User talk:Robwingfield/Archive/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

fc edit

Hi, I would like clarification concerning your AWB editing of the football (soccer) entries from, for example, {{fc|Example Team}} to [[Example Team F.C.|Example Team]]. According to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Templates the {{fc}} option is the correct one. → friedfish 16:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Templates such as {{fc}} and {{afc}} are not intended to be left inline, they should be substituted. I've left a note explaining usage at the page you mentioned. Robwingfield ^(talk) 17:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Kilmarnock F. C.

Couple of changes I have submitted, Rob.

Killies top league scorer William Culley not Gillies

Changed positions mentioned in article for Naismith and Invincibile.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by LondonKillie (talk • contribs) 13:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Reversions

No problem! I have you on my watch list now. I generally do anon IP recent changes and if i see an anon IP editing a named user page, it is almost always vandalism! I keep my eye out. Keep up the good work! If you need help with anything, let me know. Chris Kreider 15:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Thomas Burns

Hi - I've changed the Thomas Burns (vicar) redlink to Thomas Burns (New Zealand). Firstly it's inaccurate to call him a vicar (he was a rector), and secondly it doesn't really indicate what he's best remembered for - a bit like saying "Condoleezza Rice (pianist)" or "Terry Venables (scriptwriter)". Grutness...wha? 05:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Bulmershe School

You have just reverted the Bulmershe School article and removed all my edits including lots of helpful external links. The article as it now stands does not make any sense. It implies that the school is still a grammar school. There is no point whatsoever in including the breakdown of the ethnicity of the pupils. The page just looks a mess without the proper citations. Changes need to be discussed on the talk page. I will revert to my previous edit. I was trying to improve the article. As it stands it could well be a candidate for deletion again. Dahliarose

I've kept your edits to the external links, but readded the other content with full citations. The Kingfisher Table Tennis Club is irrelevant, and should have its own article if notable. The article could well be a future candidate for deletion, but as it was proven notable before (and now has full citations to prove), the nomination would fail. Can we discuss here or at Talk:The Bulmershe School before you remove the content in future? robwingfield ^«T•C» 16:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I think we need to continue this discussion on the Bulmershe discussion page. I will add some comments there in a minute. Dahliarose 17:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject:Sheffield United

Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Sheffield United!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?

• You can help comform United-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
• You can get free Blades-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
• You can create and edit Blades-related articles.
• You can help do assessments of Blades-related articles.
• You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
• You can help reference articles.
• Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about United!
• You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. The Blades have a long history. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above.

To add yourself to the project, add four tidles (~~~~) to the bottom of this page.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.

My user page

Hi.. I saw you edit my user page. Please don't. -- Mattythewhite 15:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Quite a while ago now, but yes. I was just correcting your typos (which I see you've just reverted back in!)... and there's no WP policy against it... but if you'd rather I didn't, I'm happy to oblige. robwingfield ^«T•C» 16:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, the reason I was so concerned was as my user page was mostly blank.. so I reverted it to my last version and was still so. I guess its okay for you to fix typos on my page.. I over reacted a little. -- Mattythewhite 19:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

"American soccer player"/"American footballer"

Just wondering if this change is standard policy now or something. I'm supportive of the change (NFL players are never called "footballers" so it's unambiguous and less awkward, in my eyes), but I have no idea whether I should begin applying it across the board, or what. Bill Oaf 14:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Emma Bunton's Downtown

Thanks! Actually, I meant to put it on "uncontroversial proposals", but I put it on "other proposals" accidentaly, but thanks anyway. :) Funk Junkie 16:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:3LW.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:3LW.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 22:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationales added, template removed. robwingfield ^«T•C» 23:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Gary Roberts

