User talk:R'n'B/Archive 35

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Usernamekiran in topic mail
Archive 30Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 40

Merchandise giveaway nomination

 
A token of thanks

Hi R'n'B! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk ~~~~~
 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sharon English School

  Hello, R'n'B. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sharon English School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned templates

Hi, R'n'B, I've come across your 28 page orphaned templates report a few months ago and a lot of the templates that I've looked through have since been deleted, are no longer orphans, or are now redirected to another template. I was wondering if you plan on updating the pages with your RussBot account since it's been twelve years and the report is pretty outdated to a degree. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, that's an orphaned report.  :-) But you may find Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates more useful. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
No problem. I can still find it useful digging through the old report. The Unused templates report is already covered by my task force. But thanks for the input. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Question

Is a hat note needed for William McAndrew (educator) per WP:NOTAMB? Are people going to end up on that page looking for the coach, and vice versa? Viriditas (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Strictly speaking, probably not. But they were both in the field of education, in Illinois, so there is at least some potential for confusion. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 02:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
That works for me. Viriditas (talk) 03:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

User talk:CERBERUS - ii iv iii

Hello, R'n'B,

I was just deleting a broken redirect to this page and was surprised to see that you deleted a User talk page. Was there a special reason that allowed this page to be deleted as an exception to the rules? Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

There was no content; only a redirect to itself. And there was no deleted history to restore. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 02:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Correction: I found the content had been moved to another page, and have now moved it back to the correct name. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 02:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RussBot 5

Hello, after creating a number of {{R to disambiguation page}} redirects (interestingly not shown as such in the edit tags) yesterday as a test run, potentially to look for somebody to create a bot, I noticed your BRFA, which had excluded the disambiguation pages without links. I don't think I agree with the arguments presented there, as disambiguation pages with no internal links could equally well be linked intentionally at any given point in time, and as an editor, I don't (want to) check whether a "(disambiguation)" redirect exists when doing that – if it doesn't, I would be rather surprised by the resulting red link. The argument about creating redirects for every article seems to be a highly exaggerative slippery slope that is not a reason to not create ones for every actual disambiguation page, which, unlike the former, are not misleading. Also, tools like WP:DisamAssist are already creating redirects like these when run on a dab page, no matter the backlinks, though only on a page-by-page basis to be fair. And it would keep people like me from bothering about at these. So, thoughts on this? It seems that extending the task as described would lead to about 50 thousand additional redirects, which is more or less comparable to the scale of the original run. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
00:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, January 2022

Bots Newsletter, January 2022
 
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost two years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

Overall
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFAs. Of these,  Y 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with  N2 8 denied,  ? 2 withdrawn, and   2 expired).

January 2020

Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.

February 2020

 
Speaking of WikiProject Molecular Biology, Listeria went wild in February

March 2020

April 2020

 
Listeria being examined

Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Wikipedia. Pages reachable via unified login, like a talk page at Commons or at Italian Wikipedia could also be acceptable [...] External sites like Phabricator or GitHub (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise anonymity) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.

May 2020

 
We heard you like bots, so we made a bot that reports the status of your bots, so now you can use bots while you use bots

June 2020

 
A partial block averted at the eleventh hour for the robot that makes Legos

Conclusion

  • What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
  • Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
  • What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
  • Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
  • What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


21:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

mail

 
Hello, R'n'B. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—usernamekiran • sign the guestbook(talk) 19:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

19:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)