User talk:RkOrton/Archive 1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by LessThanClippers in topic Legend Thriller
"Oh Who Would Ever Wanna Be King?" | Userpage | Talk Page | Contributions | Guestbook | Signatures
 10:30 pm (EST) 
Archive 1 Jump to Archive II →

WWE Raw edit

I reverted your edits because the new sets information should be added after it happens. Wikipedia is not a news site, so adding future events like so is not good to the article. The HD info should only remain. --TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 20:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Makes no sense if that sould remain, but not the sets? NimiTize 22:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter edit

Delivered: 17:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Fair use rationale for Image:RAW NEW SET.PNG edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RAW NEW SET.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cheers, LAX 22:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:RAW NEW SET.PNG edit

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:RAW NEW SET.PNG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cheers, LAX 22:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is Fair-use and not free because anyone who attends RAW, could simply take a picture of the set. That picture would be FREE, the image you uploaded is Fair-use, not Free. (see: WP:NFCC) Cheers, LAX 03:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Xbox360DashboardLive.png edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Xbox360DashboardLive.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your NEW Raw set image edit

Unfortunately the copyrighted image will have to be deleted. The image is of an existing, accessible, object and therefore a replaceable fair use image. A free image will soon become available, but in the mean time please refrain from uploading any more replaceable fair use images. Thank you.-- bulletproof 3:16 03:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regardless of when the image will be deleted, it cannot be used in the article per WP:FU/WP:IUP.-- bulletproof 3:16 03:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RAW NEW SET.PNG) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:RAW NEW SET.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shawn Michaels edit

Listen, I don't want to start an edit war with you, but yes he does perform an elbow drop and proceeds to tune up the band, but if you've seen, the superkick has always been blocked, therefore it doesn't count to be added next to finisher's info. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

When creating Wiki links... edit

When creating Wiki links, you don't need to add a space in between the brackets. For example: just type [[Xbox Live]] instead of [[ Xbox Live ]]. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 03:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:WWE RAW LOGO.png edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WWE RAW LOGO.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:SmackdownHD.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SmackdownHD.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- bulletproof 3:16 03:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter edit

Zoey 101 table edit

A minor nit, but generally in tables you don't repeat the column header in each cell under that header. --NrDg 04:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Febuary 2008 edit

What do you mean by wrong area? --JayTur1 (Contribs) 16:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SmackdownHD.jpg) edit

⚠
Thanks for uploading Image:SmackdownHD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cheers, LAX 20:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edits edit

Next time you "undo" edits, make sure you know what your undoing. As per here. Thank you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Xbox 360 edit

Game libarys are like trivias, non-encyclopedic, so they should be removed. --JayTur1 (Contribs) 22:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Drake & Josh edit

You have cited Nick.com as a source for the three unaired episodes of Drake & Josh. If this is true, then I apologize for my perhaps slightly rash comments before. If you can provide a direct link to the document on Nick.com that states that there are indeed unaired episodes of Drake & Josh, then I will no longer dispute your edits. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ya... edit

give proof that the other people lied about it all.--Jakezing (talk) 00:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008 edit

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE Raw. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have reverted three of my edits, and now to avoid me violating the 3RR rule I will leave your edit, but may soon be removed. Thus reverting three of my edits you are in the verge of violating the 3RR rule. TrUCo9311 19:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Its not that I am not happy with the edit nor because I disagree with you edit. I know RAW goes over the 5 mins, but we have to go by the runtime it originally is suppose to go by. --TrUCo9311 19:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, but you know how Wiki has to remain informative and accurate, but following reliable sources. And there is no source that will say RAW goes over the 5 mins, the cable boxes/satelite providers dont say it either.TrUCo9311 19:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
While I agree that Wiki isnt a news site, WWE has already confirmed this and we report what WWE does so it must remain in the article for now.TrUCo9311 19:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

User page design edit

Sure, you're more than welcome to use my design. Just give credit. -- Oakster  Talk  21:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Glad to have been of help. -- Oakster  Talk  21:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Could it be a bit more discrete, like just a sentence on the user page? It's a tad bit too much having my name on all of your user pages. Sorry about that. -- Oakster  Talk  22:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. -- Oakster  Talk  22:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Legend Thriller edit

Jeff Hardy is now also referred to as the Legend Thriller. They started using it against "Legend Killer" Randy Orton, but its been used since then, including last ngiht on raw. I would source it right now, but I do not have full internet access at work. LessThanClippers (talk) 23:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

And that is why I had not updated it myself (you'll notice I never put it in). But since we know it is a fact we could just put the citation needed in there.LessThanClippers (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply