Rahio1234
March 2024 edit
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to MapleStory: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Welcome edit
Thank you for reverting some very problematic edits at Neolithodes brodiei and Neolithodes. I have removed the false positive report from ClueBot: it is usually very good but it does make mistakes. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse or feel free to ask me. Johnuniq (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Reversions edit
Hi, just an FYI that there's no need to tell a vandal their edits have been reverted if they've already been warned by somebody else for the edit. You may find these templates useful for warning users, or alternatively the Twinkle tool (automated). AbsoluteWissen (talk) 12:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
True black hair is rare, It's estimated that only 2% possesses true black hair edit
It's unfair to add dark brown hair and true black hair into the same category as "black". Wish l (talk) 12:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please read your talk page Rahio1234 (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rahio1234 reported by User:AlphaBetaGamma (Result: ). Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 11:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 16:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)- @Drmies Sorry, i don't make mistake anyway. Why did block my account? Rahio1234 (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please think before editing or writing a comment. Did you see the "Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion" section just above? The link they provided no longer goes to the right place but it should be pretty simple to find your user name and see what the problem was. Some thought regarding edits at A Thousand Times Repent would show that reverting an IP six times in under half an hour was not a good idea. Johnuniq (talk) 08:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I WAS REORGANIZING THE ARTICLE NOT VANDALIZING IT 91.152.225.81 (talk) 10:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide a reliable source. Rahio1234 (talk) 10:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Then why did you remove all my added content? Surely some of my text was properly sourced even if you don’t think the official website of an organisation is “reliable”?? 2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (talk) 10:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you revert my edits this time??? 2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- This a unreliable source Rahio1234 12:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you revert my edits this time??? 2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Then why did you remove all my added content? Surely some of my text was properly sourced even if you don’t think the official website of an organisation is “reliable”?? 2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (talk) 10:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide a reliable source. Rahio1234 (talk) 10:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
You reverted eight times in a little over an hour, and you didn't explain why--not a single time. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
May 2024 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 13:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Rahio1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.