington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Flag of Washington must show George Washington's profile facing the same direction on both sides, making it one of the most expensive U.S. state flags to produce? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Washington. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Flag of Washington), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for International District/Chinatown station

On 2 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article International District/Chinatown station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Seattle's International District/Chinatown station is located under a large concrete lid that supports several office towers and a public plaza? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/International District/Chinatown station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, International District/Chinatown station), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Community Transit powertrains.

I edited the powertrains for the fleet section, they are confirmed by VIN codes, personal experience, and confirmation from community transit staff. Sorry, I'm sort of new at this and I hope that tells enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilligphantom (talkcontribs) 00:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Gilligphantom: Unfortunately, some of this falls under the site's original research rules, which forbid things like checking VINs and citing personal experience, as well as the venerability policy, which prefers accessible sources that are verified as knowledgeable and accurate. The document currently cited on the bus roster is something I obtained from Community Transit and can re-produce if necessary, but lacks some details. Moreover, adding small details like engine type and powertrain is better suited to a fan wiki (like CPTDB) than Wikipedia, which prefers summary-style content. (P.S. Make sure to sign your posts) SounderBruce 00:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Still, Wikipedia is user based and you CANNOT tell people what to do. I have PROOF, I'm NOT spreading fake info all over. It's verified by VINs. Just saying... -Gilligphantom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilligphantom (talkcontribs) 07:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Gilligphantom: Wikipedia, while "user based", still operates under tons of policies that cover legal mumbojumbo, the site's style set, and (relevant to this case) verifiability. It's pretty much impossible to reliably source the VINs without admitting that you collected data yourself (that's original research). As the Community Transit is a Good article, it has to be held to a higher standard, which forbids original research. SounderBruce 04:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Gilligphantom: All you need to do is get a detailed fleet summary from Community Transit. It may take a few tries to connect with the right person, and with some properties it may be necessary to resort to a FOIL request, but in the end all that information is supposed to be public. Useddenim (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)Reply

No Conflict of Interest

I am a financial analyst - I read the BOC wikipedia page in doing research and noticed it was incorrect and did not give an accurate picture of Sugarman's departure. The Banc filed 10ks and did not cite cause for his departure. My edit made the entry more accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Financewatcher (talkcontribs) 22:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Financewatcher: Your edit removed content without replacing it with verified information that was cited to a reliable source. If you do try to edit the article again, please follow the site's policies. SounderBruce 22:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)The paragraph you added was overtaken by events as reported by the SAME journalist at the same publication. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-banc-investigation-report-20170209-story.html Your pride of authorship does NOT justify leaving incorrect information that is potentially slanderous and misleading to investors.Reply

DYK

  Hello! Your submission of East Redmond, Washington at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 23:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Westlake station (Sound Transit)

On 12 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Westlake station (Sound Transit), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that additional fire sprinklers were installed in Seattle's Westlake station to accommodate parties and receptions on the station's mezzanine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Westlake station (Sound Transit). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Westlake station (Sound Transit)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 202

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 202 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 00:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

More Hall Annex

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article More Hall Annex has been completed.

I took the liberty of adding a section to provide a brief description of the replacement building. Please feel free to remove it if you don't feel this is appropriate.

Good luck with the FAC.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Twofingered Typist: Thanks for the copyedit! Everything looks good after my minor adjustments to your edits. SounderBruce 22:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Capitol Hill station

  Hello! Your submission of Capitol Hill station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Elisa.rolle (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for List of international goals scored by Clint Dempsey

On 15 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of international goals scored by Clint Dempsey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Clint Dempsey (pictured) has 57 international goals, ranking third among active male footballers behind Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of international goals scored by Clint Dempsey. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of international goals scored by Clint Dempsey), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bellevue City Hall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bellevue City Hall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bellevue City Hall

The article Bellevue City Hall you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bellevue City Hall for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kayak Point County Park

On 16 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kayak Point County Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the site of Kayak Point County Park was originally proposed as an oil refinery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kayak Point County Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kayak Point County Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 01:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bellevue City Hall

The article Bellevue City Hall you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Bellevue City Hall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 06:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kayak Point County Park

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kayak Point County Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kayak Point County Park

The article Kayak Point County Park you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kayak Point County Park for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kayak Point County Park

The article Kayak Point County Park you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Kayak Point County Park for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for East Redmond, Washington

On 21 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article East Redmond, Washington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the town of East Redmond, Washington, was found by the Washington Supreme Court to have been "illegally incorporated"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/East Redmond, Washington. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, East Redmond, Washington), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Andrew Schneider (journalist)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andrew Schneider (journalist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 202

The article Washington State Route 202 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Washington State Route 202 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 02:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Andrew Schneider (journalist)

The article Andrew Schneider (journalist) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Andrew Schneider (journalist) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:01, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel

Amazing work, and congrats on the Main page appearance! ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Another Believer: Thanks! The TFA isn't confirmed yet (hopefully it will), since the slot is currently occupied by another article. SounderBruce 03:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Doh! I see now that I accessed the article from the Featured content portal and not the Main page. Congrats on the article's FA promotion, then! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 24, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 24, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cherriots logo.svg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cherriots logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Capitol Hill station

On 3 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Capitol Hill station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that scrap metal from the demolition of the Capitol Hill station was sold to fund meals for the homeless? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Capitol Hill station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Capitol Hill station), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Westlake station photos

Hi, Bruce. I don't understand the explanation you gave in this edit summary (on August 10), in which you referred to "two Link photos". Before my edit, the article had a total of one Link photo, so I added one, which you removed, and since then the article has again had only a single Link photo. I suppose you meant "two photos", rather than "two Link photos", but I still feel my addition was logical and justified, and I know of no policy or guideline that says having two photos together (on top of one another) is discouraged. The two photos I added on August 10 differed from one another in several ways: One showed a bus, the other a light rail train; one a Metro vehicle, the other a Sound Transit vehicle; and they had different orientations/compositions, one with the platform on the left and showing the mezzanine's viewpoint, the other with the platform on the right. Considering these multiple differences, the two images are complementary, not repetitive. Why do you feel that an article that is now very long and a good candidate for GA (thanks to your expansion) cannot justify more than one Link photo? The only photo currently in the article does not show the end of the train, and while its blurriness (maybe intentional) from the moving train might be appealing to some readers, it is unattractive to others. Had the removal come from any other editor, I might have just reinstated the second Link photo, but since you were the editor who carried out the major expansion, I felt you deserved the opportunity to explain your position to me first. (Of course, I am hoping I might have changed your mind.) You may reply here, on your talk page. – SJ Morg (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@SJ Morg: Sorry about that edit summary. I meant to say that having two vehicle pictures in quick succession would be a bit much. The article has enough photos, and the light rail train photo in the history section is adequate (showing not only the train in motion, but the stairway and floor pattern), so I also think it would have been redundant. Honestly, the article doesn't need so many images of the platform level; the station has a mezzanine and entrance, after all, and they warrant coverage. Generally, to have two photos on top of each other, a template like {{multiple image}} is used to keep the formatting consistent and prevent text from being moved around, especially on smaller or extra-large screens. SounderBruce 20:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of East Redmond, Washington

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article East Redmond, Washington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 03:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of East Redmond, Washington

The article East Redmond, Washington you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:East Redmond, Washington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 20:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Idea - megaprojects

