Welcome!

edit

Hi SPC27205! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  — Tartan357  (Talk) 23:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note on reverted edits

edit

I realize it's probably frustrating to have all of your first edits quickly reverted, but please don't be discouraged from contributing further. Nobody expects newcomers to understand every procedure we have here, and editors are not expected to be aware of all consensuses relevant to the pages they're editing. There's only a problem if editors continue to try to make a change after they've seen that others disagree, which you have not done. See WP:BRD for an essay on the how this cycle often plays out constructively. — Tartan357  (Talk) 22:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dendeviin Terbishdagva moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Dendeviin Terbishdagva, does not have any references, and because it is a BLP, it must have at least one (note that unreferenced BLPs can be nominated for deletion (see WP:BLPPROD). It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). If you need help finding sources, please visit the reference desk. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thank you for your contributions so far, however; and if you need more help you can click this link to ask a question, or just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! Seagull123 Φ 18:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Valery Kvarchia moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Dendeviin Terbishdagva, does not have any references, and because it is a BLP, it must have at least one (note that unreferenced BLPs can be nominated for deletion (see WP:BLPPROD). It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). If you need help finding sources, please visit the reference desk. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thank you for your contributions so far, however; and if you need more help you can click this link to ask a question, or just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! Seagull123 Φ 18:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valery Kvarchia (March 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nathan2055 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, SPC27205! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

TOI-178c moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, TOI-178c, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve BD+48 738 b

edit

Hello, SPC27205,

Thank you for creating BD+48 738 b.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Does this exoplanet meet the notability guidelines at WP:NASTRO?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit (blether) 14:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there - sorry, the above automated message isn't very informative. My concern about that new article is that we have a set of guidelines - WP:NASTRO - which outline how we determine whether or not an astronomical object is notable enough to have an article about or not. I'm guessing that you know more about space stuff than I do, so perhaps you could read those guidelines, and if you think it's notable you could add some more references that would demonstrate that? GirthSummit (blether) 14:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of HD 159243 b for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HD 159243 b is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 159243 b until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lithopsian (talk) 19:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Dendeviin Terbishdagva

edit

  Hello, SPC27205. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dendeviin Terbishdagva, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Dendeviin Terbishdagva

edit
 

Hello, SPC27205. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dendeviin Terbishdagva".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Valery Kvarchia

edit

  Hello, SPC27205. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Valery Kvarchia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Valery Kvarchia

edit
 

Hello, SPC27205. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Valery Kvarchia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:TOI-1259Ab

edit

  Hello, SPC27205. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TOI-1259Ab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:TOI-178c

edit

  Hello, SPC27205. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TOI-178c, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

What is Saint Helena?

edit

Please link.Xx236 (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Saint Helena. SPC27205 (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

So link this in your pages. Xx236 (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Goof work on creating the Chief Executive articles, but please format the references properly. You need to use inline citations, not just put urls in the references section. Cheers, Number 57 21:35, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for R. K. Krishna Kumar

edit

On 2 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article R. K. Krishna Kumar, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ktin (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wei Lian moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Wei Lian, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 19:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Wei Lian

edit

  Hello, SPC27205. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wei Lian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Wei Lian

edit
 

Hello, SPC27205. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wei Lian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kimberly Remak moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Kimberly Remak. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply