User talk:Seattle/Archive 9

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Okeyes (WMF) in topic Article Feedback Tool update

Capel edit

That sounds good; I'll find some free time next week to take a look through the article and make whatever changes are needed. Wizardman 17:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 25 March 2013 edit

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter edit

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate   Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's   Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr (  Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare (  Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus (  Keilana (submissions) and   Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John (  Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) J Milburn (talk) 22:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Kevin Ware edit

  Hello! Your submission of Kevin Ware at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 16:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 01 April 2013 edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Roly Poly (song)
Benji Gil
Gary Gray (baseball)
Liz Larsen
Leontopolis
Ike Butler
Commune-level subdivisions (Vietnam)
Cunégonde
Susan Browning
Dave Schmidt
Silesian Beskids
David Lee Jordan
Mike Morris (American football)
Prentiss High School
Lauri Peters
Brian Esposito
Calvin Jones (baseball)
Vivente rege
1973 Los Angeles Dodgers season
Cleanup
1981 Major League Baseball Draft
Jordan High School (Long Beach, California)
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Merge
Zilog Z80
Removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act
Places that have decriminalized non-medical cannabis in the United States
Add Sources
History of the New York Mets
Waingels College
Suburban Lawns
Wikify
Falange
Playtime Is Over (Wiley album)
Harry Shapiro (author)
Expand
Mermaid Avenue: The Complete Sessions
Carolyn Cooke
History of the New York Yankees

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 08 April 2013 edit

DYK for Kevin Ware edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013 edit

TB edit

 
Hello, Seattle. You have new messages at Talk:Amanda Clement/GA1.
Message added 05:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sven Manguard Wha? 05:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Seattle. You have new messages at Talk:Amanda Clement/GA1.
Message added 21:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sven Manguard Wha? 21:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 April 2013 edit

The Signpost: 29 April 2013 edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Benji Gil
Liz Larsen
Mike Morris (American football)
Roly Poly (song)
Orlando Mercado
1961 Major League Baseball All-Star Game (first game)
Let's Explore Diabetes With Owls
Gary Gray (baseball)
Brian Esposito
Commune-level subdivisions (Vietnam)
Ed Vande Berg
Prentiss High School
Cunégonde
Silesian Beskids
Calvin Jones (baseball)
Siu haau sauce
1973 Los Angeles Dodgers season
Mike Kekich
Leontopolis
Cleanup
Falange
Forfar
Hannibal
Merge
Pork ribs
Zilog Z80
Montreal Expos
Add Sources
2011 Major League Baseball All-Star Game
Bloody Mary (South Pacific)
Ruthless People
Wikify
1981 Major League Baseball Draft
Traditional animation
Wonder Girl (Cassie Sandsmark)
Expand
Mermaid Avenue: The Complete Sessions
1992 in baseball
Carolyn Cooke

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter edit

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with   Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place   Casliber (submissions) and second place   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 15:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 06 May 2013 edit

Matt Downs edit

I made the fixes you noted in your review. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:06, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Added outfield information. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 May 2013 edit

The Signpost: 20 May 2013 edit

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1987 Major League Baseball Draft may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 May 2013 edit

