A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Somsak Ung. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Nardog (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Standard Chinese phonology, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Unattributed Contributions by Somsak_Ung to Ethnic Groups of Thailand Page

edit

This is a notice flagging that Somsak_Ung is making unattributed contributions to this page, i.e., contributions without citations, as can be seen on the Revision History page. The user is also not summarizing his edits. I advise Somsak_Ung to check how to do citing sources on Wikipedia: citations. I am at the moment exercising discretion but mainly deleting the user's unattributed contributions. Somsak_Ung is also making unattributed assertions about the existence of a contemporary 'Siamese' ethnic group. The Siamese were an ethnic group of Thailand according to 19th century race theory,[1]. However, they are not now. They are not even recognized as such in the official Royal Thai Government submission listing ethnic communities, the 2011 ICERD submission.[2] I am at the moment assuming good faith (agf) by Somsak_Ung but deleting his contributions on this issue. I am copying this notice to his talk page, where I see he has been flagged once for unattributed contributions.Johncdraper (talk) 17:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Streckfuss, David (1993). "The mixed colonial legacy in Siam: Origins of Thai racialist thought, 1890–1910". Autonomous Histories, Particular Truths: Essays in the Honor of John R. W. Smail. Madison, WI: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies. pp. 124–153.
  2. ^ International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination; landforms a growing larger by the second Reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention: Thailand (PDF) (in English and Thai). United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. 28 July 2011. Retrieved 8 October 2016.

Citations and neutral point of view at "Thai Chinese"

edit

Hi Somsak Ung, I reverted this edit: [1] because it did not provide a reliable source. The edit could be considered controversial, and citations must be provided for any material that is likely to be challenged. The burden is on the editor who adds the material. It looks like this is your third warning about unsourced edits. Please understand that persistenly adding unsourced material, particularly if controversial, may be considered disruptive editing, and could lead to you being blocked from editing. Furthermore, the article already cites several sources stating that Thai Chinese are considered ethnic Chinese, and uses that term often in the text of the article. It is maybe not a black-and-white issue, and there is always room for improvement of the article. But please be aware also of the neutral point of view policy, and avoid adding content based on your own analysis or knowledge. If you still want to change the lead sentence, I would suggest first opening a discussion on the article's talk page and working toward a consenus about the wording. You should provide reliable sources to support your argument. Thanks for your understanding. --IamNotU (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangkok. You did not cite any source in this edit: [2]. The information appears to be incorrect, and has been reverted. Furthermore your change to the photo caption appears not adhere to WP:NPOV. IamNotU (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

IPAc-th

edit

It looks like you are working on a new template IPAc-th. I reverted a few instances of it because the output is not IPA at all. Can you explain what you are trying to achieve? −Woodstone (talk) 01:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

like many languages, Central Thai is also have many varieties, not only Thai as auxiliary language like Isan, Northern Thai and Southern Thai etcs., it's also many dialects on native speaker (mainly Siamese's accent which speak in countryside and Thai Chinese accents which native in Bangkok). in Template:IPA-th currently use in narrow transcription which refer pronouciation from Ayutthaya province, but almost all of sound reference speak in Krungthep (Bangkok) accent, therefore (you can watch my sandbox zh:使用說明:泰語國際音標), i think it's better if it change to broad transcription, it's look like use narrow transcription in General American English but every reference speak in AAVE.--Somsak Ung (talk) 08:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The way IPA is applied to Thai in Wikipedia is defined in Help:IPA/Thai. That page corresponds to the way the IPA organisation defines it, which is already a rather broad transcription. It is not a good idea to start inventing private ways to "improve" on recognised world standards. And certainly before you might activate any changes, these would need to thoroughly discussed on talk there. Also, inputting transcriptions by Thai symbols is not practical in an English language Wikipedia.−Woodstone (talk) 11:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