I noticed you removed my move of Gary Roberts from Gary Roberts (ice hockey player) to Gary Roberts (hockey). Having looked at the article again, he definitely plays ice hockey, not hockey, so surely my move was correct...? robwingfield ^«T•C» 11:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks for discussing, but no. To paraphrase Lenin, the purpose of dab'n is to dab'ate. And it should do that as tersely as possible. If "hockey" is sufficient to distinguish a contender for the title "Gary Roberts" from all the others, it is a successful dab'g sufx, and any elaboration on it would pervert the Dab'n mechanism, from its purpose as a navigational device, into some kind of substitute for the text of the article. The titles of books are primarily for marketing (George Washington: Hero of Independence) which can justify including some storytelling in them, but those of 'pedia articles are solely for identification. I'm not even looking at ice hockey and hockey, bcz i'm a native speaker of modern English, and i don't need a dictionary (let alone an encyclopedia, which is a poor substitute as a source of information on the usage of words) to tell me what matters here: saying "ice hockey" (since there are no air-, field-, or knock-hockey equipment, games, players, or teams around to be confused with the matter at hand) would provide no benefit, and would have a (small) direct cost and a large indirect one (contributing to the impression that terseness in dab sfxes is unnecessary or even undesirable).

(BTW, the dates in the other Gary Roberts titles are even worse, and having invested this much (away from my normal LoPbN-tree concerns) will probably get me to fix them as well, tho the correct approach is not in that case so immediately apparent: it will require reading the bios involved.)

Disambiguation work is necessary, and not a lot of fun. I appreciate your taking part in it!
--Jerzy•t 18:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, good points well made...! As far as the footballer articles are concerned, I used the year of birth as that seems to be an approach that's used in the same scenario for other footballers with the same name. Both players are English, so nationality can't be used, which is the other common attribute used to disambiguate players of the same sport of the same name... happy to hear any alternative suggestions you have, though! robwingfield ^«T•C» 19:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

You are far from the first to resort to it, and i admit it's better than nothing. Are you a fan? Bcz a fan is likely to do a better job, other things being equal. Yeah re nat'ty; i'm used to being a bug abt, as far as LoPbN descriptions are concerned, nationality meaning passport, and all those people having British passports, but i think used English vs. Scottish as dab'g sfx's abt a wk ago. (And i once resorted to "(lefty)" and "(righty)" for two American pitchers!) I think the most cogent objection to dates is that (even tho they are good, compared to say team name, in not being subject to change) is that (especially when the careers overlap) they don't tell most users at a glance which one you want -- they may be no more helpful than middle name, hometown, or randomly assiging "(psi)" and "(upsilon)". And (full disclosure) in my personal case from hell, the boxers Davey Moore, i gave up and used dates (fl. dates, rather than birth); you'll see why, i think.

In this GR case, my first glance left me considering somehow using prominence (as i once did with a major and a minor leaguer, IIRC), but i'm at the very beginning of thinking abt it. Your ideas welcome, fan or no.
--Jerzy•t 21:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• Here's what i see:

  '84: plays Left Wing; playing regularly since 2005; offered big money (big for pro soccer? dunno);

  '87: plays Defensive Midfielder; playing regularly since 2004 or 2005 (depending on which part of his article you consult)

  Very hard to find clear handles for them, at least with my poor knowledge of the sport's culture. At this point, unless you have more ideas, my suggestion is to leave it to fans, perhaps by just copying this discussion to the Dab's talk page & lk'g it from the two articles' talk pages.
  --Jerzy•t 04:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  

You'll never guess what i tripped over on my morning stroll: Hmm, another problem, or part of a solution? The problem, and whole solution.
--Jerzy•t 16:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Melissa_Theuriau_Zone_Interdite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Melissa_Theuriau_Zone_Interdite.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Apprentice UK

Hello, fellow The Apprentice UK fan! WikiProject The Apprentice is up and running, so if you are interested feel free to put your name here and start editing! Dalejenkins 17:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Apprentice UK

Hello, fellow The Apprentice UK fan! WikiProject The Apprentice is up and running, so if you are interested feel free to put your name here and start editing! Dalejenkins 17:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

MetsBot edit to User:Robwingfield

All contributions are strongly appreciated and encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Robwingfield is unwelcome as it not only migrated userboxes, but damaged other content on the page. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Thank you. robwingfield ^«T•C» 10:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the bug in my bot's code. I've fixed it now. —METS501 (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Emre Belözoğlu

While someone might be generally known by their first name in this country (many pop stars are, for example), as an encyclopædia we don't follow suit (it has a fanzine feel about it). His name is Emre Belözoğlu.

The en-rule, not the hyphen, is used to separate ranges of figures and dates.

You removed the reference to his agent rejecting the charge.

Sorry for the change of the references; I've transferred those over, but the name and the dashes are, I believe, in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. If you disagree, we could get a third opinion. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 20:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Pointless Edits

Well, those big gaps at the bottom of Reading players (about two lines of nothingness between squad templates and stubs) annoys me so I remove it. -- Mattythewhite 07:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Template_talk:Soccerbase#Removing name parameter

I was wondering if you could answer that last question I asked there. Thanks, Yonatan (contribs/talk) 18:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Verity Dearsley article

Biography Notability Discussion: Please could you leave a reason in the Talk:Verity_Dearsley as to why you feel that this article should be modified or deleted. This way it will give me a chance to update it - as of this time I feel the article is now fine. -- Thanks Zarief 20:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Zarief. As the tag states, I don't believe that she's notable. Please check WP:BIO for why I've come to that conclusion. This is just the first stage, to allow you to expand the article to comply with WP:BIO, so I've not nominated for deletion at this stage. robwingfield ^«T•C» 00:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Robwingfield! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Problems with user "SeK612"

Hi I am trying to contribute to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Bassingthwaighte but "SeK612" keeps undoing what I write. Please block him.

Nbwiki 15:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

WP Christianity

Hi, I saw your name on the WikiProject Christianity Membership page.

I've made some changes to the WP Christianity main project page, added several sup-project pages, created a few task forces section, and proposed several more possible changes so that we can really start making some serious progress on the project. Please stop by and see my comments on the project talk page here and consider joining a task force or helping out with improving and contributing to our sub-projects. Thanks for your time! Nswinton 13:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Fabrice Muamba

Hi Rob, thanks for adding the {{fact}} tags to Fabrice Muamba !! you encouraged me to do something about the errors that had crept in there.

Regarding my use of the vertical format of {{cite news}} - I find the text easier to read in that format, so naturally added "my" 6 that way round. Didn't think to notice whether I was going against consensus. Sorry! Struway 09:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem... I quite often do it for my own benefit as much as anyone else, as they're helpful place-holders for future edits... I can then go back and find sources or remove the statements at a later date. Regarding formatting of citations, I prefer to have them in-line rather than split them out, because it really bloats out a page when you're coming back to edit it later. I wouldn't have edited the page to do just that if I hadn't had other edits to make, though! robwingfield ^«T•C» 15:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bladeslogo2.png

Hello, Robwingfield. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bladeslogo2.png) was found at the following location: User talk:Robwingfield/Archive/Archive 2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Dave Kitson

Excuse me, but I really don't think you're informed about Dave Kitson. You should be ashamed to be a Reading Football Fan. If you bothered doing any background research, which you obviously fail to even think about, you will have known that he signed up last year on a 4 Year Course. If you do not believe me, you can access the personal files on www.bath.ac.uk, or call the general information office. Please don't be an incompetent moderator and check your facts the next time you revert my changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.38.232.8 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 23 May 2007

I'm not being incompetent. There was debate on this at Talk:Dave Kitson. Please debate there before making further edits. If you can cite an independent source which doesn't consititute original research, then this information can be added... but only if such a citation can be provided. The evidence so far suggests this is a different Dave Kitson. robwingfield ^«T•C» 15:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Template talk

Please do not try to take one comment, made by yourself, on a template talk and present in in an edit note as if it were an established consensus as you did today with Owen Hargreaves. Kevin McE 18:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I didn't do anything of the sort. Edit summaries don't allow for long justifications, so I pointed to the location of my justification. robwingfield ^«T•C» 22:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

OK: point accepted and apology made. But I am unsure as to what you mean by a claim of having made the "original version" on the Hargreaves page, and I would ask for your observations on my comment on the Sidwell page, that our default position should be that which is undeniably true, until consensus be reached (I hope it will not be: you clearly feel otherwise) that it is OK to anticipate. Kevin McE 10:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Owen Hargreaves

Just to imform you that one of those reverts was on a suspected sock. Not you. Another user. Kingjeff 23:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Please don't revert back to to that guy's version. He's a sock and doesn't deserve to have his version reverted to. Kingjeff 23:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Because it's the technically incorrect version. Hargreaves hasn't signed a contract with united. Kingjeff 17:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 Wikiproject Christianity Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter Volume I, no. 1 - June 2007
Project News Four articles are at FA level and sixteen are GA level articles. You can help by adopting a topic. There is a lot of work for this Wikiproject. Go to tasks to find out how to help. Please help with the Destubbification Drive. John Carter created the template {{Christian list}}. There are currently five article being peer reviewed by the peer review team. Please stop by and see if there is any way that you could contribute to those articles. It has been proposed by John Carter that the various other projects which relate to Christianity ought to all at least tag those articles which fall within their scope. That way, this project would have a better idea which articles do not fall within the specific scope of any of the other related projects. Articles can be "tagged" by placing {{ChristianityWikiProject}} in the articles talk page.	Current proposals and discussions We're sorry if you did not want to receive this newsletter, but this is sent to all Wikiproject Christianity Members as it is the first newsletter. If you would like to recieve this in the future, or if you wouldn't, you must add your user name accordingly here. If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 2 – July 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! Contributors to this Issue Nswinton\talk Wikihermit • Talk HermesBot
Christianity Articles by Quality Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively. Christianity articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Other ??? Total FA 10 8 37 125 3 1 184 FL 1 14 20 35 FM 201 1 202 A 1 1 2 GA 21 16 191 449 33 2 712 B 220 254 793 2,179 367 222 4,035 C 342 805 2,294 6,635 1 2,441 629 13,147 Start 224 226 1,300 18,657 2 10,442 981 31,832 Stub 11 277 14,711 8,310 482 23,791 List 13 38 697 996 2 78 26 1,850 Category 2 5 22,908 1,317 24,232 Disambig 1 322 18 341 File 1 875 31 907 Portal 374 1 375 Project 175 14 189 Redirect 6 40 108 693 1,674 574 2 3,097 Template 3 3 2,159 111 2,276 NA 15 14 10 39 Other 111 111 Assessed 837 1,399 5,717 44,490 28,818 23,751 2,345 107,357 Unassessed 4 4 Total 837 1,399 5,717 44,490 28,818 23,751 2,349 107,361 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 368,174 Ω = 4.99
We couldn't do it without you!
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

June 2007 Automatically delivered by HermesBot

Phil Whitehead

Was wondering what you mean by 'template not needed'? I assume you must feel strongly in order to undo my edit. Thanks. --Jameboy 20:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't think I had a reply from you before. Can you give some guidance regarding the height templates, as I noticed you are actively removing them. Are these templates deprecated or not? Do you have a link to the relevant guideline or discussion? Thanks. --Jameboy 21:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, your message got hidden by a subsequent one. Have a look at Template_talk:Infobox_Football_biography#Height_template. There is no consensus for using this template in infoboxes. My view is that it should be used as an aid to conversion of units, but as that conversion will not change, the template should not stay inline and should be subst'd. At the moment, subst'ing {{height}} makes things look clunky so I'm compromising by not removing it unless another edit has to be made, but there needs to be consensus to add the use of the template, not remove it. robwingfield ^«T•C» 09:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Oops!

I just noticed your comment on another user's talk page. I never knew that the standard for (loan) in the infobox was without the italics. The italics seemed so common that I never bothered to check the footy style manual. I will remove the italics wherever I see them from now on. Incidentally, do you know if there is a set of standards for the manager succession boxes that go at the foot of articles? There seem to be a few inconsistencies in them. For example, some display the F.C. suffix, some don't. Some have 'manager', some have 'Manager'. Some link to the club article, some link to the 'Managers' section of the club article, still others to the 'List of (club) Managers' article. If there are no set standards that you know of I will raise it at WPFOOTY. Cheers. --Jameboy 16:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:The Bulmershe School logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Bulmershe School logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

More detailed fair use rationale added... robwingfield ^«T•C» 06:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

footballer

Why do you think these articles should be merged. Footballer, although in a poor state, talks about all types of football. If anything it should be merged with Football not Football (soccer). When you add merger tags it would be helpful to explain your reasoning on the talk page of the article concerned. At the moment i don't see any discussion as to why they should be merged and i don't really see a valid reason. Comments appreciated. Thanks. Woodym555 13:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Lough Neagh in the British Isles or not.

Hello - I see you've participated in the TalkPage discussion at Lough Neagh. I have created a table of the different contributors and their views/arguments about the geographical description to be applied. I am proposing that, if there is a clear consensus then the article is modified to reflect the consensus amongst editors. I am notifying each of the people I've identified as having been interested of this fresh opportunity to reach a consensus and settle this matter. Wikipedia has a policy on canvassing, please do not breach it with actions that are, or could be seen as being, partisan. PR^talk 07:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Scott Davies (Irish footballer)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Scott Davies (Irish footballer), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Davies (Irish footballer). Thank you. Jonesy702 18:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Conor Sinnott

An article that you have been involved in editing, Conor Sinnott, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conor Sinnott. Thank you. Jonesy702 18:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Curtis Osano

An article that you have been involved in editing, Curtis Osano, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis Osano. Thank you. Jonesy702 18:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pierre Joseph-Dubois

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pierre Joseph-Dubois, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Joseph-Dubois. Thank you. Jonesy702 18:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Reading FC logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Reading FC logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Reading Fans

An article that you have been involved in editing, Reading Fans, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reading Fans. Thank you. WikiGull 22:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Eddie Anaclet

Thanks for clarifying what you meant. As a Torquay fan you'll understand why I found the comment re the Conference being amateur a little offensive! WikiGull 08:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

I just wanted to say thank you for your help! Magkaz (talk) 22:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Berkshire WikiProject invitation

File:Berks arms.gif

Hello, Robwingfield/Archive/Archive 2! I'd like to invite you to join the Berkshire WikiProject. It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Berkshire-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of members. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We hope to be working with you in the future!

Seaserpent⁸⁵ 01:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Berks arms.gif

An image that you uploaded, Image:Berks arms.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 08:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Merdenisianos

I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Merdenisianos. The reason is:

doesn't seem to come from a foreign-language Wikipedia, as CSD A2 requires

For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Andrew Cohen (footballer)

You've tagged Andrew Cohen (footballer) as unreferenced when there are two external links clearly showing who he is and the piece about being top scorer is clearly referenced. I'm confused! Paste (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Template help request

Hello. I notice you've helped out with Template:Fc. I was wondering if you could tell me what I've done wrong with Template:Nct, which I've attempted to from adapt from the football club template to work for national cricket teams.

Currently when I use it creates a quote esque area of formatting (see the Qualifying section of this version of ICC World Twenty20.

Any help you can offer would be much appreciated. Earl CG (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, it seems to work fine for me. Check out User:Robwingfield/sandbox, where I've used the template both (1) transcluded and (2) substituted. What I have done is remove the underscores from your template... but purely for aesthetic reasons! If you let me know which article you're having problems, and what you're trying to do, I'm happy to help there. robwingfield ^«T•C» 15:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Well whatever you did appears to have resolved it. Thank you for your time :o) - Earl CG (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Persondata

Hello and welcome to WikiProject Persondata! Thank you for joining up - it is very much appreciated. There's quite a few articles out there that could use Persondata! I hope you enjoy contributing to the project. Mouchoir le Souris (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Berkshire Maestros hi res CMYK logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Berkshire Maestros hi res CMYK logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

You have been granted with rollback permission. For more information, please refer to this page. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 13:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Chris Smith AfD

[1] ArtVandelay13 (talk) 23:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

You might want to have another look at this AfD, Rob. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.70.158 (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Curtis Osano

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Curtis Osano, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching request

You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. We're currently engaged in a program reset to help things move more smoothly in the future. If you are still interested in the program, please go to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching and re-list yourself under Current requests, deleting your entry from Older requests. Also, double-check to make sure coaching is right for you at theCoachee checklist; WP:Adoption or WP:Editor review may be more appropriate depending on your situation and aspirations. We should get back to you within a day or so, once a coaching relationship has been identified. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching match

Hello, I am pleased to announce that you have been paired with User:Tone as an admin coachee. You now have two important tasks to complete:

1. Introduce yourself to Tone and explain to them why you want to be an admin.

2. Once he has confirmed the relationship to you, edit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching to move your name to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to record the match.