DYK for 1987 Major League Baseball Draft edit

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 07:34, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
4   I've Got a Secret (song) (talk)           Add sources
7   I Had a Ball (talk)         Add sources
1,509   The Jetsons (talk)   Add sources
25   Floyd Bannister (talk)         Add sources
40   1994 in baseball (talk)       Add sources
88   2011 Major League Baseball All-Star Game (talk)   Add sources
28   1981 Major League Baseball Draft (talk)         Cleanup
23   1978 Major League Baseball Draft (talk)       Cleanup
68   Cody Ransom (talk)     Cleanup
34   1992 in baseball (talk)       Expand
48   Mermaid Avenue: The Complete Sessions (talk)         Expand
35   Detroit Film Critics Society (talk)     Expand
132   Reform of the House of Lords (talk)   Unencyclopaedic
614   Designated hitter (talk) Unencyclopaedic
21   Jim Hendry (talk)       Unencyclopaedic
148   Baldwin Hills, Los Angeles (talk)     Merge
697   Pork ribs (talk)       Merge
939   Montreal Expos (talk) Merge
8   Harry Shapiro (author) (talk)           Wikify
36   History of the Miami Marlins (talk)   Wikify
28   Sanders Commings (talk)         Wikify
1   Andrei Grigoryevskiy (talk)           Orphan
1   Arles duck colony (talk)           Orphan
0   Apeleptera (talk)           Orphan
11   Commune-level subdivisions (Vietnam) (talk)         Stub
48   Cunégonde (talk)           Stub
3   Curtain Call For Clifford (talk)           Stub
5   Calvin Jones (baseball) (talk)           Stub
9   Irra Petina (talk)           Stub
5   Gary Gray (baseball) (talk)           Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 1987 Major League Baseball Draft edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013 edit

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre edit

 
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Safety (gridiron football score)/GA1 edit

I believe I have fixed all of the issues you noted. Toa Nidhiki05 16:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Capel edit

I'll do a copyedit and look over the final things tomorrow. Wizardman 02:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

OK. Albacore (talk) 02:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I put in a request for the link noted in the review, which should hopefully be provided by tomorrow so I'll be able to view it and make any necessary additions. Wizardman 04:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 12 June 2013 edit

The Signpost: 19 June 2013 edit

The Signpost: 26 June 2013 edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
62   Golden Globe Award for Best Actress – Television Series Musical or Comedy (talk)       Add sources
1,313   The Jetsons (talk)   Add sources
23   KC Masterpiece (talk)           Add sources
25   Floyd Bannister (talk)         Add sources
35   Detroit Film Critics Society (talk)     Add sources
37   1994 in baseball (talk)       Add sources
82   Cody Ransom (talk)     Cleanup
299   Regional variations of barbecue (talk)   Cleanup
523   Sonic Heroes (talk) Cleanup
39   Méchoui (talk)       Expand
81   Memphis-style barbecue (talk)     Expand
129   Sonic Blast (talk)       Expand
12   Barbeques Galore (talk)       Unencyclopaedic
35   Indirect grilling (talk)       Unencyclopaedic
27   Hot stove league (talk)         Unencyclopaedic
59   Pittsburgh Pirates minor league players (talk)   Merge
380   Briquette (talk)       Merge
828   Montreal Expos (talk) Merge
34   1981 Major League Baseball Draft (talk)         Wikify
910   Hoisin sauce (talk)         Wikify
27   1978 Major League Baseball Draft (talk)       Wikify
3   Anchal Achan (talk)         Orphan
12   Aspid (talk)           Orphan
4   Abd-Allah ibn Numayr (talk)           Orphan
24   Siu haau sauce (talk)           Stub
5   Calvin Jones (baseball) (talk)           Stub
10   Commune-level subdivisions (Vietnam) (talk)         Stub
10   The Barbecue Bible (talk)       Stub
3   Gary Gray (baseball) (talk)           Stub
9   Orlando Mercado (talk)           Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter edit

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note.   Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition:   Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted   Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to   Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example,   Casliber (submissions) and   Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 09:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter edit

22:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013 edit

The Signpost: 10 July 2013 edit

The Signpost: 17 July 2013 edit

The Signpost: 24 July 2013 edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
1,457   The Jetsons (talk)   Add sources
8   The Barbecue Bible (talk)       Add sources
23   Floyd Bannister (talk)         Add sources
21   KC Masterpiece (talk)           Add sources
34   Shisa nyama (talk)           Add sources
3   Savage Barbecue (talk)       Add sources
329   Regional variations of barbecue (talk)   Cleanup
828   Hoisin sauce (talk)         Cleanup
138   Billy Butler (baseball) (talk)         Cleanup
37   Méchoui (talk)       Expand
88   Memphis-style barbecue (talk)     Expand
35   1992 in baseball (talk)       Expand
3,595   Gulf War (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12   Barbeques Galore (talk)       Unencyclopaedic
34   Indirect grilling (talk)       Unencyclopaedic
97   Pittsburgh Pirates minor league players (talk)       Merge
416   Briquette (talk)       Merge
9   Corner outfielder (talk)           Merge
23   1981 Major League Baseball Draft (talk)         Wikify
143   Justin Miller (baseball, born 1977) (talk)         Wikify
131   Jason Marquis (talk) Wikify
28   Kevin Barker (talk)           Orphan
1   21ème Siècle (talk)           Orphan
6   AERCO International (talk)         Orphan
22   Siu haau sauce (talk)           Stub
21   Ah-So (talk)           Stub
4   Calvin Jones (baseball) (talk)           Stub
2   Bob Adams (politician) (talk)           Stub
3   Wilfred Hildreth (talk)           Stub
6   Jack Lazorko (talk)           Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter edit

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's   Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today,   Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by   Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by   Piotrus (submissions),   Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 23:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Joan Boice, et al v. Emeritus Corporation for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joan Boice, et al v. Emeritus Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Boice, et al v. Emeritus Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GregJackP Boomer! 15:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 July 2013 edit

The Signpost: 07 August 2013 edit

Re:Signature edit

Ok thanks for warning me, I have removed it. However, I do not want to be contacted on my talk page for these kind of mistakes, I rather be sent an e-mail because it very embarassing when I violate Wiki policy, therefore next time please send me an email other than contacting me on my talk page, also, I will remove youre message, so users can not see what I have done. Thanks again!  — SoapFan12 Talk :) 17:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 14 August 2013 edit

Disambiguation link notification for August 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billy Bates (baseball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double switch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

FA Thanks edit

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial efforts that have brought Mike Capel to WP:FA status.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Congrats Albacore! Well deserved! ceranthor 15:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you both. I'm working on Billy Bates now, hopefully for another FA. Albacore (talk) 15:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
22   1965 in baseball (talk)       Add sources
164   Trichology (talk)           Add sources
99   Crimean Karaites (talk)   Add sources
42   Mangal (barbecue) (talk)       Add sources
8   Mırra (talk)         Add sources
324   European cuisine (talk)     Add sources
9   Kansas City Royals Baseball Academy (talk)           Cleanup
266   Grady Sizemore (talk)     Cleanup
83   2001 Major League Baseball Draft (talk)         Cleanup
62   History of the Atlanta Braves (talk)     Expand
258   Atlanta Thrashers (talk)   Expand
25   1979 Major League Baseball season (talk)       Expand
20   José Cardenal (talk)         Unencyclopaedic
200   Sarma (food) (talk)     Unencyclopaedic
511   National dish (talk)   Unencyclopaedic
19   Milwaukee Brewers minor league players (talk)       Merge
14   Kesme (talk)         Merge
1,460   Alternator (talk)   Merge
49   Cody Ransom (talk)     Wikify
22   1978 Major League Baseball Draft (talk)       Wikify
155   Synclavier (talk)   Wikify
3   Halguane (talk)         Orphan
2   Abraham of Aragon (talk)           Orphan
1   Akseki, Antalya (talk)           Orphan
5   Hoşmerim (talk)         Stub
1   Pete Koegel (talk)           Stub
13   Tahini roll (talk)         Stub
8   Şöbiyet (talk)         Stub
9   Chick Fraser (talk)         Stub
2   Dan Boitano (talk)           Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 August 2013 edit

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter edit

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

  1.   Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
  2.   Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
  3.   Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
  4.   Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
  5.   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
  6.   Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
  7.   Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
  8.   Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final:   Piotrus (submissions),   Figureskatingfan (submissions),   ThaddeusB (submissions),   Dana boomer (submissions),   Status (submissions),   Ed! (submissions),   12george1 (submissions),   Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 05:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 August 2013 edit

Article Feedback Tool update edit

Hey Seattle. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply