User talk:Sasha Callahan/August 2007
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Clashwho in topic Three Revert Rule
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
 Archives | |
|---|---|
2007
| |
2008
| |
Comments at the deletion review of Ken Stein
Be as feisty or sarcastic as you want, but please don't insult users. Ichormosquito 03:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- How does being a jerk help us write a better encyclopedia? As you've seen, ad hominem attacks lead to retaliatory, bad faith disruption. If I were you, I would let the issue go. The noticeboard would not be sympathetic if they saw that both of you engaged in personal attacks. Just keep your cool, and everything will turn out OK. Ichormosquito 06:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Three Revert Rule
Who says I'm doing the reverting? The way I see it, whoever is deleting art rock from The Who's genre list is guilty of exceeding the three revert rule. I have backed up my argument with citations. You and the other editor have backed up nothing. Clashwho 23:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I suggest you read the rule for yourself. This is the important part: "A revert, in this context, means undoing, in whole or in part, the actions of another editor or of other editors. This can include undoing edits to a page, deleting content or restoring deleted content" (bolding was done my me to emphasis the part relevant to you). Sasha Callahan 23:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am also an editor. You are undoing my edits and deleting my sourced and properly referenced content. Continuously. Your edits are backed up by nothing. My edits are backed up by multiple appropriate sources. You are the one who ought to be in danger of banning. Not I. Clashwho 23:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Except I only made two reverts (and one wasn't even of your edit), while you have made 3. Plus, it is standard to issue the warning I did to help reach a compromise. For the record, the source you listed used the term "progressive rock" so I added that to The Who genre. Sasha Callahan 23:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Then it's the other guy who is being completely unreasonable. Thank you for attempting to help in a constructive way. Clashwho 00:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Except I only made two reverts (and one wasn't even of your edit), while you have made 3. Plus, it is standard to issue the warning I did to help reach a compromise. For the record, the source you listed used the term "progressive rock" so I added that to The Who genre. Sasha Callahan 23:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am also an editor. You are undoing my edits and deleting my sourced and properly referenced content. Continuously. Your edits are backed up by nothing. My edits are backed up by multiple appropriate sources. You are the one who ought to be in danger of banning. Not I. Clashwho 23:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)