Reiftyr

Reiftyr, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Reiftyr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 01:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Gallipoli Campaign

I have checked Erikson's Ordered to Die: A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War, he does definitely describe the Ottoman victory in the Dardanelles as "great". How do you think this battle would have remained in the minds of all nations involved if the outcome had no impact? The Allied failure was certainly a turning point in the Middle Eastern theatre of the war.

The heady exuberance which had resulted from the great victory at Gallipoli was gone and was replaced by a gathering sense of despair.

— Edward J. Erickson.

Regards, Bright Darkness (talk) 09:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I added this point to the article but now it is little bit changed. I don't think the Gallipoli victory had no impact, or isn't "great", but I think it lacks the decisiveness to be described as such, and principally, Erickson didn't use it to describe in this way. Reiftyr (talk) 21:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peninsular War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Toro and Avila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Template:POTD/2013-06-23

Hi there, and thanks for showing an interest in the Picture of the Day process. Generally I've been the one to select the images since January, but this one looks fine (the age of the promotion is roughly correct, the blurb is written okay [although I've made it more neutral and in-line with standard MP formatting], and the template you've created at Template:POTD/2013-06-23 is correctly formatted [surprisingly an issue for some editors]). However, I'm concerned that you didn't complete the notification process. Part of selecting a featured picture is notifying the image's creator and/or nominator, as well as editors of the bolded article. I've completed that, but just a heads up in case you choose to contribute to POTD again. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Ops, that was my first POTD, thank you very much for the help. And be welcome to made any correction you judge necessary. Reiftyr (talk) 00:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

• No worries, and there wasn't much to fix. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peninsular War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint-Cyr and Palafox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Cannae

Hi. Like you, I was taken aback by the recent IP editor's revision. Unlike you, I concluded (having studied it carefully) that the changes were mostly in expression, not substance; and they tended to reduce duplication and redundancy which has been a problem in the article. On the other hand, the IP editor overlooked some typos (eg, Pyrennes for Pyranees) and made a few slips of his own. I copyedited the lot in two stages, only to find that you had reverted my first lot (including the correction to Pyranees). If you feel any substance and references have been lost, I suggest you draw attention to them in detail on the Talk page rather than use the blanket-reversion again. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 14:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peninsular War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Levante and Durán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Peninsular War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Portland, Holy war, Absolute power and La Romana

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, Reiftyr, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person (Hansmccx, Moagim, and -Ilhador-), please remember to disclose these connections. --Omnipaedista (talk) 13:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Controversial moves

Could you please explain the rationale behind these moves: [1], [2], [3], [4] ? Your edit summaries are quite uninformative. --Omnipaedista (talk) 13:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

'Copy edit' tags

Note that it is a good practice to indicate a reason—either on the talk page or in the edit summary—for placing such tags. Placing them around without giving a rationale isn't helpful. --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

More controversial moves

11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+31)‎ . . N Talk:Ngô Bảo Châu ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Talk:Ngô Bảo Châu to Talk:Ngo Bao Chau over redirect: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (0)‎ . . m Talk:Ngo Bao Chau ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Talk:Ngô Bảo Châu to Talk:Ngo Bao Chau over redirect: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+26)‎ . . N Ngô Bảo Châu ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Ngô Bảo Châu to Ngo Bao Chau over redirect: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (0)‎ . . m Ngo Bao Chau ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Ngô Bảo Châu to Ngo Bao Chau over redirect: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+30)‎ . . N Talk:Ngô Sĩ Liên ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Talk:Ngô Sĩ Liên to Talk:Nge Si Lien: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (0)‎ . . m Talk:Nge Si Lien ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Talk:Ngô Sĩ Liên to Talk:Nge Si Lien: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+25)‎ . . N Ngô Sĩ Liên ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Ngô Sĩ Liên to Nge Si Lien: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (0)‎ . . m Nge Si Lien ‎ (Reiftyr moved page Ngô Sĩ Liên to Nge Si Lien: Removing diacritics, per usual format of Vietnamese biographies) (current)

• Are you aware that you are moving counter RM decisions, counter RfC? In ictu oculi (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)