I'm not sure if I already mentioned this to you. I have a draft at User:Bri/List of Seattle megaprojects that could become a small list article with possibilities for future expansion. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Bri: So...what's the scope of the list? Anything over a billion dollars? Should past megaprojects be included (adjusted for inflation)? I'm not sure the scope is well defined enough to become a standalone list. SounderBruce 22:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
The megaproject article sets a $1B threshold as commonly accepted, I'm good with that – or to bend the def for particilarly important projects. Actually as far as time scope, I'm thinking of setting a historic context of the Seattle water supply, Snoqualmie Falls generator, the cross-Cascades railroads and tunnels, and other basic infrastructure like Chittenden Locks. Then jump to the 1980s or so. Maybe with a stop in the 30s and 40s for Grand Coulee & Columbia Basin reclamation, and the big wartime projects like Hanford. Oh probably the construction of I-5 and I-90 too, of course the floating bridges. Maybe Dennis Bratland could help with some visualization like a project map or cost-vs-time graph (my gut says a semilog plot would be interesting) ☆ Bri (talk) 17:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Also: User:Bri/Electricity in the Puget Sound area. I'll probably article-ify this today or tomorrow unless you want to hold up for something. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Would it be better as a statewide article? PUDs are found statewide and I'm sure the BPA controls most of the state's power. SounderBruce 20:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps that is a valid topic but the scope is a bit ... daunting. I feel like the current electricity draft is at a good enough state to publish. While I was creating it though I realized that the PUDs are more important than I'd thought. They might merit their own separate treatment, probably statewide. The history of populism in Washington and the 1930 enabling act would certainly be interesting components of a complete article. How to work WPPSS into it is a whole other thing. Again, scope starts to hurt my brain. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Also adding this: A friend works for BPA which got me more interested in finding out what they do. Turns out they mostly own transmission infrastructure, not generating equipment – which is a way of both agreeing and disagreeing with your statement that they control the power. Example at a big dam the BPA line will enter a transformer and at a particular insulator it's the dam owner's (problem). Dam ownership in this state is a crazy quilt with PUDs (Wanapum, Priest Rapids), the Army (!) (John Day - but operated by Grant County PUD), the Bureau of Reclamation (Grand Coulee) and others just on the Columbia; on smaller rivers you've got cities and even smaller industrial owners (the infamous Elwha Dam was owned by a Port Angeles paper mill). Just writing this reply I found one I'd never heard of, the Quincy Chute Hydroelectric Project. Then you've got some long-distance transmission equipment surprisingly owned by City of Seattle like a HVAC line going through the middle of Bridle Trails State Park on the Eastside and a Puget Power line also on the Eastside going who knows where (over the Puget Power Trail oops, add that to my todo list). It's weird. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for 2017 Puebla earthquake

On 20 September 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2017 Puebla earthquake, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT♦C 00:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tell that

To the families of people that was not helped in order to rescue an inexistent girl. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 03:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch: We're an encyclopedia, not a clickbait website. SounderBruce 03:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
The article (yours for what I can ser now) is clearly a NEWS clickbait ("Donald Trump sent condolences"). So what, dozen other politicians have done it as well and nothing is there. Don't reply, as I said, I don't have time for this. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 03:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Tbhotch: You've done nothing to establish the notability of that hoax. Also, I did not add the Trump passage; the "blame" lies with this revision, found via WikiBlame. There is a precedent to include condolences and aid from heads of state into disaster articles, so it fits. SounderBruce 04:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've done nothing to establish the notability of that hoax because I've been helping my people instead of sitting my ass off writing an article that won't do something for them. I always critizise Spanish Wikipedia articles for being incomplete, but es:Terremoto de Puebla de 2017 can clearly teach English Wikipedia how to write a complete article (don't blame it on "it was in a Spanish-speaking country", the lack of information is not because of that).

You justify Trump's inclusion as "There is a precedent to include condolences and aid from heads of state into disaster articles, so it fits." Have you attempted to add Canada's, Russia's, Venezuela's, Israel's, Spain's,[1] Germany's, Italy's, EU's, France's,[2], UK's, UN's, Paraguay's, Vatican's, Guyana's, Panama's, Portugal's, Finland's, Kyrgyzstan's,[3] Colombia's, Honduras', Argentina's, Bolivia's, Guatemala's, Chile's, Ecuador's, Nicaragua's, Brazil's, Salvador's,[4] Kazakhstan's, OECD's, OAS',[5] China's,[6], Switzerland's.[7] (I don't know if there are more). Or that multiple national and international companies have made donatives? "It is not my job to add them" you might think or say. "Obviously", it is my answer, but for what I can see in the history you created it, nominated it for ITN, and once it was there you said "well let's do something else, who cares about updating this article anymore." Yet, besides not adding more information, you are deciding what should or should not go there.

"With efforts still underway to rescue people crushed by rubble following Mexico City’s 7.1 magnutiude earthquake, people across the country are outraged by the fact that TV network Televisa devoted extensive coverage to the story of Frida Sofia, a little girl allegedly trapped under the remains of her elementary school. Televisa’s rescue effort live-stream went on through the night, according to the Daily Beast, and included heartwrenching details, such as Frida Sofia waving her tiny hand and saying she was tired. But Frida Sofia, it turned out, never existed, leaving viewers who had been watching and praying for the girl feeling duped and manipulated for ratings." Rachel Withers for Slate

And you ask Frida Sofía's WP:N: here it is: How to write about her, courtesy of Spanish Wikipedia. How to source the hoax (I will mix sources from when we thought she was real, and when Mexican Navy apologized for lying):[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], there are +100 more; and how it was compared to a similar 1985 earthquake case of a kid named Luis Ramón "Monchito" that didn't exist as well: [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], +25 more; and it was even compared to Simpsons Did It episode "Radio Bart": [35][36][37][38][39][40], +30 more.

Most of them are in Spanish, but even in Google.mx I got results in English, so I'm sure there are way more. So, instead of call this "clickbait", or Americans' new neologism for clickbait, "Fake news", be that user that if proud of his 30 GA and don't go around getting conclusions based on his personal (and not encyclopedic) point of view of what is or is not notable. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 18:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch: Calm down, please. If Wikipedia is causing too much personal stress, I suggest taking a break for a bit, or editing another article to keep your mind off this topic. There's no need to start reaching towards personal attacks or remarks that may be considered harmful. I'm a person too, as are you, so let's agree to disagree and not be so aggressive, yes? SounderBruce 00:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Hugh Hefner

On 28 September 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hugh Hefner, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — xaosflux Talk 14:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Capitol Hill station

The article Capitol Hill station you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Capitol Hill station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. AmericanAir88 (talk) 02:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Cary Moon

  Hello! Your submission of Cary Moon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NoGhost (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Capitol Hill station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Subway
King Carl XVI Gustaf's 1976 visit to the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Secret Service

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of International District/Chinatown station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article International District/Chinatown station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 19:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Cary Moon

  Hello! Your submission of Cary Moon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on your nomination. Yoninah (talk) 10:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited King Carl XVI Gustaf's 1976 visit to the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Picket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of International District/Chinatown station

The article International District/Chinatown station you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:International District/Chinatown station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 04:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Katia, Irma, Jose 2017-09-08 1745Z–1935Z.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kamaishi Recovery Memorial Stadium

On 21 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kamaishi Recovery Memorial Stadium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a host venue for the 2019 Rugby World Cup will be built in Kamaishi, which suffered major damage during the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kamaishi Recovery Memorial Stadium. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kamaishi Recovery Memorial Stadium), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 520

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 520 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adityavagarwal -- Adityavagarwal (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 520

The article Washington State Route 520 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Washington State Route 520 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adityavagarwal -- Adityavagarwal (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Halloween cheer!

GA Review

Hi there! I would be picking up your GA articles for review, but it would take me from now to four hours to complete it, as I would be going to university in a while. So, would complete it there. If there is a time mismatch and you need me to fix the GAN issues myself, please let me know. Adityavagarwal (talk) 02:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Adityavagarwal: I'm going to be heading to bed soon, and won't be able to edit for much of tomorrow. It's alright if you pass it over while gunning for WikiCup points.
Actually, I have been reviewing participants' GANs not for 4 points, but because they would get them reviewed before the cup finishes! :) 4 points hardly matters; I thought you would be able to score your GA points at least. Adityavagarwal (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kitsap Fast Ferries

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kitsap Fast Ferries you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adityavagarwal -- Adityavagarwal (talk) 04:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kitsap Fast Ferries

The article Kitsap Fast Ferries you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Kitsap Fast Ferries for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adityavagarwal -- Adityavagarwal (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
  • Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
  • Featured List –   Bloom6132 (submissions) and   1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures –   SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
  • Featured Topic –   MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
  • Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
  • Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
  • In The News –   MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
  • Good Article Review –   Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup awards

 
Awarded to SounderBruce for reaching the final "8", and finishing in fourth place in the 2017 WikiCup Sturmvogel 66, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cary Moon

On 13 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cary Moon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Seattle mayoral candidate Cary Moon qualified for the general election by a margin of 1,170 votes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cary Moon. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cary Moon), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

On this day, 10 years ago...

  Happy First Edit Day, SounderBruce, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Slightlymad 06:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

"According to..." language

Please do not clutter up articles such as 2017 Kermanshah earthquake with useless "According to the BBC..." verbiage, per WP:INTEXT. Abductive (reasoning) 09:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Washington State Route 520

On 17 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Washington State Route 520, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Microsoft helped fund a new overpass on Washington State Route 520 near its corporate headquarters in Redmond? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Washington State Route 520. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Washington State Route 520), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Triple Crown

 
It's very nice to see you upgrading yet again to the Imperial Napoleonic triple crown. Thanks for all your hard work. Freikorp (talk) 13:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

New Page Reviewing

 
Hello, SounderBruce.

I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Washington State Route 520

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Washington State Route 520 has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the ACR.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

DYK

  Hello! Your submission of 1120 Denny Way at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 14:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK

  Hello! Your Washington's 45th state senate district special election, 2017 submission at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 14:52, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SounderBruce. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Question

I know that you've had several city articles promoted to GA or FA. I understand that you also seem to have physical newspaper references on the pages. Do you access these online, or off? What is your typical workflow like when researching?

Thanks.

Buffaboy talk 21:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Buffaboy: My newspaper references come from either online archives or microfilm rolls that I view at the local library. One can also use Newspapers.com or a similar service that allows for links in those references. When researching city articles, I tend to comb through a few years of articles at a time, looking for major events that would be worth including. It also helps to review other compiled histories of the city from other sources and use the newspaper articles as infill between major events. SounderBruce 22:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
SounderBruce Great answer, thanks. Buffaboy talk 00:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mitzi Johanknecht

On 7 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mitzi Johanknecht, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mitzi Johanknecht, the new sheriff of King County, Washington, was the first female deputy to lead the county's SWAT team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mitzi Johanknecht. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mitzi Johanknecht), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Washington State Route 20, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colville River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Washington's 45th state senate district special election, 2017

On 8 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Washington's 45th state senate district special election, 2017, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Manka Dhingra's election to the Washington State Senate gave Democrats complete control of the state's government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Washington's 45th state senate district special election, 2017. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Washington's 45th state senate district special election, 2017), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Manka Dhingra

On 8 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Manka Dhingra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Manka Dhingra's election to the Washington State Senate gave Democrats complete control of the state's government? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Manka Dhingra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for MLS Cup 2017

On 9 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article MLS Cup 2017, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that today's MLS Cup 2017 soccer final between Toronto FC and Seattle Sounders FC is a rematch of the 2016 Cup, and will be played at the same venue? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/MLS Cup 2017. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, MLS Cup 2017), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Belmont, Arizona

On 10 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Belmont, Arizona, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bill Gates plans to build a "smart city" near Phoenix, Arizona? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Belmont, Arizona. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Belmont, Arizona), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Interstate 405

Why did you deleted the comments for the talk pages of Talk:Interstate 405 (California), Talk:Interstate 405 (Oregon) and Talk:Interstate 405 (Washington)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.100.126.103 (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 1120 Denny Way

On 12 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1120 Denny Way, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a highrise building replacing part of The Seattle Times' headquarters will have historic headlines etched into its facade? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1120 Denny Way. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1120 Denny Way), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giants Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York Cosmos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I can geography

Sorry for making a hash out of south Snohomish County geography at the casino article. I should have looked at a map instead of going from memory. But maybe this underlines the section needs a bit of work to get the locations straight. Smokey Point and Tulalip are just across I-5 from one another aren't they? ☆ Bri (talk) 15:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Bri: It's fine, now that things have been corrected. Smokey Point is a mile north of the Tulalip Reservation's boundary, and a few miles north of what most would consider "Tulalip" (or rather, Quil Ceda Village), where the casino is. The article was written in a bit of a frantic rush (limited access to the Herald archive and all), so I'll make some copyedit passthroughs while expanding it further. SounderBruce 05:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Amtrak derailment draft

