Shyam Raghavan
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:15, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Final warning before indef block edit
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Rebuttal edit
I am not, unfortunately for you, adding external links that are inappropriate. These links are true references. I do realize that this is not a help for search engine ranking, and I do not appreciate that you do not believe that these are true references. You obviously do not realize the necessity of true information as a free, important right to human beings. I would ask you to leave my additions to the Wikipedia society alone, as I can and will call upon a senior to you. Thank you. --Shyam Raghavan (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately for you, if you spam Wikipedia again, I will block this account from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- This is an inappropriate use of your power, and I believe that I should have the ability, as a person who is dedicating their time to bettering the Wikipedia website and society, to reference articles that I used to learn about the subject. --Shyam Raghavan (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Spam-only account edit
http://spam.bankruptcylawreview.com edit
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.
OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:06, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Shyam Raghavan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please see rebuttal above. This is an unacceptable use of power, and I have added invaluable content to the Wikipedia site. The content I have added was not inappropriate and was adding value to the development of the Wikipedia society. Ohnoitsjamie is biased against me, and it is unacceptable to have to deal with this. Thanks.
Decline reason:
Please see your warnings and block message, they contain links to all the relevant policies. Max Semenik (talk) 15:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Due to your messing with the unblock request template, your right to edit this page has been withdrawn. Max Semenik (talk) 15:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)