Queer Scout
Jai's age
editThanks, I will try. IMDB don't seem to check new DOB subs, only changed ones. I did try to change it a while ago, using a link to Jai's official site, but they said they don't accept official sites as proof for changed DOBs because so many celebrities lie about their ages. It's just ridiculous because Jai has been in the public eye (giving interviews) since he first landed the role in 'Rent,' and he was only 17 and in high school then. I doubt he was lying his age down as a teen, especially given he was playing older. Bu yeah, I'll dig out some of his teenage interviews and try submitting with those. Thanks. -- Queer Scout
- Find his high school graduation year then.--Fallout boy 23:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
If you're sure about him having been born in 1979, I'd suggest putting together some evidence and submitting it to imdb for consideration.--Fallout boy 14:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Thought you might be interested in joining the LGBT WikiProject. Take a look around, and if you are interested, sign up! Thanks, -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject LGBT studies!
edit
Hi, Queer Scout, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
editThe LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot (talk) 23:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Jayne Marie
editJust being inquisitive - where was it posted that the article claimed her as a Playmate? Wikipedia? I certainly hope it's some place else. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
editThe LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by SatyrBot around 17:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC) SatyrBot (talk) 17:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
editThe LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was delivered by §hepBot around 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC). ShepBot (talk) 16:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter (July 2008)
editThe LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
MERLIN
editAre You A Fan Of The New TV Show MERLIN On BBC One If So A New Wikia Has Just Started On www.merlin.wikia.com and it desperatly needs pages editing and adminastrators so if you would like to edit or be a part of the community start editing and drop me a message on the user name Michael Downey. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.175.146 (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Holly Madison
editHi. I hope you don't mind that I added the filmography chart to Holly's article. I figured it might look a little cleaner with the chart and deter people from adding random credits. Plus, I was really bored. Great job reverting all the unsourced garbage/vandalism too! I seriously thought I was going to have to get that thing protected. Thanks for watching it :) Pinkadelica Say it... 04:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject LGBT studies Newsletter
editThe Miss Julie Memorial LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was sent by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC) by the request of Moni3 (talk)
Ianto
editBefore the edit war is engaged any further, you may want to check out the talk page where the discussion of Stephen Walker's comments has been underway. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 12:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- You're getting near to violating the 3-revert rule. I request that you please stick to discussing this on the talk page. As this is not in my opinion OR, as it is reliably sourced, it shouldn't be removed from the article outright because you think it is. You may very well do a request for comment for the article and seek outside opinion (which may be good to do anyway), and see if other neutral parties believe this statement is either OR or should just be removed. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 12:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Check the history please. I see your name up there 3 times. I give the first time your "original edit". The next two aren't original edits, you're removing the same material again (that constitutes a revert). As for invading your page to leave rude messages, I thought I was being quite polite by asking nicely. I didn't snap at you. I didn't do anything but politely request that you go to the talk page because a discussion had already been started there. When you reverted a second time I just felt that I would warn you that you were getting close so that you didn't waste your last revert to the page on some petty content dispute. That was actually me looking out for you. But since you seem to be in this idea that I'm actually attacking you, I'll remember to keep my courtesies to myself (at least with you) in the future, should we cross paths again. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please read the history carefully. An IP (which I am not saying that it was you) removed the SW portion of the sentence. Then you removed the rest. I initially assumed that you were removing something that was not sourced. When I replaced the original statement, which had the context needed to show why the bit you removed was necessary, you returned and removed everything (your original bit, plus the stuff I restored that was already there). That was your first revert (it doesn't matter that you removed additional stuff, because you still removed the same information as before). You reverted again after Paul restored the comment, which was your second revert. I came to your page after your first official revert to inform you that there was a discussion. Subsequently, 5 minutes later you went to the talk page and left a comment, and then you went back to the article and reverted for a second time. That was why I came to your talk page again and alerted you to the fact that you were getting close to your third revert, and asked you to stay on the talk page. Yes, I did revert as well, which is somewhat hypocritical of me, but IMO it felt more like you were coming in and asserting your opinion as the supreme one (which I based on the fact that you left a comment and then immediately reverted the page). Possibly poor assumption on my part, but nevertheless, that was why I reverted you and asked you to stay on the talk page to hash this out completely. But, for some reason you're taking everything I do toward you as hostile (at least that is my impression), so I'll just leave you be completely then. Good day. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject LGBT studies Newsletter (June 2009)
editThe Miss Julie Memorial LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter: Special Pride 2009 Booty call edition | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
- What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
- When? June 2015
- How can you help?
- 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
- 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
- 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Pride 2016
editAs a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
- Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
- Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
- Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Blair Boone has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)