Latest comment: 16 years ago8 comments1 person in discussion
While I appreciate you trying to patrol the article, but we have not reached consensus on the issue and if you read the talk page. WP:GAMEGUIDE does not apply to this. While you are doing good faith edits, you are potentially violating the 3RR rule, just a heads up. --TrUCo9311 21:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well yeah, but when you are doing this, you are edit warring basically and if an admin sees the history page of the article and you have done more than 3 reverts, than you might be blocked. But please voice your opinion on the matter in the talk page. Also for your sigs, for the first one did you take the idea from me from my previous sigs?TrUCo9311 22:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah that's cool. IDk if you answered this in my previous question, for your first signature, did you get the idea from my previous signature? Also what are you using internet explorer or mozilla firefox?TrUCo9311 22:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, cuz I was wondering if I could put a redirect link on your sig history on your first signature where you said user, to my user page. I wouldn't mind, and if its ok with you. Also idk if you see this on your version of fire fox, but your header with your name doesnt stretch all the way and isnt like complete. Like you can see the real wording that is suppose to be there ie. "User talk:NimiTize", do you see what I mean?TrUCo9311 22:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Y-Well there you go, idk if you saw what I meant, like now your header is bigger and covers the original wording. I fixed it for you.TrUCo9311 22:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh well on mine it look different..it looks perfect. Ok I will shrink it, also how did u take an image of it that fast?TrUCo9311 22:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
So is it in a good size now? Also, wow cool program.--TrUCo9311 22:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yep, we cool.TrUCo9311 22:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
No probs. See La Chapelle-Anthenaise now. It will take weeks before all the infoboxes are added but we are years behind with these places and really they should be half decent articles by now not red links. First phase it to actually get them up and runnign however minimal. Regards ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦$1,000,000? 20:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Yeah your coding is fine, if the header reads fine its obvious that the header code is good. I checked it myself though, and I found nothing wrong. You're learning Wiki coding!--TrUCo9311 00:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Royal Rumble (2005) and Over the Edge (1998) have been listed for Peer review. Please review this article and make suggestions for how it can be improved in preparation for a Good article nomination. Their peer reviews can be found here and here.
Ron Killings is still being reported as having signed a WWE contract. As there is no reliable source for anything of the sort, be prepared for his name to be continually added to the WWE Roster article, and information about his return being added to his article. There is also, apparently, an audio interview with Killings where he states he will be returning to WWE with his old K-Kwik gimmick. Recent SmackDown! Taping spoilers indicate that he debuted under the name Kwik Killings in a Dark match. No reliable source has reported this as of now, however.
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
LAX has been promoted to admin status. His RfA can be seen here.
Next week's interviewees are D.M.N. and 3bulletproof16. Submit a question to ask them here. 3bulletproof16 has confirmed that he will indeed be taking part in the interview, even though he has retired.
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
Since the last newsletter, the number of stub articles has dropped by 45 while the total number of wrestling articles continues to grow. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve. Please check it out and see what you can help with (even if you can only add a few details or a couple of references).
Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I guess it varies by cable station. Usually RAW does end around 11:05, although WWE has leeway to go longer. BTW, my cable station is Time Warner (or was. I'm without cable for the moment until my dad pays the money he owes them). TJSpyke 01:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago49 comments3 people in discussion
You're welcome and thanks for signing mine. Well, try not to make WrestleMania your priority. But, it will be cool if you do take pictures. ;) And sorry if I have been hard on you lately. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 22:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I remember I was. Sorry. Do you anything about working on PPV's? And, thanks. Your cool too. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
OMG, my message seems to say that I'll add you to my page, if you work on Unforgiven. Its written backwards. I'll add you to my page, whether you did or not do something for Unforgiven. Hope that made sense. But, thanks again. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Have a good time! SexyiMatthew2008 00:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well you seem to be friendly with some users I'm friendly with, so I thought I would wish you a good time. SexyiMatthew2008 00:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your welcome, and thanks for signing mine. SexyiMatthew2008 00:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its cool. Just hit me when you are stuck on something or when your done. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Flair becoming IC champion. (don't mention his IC win as his first) --Sexy ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Is it easy working on the Event or... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alrighty then. Oh, remember to keep the matches in the past tense. Since it happened in '05. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
It looks fine. Good job. But, I can't stop laughing on this. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry, you made my day. ;) Well, I was planning on shortening the Cena and DX match at Vengeance '06... but, do you want to see what you can do? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Be my guest and short them up. Just those two. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome. One more; can you expand (a little more) / re-write the Event for Unforgiven '03? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for taking the time to do this. LAX, Matt and I will be grateful. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate you trying to help us with Unforgiven, but could you please try to trim it down some. There is no need for that much play-by-play, just note the momentum changes. For an example, see SummerSlam (2007). --Sexy LAX 10:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Will do. BTW, I'm in no rush, so you can do it whenever you get the time to. --Sexy LAX 21:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I thought Blue said she was going to work on it (the aftermath). --Sexy LAX 21:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know, I've never doubted you. I probably will have to do some cleanup (no offense to you). --Sexy LAX 21:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I just meant that since you are somewhat new to WP:PW, I would probably have to do some cleanup. Nothing more, nothing less, and nothing personal. ;) --Sexy LAX 21:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright, glad you understand. ;) --Sexy LAX 21:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good. --Sexy LAX 21:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good job, man. ;) Thanks for working on it. Would you like to work on Backlash '05? That's if your not busy. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its cool, me and LAX can make a cleanup, but thanks for helping. Alright, do you want to create Backlash by sandbox or create the article? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Refs: Go here, here and here. Do you mind working on the Triple H and Batista feud? Also, watch out for Cimmo. He tends to write the feuds in his POV. Just wanted to let you know. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright, its no problem. If its cool with you, I'd like the HBK and Hogan vs Davairi and Hassan feud. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, man. I really appreciate it. Also, the other undercard match was between Edge and Chris Benoit. Thought I should let you know. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, I'll give you some pointers. Look at Unforgiven (2003) and read the Triple H and Goldberg feud and try to do that. If you still are stuck, then I'll work on it and maybe you can work on the Event or Aftermath. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Don't make Backlash your priority. Just do what you can. ;) Also, we might have to create Backlash, since Cimmo has decided he wants to create the article. Thoughts? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, he has a tendency to create things and then delete them. See his talk page or his contributions and you'll know what I'm talking about. But, if you want to create it by sandbox, then that's fine with me. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, if he adds something in his POV, revert it, since POV its not allowed in Wikipedia. Just sayin'. Are you going to work on the Event after your done with the Triple H and Batista feud? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Just wanted to make sure. If you don't want to do it, then its fine. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Yes, do check on his edits. He likes to target the articles that I've expanded in the past. Do you mind checking on those? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cool. I guess you really do have my back. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Question: Do you think I would make a good Admin? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I was waiting when I hit the 10,000 edit and consider going into the Adminship. But, I don't know if I would make a good or bad Admin. Thanks for thinking of me, but I'll wait until the 10,000 edit. Is that cool or... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I'll wait. Let's see what the future holds. ;) After Backlash, do you have another PPV in mind? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cool. Then we can work on Survivor Series '04. Thoughts? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Awesome. Sorry for making your talk page long. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. I guess you'll have to get use to this. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, NimiTiz. I've found verifiable sources showing this to be a book for teaching children that is probably notable. Dlohcierekim 23:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, just letting you know I declined the speedy deletion. --Canley (talk) 02:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hi NimiTize. An article need not obviously meet WP:N to not meet WP:CSD. That's what PROD and AfD are for. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 03:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Right now, I'm currently busy with the GA review for Unforgiven '04, but if you see No Way Out '04, you can see the difference between your edits and the articles. Hope that helps. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, the only thing I'm saying that I can't make any changes, because of the GA review, but if you see No Way Out, you'll be fine. Oh, yeah if I were you notify Wikipedia about the new messages. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Thanks for notifying me of this, I have now added "-" and like that it is not taken. But thank you so much, you deserve this.
The Minor Barnstar
For finding the username flaw, during the process of changing my username, I Truco award this Barnstar to NimiTize. you also deserve thisTrUCo9311 05:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why do you put pages up for AfD, and tag them for being uncited, when you could just ask Blofeld for proof? Basketball110what famous people say ♣ 19:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Alright you weren't to know that I have clearance from the arbitration committee to create unreferenced stubs. I wouldn't normally but here goes:
Notice to new page patrollers: If you are visiting with a criticism about lack of full information for the new French commune articles or references the answer is yes, initially they are indeed short new articles. This has been discussed and approved in an AN/I discussion. The thing is at least five smaller wikipedias have had half decent articles on these for five years and english wikipedia is lagging way behind. These have been missing too long. It is easier to establish the pages and then build the articles upon it afterwards. Have patience and in time these will develop even fully and images, infoboxes will be added etc will be available. It is now the responsibility of WikiProject French communes to develop these to the next level and add infoboxes and to translate from french to write the articles. You may not be aware of how much could actually be written for each of these if this is given time to develop. I believe I am setting up something very useful to build upon in the future. PLease show me the respect by not disturbing me while these articles are started. All the best and regards
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
can i have your Randy Orton photo so i can out it on my userpage and your userpage is mad and i am giving you credit because your userpage is just mad Cimmo 23:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Cimmo (talk) 23:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
can i help you on your backlah 2005 when you put it into an article. Cimmo 23:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Cimmo (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
you can put the Randy Orton photo on my userpage. you have permission to go to my userpage and put the randy orton photo and you can add the credit. Cimmo (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion
You have been invited to join The Kliq. Before you become a part of The Kliq, you need to be voted in by the current members. Before you are voted in (or not), we'd like you to accept your nomination here. Thanks! iMatthew2008 16:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
(x-posted)
Congrats NimiTize, you are now a member of The Kliq. Please go to The Kliq's talk page, and go to the last discussion about our coming up PPV project. D.M.N. and bulletproof will be returning to the group for one final PPV project. The only thing left, is what PPV do we work on? So please go to the talk page, and select a few PPV' you'd like to work on for this project. Voting will begin soon. iMatthew2008 21:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Welcome! If you have any PPV's in mind, please note them on the page. Thanks! iMatthew2008 23:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your very welcome! Please go to The Kliq's talk page again, the next round of voting is up. Thanks! iMatthew2008 23:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
-- Hi what is wrong with the edit I made to the PS3 article? it correctly highlighted the fact that a lot of people are ruining their PS3 by upgrading to the latest firmware. Is this wrong? Furrycushion (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
-- It doesn't affect just linux, it greatly restricts programming on all non-sony designed software. So this affects homebrew games and video players such as an XBMC on the PS3. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furrycushion (talk • contribs) 17:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
-- OK, so you would be happy for me to add this back if I had a source for this information? I personally think its very important because people are permanently damaging the potential of their PS3 by applying this upgrade. Furrycushion (talk) 17:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments1 person in discussion
Thanks for the signature! Keep up the good editing! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
NiciVampireHeart has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Hey. my first smile! LOL. Thanks, man, and I was just returning the favour! ;) Happy editing! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Of course! I'll add ya to mine as well! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yea, that's absolutely fine, and thanks for the barnstar!! It's so nice of you! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
LOL! I appreciate it man, seriously. See ya 'round the 'pedia! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey thanks! Sorry for the delay in replying, only just noticed your message! *Sigh* Anyway, I appreciate the thought man! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 03:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments1 person in discussion
may I kindly ask why you have reverted my Xbox 360 edit's, as all of them were improvements that are closer to provable facts than your own original version you reverted to.
Let me explain why, and why I made the improvements.
I improved a illogical sentence, I wrote
An Xbox 360 displaying the "Red Ring of Death", a "general failure error"
which makes perfect sense, the original does not, as the red lights do not display "the console's hardware fault indicator", as the sentence in the the reverted version implies.
I corrected a chronological order,
Since these problems surfaced, design....
comes chronologically before
"In February 2008 an examination of 1040 "
as the first happened in June 2007, while the second happened in February 2008, reverting my correction is therefore factually wrong.
I corrected a less well documented number with a better documented number. The number of 171 instead of 164 is the more correct number coming from the factually most reliable source of the two. This source does not just mention a number, but even gives info to how the number is reached with a point by point sum of it's exponents. So reverting back to 164 is wrong!
I added a significant fact, that's in the original data on which the passage is based. My correction that the three year warranty is only valid for general failure errors (as shown by the three red error lights) is both significant, and is proven by the source, which I even quoted. reverting this edit removes significant and proven information.
So why did you revert these valid edits?
I don't want to start a reversal war, but at least explain the reversals. Mahjongg (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your reaction on my talk page:
Two dont make sense including
"In February 2008 an examination of 1040 "
But
Xbox 360 Red Lights are known as a hardware faulty."
Yours had two, ", which does not need to be included
Does not make any sense to me, please explain what does not make sense in "In February 2008 an examination of 1040.." And where did I write "Xbox 360 Red Lights are known as a hardware faulty."??? I did write no such thing, and what do you mean by
Yours had two, ", which does not need to be included
P.S. the only sense I can make of your reply that I used too many quote signs, what ever that means, but I made FIVE significant edits, and you reverted them all instead or correcting some quote signs you say were "too many"?! Sorry, but I need a better reason. Mahjongg (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You replied (on my talk site)
"In February 2008 an examination of 1040 ", dosent make sense.
My answer what doesn't make sense in this sentence?
All consoles manufactured after June 2007 have a second GPU heatsink to reduce overheating. But in February 2008 an examination of 1040 Xbox 360s by SquareTrade still found a 16.4% (one in six) failure rate.
First sentence claims that All consoles manufactured after June 2007 have a second GPU heatsink ..., which is a fact, but it's also a fact that half a year a test was done, and this was found An examination of 1040 Xbox 360s by SquareTrade still found a 16.4% (one in six) failure rate. Well, if you are suggesting the words "But in" and "still" are improper, as many of the systems tested might have been from before June 2006, then to a degree I can agree with that, but I do not see much more wrong with this order of sentences. or their syntax or logic. So I still fail to see what is syntactically or logically wrong with But in February 2008 an examination of 1040 Xbox 360s by SquareTrade still found, but let's assume its the "But in" and "still" that has you bothered. No problem, Ill remove them. Mahjongg (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm not saying you have to remove anything, just in my opinon I think it souldent be added. NimiTize 21:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
What should not be added ? The quote? Well I have removed that. And so far as I know it's the only significant part I added. Is the quote what you meant? Mahjongg (talk) 21:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes? NimiTize 21:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes ? Why the question mark? Oh never mind.... Mahjongg (talk) 22:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cool. I remembered my days when I attended shows and PPV's. Anyways, do you want to put Backlash on hold? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, the first three weeks I have tutoring and I might only edit here and there. But, I'll manage to edit some stuff. And, because I don't want you going through the article alone. ;) No, it just brought me back to the shows that I've attended. I was suppose to go to NWO '08, but I didn't. Is this your first show? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
You kept accusing User:Cimmo about violating WP:OWN, when in reality he commited no such violation. No user owns any design here on Wikipedia, and can be endlessly copied and mimicked without any violation of any guideline, because [b]everything[/b] on Wikipedia is Wikipedia's and not the user's. I understand that it is more cordial to ask the user for permission and not simply just take it, but by doing so, he doesn't violate any guideline, so please don't incorrectly tell him otherwise. Cheers, AlexT/CGuest Book 01:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You wrote this:
"Please stop copying parts of other user's userpage without permission, see WP:OWN for more details. NimiTize 22:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)"
However, that sentence contradicts itself, because WP:OWN statesthat anyone can copy parts of other users' pages without permission, because those users don't own their user pages. It's clearly states in WP:OWN. The problem is that the user is not familiar with it, and you were incorrectly defining the guideline to him. Please understand guidelines better yourself before explaining them to newer users. Thanks, AlexT/CGuest Book 01:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