Given the limited coaching resources of the Admin Coaching project, if you plan to take a Wikibreak of more than 30 days, please notify your coach or myself so that we will know not to tag you as retired and give your spot to another user. Remember that adminship is not a big deal and that it may take multiple RfAs before one becomes a sysop, even for a highly qualified, coached, editor. Also, remember that while admin coaching will help you prepare for the mop, there is no guarantee that completing this program will ensure passage of an RfA.

Congratulations again, and happy editing. MBisanz ^talk 08:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Nice to meet you. I will be happy to offer you an advice if you need one. I see you've been around for quite some time so you know the wiki procedures well, I suppose. When you have any questions, feel free to ask. I usually check my talkpage daily but if I will be absent for a longer period of time, I'll let you know. Have a nice time. --Tone 20:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi. How's it going? I realized I should come around more often, if we are doing admin coaching... The way I imagine it is that I present you a hypothetical situation you may encounter as an admin and you try to resolve it. And then we look at the way you did it. So, shall we try some? Greetings. --Tone 19:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Yup, sounds like a good idea! Fire away!  :-) robwingfield ^«T•C» 19:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, good. (Maybe it would be a good idea to have this discussion on a separate page, not on the talkpage? As you prefer.) Let's start with an easy one. You have deleted an speedy-delete tagged article, tagged as A7. The author of the article asks you, why you deleted it. For example, this one I have just deleted: Cherisse Osei (born Cherrise Amma Loren Ofosu-Osei, 23rd December 1986 ) first came to fame as the drummer in the English pop band The Faders. After the announcement of the groups split in July 2006, via their Myspace page, Osei initally joined the band Calaisa , before becoming the current drummer for the singer Mika. (that was all the content.) Please, argument why you deleted it and quote the appropriate policies. --Tone 19:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

???sorry about deleting info on nowra nsw???

I didnt even know that I had done it! I didnt even know anyone can change whatever on here??? Anyway, as long as its been restored and truth prevails! Ok cya... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.246.8.168 (talk) 07:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability of footballers

To answer your question on this AfD, the discussion took place on the main WP:FOOTY page here in November after fizzling out it was restarted here in February. It was clear that criteria 1,2,3 & 7 were supported by the vast majority and moved to the WP:FOOTY/Notability page, which had remained blank for over 2 years. Criteria 4 was more contoversial, we agreed to move onto other topics with an understanding that we would reconsider Youth footballers at a later date (definately before the World Youth Cup in 2009). Unfortunately after the two lengthy and considered debates, the new criteria were immediately set upon and undermined by editors from WP:BIO, in my opinion a victory for maintaining the status-quo over reasoned debate and consensus between members of a specific project. The undermining of these criteria have dealt a huge blow to my faith in the Wikipedia project and led to my virtual withdrawal from WP:FOOTY and severaly damaged the chances of the Wikiproject moving on to define clear, unambiguous notability criteria for other parts of the game, (clubs, leagues, stadiums, managers, referees etc). It frustrates me that we spent so long discussing the new criteria in order to end "notability by precident" and resolve the "Anderlecht issue" you raised in this AfD yet all of that discussion and consensus building can be overruled by one sentence from WP:ATHLETE. Oh well, never mind, perhaps I should stick to creating articles & categories rather than consensus building. English peasant 19:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Prods

Please check some of these articles that you are {{prod}}ding. At least three of them - Patrick Nyarko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Josh Lambo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and Sean Franklin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - have already survived an AFD. (I didn't look at the others.) A prod is considered to be out of order for an article that has been AFD'd. If you do have a desire to re-AFD any of them, please do them separately. The big problem with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Espinoza is that it was considering a number of different players with varying degrees of notability. Patrick Nyarko, for example, has been the subject of multiple articles by multiple media outlets, even before being drafted. Some of the others got just a blurb or two when they were drafted. Having a joint AFD really makes it difficult to have a good discussion/evaluation of each article and the reliable sources available. --B (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Additionally, please link to previous AfDs when you start new ones. It's very misleading to give the impression that it's just been a Prod and to not give the AfD history; it's standard to post links to those. matt91486 (talk) 12:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Yately Rd

I understand that you deleted my article on Yately Rd because because it provided little or no context to the reader. The Rd had been referenced from Herbert Tudor Buckland who was a famous architect of the Arts and Crafts movement. He is also credited with building the Elan Village at Elan Valley in Wales. Yately Rd contains the home he designed for himself and also others in the road. These are listed buildings, his own being Grade one listed. Can you reinstate Yately Rd as an article please. Canol (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Dave Kitson

why am I being told I tried to make jokes on the dave kitson page? I have not done this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.120.42 (talk) 11:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[replied on user's talk page]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 21:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Noel Hunt

Why do you keep removing the height template from Noel Hunt's infobox? I appreciate the information is not changing but that makes me wonder more why you are bothering to change it? The template is used on countless other football biography pages. •Oranje•·Talk 08:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Maidenheadunited.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Maidenheadunited.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Reading FC Season Pages

Can I start making a list of Reading seasons? I would like some help if I get the go-ahead! Clyde1998 (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace Cup Redddogg (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Seasons of Reading F.C.

Hi,

I'm going to start a new page for Reading. This will be done over the Weekend! Other clubs have a full list of all the club's seasons, why can't we?

Reading F.C. Seasons - The Page

Clyde1998 (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Daniel Lloyd-Weston pro footballer Port Vale England

Rob, You seem like an expert on this. Can you please assist with a page for Daniel Lloyd-Weston as he's now a pro contract footballer for Port Vale and made the first team bench for several marches last season and you were originally most insistent that he didn't make the grade as per Wiki rules. Ta very much. http://deletionpedia.dbatley.com/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Lloyd-Weston_(deleted_27_Feb_2008_at_00:51) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonylw (talk • contribs) 20:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Grzegorz Rasiak

I have reverted your change to the infobox - as far as I can see, the consensus is to include the player's full name, even where this is the same as the article name. Can you show support for your statement: "no further names known, so no need for fullname"?

The documentation for the template (at [2]) says under {{{fullname}}} - "The player's complete name". No mention of any exception. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 04:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi - thanks for the responses. Although you imply that you think it is "obvious" that the full name should not be included if it's the same as the article title, you have not produced any support for your point of view. The section is headed "Personal information" - surely someone's full name is an important part of that information.

In cases where I am in disagreement with another, long-term and respected editor, I usually refer to Featured Articles to see how they have treated the matter in dispute. The list at [3] includes two articles where the player has no middle or other names – Duncan Edwards and John Wark. On both of these, the {{{fullname}}} parameter has been completed, which seems to support my point of view. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

p.s. I hope Rasiak does well for you at Reading, and helps get you back into the Premiership. Hopefully, Southampton will be back in a few years.

St James' Park

I disagree with your recent move of St James' Park to sportsdirect.com @ St James' Park Stadium. Such a move really shouldn't have been performed without discussion first, especially as WP:COMMONNAME states to use the most easily recognised name. I somehow doubt that this full name will be used in favour of St James' Park... Nouse4aname (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Bulmershe School logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Bulmershe School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

First ever Reading Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Icthus

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Robwingfield! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Carey baptist church.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Carey baptist church.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nft

Template:Nft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Efs

Template:Efs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afc2

Template:Afc2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afc

Template:Afc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fc

Template:Fc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Berkshire

Hello, Robwingfield/Archive/Archive 2! I'd like to invite you to join the Berkshire WikiProject. It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Berkshire-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of members. BaldBoris 14:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Robwingfield. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JasonDonovanTenGoodReasonsalbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JasonDonovanTenGoodReasonsalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Robwingfield. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Robwingfield. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mammut logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mammut logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Soccerbase

Template:Soccerbase has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afc

Template:Afc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 18:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Editing block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robwingfield/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 94.174.38.122. robwingfield ^«T•C» 13:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That IP address is not blocked. That probably means you were using a proxy or a VPN, but have now disabled it. You need to wait a full 24 hours after doing so, in order to edit. Yamla (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.