Pulsifier220
Pulsifier220, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Pulsifier220! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC) |
April 2018 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Goldfinch (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Miaow 16:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Columbia Pictures films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please don't add unsourced production companies; see this consensus that production companies require sourcing. The comingsoon.net source that you added for Wish Dragon also does not say that Columbia is producing it. It says that Sony Animation is producing it, which is not the same thing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Captain Marvel (film), you may be blocked from editing. TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC) Please disregard the final warning I had previously posted on this page. Thank you and have a nice day. IanDBeacon (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Underwater (film). IanDBeacon (talk) 02:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced production companies edit
Again, please stop making unsourced edits, as you did in this edit, which added a bunch of unsourced entries to List of Universal Pictures films. If you don't know where to look for sources, please ask at WikiProject Film or see this list. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Miaow 13:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of 20th Century Fox films (2000–present). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- The next time you add unsourced content or remove sourced content, I'm going to ask an uninvolved administrator to block you from editing Wikipedia. This is your last warning. This has been explained to you enough times. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
ANI notification edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf(talk) 17:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reason for blocking edit
Pulsifier220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I know what I’ve seen. Variety is not a reliable source because they don’t change anything. I checked Fox’s website, and nowhere does it state that Joel Silver and Lawrence Gordon and their companies are working on this film. That is why I kept deleting them. It’s not because I wanted to. But because Variety is full of hooey. That’s why I go to Fox’s official website, because they tell me everything I need to know about the movie. Pulsifier220 (talk) 21:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia follows what reliable sources report. I had no trouble finding additional sources that agree Silver is a producer for this film. Maybe Fox is not the ultimate truth. Huon (talk) 23:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
May 2018 edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shock and Awe (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 18:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bohemian Rhapsody (film), you may be blocked from editing. The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Backseat (film). The Old JacobiteThe '45 17:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Pulsifier220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don’t understand how changing cast members could be seen as vandilization. All I did was add people that were already in the movie. That shouldn’t be seen as vandalization. In fact, it should be seen as the exact opposite.
Decline reason:
In order to be unblocked, you need to show that all of your edits since your last block were backed by reliable citations which you included as part of the edit, and that they were not disruptive. Consider, for example, this edit which was obviously disruptive. As such, the block appears appropriate. Yamla (talk) 13:13, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Pulsifier220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Listen, I didn’t put anyone new on the cast that wasn’t in the cast itself. All I did was put someone in the billing block. That’s all. Just because I added someone to the billing block doesn’t mean I added them to the cast. Tyler Perry was already in the cast. So he could be in the billing block.
Decline reason:
I would recommend lifting this block only if you promise to make no changes to movie cast lists for six months. This problem has been going on long enough. EdJohnston (talk) 01:53, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
July 2018 edit
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Grudge (film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Didn't you just come off a 1 month block for this? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Ok.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Columbia Pictures films. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 edit
Your recent editing history at Spider-Man: Far From Home shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC) Pulsifier220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Listen. Why aren't you blocking RustedAutoParts? He has been reverting things many times. I know I'm not going to get my account back, which is fine by me. And I know I'm definitely not right. But please, at least block RustedAutoParts. He's not a good person. Then again neither am I. I know I'm terrible, but but I'm terribly terribly sorry, and I truly mean it. If you do see this, please give me another chance. Pulsifier220 (talk) 19:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
WP:NOTTHEM. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Pulsifier220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ok, I'm sorry about bringing RustedAutoParts into this. I know he assumed a lot of good faith towards me and thought I could be like him. I promise not to edit war again. I mean, I edit warred over a stupid thing (That thing being where the cast gets to go). I wanted to join Wikipedia because I want to give people the latest news on the newest movies coming out in the next few years. I felt like changing the cast to the way it should've been, but now I know that's not right. I promise to add citations to reliable sources and give people what they want.
Decline reason:
Way too much disruptive editing in your history. If you are serious about trying to make a comeback and be a better editor then read WP:SO and come back in not less than six months. Maybe we can talk about it then. For now I suggest you cease posting unblock requests as there is no realistic likelihood of them being granted and if you keep doing this you will damage whatever chance you may have in requesting a standard offer down the road. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I’m really not the editor one would want to model oneself around. Rusted AutoParts 21:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC) Why do you think that?
February 2019 edit
Pulsifier220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It’s been 6 months since I last edited anything. These past few months have taught me to citate my changes, and see if others are correct the first time. I sincerely, from the bottom of my heart, apologize for my actions. I’ve become a changed person and, if you’ll allow me to, I want a chance at redemption. I promise that I will not cause or be a part of any edit war, and to be sure if I’m wrong.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Do you realize that you are promising to "cause or be a part of any edit war"? 331dot (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
That was my bad, it was a typo. Thanks for pointing that out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulsifier220 (talk • contribs)
- Pulsifier220, what reliable sources would you add to Surf Nazis Must Die? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Sources that basically confirm the fact that the film is real, and tell me all about the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulsifier220 (talk • contribs)
I would use sources like Comicbook.com or deadline.com