First, it's not make sense enough to use Help:IPA/Thai as narrow script, but fair enough if we change this Template:IPA-th into broad script. Second, in Template:IPAc-th we can use RTGS, not cover everything, but it's official and we can modified something if you want.--Somsak Ung (talk) 16:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The documentation of template template:IPA-th refers to help:IPA/Thai as its definition. So that's the way it should be used. Any template with IPA in its name should be based on IPA symbols, so it should not be used to generate RTGS transcriptions. For that here is the template:RTGS. If you are serious in developing template:IPAc-th further, for consistency with template:IPAc-en, it should take latin script as input, create broad IPA as defined in help:IPA/Thai and generate pop-ups with short example words for each symbol. And of course all of this should be discussed at the proper talk pages first. −Woodstone (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mueang Surat Thani District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Auxiliary language. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to BTS, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ayutthaya spoke Sukhothai? Or Phitsanulok?

edit

Hi there, just wondering, since I know the Ayutthaya Kingdom spoke a Northern Cities dialect, did they really speak the Sukhothai dialect? Phitsanulok was once the Ayutthaya capital, so just curious to if it might have been them instead. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 19:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, hahaha, you maybe don't know much about Thai history. first, they speak Sukhothai "language" not dialect, this language already dead, but because it's develop to Central Thai language and Southern Thai language in 17th century, like Ruthenian language already extinct, but because they develop to Ukrainian language and Ruthenian language. today we use Sukhothai "language" in somethings like soap opera, or game show or somethings like comedy etcs.
oh, and you say why Phitsanulok was once the Ayutthaya capital?, it's very simply, first King Samphraya of Ayutthaya invade Kingdom of Sukhothai, and bring their princess to become their wife (technically it's royal marriage), in 1438 King Borommapan of Sukhothai don't have male heir this make crown prince Borommatrailokkanat of Ayutthaya become king of Sukhothai, and also inherit Ayutthaya throne in 1448 but he always stay at Phitsanulok, so technically Kingdom of Ayutthaya and Kingdom of Sukhothai is personal union. In 1583 King Naresuan of Sukhothai (last king of Sukhothai; are also crown prince of Ayutthaya) revoke vassal status from Kingdom of Toungoo and won the war at Battle of Sittaung River, he forced displacement population entire country to Kingdom of Ayutthaya, so this year it's technically Kingdom of Sukhothai was annex by Kingdom of Ayutthaya. they rebuild Sukhothai area in 1601 but this time it's just provinces of Ayutthaya kingdom, many people are Lannaese refugee from Kingdom of Lanna because they hate their king Nawrahta Minsaw (member of Toungoo dynasty), so today upper central dialect it's just dialect continuum between Central Thai language and Northern Thai language.
Thai history have many time to forced displacement population in the country, examples Teochew people is native people of Krungthep (i mean Bangkok) (so i called Krungthepians), so when they shift language to Central Thai, they speak different accent with Siamese people (Central Thai people) and they call Siamese accents as Ner (Thai: เหน่อ; literally: bumpkins), during early 20th century, King Mongkut Klao want to build new cities, Hatyai, Bandon and Betong, he forced displacement Krungthepians to these cities, and that's why the local of Hatyai and Bandon encircled by Southern Thai language and Betong was encircled by Malay language, but they resist assimilation and maintain the same accent with the capital city.--Somsak Ung (talk) 21:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:C-th

edit

 Template:C-th has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:IPAc-th

edit

 Template:IPAc-th has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tone-th

edit

 Template:Tone-th has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Han Chinese subgroups table

edit

 Template:Han Chinese subgroups table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Eguersi (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Krung Thep dialect

edit
 

The article Krung Thep dialect has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

content without directly-related reliable sources; original research with self-coined terms and self-interpreted definitions and phonetic transcriptions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oyster omelette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minnan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, I have reverted/adjusted your replacement or insertion of Cambodian tical in a few articles because they are unsourced and not aligned with existing article text and sources.

I have done so only with Siam-related articles because I don't know enough about the economies of other former countries that you have also inserted Cambodian tical as currency. Nonetheless, I suggest you find sources to support the edits you made to those articles. Aithus (talk) 02:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

No original research

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. RJFF (talk) 11:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply