Welcome!

Hello, Satkara! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Satkara, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Satkara! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Satkara. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Biblioworm 22:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
 
Hello, Satkara. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Becky Sayles (talk) 02:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

GOCE copy-edit review

edit

Hi Satkara, as you requested, I've reviewed your copy-edit of the article Thai Pongal; the review is available here. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

City of Angels (Thirty Seconds to Mars song)

edit

Thanks for your copyeding there. For info, the article is a former FA candidate and the nomination features some objections and advice :) --Earthh (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Earthh: I took a look at it! I'll go back over the article to make some more prose edits. The most confusing sentence for me was ""City of Angels" was first performed at special concerts, dubbed as Church of Mars, in May 2013, shortly before the release of the album." It mentions multiple concerts, but calls it the singular "Church of Mars". Should it be "Churches of Mars", or was it a tour, or was it something else? karatalk 19:08, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
It was a series of intimate concerts dubbed "Church of Mars".--Earthh (talk) 20:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've nominated (again) the article for the FA status. If you want to leave a comment, your help would be very much appreciated :) --Earthh (talk) 18:21, 21 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Calvert, Texas
added a link pointing to Owensville
Elizabeth of York
added a link pointing to Scottish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

edit

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Thai Pongal has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. "Malaria is a one-day celebration" isn't helpful and appeared to be spam until I analysed the diff; please use more helpful edit summaries as your edit appears to be constructive. Ogress smash! 20:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Ogress, I meant to type "Makara is a one day celebration" because the text I was fixing described Makara as both the festival "Thai Pongal" and the one day celebration "Pongal", when it should really have been just the one day celebration. Unfortunately I was editing on an iPad and hit "submit" before seeing that I had been autocorrected to "Malaria". I was hoping no one would notice that particular unfortunate summary :/ Hope that explains it! karatalk 20:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Satkara:, Okay, I was just checking and you did a few edits I had questions on. (Happens to me more often than I'd like.) Is there a reason you changed Tibetan Empire > Tibet on Emperor Taizong's campaign against Tufan? The Empire was a discrete and specific thing in Tibetan history and quite notable and I added a cite demonstrating it was a political entity with embassies in the Chinese capital starting in the Sui, if that helps? Feel free to reply on the Talk page of that article if you wish to discuss it or any other changes as that's the best place for it.
Speaking of which, you can flag people's attention so you don't have to repeat your replies by using the template {{yo}} - just write the user's name after a | or "pipe". You can even flag multiple people as, for example, {{yo|Ogress|Satkara}}. If you want a shortcut to just linking their user name, use {{u}} the same way, e.g. {{u|satkara}}. So you can go to Talk:Taizong BlahBlahBlah Tufan and make a new section and if you want to include me, just use {{yo|ogress}} when you are trying to talk to me. Ogress smash! 20:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Ogress: Thanks for telling me about the template! But I don't know what you are talking about, to my knowledge I've never edited a page on anything related to Tibet. I looked at the Tufan page history and I'm not on there—maybe you meant to talk to someone else? karatalk 20:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Satkara: I did indeed, I'm so sorry, I'm very sleepy and caffeine is kicking in slowly. Apologies. Ogress smash! 21:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Ogress: No problem! karatalk 23:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

GOCE requests tagging

edit

Hi. I accepted Madhukar Dattatraya Deoras for copyediting because it was the oldest unclaimed article on the GOCE requests page, but when I checked its history (to see if really was stable :-)) I noticed that you had already begun copyediting it. When you start copyediting a request article, please use the {{Working}} tag under the request. Thanks for your help and all the best, Miniapolis 18:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that, Miniapolis! I wasn't confident about completing the article when I saw it, but decided to edit it a little anyway; when I realized I would be fine, I finished it within 30 minutes and didn't think anyone would claim it in that time! :) karatalk 18:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Copyedit looks okay and you tagged it as {{Done}}, so I'll archive it. However, there were some inconsistencies in the dates; Indian articles generally use day-month-year format, and I fixed the lead and the infobox. Frankly, though, a GAN copyedit should take more than half an hour; the prose bar is higher for GANs than it is for backlog articles and non-review (non-FAC, GAN or A-Class) request articles. It's best to gain copyediting experience with backlog articles and request articles not awaiting a review, and you really have to do the others with a fine-tooth comb; the nominator is counting on you. All the best, Miniapolis 21:07, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Forgot to mention using the {{GOCE}} tag on the request article's talk page (I did this one); it helps at review time. Miniapolis 21:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Magadheera

