RedTurtle495

Image copyright problem with Image:MV5BMTk0MDM2MzE3NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDMwMzE4MQ@@. V1. SX93 SY140 .jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MV5BMTk0MDM2MzE3NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDMwMzE4MQ@@. V1. SX93 SY140 .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Millie2.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Millie2.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Millieh.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Millieh.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Asenine  16:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jordan B

A tag has been placed on Jordan B requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 09:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The X Factor (UK series 6). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrea105 (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ellie Kendrick in The Making of Anne Frank.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ellie Kendrick in The Making of Anne Frank.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 21:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hannah Montana main characters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 01:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ryan Connor, you may be blocked from editing. Ground Zero | t 12:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Justin Bieber, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — anndelion (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Daniel Radcliffe, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. NellieBly (talk) 22:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The X Factor (UK), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 23:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Simon Cowell, you may be blocked from editing. --Bbb23 (talk) 23:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Susan Boyle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You also added an incorrect middle name to Matt Cardle.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi there

You've made some useful edits to Wikipedia, so I have to wonder why exactly you feel the need to edit articles like Simon Cowell, The X Factor (UK), and Justin Bieber to add unoriginal, tired, boring insults. Since edits like this are virtually always reverted within seconds by a member of our recent changes patrol (who is probably the only person who sees them, and who likely doesn't care even a tiny bit about Simon Cowell, The X Factor, or Justin Bieber), the only person who is hurt by them is you.

I'd encourage you to think carefully about whether you want to lose your editing privileges here on Wikipedia over what are basically unfunny, unoriginal, boring acts of vandalism. Nobody expects you to like Justin Bieber; just leave his page alone and edit articles that you can make productive edits to. Take care. --NellieBly (talk) 01:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011 (2)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Simon Cowell, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. –anemoneprojectors– 18:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism-only account

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Best Friends (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Best Friends (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Friends (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 20:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)