Robertglan

Article review on Draft:Sybrid Private Limited

Hello, thanks for contacting me. The tone of the draft have improved significantly. However, I don't think this company is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. I think you would have a better time just adding the information to Lakson Group instead. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 14:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Sure thing. Let me add some information according to your instructions.

Thank you for your reply. Robertglan (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello Carpimaps,

Sorry for disturb you again. I have made changes according to your suugestions. I have included Lakson references. Can you please review it again?

Lots of thanks to you Robertglan (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for being unclear. I meant that the current information in the draft Draft:Sybrid Private Limited should be transferred or merged to the Lakson Group article. I do not think Sybrid can become a stand-alone article. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 14:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello Carpimaps,,

Sorry for convincing you again. Actually this company is very notable in Pakistan as it did alot during corona. It is sreading its business now and become more popular. Can you please think again before making your decisio.

Thank you brother Robertglan (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Does it meet WP:GNG? Currently, I can't find any sources that gives significant coverage to this company. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 14:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Dear Carpimaps,

I have provided lots of independent references according to WP:GNG. Including Express tribune news coverages as well. And, can not merge it with Lakson as both are different companies and both have different CEOs. Please review it again.

Thank you Carpimaps Robertglan (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Dear Carpimaps,

If you are talking about any significant coverage so please see references number 06.

Thank you for your suggestion Robertglan (talk) 15:03, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Again, I have read thoroughly WP:GNG then included a detailed reference in which a primary subject is only Sybrid Private limited. Can you please review it again and let me know if any changes are required.

Thank you dear Robertglan (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Junaid Akram

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Junaid Akram, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sybrid Private Limited (May 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

scope_creep^Talk 09:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Robertglan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creepTalk 09:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

July, 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Sybrid Private Limited a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Sybrid Pvt Ltd. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sybrid Pvt Ltd (July 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Greenman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This appears to be an attempt to get around the rejection of Draft:Sybrid Private Limited.

Greenman (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abbasshaikh124 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasshaikh124. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)