edit

Hi. i observed your copy edit in the plot section of Magadheera. First of all, thank you for your contribution. But we cant afford more than 700 words for a film's plot in ideal conditions as per WP:FILMPLOT. Moreover, a clarify tag was placed which if clarified would make the narrative complex. The note also specifies that the plot summary does not follow the film's screenplay exactly. So, to ensures prevention of complications and summary within limits of WP:FILMPLOT, i reverted your edit. Please don't mind otherwise. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Pavanjandhyala, thanks for letting me know! I think you may have miscounted—my edit (without counting the "clarification needed" tags) actually did not change the word count at all, although it did fix some grammar issues. Of the clarification tags, the first could be fixed by removing "standing there" (which raises questions about where "there" is), and the second simply needs to replace "he" with a name (it is not clear from the sentence if Indu hates Harsha or Rughuveer). Were there any further issues with my edit, or should I continue? karatalk 03:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nope. You may continue. Replace the name if you watched the film. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Pavanjandhyala: Thank you! Unfortunately I have not watched the film and do not know who Indu hates, which is why I added the tag instead. Have you? If so, will you replace the name? Thanks, karatalk 03:56, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Done. I replaced the name as per your suggestion for which i would love to thank you. Well, one question. Can we expect the requests at GOCE of November 2014 be replied soon, as i nominated this film's article for a GA. Please do reply. Thank you, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Pavanjandhyala: I made the edits while initially looking over the article, but have not personally claimed the article on the request page. This means that it is currently open for any editor to accept and copy-edit, but I do not know when that will be because copy-editors work both chronologically and by interest. I expect the edit to get done within a month, and might look over it again myself after I finish the article I am working on. karatalk 18:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot for your help. Almost all the concerns were met and explanation regarding the adjustment in the plot is written in the Talk page. Hope you go through it. On suggestion of Ssven2, i submitted a GAN. Rectify if i was wrong anywhere in my work regarding addressing your concerns and nominating it, as i see you kept it on hold at GOCE. Thank you, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Thank you for doing the copy-edit on Dennis Rader. Could you please add the GOCE tag on the articles talk page. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Done. Let me know if there any issues with my edit! karatalk 16:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

GoCE edit

edit

Hi Satkara, I noticed you just made this edit to GamersGate which I gather from your edit history is connected to the GoCE request I'd made a few weeks ago. First of all thank you very much! Secondly I have never gone through a GoCE cleanup before and I am wondering what would be best for me to do. I'm tempted to jump in and start addressing tags such as the "clarify" tag you placed just now, but perhaps it would be better to wait until you have finished. Please let me know what you would prefer and thanks again! -Thibbs (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @Thibbs:! I made the edits while glancing over the article before accepting it, but have not yet claimed it off the request page. I may claim it later, or another editor may do so instead. Please feel free to edit whatever you like, as you like! If a major edit is going on, you'll probably see the {{in use}} template. Let me know if there are any issues with my edits. Thanks, karatalk 19:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
OK sounds good. -Thibbs (talk) 04:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oops. I just noticed this edit and your copy-edits. The ping never came through. An admin explained it to me when I tried to do the same thing actually. Apparently it doesn't ping the person unless you create the pinging template simultaneously with signing the post. So if you edit a post you already signed to ping someone then it doesn't work. Kind of counter-intuitive if you ask me. Anyway thanks for the edits! I'll take a look at them when I get a bit more free time tonight. -Thibbs (talk) 19:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Thibbs: Interesting, I had no idea! Thanks for letting me know :) karatalk 02:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William Augustus Muhlenberg
added links pointing to Episcopal and St. Luke's Hospital
GamersGate
added a link pointing to Escapist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Castlerea
added a link pointing to Supervalu
Magadheera
added a link pointing to Pooja
The Great Day of Girona
added a link pointing to Physicochemical

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Anbe Vaa

edit

Hi, would you like to copy edit this article on a classic Tamil film starring M. G. Ramachandran and B. Saroja Devi. This is the first MGR film to be attempted for GA on wikipedia. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 02:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

GOCE November copy editing drive awards

edit
  The Barnstar of Diligence
This barnstar is awarded to Satkara for copy edits totaling over 60,000 words during the GOCE November 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 1st Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Satkara for copyediting 22 articles during the GOCE November 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 3rd Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Satkara for copyediting 10 old articles during the GOCE November 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 1st Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Satkara for copyediting three long articles during the GOCE November 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 3rd Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Satkara for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 11,229 words – during the GOCE November 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 1st Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Satkara for copyediting 49,738 total words during the GOCE November 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

R U Professional - featured article candidate

edit
Notifying you, as you were the copy editor for the article:

I've nominated the article about the song "R U Professional" for Featured Article consideration.

It's a satirical song and a form of parody music using sampling.

Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/R U Professional/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

Cirt (talk) 21:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Satkara. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Satkara. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Grapevine Red Blotch disease

edit

Hi, I'm Elmidae. Satkara, thanks for creating Grapevine Red Blotch disease!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Nice job! :) - Please note that it is generally not recommended to use "naked URLs" as references, because the reference gives no indication to the reader about its location and content. Using the citation template is better. I have tagged the article for cleanup, and likely someone will be along shortly and sort those out; please do go over the result once more and polish them up. Cheers! --

Also, please add some categories!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Satkara. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply