Satnam2408
Abhishek Sengupta 24, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Abhishek Sengupta 24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC) |
Welcome edit
Hello, Abhishek Sengupta 24, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Narahari Sarkar has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
— The Most Comfortable Chair 19:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)- The Most Comfortable Chair Thanks for these. You have also contributed and modified the article. Your contribution is really appreciable. Thanks again from the bottom of my heart. Satnam2408 (talk) 16:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kanyakubja Brahmins edit
In the article the editor added the Raj Sources which are invalid for castes articles see WP:Raj. And in the section of Social Status op added the content with random source which doesn't mention what he edited/wrote in the article see . He also added Ramanand in notable ones with unreliable sources and also added the Jayadeva which already have birth controversy same goes for Bhanabhatta given source by the editor is this which mention him Brahman of Kannauj/Kanyakubja not a Kanyakubja Brahmin what the op is trying to show. Similalry rest of the people in notable are added with poor sources. So I would say you must check them & also check the version histoy of the page as Sitush removed all these poor sources in previous version but the op re added them. OP is the sock puppet of this and is a SPA. And please also check the Jayadeva article op edited this too which can be reverted only by extented comfirmed users. Hemraj108 (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hemraj108 I would check those odds. Thanks. Satnam2408 (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Just to inform you that this user is likely a sock. So, if proven, their edits may get ban-reverted back to this stable version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hey Fylindfotberserk thanks for informing me. Your active role is admirable. Satnam2408 (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Most welcome
. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Most welcome
- Hey Fylindfotberserk thanks for informing me. Your active role is admirable. Satnam2408 (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Just to inform you that this user is likely a sock. So, if proven, their edits may get ban-reverted back to this stable version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks , I checked the page & sources. I am writing my point of view may be it can help.
- In section social status editor wrote this :
- During the Medieval Imperial Era of Kannauj, Kanyakubja Brahmins became the leading Brahmins in all of India, and were subsequently placed at the head of the Brahmin subcastes of North India
- which is completely violation of Wikipedia policies & it comes under puffery according to the Wikipedia rules. Also the sources given the editor , after searching the word Kanyakuba word shows 0 results. I think this section is not be present in the article as does not have any source as again the next paragraph see below in italics the editor is doing puffery
- In Uttar Pradesh, Kanyakubja Brahmins are considered the highest class of Brahmins. They are a Dominant and landowning caste but they are not engaged directly in agricultural operations. They get it done through agricultural labourers.
- Similarly in military section the editor is doing puffery by writing :
- Kanyakubja Brahmins supplied excellent recruits in the old Bengal Army. There were only two regiments of Brahmins in Bengal Army which recruited exclusively from Kanyakubja Brahmins. It is from this tribe that most of the soldiers in two Brahmin regiments 1st Brahmans & 3rd Brahmans were drawn.
- But when I check the regiment pages & cross verify the source its says nothing what the editor is wrote here see the source regarding this.
- In notable persons below the editor unreliable sources which are not academically approved
- Ramananda - see [1] academically approved sources
- Bhagat Parmanand - see [2] academically approved sources
- In below the editor used only one source link that is : this but when search the word Kanyakubja it shows no results.
- 1. Chandra Shekhar Azad
- 2. Bindeshwari Dubey
- 3. Dwarka Prasad Mishra
- 4. Nand Dulare Bajpai
- Similarly the editor add the pic of Jayadev which must not be there due his birth controversy. Also the editor is trying to vandalize the wiki pages related different castes see below :
- 1. the editor made changes which are reverted
- 2. the editor added changes to this page like editor wants to use Wikipedia as a tool of promoting his caste
- 3. the editor tried to vandalize this article which was reverted by other user
- 4. this article also vandalize by the editor which was also reverted.
- 5. Again the editor vandalized the article and at last banned for editing caste articles.
- So I suggest to please go through all the links I mentioned and also check the last version of Sitush is better see - Hemraj108 (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Panchagauda Brahmin edit
Satnam 2408 Kanyakubja Brahmin are classified as one of the Pancha Gauda Brahmin communities. Check this book please https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Ohk5EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA188&dq=pancha+gauda+kanyakubja+brahmin&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiTqbDN_L-CAxWxga8BHcgRCXoQ6AF6BAgKEAM#v=onepage&q&f=false (page 188) Federicoluizz (talk) 02:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)