FYI Draft:2017 JBLM Amtrak train derailment. Hope it's not as bad as it sounds. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Bri: Sounds bad. An article here has already been written. SounderBruce 18:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
I wonder if the title should be changed to make it easier to find & for consistency ☆ Bri (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Now the title is being debated, so that's good. By the way this is going to be a huge jurisdictional nightmare. Owner of tracks = Sound Transit; owner of the route = WSDOT and ODOT; operator = Amtrak; owner of highway = WSDOT; expect NTSB and WSP to conduct their own investigations. Who did the last trestle inspection?? At least it didn't happen on the base. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:52, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Throw in the FRA and FTA and you have the complete picture. I think the FRA is responsible for inspecting WSDOT's work. SounderBruce 20:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Phew. The only thing that could make it better (I mean worse) is if one of the other track users had damaged it somehow. Hey maybe it was one of the military trains, DOD can get a seat at the table now. By the way a couple of possible improvements:
  • it might be worth noting somewhere why the locomotive was a pusher; it's because they don't want to turn around in Portland I suppose?
  • is "bridge" the right term here or is a trestle what crosses a freeway?
Later ☆ Bri (talk) 20:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oh, add Pierce County Sheriff, they are already on scene ☆ Bri (talk) 21:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oh, add BNSF, apparently they dispatched the train ☆ Bri (talk) 00:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
WSDOT has pointedly noted that FRA was responsible for reviewing the new tracks. The blame game begins... ☆ Bri (talk) 18:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit conflicts =

Be careful when you are editing that you do not save over edits by other editors. You removed my edits by editing an older version, then gave a reason for removing my edits that didn't correspond to the changes made. Natureium (talk) 18:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Natureium: Sorry, the new revisions are slow to load on my PC for some reason. SounderBruce 18:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

  Please stop reverting to previous versions as you did in 2017 Washington train derailment. You are overwriting removing constructive edits in the process. You are still responsible for edits you make using Twinkle. Thank you. Gamebuster (Talk)Contributions) 02:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Saturday, December 23, 1 PM

 
If you are in the Seattle area, please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Saturday, December 23, 1 PM. If you cannot attend in person, you may join us virtually from your PC, Mac, Linux, iOS, or Android at this link: https://zoom.us/j/2207426850. The address of the physical meeting is: Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102) 47°37′23″N 122°19′20″W / 47.622928°N 122.322312°W / 47.622928; -122.322312

The event page is here. You do not have to be a member to attend, but only members can vote in board elections. New members may join in person by completing the membership registration form onsite or (to be posted) online and paying $5 for a calendar year / $0.50 per month for the remainder of a year. Current members may renew for 2018 at the meeting as well.

Cascadia Wikimedians User Group is a recognized 501c3 non-profit organization in the US. EIN # 47-3513818 Our mail address is Cascadia Wikimedians User Group, 520 Kirkland Way, PO Box 2305, Kirkland, WA 98083.
06:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

DYK nomination of Tacoma Dome Station

  Hello! Your submission of Tacoma Dome Station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Bushranger One ping only 06:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

MLS Cup 2017 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Marco Delgado
Point Defiance Bypass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Point Defiance

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas!

  Wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
A very Happy, Glorious, Prosperous Christmas and New Year! God bless!    — Adityavagarwal (talk) 17:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Westlake station (Sound Transit)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Westlake station (Sound Transit) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kew Gardens 613 -- Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Angel of the Winds Casino Resort

  Hello! Your submission of Angel of the Winds Casino Resort at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Bushranger One ping only 00:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Westlake station (Sound Transit)

The article Westlake station (Sound Transit) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Westlake station (Sound Transit) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kew Gardens 613 -- Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 01:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Vitamin C stalled on its way to Prep

Out of your hands, but my DYK nom for vitamin C has been stalled on its way to Prep. I am hoping that my added information will clear the way. David notMD (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of MLS Cup 2016

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MLS Cup 2016 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of MLS Cup 2016

The article MLS Cup 2016 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:MLS Cup 2016 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of University of Washington station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article University of Washington station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 03:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply