User talk:Rajasekhar1961/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Tikkavarapu Venkata Ramana Reddy, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0714775/. As a copyright violation, Tikkavarapu Venkata Ramana Reddy appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Tikkavarapu Venkata Ramana Reddy has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tikkavarapu Venkata Ramana Reddy and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Tikkavarapu Venkata Ramana Reddy with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tikkavarapu Venkata Ramana Reddy.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ✤ JonHarder talk 05:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Mettapalli
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mettapalli, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mettapalli. Jeodesic (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of The University of Hyderabad Act, 1974
An editor has nominated The University of Hyderabad Act, 1974, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The University of Hyderabad Act, 1974 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Is it okay to move this article to Pusapati Vijayarama Gajapati Raju - Vijayarama as a single word ? Isn't he often referred to as P.V.G.Raju ? Tintin 11:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Vijayarama can be used as single word. Both are same. You can shift it there.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 11:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Tintin 11:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Vizianagram royal family
Sir, do you have any books about the Vizianagram royal family. I have been trying to find out the exact reason why Maharajkumar of Vizianagram moved to Benares in 1922. It seems that it was because of a quarrel with his elder brother who had become the Maharaja that year, but don't have any sources to confirm. Tintin 08:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:INDIA Tagging for WP:Andhra Pradesh with TinucherianBot
Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Andhra_Pradesh#WP:INDIA Tagging with TinucherianBot. Your attention and help is requested .You are receiving this note as you are the member of the project -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 10:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.appcb.org/aboutus.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Hi Rajasekhar, the heading on Tarnaka article on Schools, you've changed it to institutions. The reason is that, it is how it is used all throughout Wikipedia and is a convention of using those headings. If you can add a pic of Tarnaka and the institution which you wrote about which are missing, would be really good. Cheers!Randhirreddy 02:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
A picture
Hi Rajasekhar, a picture of the organisation would be perfect. Cheers! Randhirreddy 04:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- I am sorry, dont have any picture of this great organization.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 09:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Good edit
[1] --KP Botany (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am going to some more information and photograph of this great surgeon. I do not know the Wiki bot is adding deletion log immediately after the page is created. It is creating bad experience on the editors and people creating new articles. It takes some time for adding information and to make it to a respectable page full of information.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 11:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it does create a bad experience when people tag articles for deletion while you are writing them. It was not a bot that tagged your article, it was another editor. He has been asked to stop tagging articles immediately after the page is created, but a lot of editors on Wikipedia do that.