User talk:RolandR/Archive 14
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
The Signpost: 24 April 2016
- Special report: Update on EranBot, our new copyright violation detection bot
- Traffic report: Two for the price of one
- Featured content: The double-sized edition
- Arbitration report: Amendments made to the Race and intelligence case
Translation help please.
Hey, you say you are a translator from Hebrew to English. Could you please translate this phrase:
הודעה בדבר בצגת רשימות הבוחרים לכנסת לשנת פנקס החוברים ה'תשמ"ו/ה'תשמ"ז - 1986-1987
If it will help you, I need it for a [trans-title] for a citation. Here is the source it self: [1].
Thanks.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Announcement about presentation of the lists of electors for the Knesset for Electoral Register year 5746-7 (1986-7). RolandR (talk) 15:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Blessings--Bolter21 (talk to me) 15:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
- Traffic report: Purple
- Featured content: The best ... from the past two weeks
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
- Ping. Please respond if you're still interested. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 June 2016
- News and notes: WMF cuts budget for 2016-17 as scope tightens
- Featured content: Overwhelmed ... by pictures
- Traffic report: Pop goes the culture, again.
- Arbitration report: ArbCom case "Gamaliel and others" concludes
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video Games
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
- News and notes: Clarifications on status and compensation of outgoing executive directors Sue Gardner and Lila Tretikov
- Special report: Wikiversity Journal—A new user group
- Featured content: From the crème de la crème
- In the media: Biography disputes; Craig Newmark donation; PR editing
- Traffic report: Another one with sports; Knockout, brief candle
Books & Bytes - Issue 17
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria
- New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
- Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
- New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
TWL HighBeam check-in
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you. 20:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 July 2016
- News and notes: Board unanimously appoints Katherine Maher as new WMF executive director; Wikimedia lawsuits in France and Germany
- Op-ed: Two policies in conflict?
- In the media: Terrorism database cites Wikipedia as a source
- Featured content: Triple fun of featured content
- Traffic report: Goalposts; Oy vexit
"Stalking" vs "Targeting"
I thought the term Target was better, since this person is after you. I would have to suggest the best way to deal with a person like this is to just ignore them and delete their emails or IMs. If they see you won't respond, they'll feel inclined to keep doing it and give up. Sometimes it pays to be thick skinned. Aside from the fact he's been hounding you, the name "runtshit" would be blocked in any case since profanity usernames are generally not acceptable anyways. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 08:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 July 2016
- Discussion report: Busy month for discussions
- Featured content: A wide variety from the best
- Traffic report: Sports and esports
- Arbitration report: Script writers appointed for clerks
- Recent research: Using deep learning to predict article quality
The Signpost: 04 August 2016
- News and notes: Foundation presents results of harassment research, plans for automated identification; Wikiconference submissions open
- Obituary: Kevin Gorman, who took on Wikipedia's gender gap and undisclosed paid advocacy, dies at 24
- Traffic report: Summer of Pokémon, Trump, and Hillary
- Featured content: Women and Hawaii
- Recent research: Easier navigation via better wikilinks
- Technology report: User script report (January to July 2016, part 1)
Changes Reverted
I have placed a new section at Talk:Karl Marx#Changes Reverted, please explain your revision there. DoomLexus (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity
would mean he ranks with Dolph Lundgren and, if my memory is correct, Clint Walker. Similar bravado fantasy world in public, too! Nishidani (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- I disbelieve the claim. It was a very dubious link, which I traced back to an unsourced assertion by Caroline Glick. It should never have been in the article, and should certainly not have been restored by a repeatedly blocked editor immediately on return from his latest block for breach of a topic ban. RolandR (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- So do I, that's why I cited the two other examples, esp. Clint Walker.Nishidani (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am sceptical not merely about Netanyahu's IQ score, but also about whether this claim had ever been made outside Caroline Glick's article. I was also under the impression that the highest official IQ score was 160, and anything beyond that was an unscientific extrapolation (not that "official" scores are any more scientific). RolandR (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Must be a change in method. In the standard test applied in schools back in the 50s, a 162 was registered by one kid in my class, and 4 within a few points of that. The genius went on to become a suburban doctor, with a hobby of drinking port wine. The fourth went up on criminal charges for malpractice, etc. To console those who wrongly attach value to such tests, and feel diminished by comparison, I suppose one should note that on that early scale Richard Feynman scored a measly 124 in high school, and became one of the finest minds of the last century. Nishidani (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am sceptical not merely about Netanyahu's IQ score, but also about whether this claim had ever been made outside Caroline Glick's article. I was also under the impression that the highest official IQ score was 160, and anything beyond that was an unscientific extrapolation (not that "official" scores are any more scientific). RolandR (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- So do I, that's why I cited the two other examples, esp. Clint Walker.Nishidani (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Hebrew to English
Hello Roland. Just a small question I couldn't find an answer in the internt. How can you translate the word "חניך" to something that isn't "student" or "pupil"? The definition in my context is "member of a yough organization", but is there a single word for it?--Bolter21 (talk to me) 01:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) According to Google Translate, it means "apprentice". Years ago, when I was a member of American Habonim, we were חניכים. I'm not sure, but I think Habonim Dror still uses the word. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Evidently the word חניך is no longer in use at Habonim Dror. Times have changed. 
— MShabazz Talk/Stalk 14:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Malik; that is fascinating! The idea of an inclusive Zionist summer camp raises so many questions, it's hard to know where to start. Many of my friends and contacts in Israel use the suffix "ים\ות" "im/ot", which is now quite common in leftist texts. But of course the same problem, in a different form, arises even in English, and my son demands to be addressed as "e" rather than "he" or "she". RolandR (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 August 2016
- News and notes: Focus on India—WikiConference produces new apps; state government adopts free licenses
- Special report: Engaging diverse communities to profile women of Antarctica
- In the media: The ugly, the bad, the playful, and the promising
- Featured content: Simply the best ... from the last two weeks
- Traffic report: Olympic views
- Technology report: User script report (January–July 2016, part 2)
- Arbitration report: The Michael Hardy case
Thanks for adding a reference, but I don't find it very convincing. I've found plenty of places where people are claiming they've heard this photo is fake, but nowhere does anyone provide any evidence or a copy of the alleged original photo. This art journalist could easily have just repeated some hearsay.
Futhermore, I've found at least two more similar photos taken at the same time, each of which shows a different facial expression for both men: [2] [3]. It seems implausible that a forger would go to the trouble of faking all of them. – Smyth\talk 22:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
![[3]](http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/communism-5.jpg){kind=link}
Additional discussion here, but still no real evidence either way. – Smyth\talk 22:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- The falsity of this picture is well known, and has been discussed in countless articles. Few of them, however, would be considered reliable sources for Wikipedia (equally, it is very hard to find a reliable source which uses this image without a disclaimer). I have read an article which reproduces the alleged original pictures which were spliced together to form this, but can't find it at the moment. For now, we have one reliable source which states that this is a fake image, and none which say anything different. RolandR (talk) 00:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 18
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads
- New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
- Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
- TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
- OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
|
Hello Roland, best regards from the Netherlands Amin (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 19
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti
- New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
- New Library Card Platform and Conference news
- Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links
19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Translation help
Hello Roland. How would you translate "הוא קיבל תואר ראשון בהצטיינות"?--Bolter21 (talk to me) 02:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- "He gained/was awarded a distinction in his first degree". Depending on the context, it could mean a BA with 1st class honours; is this possibly originally a translation from English?RolandR (talk) 12:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- The original text is: "בשנת 1998 חזר ללמוד במכללת ספיר, שם למד מדעי ניהול ומדעי המדינה, וקיבל תואר ראשון בהצטיינות.", which I translated as "...received his Bachelor's degree with honors", with the trust given to google translate. I"ve never heard the term "Bachelor's degree" nor "honors" in that context, so it seemed very suspicious to me.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Those would both be perfectly good English translations, understandable by anyone in Britain, and I imagine also anyone in the USA. A "Bachelor's degree" is a first degree, BSc/BA or other, while most degrees are awarded as a simple pass, or with Third Class, Upper or Lower Second Class, or First Class honours. It's not certain, but I would interpret "בהצטיינות" to mean First Class or Upper Second honours.RolandR (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Alright. Thanks.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Those would both be perfectly good English translations, understandable by anyone in Britain, and I imagine also anyone in the USA. A "Bachelor's degree" is a first degree, BSc/BA or other, while most degrees are awarded as a simple pass, or with Third Class, Upper or Lower Second Class, or First Class honours. It's not certain, but I would interpret "בהצטיינות" to mean First Class or Upper Second honours.RolandR (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- The original text is: "בשנת 1998 חזר ללמוד במכללת ספיר, שם למד מדעי ניהול ומדעי המדינה, וקיבל תואר ראשון בהצטיינות.", which I translated as "...received his Bachelor's degree with honors", with the trust given to google translate. I"ve never heard the term "Bachelor's degree" nor "honors" in that context, so it seemed very suspicious to me.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Charles Marowitz Birth Date
Hello There, Regarding Charles Marowitz birth date - I am his widow and in possession of his birth certificate. The New York Times worked with me on the drafting of his obit - I sent them a copy of the birth certificate. They are the only publication that used the correct date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allwinomar (talk • contribs) 00:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- The article cites the Daily Telegraph and the Los Angeles Times, which both state that Marowitz was born in 1934. You deliberately misquoted the Telegraph, citing it as a source for a birth date of 1932. This is not acceptable. If you think that the sources are mistaken, and that there is a better source, you need to raise this on the article talk page and gain consensus for this change. In fact, it appears that you have made the same edit in the past using a different account, when your edit was again reverted and our rules of verifiability were explained to you. You cannot simply assert that you know better, in defiance of the sources available to us. RolandR (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
ACTUALLY - I QUOTED THE NEW YORK TIMES AS MY SOURCE AND THEY GOT THE INFORMATION FROM THE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE I PROVIDED THEM WITH. I WORKED CLOSELY WITH MR. BRUCE WEBER IN ORDER TO GET THE CORRECT INFORMATION INCLUDED IN HIS OBIT. ALL THE OTHER OBITS ARE WRONG ON HIS BIRTH DATE. CHECK YOUR FACTS BEFORE FIRING OFF A RUDE REPLY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allwinomar (talk • contribs) 00:57, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- No, you didn't. You altered the year, while still linking to the source which stated that he was born in 1934. And all the sources cited in the article confirm 1934 as the year of birth. We need more than your assertion to alter this. And this discussion should be taking place on the article talk page, not here. RolandR (talk) 09:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, RolandR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- News and notes: Arbitration Committee elections commence
- Featured content: Featured mix
- Special report: Taking stock of the Good Article backlog
- Traffic report: President-elect Trump
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on 2016
- News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results
- Special report: German ArbCom implodes
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
Books and Bytes - Issue 20
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)
- Partner resource expansions
- New search tool for finding TWL resources
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikidata Visiting Scholar
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Translation help.
Hey Roland. I need your help again. I need to translate this sentence: "הסיבה לשינוי היתה ידיעות מוטעות על הקדמת פינויו של הצבא הבריטי מהעיר". Google translate did not help and I translated it as "...false reports of a fast British evacuation from the city" which sounds very bad, since I don't know what is the translation for "הקדמה".--Bolter21 (talk to me) 16:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Bolter. I'm on a train journey, so don't have my dictionaries to hand. "הקדמה" would normally mean "introduction", but that clearly does not make sense in this context. The best sense I can make of the sentence is "bringing forward", which would be clumsy, so it might make more sense to rewrite the sentence as "false reports that the British had brought forward their evacuation". Was the text originally written in Hebrew, or is it a translation? If the latter, I would suggest trying to consult the original. RolandR (talk) 17:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. The text is a quote from an Hebrew source. I think that naturally, since "הקדמה" is of the same root of "earlier", maybe "earlier British evacuation" might be the answer.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 00:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
User:Crissedcrossed
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 15:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 21
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikipedia Library User Group
- Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
- Spotlight: Library Card Platform
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Your comment in the SAQ Arbitration thread
I'm not even sure I understand the point of view you're supporting or opposing here:
"Statement by RolandR
No-one seems to have responded to Proximity's argument that "in a partisan controversy, no partisan adherent should be allowed to stand in for, to represent for his or her adversaries, their points of view --whether those points of view be of the minority or of the majority. Every camp, every arguant's position should be reserved for explanation, presentation and clarification by partisans, and only by partisans, of each point of view concerned." This is so clearly against Wikipedia's norms and guidelines that it cannot be ignored. Wikipedia is based on a neutral point of view. This does not mean that editors may not hold particular points of view, but does mean that we must edit neutrally. We should not ignore and dismiss the point of view of those we disagree with, and nor may we present our own point of view as unquestioned fact. Wikipedia is not a debating chamber, and articles should not be a place where rival points of view are presented and voted on. If Proximity cannot accept this basic rule, then they have no business editing anywhere on Wikipedia, and least of all in such a highly contentious article. RolandR (talk) 22:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)"
( by the way, I have no clear idea to whom you are referring by "they", above? )
I wonder if you understood my point-- "Every camp, every arguant's (i.e. disputant's) position should be reserved for explanation, presentation and clarification by partisans- (clarification: that is, by each position's own partisan participants rather than by their adversaries), and only by (those) partisans, of each point of view concerned." In short, Stratfordian partisans in the SAQ should have no more business exclusively taking on the role of explaining what their advesaries' point of view is* than the other way around--in which case, the Stratfordian partisans would be screaming to high heaven.
Am I to understand that it is this which you mean when you write that, "This is so clearly against Wikipedia's norms and guidelines that it cannot be ignored" ? Proximity1 (talk) 07:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Please clarify
You changed "at times" to "on one occasion" in this edit. MShabbazz asked you to clarify why you made this change. Please provide a quote or other proof that the change was justified. Debresser (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- If you had bothered to look at the article talk page before coming here to interrogate me, you would have seen that I have already been engaged in extensive discussion and clarification of exactly this point. That is what article talk pages are for. RolandR (talk) 12:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- From the editors: Signpost status: On reserve power, help wanted!
- News and notes: Global Elections
- Arbitration report: Cases closed in the Pacific and with Magioladitis
- Featured content: Three months in the land of the featured
- In the media: Did Wikipedia just assume Garfield's gender?
- Recent research: Wikipedia bot wars capture the imagination of the popular press
- Technology report: Tech news catch-up
- Traffic report: Film on Top: Sampling the weekly top 10
Books and Bytes - Issue 22
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017
- New and expanded research accounts
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)
- In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
- Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
- Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues
- Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth
- Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:
Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.
The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".
The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.
The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".
Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hebrew?
I somehow seem to remember that you understood Hebrew? If so, could you please tale a look at User:Huldra/Ben-Arieh? The Ben-Arieh article here has a lot of info about Palestinian villages, and I have tried to note which villages in User:Huldra/Ben-Arieh.
If you have time/interest, could you please check that I have gotten the names correct? And please add any one I have missed. So far I have only added villages which has been mentioned in the 1596 dafter, that is, this. I see Bolter21 is around, so Ill ask him, too. Huldra (talk) 21:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 August 2017
- Recent research: Wikipedia can increase local tourism by +9%; predicting article quality with deep learning; recent behavior predicts quality
- WikiProject report: Comic relief
- In the media: Wikipedia used to judge death penalty, arms smuggling, Indonesian governance, and HOTTEST celebrity
- Traffic report: Swedish countess tops the list
- Featured content: Everywhere in the lead
- Technology report: Introducing TechCom
- Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs
Books and Bytes - Issue 23
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017
- Library card
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
- Bytes in brief
Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Category
Regarding [4] and [5], see also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 September 2 and User talk:DVdm#Mass removal. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 September 2017
- News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL
- Humour: Chickenz
- Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe
- Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications
- Gallery: Chicken mania
- Traffic report: Fights and frights
- Featured content: Flying high
Books and Bytes - Issue 24
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
- Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
- Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
- News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!
- Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables
- Humour: Guys named Ralph
- In the media: Facebook and poetry
- Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK
- Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment
Maybe dial back template drama?
Templating an editor with an accusation of defamation or libel for an edit like this is not helpful. Your own edit summary said "Unhelpful, and borderline vandalism". It's quite a leap from borderline vandalism to defamation. The first thing to know about that is that the WP:BLP policy doesn't apply to criticism of a country. Your revert was justified, and perhaps a talk page warning was acceptable, but please dial it back a bit with the warnings.
You could even consider talk page discussion before issuing warnings, or other avenues of dispute resolution. Just my opinion. I haven't reverted any of your edits. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The edit I reverted was not criticism of a country; it was criticism (in my reading, defamatory criticism) of a group of political activists, and therefore covered by BLP. RolandR (talk) 16:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BLPGROUP makes that a dubious claim. If the group were a discrete set of named individuals, like say The Beatles, then it's more BLP-ish. But a movement can include formal members, leaders, followers, associates, contributors, supporters, sympathizers, fellow travelers. Defamation and libel are specific legal terms and if I badmouth Bronys, that doesn't mean any specific individual brony is going to have a libel case. Blowing it out of proportion shifts the dispute from their edit to your reaction. The overreach gives the other guy an opportunity to cast himself as the victim of a false accusation, and now you're the one playing defense. Would you rather focus on what they did or what you did? A light touch keeps your own behavior out of the spotlight.
You're indisputably on solid ground if you say the edit violates WP:NPOV, and that's a good enough reason for a warning and a revert. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- And most certainly not a final warning. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- It was an only, not a final, warning. And I gave that because only yesterday another editor had given them a final warning for vandalism. RolandR (talk) 21:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- And most certainly not a final warning. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BLPGROUP makes that a dubious claim. If the group were a discrete set of named individuals, like say The Beatles, then it's more BLP-ish. But a movement can include formal members, leaders, followers, associates, contributors, supporters, sympathizers, fellow travelers. Defamation and libel are specific legal terms and if I badmouth Bronys, that doesn't mean any specific individual brony is going to have a libel case. Blowing it out of proportion shifts the dispute from their edit to your reaction. The overreach gives the other guy an opportunity to cast himself as the victim of a false accusation, and now you're the one playing defense. Would you rather focus on what they did or what you did? A light touch keeps your own behavior out of the spotlight.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, RolandR. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 25
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017
- OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
- Gallery: Wiki loving
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
Books and Bytes - Issue 26
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
- Bytes in brief
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Speedy deletion declined: Tobias Hübinette
Hello RolandR. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tobias Hübinette, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I don't speak Swedish, but the article at sv:Tobias Hübinette looks like he might be notable enough. Thank you. SoWhy 11:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Notification
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WikiNutt's harassment of RolandR. GMGtalk 12:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
I apologize
Could you kindly refer me to the right English section where to report acts of bullying? I can not find it, thanks--Razorblade76 (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 27
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
- User Group
- Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
- Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)