Appeal 05/08/2022 edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My account has been alleged for using multiple accounts and has been blocked indefinitely since 07-06-2017. I have never used such accounts to edit any articles on the Wikipedia nor did I own any account from those accounts and which are being listed in the suspected sockpuppets. let me make myself clear I have only one account on Wikipedia that is why I am still requesting you to unblock me that too from very long time I accept I have created a page “WCarPS” If anybody has edited it or deleted a tag on it how can I be proven guilty for the things I haven’t done. I hope that I can be of assistance in correcting my mistake and resolving the matter. While I have caused this unpleasant experience and I assure the Team it won't happen again. Sincerely, Sauood07 9:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal 14/08/2021 edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My account has been alleged for using multiple accounts and has been blocked indefinitely since 07-06-2017. I have never used such accounts to edit any articles on the Wikipedia nor did I own any account from those accounts and which are being listed in the suspected sockpuppets. let me make myself clear I have only one account on Wikipedia that is why I am still requesting you to unblock me that too from very long time I accept I have created a page “WCarPS” If anybody has edited it or deleted a tag on it how can I be proven guilty for the things I haven’t done. I hope that I can be of assistance in correcting my mistake and resolving the matter. While I have caused this unpleasant experience and I assure the Team it won't happen again. Sincerely, Sauood07 11:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sauood07

Appeal 27/03/2020 edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has been 3 years requesting for a sincere apology I owe to the team of Wikipedia a sincere apology for abusing multiple accounts back on 7 June 2017 for which I got blocked from editing on Wikipedia. It was never my intention to create such an awkward and uncomfortable situation. I hope that I can be of assistance in correcting my mistake and resolving the matter. While I have caused this unpleasant experience and I assure the Team it won't happen again. Sincerely, Sauood07 10:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock appeal 2019 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I owe the team of Wikipedia a sincere apology for abusing multiple accounts back on 7 June 2017 for which I got blocked from editing on Wikipedia. It was never my intention to create such an awkward and uncomfortable situation. I hope that I can be of assistance in correcting my mistake and resolving the matter. While I have caused this unpleasant experience and I promise next time it won't happen again. Sincerely, Sauood07

Decline reason:

The Committee has declined this appeal because Sauood07 has shown insufficient understanding of why they were blocked. They may apply to the Committee any time after six months. Appeals on this page should be redirected to the Committee. SilkTork (talk) 08:42, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note. Sauood07 has simultaneously sent an appeal to ArbCom, so the Committee will deal with this. SilkTork (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This is dealt with, and the matter is closed. SilkTork (talk) 10:06, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Appeal 31/07/2019 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has been 2 years requesting for a sincere apology I owe to the team of Wikipedia a sincere apology for abusing multiple accounts back on 7 June 2017 for which I got blocked from editing on Wikipedia. It was never my intention to create such an awkward and uncomfortable situation. I hope that I can be of assistance in correcting my mistake and resolving the matter. While I have caused this unpleasant experience and I assure the Team it won't happen again. Sincerely, Sauood07 08:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion and possibly conditions for unblock edit

Hello. It looks like you've waited the 6 months, so we can consider an unblock. But first, some questions and discussion.

  • Please review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sauood07 Had you and have you used any other accounts not listed there.
  • Have you edited from a different account or not logged in since the time of your block.
  • WCarPS seems a departure from your usual editing pattern. How did this come to be? There was an editing hiatus on this account, during which you used another account to create WCarPS. How did this come to be?
  • Hate to say it, but there was a question of WP:PAID during the SPI. Have you edited in return for any compensation or any other consideration, monetary or in kind, or in a "voluntary" capacity?
  • That's all I can think of for now. Any other admin might add to this. It's a start. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sauood Yaqoob 15:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Dlohcierekim Sir the accounts which are mentioned in this case are of different individual i only know one of those accounts that is Gouravnama from those accounts other i am not aware of WCarPS was page which was created which got us in trouble No compensation or any other consideration, monetary or in kind was done it was voluntary action i hope you will get me unblocked soon.

Appeal 18 October 2017 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i want second chance so that I may help better as I have been editing so long on Wikipedia and next time it wont happen again

Decline reason:

This does not address your abuse of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apeal 15 July 2017 edit

It should be there on Wikipedia as users can get information regarding this app and at the same time we want users to check Wikipedia for the information regarding the app which is famous in Chandigarh India Sauood Yaqoob 11:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am blocked as i have created a page which got deletion tag after few editors have edited it i don't understatnd why i am blocked in between this please unblock me as soon as possible

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. You will need to address that. Huon (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Save.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you.

 
This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19524 was submitted on Oct 18, 2017 16:41:47. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Works edit

April 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fatehpora may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Fatehpora''' ({{lang-ks|फतेह्पोरा <small>(([[Devanagari]])</small>, {{Nastaliq|فتح پورہ}} <small>([[Perso-Arabic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anantnag, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ITI and Delhi Public School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar edit

  The India Star
Salaam Sauood07! Thank you for all your contributions to WikiProject India related articles. Keep up the good work! With regards, AnupamTalk 07:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Tell me edit

Tell me when was Anantnag railway station electrified. In Kashmir valley no station is electrified. Owais khursheed (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Langate edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Langate, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://encyclopine.org/en/Handwara.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tral Killing edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tral Killing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jbh (talk) 09:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Killing of Khalid Muzaffar Wani edit

Hello, Sauood07. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Killing of Khalid Muzaffar Wani, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015 edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Srinagar, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Jammu and Kashmir does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

Thanks for making me aware about it next time i will keep this thing in mind!

Speedy deletion nomination of Kulgam (Lok Sabha constituency) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Kulgam (Lok Sabha constituency) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No such Lok Sabha constituency exists

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Abhijit Sathe (talk) 11:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Some baklava for you! edit

  hi i like ur page sauood Oknokwoonochie (talk) 09:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Asian Month Barnstar
Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 19:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon edit

Hello,

 

CIS-A2K is going to organize an edit-a-thon between 25 and 31 January this year. The aim of this edit-a-thon is creating and improving Geographical Indications in India related articles.

We welcome all of you to join this edit-a-thon.
Please see the event and add your name as a participant: Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Events/Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon

Feel free to ask if you have question(s).
Regards. --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016 edit

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


</gallery>

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month! edit

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

  1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
  2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
  3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
  4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
  5. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shalwan Pora for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shalwan Pora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalwan Pora until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sifan for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sifan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sifan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Isoo for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nepora for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nepora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nepora until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Keep up the good work edit

My apologies for nominating the pages above a little bit prematurely. Looks like you are working hard to improve the pages and are adding the infoboxes. Keep up the good work! If you have questions or need assistance, let me know! You are welcome to leave a message on my talk page or {{ping}} me here. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:25, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

New deal for page patrollers edit

Hi Sauood07,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Sauood07. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sauood Yaqoob edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sauood Yaqoob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU () 06:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Syed Altaf Bukhari edit

"is currently the MLA of this area" - which area? This article needs a lot more information, with sources. Cabayi (talk) 11:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • currently - from when? until when?
  • MLA - a member of which legislative assembly?
and you've still not provided any reliable sources. Cabayi (talk) 12:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Syed Altaf Bukhari edit

 

The article Syed Altaf Bukhari has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cabayi (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Re-initiating INCOTM edit

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Re-initiating INCOTM edit

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history edit

You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Indian defence services edit

You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Government Medical College, Srinagar edit

  Your addition to Government Medical College, Srinagar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of MCSSAN ITECH edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MCSSAN ITECH requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of WCarPS edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WCarPS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 08:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of WCarPS edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WCarPS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Smart city edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Smart city, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of WCarPS for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WCarPS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCarPS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate edit

 

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India) edit

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution edit

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sauood07 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I owe the team of Wikipedia a sincere apology for abusively using multiple accounts. It was never my intention to create such an awkward and uncomfortable situation. I hope that I can be of assistance in correcting my mistake and resolving the matter. While I have caused this unpleasant experience, I was blocked when I told other users to try to help me out of the situation when my page that I created with the name of WCarPS got deletion tag. I believe acquiring this insight will allow me to learn and grow and prevent similar issues in the future. Please feel free to let me of your thoughts and concerns over this matter.I want a second chance so that I may help better as I have been editing so long on Wikipedia and next time it won't happen again. Sincerely, Sauood07

Decline reason:

See Bbb23's findings below. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Discussion edit

Checkuser needed Can we get a CU to see if there is recent socking or if there are any other objections to an unblock? TonyBallioni (talk) 04:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Sauood YaqoobTonyBallioni (talk) Sir, I have been waiting from the last year since i am blocked for editing anything on Wikipedia for this mistake even after so much time i am not unblocked please its a request unblock me soon.Reply

Bbb23, I just saw you on my watchlist and it reminded me of this. Since you were the original blocking admin, would you mind killing two birds with one stone and running the check as well as giving any thoughts on the unblock? TonyBallioni (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sauood Yaqoob Bbb23 Sir, I respect your concern for any matter related to the Sockpuppet but sir, I just want to know why I am not getting even fist chance after I have done stupid act by a violation of T&C of Wikipedia check my record i was never blocked for any act please review my unblock request.


@TonyBallioni: I oppose the unblock. At the SPI, I found that three socks were likely to each other, two of which were Sauood07 and Gouravnama (talk · contribs · count). Sauood07 admits that Gouravnama is their account but denies any other socks. I also found that two other accounts were confirmed to each other but unlikely to the Sauood07 group. One of those accounts was Mcssanceo (talk · contribs · count). On the same day, December 2, 2017, both Gouravnama and Mcssanceo submitted unblock requests, which were denied. Based on the edits by the two accounts on December 2, I can now say that they are   Technically indistinguishable from each other and very   Likely to Saudoo07. The credit for this discovery goes to Berean Hunter.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Sauood Yaqoob
TonyBallioni Bbb23
I have mentioned it earlier that I only know Gouravnama (talk · contribs · count) as we helped each other to create that article on which we got blocked as we were unaware of how pages were reviewed on Wikipedia so, this is how it began for us but after the block we got to know we have violated the Wikipedia conditions. Sir, it has been six to seven months now from that date I have been continuously requesting you to unblock me but nobody out here is paying any attention to my request it will be your most kindness if you guys here unblock me now. Once again I am so sorry for any inconvenience caused to anybody of you here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sauood07 (talkcontribs) 10:12, February 17, 2018 (UTC)
No admin is allowed to unblock you without the consent of a CheckUser. Given that the blocking CU declined to unblock, and it appears multiple CUs are involved at this point, if you still think your block should be lifted your only option appears to be an appeal to the arbitration committee. You may do this by emailing them at arbcom-l lists.wikimedia.org. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unblock discussion and possibly conditions for unblock edit

Hello. It looks like you've waited the 6 months, so we can consider an unblock. But first, some questions and discussion.

  • Please review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sauood07 Had you and have you used any other accounts not listed there.
  • Have you edited from a different account or not logged in since the time of your block.
  • WCarPS seems a departure from your usual editing pattern. How did this come to be? There was an editing hiatus on this account, during which you used another account to create WCarPS. How did this come to be?
  • Hate to say it, but there was a question of WP:PAID during the SPI. Have you edited in return for any compensation or any other consideration, monetary or in kind, or in a "voluntary" capacity?
  • That's all I can think of for now. Any other admin might add to this. It's a start. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sauood Yaqoob 15:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Dlohcierekim Sir the accounts which are mentioned in this case are of different individual i only know one of those accounts that is Gouravnama from those accounts other i am not aware of WCarPS was page which was created which got us in trouble No compensation or any other consideration, monetary or in kind was done it was voluntary action i hope you will get me unblocked soon.

Project Tiger Writing Contest edit

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).Reply


WikiProject India edit

 

 

Namaste, Sauood07. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.




Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge edit

  Hello Sauood07. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kullam Chinar for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kullam Chinar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kullam Chinar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 17:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Forah edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Forah. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Furrah. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Furrah. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Iflaq (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

UTRS 46812 edit

UTRS appeal #46812 declined. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:20, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sir, Tell me how to get myself out of this this is really a hurtful for blocking me for so long please unblock me now I will follow all the policies of Wikipedia Sauood Yaqoob 11:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)