Rahulmdinesh1234
Welcome!
edit
|
November 2014
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page National Centre for Excellence has been reverted.
Your edit here to National Centre for Excellence was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/nationalcentreforexcellence/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at National_Centre_for_Excellence. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.
Please discuss the changes on Talk:National_Centre_for_Excellence, as opposed to reinstating the changes time and time again. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Multiple accounts
editCan you explain why you have abandoned Rahulmdinesh and are using this account ? Nick (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Incident report notification
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute and other issues. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 03:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 05:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC) |