User talk:Primefac/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

→

Notice

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Olowe2011 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 27 September 2015‎ (UTC)

You corrected my reference syntax for me.

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Much appreciated for the altruistic help!

-MasterChiefNY117 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterChiefNY117 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 8 October 2015‎ (UTC)

Article for Deletion: Michigan State Miracle

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! There is an article that has been nominated for deletion regarding the Michigan State football team. I noticed you were an alumni, so I thought I would let you know in case you have any interest in participating with the discussion. If so, please just click on the Title as I have linked it straight to the page's deletion review. If you wish to see the article itself, it is titled Michigan State Miracle. Any thoughts, ideas, or edits that would help improve the page itself would also be appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stubbleboy (talk • contribs) 18:29, 18 October 2015‎ (UTC)

Deletion review for Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 18

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Anthony Marinelli. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 009o9 (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

I have undone your non-admin closure, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 18, because non-admins may not close discussions as "delete", see WP:NACD. Please don't do that again, it generates extra work for everybody else. Thanks, Sandstein 10:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@Sandstein: You may wish to check the TfD archives. NAC deletes are an established process at TfD. The RfC Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion/Archive 19 here allows for an orphan/CSD mechanism and it has become accepted in practice that this means "close as delete, orphan, tag G6. BethNaught (talk) 10:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

OK, but this discussion resulted in consensus to do a trial - has this been done, and what were the results? If the trial was successful, discussion should start to seek consensus to document this mechanism in the appropriate guidelines, notably WP:NACD. Until then, the current guidelines apply as written. Sandstein 10:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Because so few people pay attention to TfD, it was never formally organised AFAICT, and messages were somewhat confusedly added to the various guidelines. I would support a proposal to codify the current practice, but stopping NACs pending that would make the backlog balloon and undo the good work the original RfC led to. BethNaught (talk) 11:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@Sandstein: NAC closures at TfD have been routine since the end of that RfC, with very little dispute or controversy; the result has been to reduce the backlog significantly and to reduce the variability in "transit time" through the process. (Formerly, enormous backlogs would accumulate and then one or two people would make dozens of closes in one run-through, which is inefficient and tedious for everyone involved.) I suppose I could quantify this - I did intend to at one point, but didn't get around to it. But as the only admin who's been at least somewhat active at TfD for the whole time the NAC process has been running, I'm pretty confident in that observation. In that time there have been, IIRC, two prior DRVs related to a NAC close of a TfD, of which one endorsed the deletion with minor procedural doubt from someone not familiar with the process, and one was relisted and then closed as keep. With just one "wrong" call in four and a half months (and even then, a complex case), this is one of the least drama-generating processes on the wiki ;) Opabinia regalis (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

All right, then the next step would be to propose a change of WP:NACD, in order to find out whether the broader community beyond the template specialists who participated in the earlier discussions agree with this change. Sandstein 09:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Well, WP:NACD currently does mention the TfD exception and has done so for a month, and the same thing was introduced as a footnote at WP:NAC in August, but yes, the documentation should be updated to describe current practice; we can't expect people at DRV to follow all the minutiae. I don't know that there's a need for more RfC'ing - descriptive, not prescriptive, and all of that - but in any event, after the holidays; I'm sure I'm not the only one short on time this week. Opabinia regalis (talk) 22:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Banned means banned

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello:
Just to let you know (following the discussion on Ritchie333's talkpage, here) I have opened a discussion at Template:banned user (here) if you wish to comment at all. Regards, Xyl 54 (talk) 23:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

AFC list

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry, I misread my edit counter, looking at the user talk page count instead of the mainspace count. Oops! (talk to) Gaelan('s contributions) 06:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Primefac!

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Happy New Year!

Primefac,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^(guestbook) 17:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.

Dear Primefac,
Thank you once again for helping me, back in February, and have a great New Year in 2016!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^(guestbook) 17:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

for splitting up your unfortunate bundle. I went ahead and re-added them to the film delsort. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

About the decline of Draft:Vineeth_Mohan

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Primefac, I just submitted for AfC. But I found that it doesn't meets notability guidelines. But I added articles from the reliable sources like Deccan Chronicle, The New Indian Express and Malayala Manorama. Also i would like to add that he played lead roles in Adi Kapyare Kootamani See, and in Aadu - Oru Bheegara Jeevi Aanu See. Also this reference [1] states everything about him. I think the article satisfies Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers and Looking forward to hear from you. Thanks. Josu4u (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

01:20:23, 6 January 2016 review of submission by Jchambers1984m

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jchambers1984m (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Beckertime (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for taking the time to review my draft. I will work on the vocabulary and finding additional independent sources 'about' Beckertime. Jchambers1984m (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Joseph

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

	The Original Barnstar
	For an impressive cleanup of the TfD backlog. Does that mean I'm going to have to read that damn Marinelli thread eventually? ;) Opabinia regalis (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, Opabinia regalis. Yes it does ;) Primefac (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Ahmad Shah Khan Crown Prince Of Afghanistan.

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Assalam O Alaikum!...

   Pleade Help Me In Editing Ahmad Shah Crown Prince Of Afghanistam Page!...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by M-Zahid-Zadran (talk • contribs) 11:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Image upload

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for responding to my question. Unfortunately, no one has responded to my inquiry on the live help page and I've been waiting for almost an hour. I looked at the link you sent but still am unable to resolve this problem. I did put in the link to the image as directed; it shows up on the edit page but nothing comes up when I save the page. I would appreciate your assistance. Also, would it be possible for you to review my draft and advise?Gaw54 (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Non-free files related to scouting/guilding

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Primefac. It seems that you have recently tagged a huge number of non-free files related to scouting and guiding with {{di-fails NFCC}} in edits such as this. I understand you are doing this per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 6#Template:Non-free Scout logo nocontent. I'm not saying I disagree with the assessment that all or some of these fail NFCC#8, but I am curious if the bot you're using is also going to notify the uploaders of each image or add {{deletable image-caption}} to the articles where the files are being used. You could run into problems if the persons who uploaded these images are not properly notified. From personal experience, NFCR/FFD discussions about a single scouting logo can sometimes get to be pretty contentious, but a mass speedy deletion of pretty much every scouting logo ever uploaded (or at least tagged with {{Non-free Scout logo nocontent}}) is not going to be very well-received at all by those who regularly upload/use such images. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Marchjuly, thanks for the note. I have notified the uploaders (fortunately, only 29 total users) about the template change. Primefac (talk) 03:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

No worries then. Just for the record, many of the "Non-free Scout logo nocontent" tags were added a long time ago and either simply ignored by the uploader (and tus the problem remains) or never removed when the problem was fixed. I think many of the images you have tagged do have non-free use rationales; the question is whether they are valid nfurs. Many who upload such images seem to feel all that is needed for NFCC compliance is to add a (bolierplate) nfur for the usage, but that's not really the case at all. Many of these nfurs tend to overly vague, giving the wrong article where they are used, claiming the wrong purpose for use, and not being provided with proper information about their source for copyright verification. In addition, NFCC#8 (i.e., "no content") is a bit subjective depending on your point of view. Strictly speaking, many of these images are being used in a purely decorative manner which is something which is not really allowed, but some uploaders seem to feel that being able to see the image makes in contextually significant. So, you might be able to save yourself a little grief in the form of blowback if you do a quick double-check of the images you've tagged. Anything in the main infobox is probably OK whereas anything added to a gallery or list, or randomly added throughout the article is probably not. If you find a usage that it particularly problematic, you may find it better to discuss it at WP:FFD instead of trying to speedy it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Many of the logo's are historic logo's. Some of the historic logo's are erroneously taged as non-free but have expired copyrights or are for other reasons PD. For example File:Katholieke Verkenners Suriname.svg. --Egel _Reaction? 11:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

03:02:36, 26 January 2016 review of submission by Willbam

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Willbam (talk · contribs)
- User:Willbam/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm starting category on unsung Artist ,Astrologers and etc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Willbam (talk • contribs) 03:02, 26 January 2016‎ (UTC)

ANI notice

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

nasty p article

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi

First of all I apologise if I am doing this incorrectly but I really need some help with regards to this article. I have looked over other peoples articles and they have less information and less sources but they have had it published.. I have a couple of extra sources in the form of paper docs etc which im currently trying to work out how to upload and due to issues I have no access to the live chat when I use this computer so unable to ask someone there.

Do you think you could help?

sorry

Azura81 (talk) 15:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Non-admin closures

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Please do not close discussions as "delete" when you are not an admin, even if consensus favors deletion, since you don't have the ability to delete articles and templates. See WP:Non-admin closure#Inappropriate closures for more. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

SNUGGUMS, please see this RfC and this discussion for why it is perfectly acceptable for me to close TfD discussions. You are welcome to bring the issue to DelRev, but simply undoing my edits is not proper procedure. Primefac (talk) 03:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hadn't noticed those threads. However, it's still best to let admins close discussions as "delete" because they have the ability to actually delete such articles and templates. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: The workflow is often different for templates, which is why things were changed for TfD in particular. They often need to be orphaned before deletion, which is usually done by non-admins working more efficiently than admins usually do :) So big backlogs were building up, and the non-admins willing to do the grunt work were waiting for obvious "delete" closes. Typically the orphaned templates are G6'd and/or listed in the holding cell so admins can deal with them as needed. Opabinia regalis (talk) 03:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

In that case, a note should probably be added to the NAC page I linked above to prevent others from raising their eyebrows at such closures. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

SNUGGUMS, I just noticed that there is a footnote right after "Deletions" in BADNAC. I do agree, though, that it could be slightly more obvious/clear. Primefac (talk) 04:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Just saw that now myself. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hopefully my change here helps Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:48, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you! 18:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeatrixZ (talk • contribs)

Template:Nuneaton Town F.C. squad

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Hi, I am writing to you as the closing admin at this TfD. The rationale for deletion, for which there was consensus, was that the template contained no wikilinks and therefore served no purpose as a navigation aid. I myself endorsed this. However, I have just updated the squad list at Nuneaton Town F.C., and at transpires that there infact 12 wikilinked players. I believe then that this template does indeed have practical value as a navigation aid, and should therefore be restored. I would be happy to update it. I'd like to invite @JMHamo:, @Fenix down: and @GiantSnowman: to comment on this, as they were involved in the TfD. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

I have taken the liberty to restore the template under the assumption that @Mattythewhite: will update with the current squad, at which time it will be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 15:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm fine with that. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

No opposition to it being restored and updated if there are so many wikilinks. Giant Snowman 21:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Notability - Thank you

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you Primefac, I appreciate your honesty. You're right, after further deliberation we have decided to kill the AfC. Jeff Jeff Jilson (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiProjectBanners

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for closing the TfD on this template. Would you mind clarifying your close at Template talk:WikiProjectBannerShell#Template:WikiProjectBanners, because the current situation is not ideal. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt action. How do we find a bot to do this job? Does someone need to post at WP:BOTREQ? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

In a word, yes. I've left some thoughts on the template talk page. Primefac (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your edits to Draft:Armand Cucciniello article

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Primefac,

First, thank you for the time you took to review my Wikipedia article submission/Subject, "Armand Cucciniello."

This Subject was a significant source for information during the Iraq war, as he served there longer than any other non-military U.S. official. Hence why an article has been created about him.

I have revised my article, and included more specific information as to why this Subject is relevant, removing general phrases and terms and replacing them with more specific detail.

Can you please be more specific as to where the “way too many WEASEL words and FLOWERY language” appear? Only once did “world-renowned” appear, in reference to the Dhvanyaloka Centre For Indian Studies and not to the Subject. (I have since removed the phrase).

According to Wikipedia, "Self-published media, where the author and publisher are the same, including newsletters, personal websites, books, patents, open wikis, personal or group blogs, and tweets, are usually not acceptable as sources. *****The general exception is where the author is an established expert with a previous record of third-party publications on a topic."***** The Subject is, in fact, an established expert on foreign policy, the Iraq war, South Asia, and the Middle east and has a previous, accessible record of 3rd party publications to support this claim --- hence all the sources in article's lengthy Reference list.

Please provide more detail as to how this article can be improved and why it is being rejected completely. ---- Rejecting the article outright (and moving a Resubmission to the end of the queue) seems unnecessary.

Blue Force (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Force2006, you are correct, primary sources can be used to verify facts when the author is an expert. However, my concern (which was just validated when I declined your draft again) was that you almost only included primary references. You need to have articles that actually discuss him in detail, as specified in the Golden Rule. As I mentioned on the draft page, there is only one reference you've given that does that. The other references you included barely mention him, and there are some that do not mention him at all (those should be removed).

With regard to the flowery language - yes, you only used "world-renowned" once, but you used "renowned" multiple times. Basically, when I first read through the draft it was entirely too promotional; trying to make him sound awesome by his association with other awesome people. A neutral point of view is paramount in all Wikipedia articles.

As a note regarding the decline/resubmission issue. There is no "queue" per se, and drafts are reviewed in whatever order the reviewers feel like. I declined your draft because I felt that it did not meet the requirements. Primefac (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Blue Force (talk) 19:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Primefac, Thank you for your reply. Actually there are several (secondary source) articles about the Subject that discuss his work and notability. You state in your last message/reply to me that "only one reference [I've] given that does that." That's not true. The secondary sources I list below are used/cited in my Wikipedia article and are accessible via the WWW:

There are other verifiable sources about the Subject, such as:

A Morris Native In Saddam’s Old Palace. The Daily Record. Schneider, Tehani. Mar. 3, 2008
A Break From Baghdad. Doctor, Diane. NJ Monthly magazine. Mar. 7, 2008

There are 3 books which discuss the Subject, his work and notability - all which are *not* authored by the Subject and are hence more secondary source material. These books, the first two having been best-sellers in the U.S., are all available for purchase via Amazon.com:

Hastings, Michael. The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan. New York: Blue Rider Press, 2012.
Hastings, Michael. I Lost My Love in Baghdad: A Modern War Story. New York: Scribner, 2010.
Fort, Patrick. Bagdad: Journal d’un reporter (French). Paris: Des Idées & des Hommes, 2007.

Furthermore, there are a series of TV and radio interviews about the subject:

CNN New Day, with Michaela Pereira. Mar. 19, 2015.
Regional News Network (New York), with Richard French Live. Dec. 21, 2011.
WCTC-AM radio (1450) The Voice of Central New Jersey, with Bert Baron. (Somerset, NJ) Dec. 28, 2011.
Newsline with Joyce Estey, WRNJ-AM. (Hackettstown, NJ)Feb. 28, 2008. Live discussion about life in Baghdad, political situation facing U.S. Government in Iraq, troop “surge.”
WBGO-FM radio, Doug Doyle. Feb. 28, 2008.

If you/other Wikipedia editors read through/watch/listen to all these sources thoroughly, I'd argue there is *more* information about the Subject than that which I included in my Wikipedia entry.

I'm still befuddled why this person is considered not noteworthy, however there are many other Biographies of Living Persons populating Wikipedia with less citations and verifyable works. They too, like my Subject, have a plethora of primary source material. Somehow they've made it onto Wikipedia, while my Subject has not. Some include

Arwa Damon, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arwa_Damon - Subject is a CNN news correspondent. Entry has lines of information without reference, and draws on the numerous news segments the Subject has appeared in. ---- This is no different than me using the many news articles and news interviews in which my Subject has appeared.
Miguel Marquez, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Marquez - Subject is an ABC News correspondent. The entry has *two* sources only, and it appears the entry was primarily written based off *one* of those sources. ----- I could have done something similar, using only one of my Subject's interviews.
Anita McNaught, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_McNaught - Another media personality, McNaught worked for FOX News. The entire Wikipedia article is sourced from one reference - which provides *nothing* except this mention of Ms. McNaught: "Anita McNaught - international journalist based in London

working for BBC World."

Please help. Given the information I lay out here... I am (honestly) perplexed and beffuddled on how a Wikipedia volunteer writer such as myself is supposed to write an entry without it being rejected; especially in light of the less-than-reliable articles on people like those mentioned above in (a) (b) and (c).

Please assist further. Much appreciated!

Blue Force (talk) 00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Primefac,

I sent you a reply on Feb. 19 (see above) but have not heard back. Please respond.

Thank you.

Blue Force (talk) 19:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Force2006, I have been rather busy the last three days. Please be patient. I will respond to your comments and queries when I have more than ten minutes to myself. Primefac (talk) 06:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Okay, Force2006, a few things. First and foremost, the existence of any other article, good or bad, does not mean another should be created. OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and to be honest the three pages you linked to could potentially be deleted. Some pages were created well before the draft process, and some just slip through the cracks. It's up to all of us to either fix, or nominate for deletion, bad pages. Now, on to the rest.

One of the articles you list as a reference isn't actually being used in the article. Second, interviews do not demonstrate notability. You could have every interview he's ever talked on, and you still wouldn't get the draft accepted. You need independent reliable sources that talk about him. His own articles are also PRIMARY and are similarly useless for notability purposes.

My main suggestion would be to remove any references that do not actually use Cucciniello's name. If it's not about him or mentions him, it's pretty much useless and is currently bordering on bombardment. Once you've removed the unnecessary sources, then you get working on the good sources. At the moment there are large chunks of text that are only backed up by his own statements. Find more good sources and add them to the relevant locations. Remove anything that can't be properly sourced. Etc.

In re-reading the draft, I still think that it reads a little too much like a CV or a "here's why he's awesome" page. It's not purely about what he's done, it's about what other people have noticed him doing. His own recollections of the things he's done are immaterial.

In summary - he may be notable, but at the moment you're not showing it. Add a few more good refs, trim the fat, and see what happens. Primefac (talk) 03:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Primefac. The reason as to why I had included the 84 red links to future years of the 21st century was partly due to the precedent set at Lists of state leaders by year. I had assumed this was the way of doing things—in case the template does not get updated when 2017 comes, etc. You may want to review that page also.--Neve –selbert 05:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiLove

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	Here's a plate full of cookies to share!
	Hi Primefac/Archive 5, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! Peter Sam Fan \| talk 16:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

You added a bunch of {{subst:Arcade History}} to articles. That template was deleted a year ago, by you. You'll need to go thru and undo your edits. Egads, this is the type of thing I do, not you. I called dibs on these types of mess ups. :) Bgwhite (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Bgwhite, it was deleted two days ago, wasn't it? Primefac (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Oy vey. Yet more proof that this is the type of mistake I usually make. Of course my dyslexia is another story.... Bgwhite (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

No worries, I've been known to do such things so I figured it'd be good to double-check. Primefac (talk) 03:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Review my Draft:Energising Bharat Awards

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I request you please review my Draft:Energising_Bharat_Awards, I have made the changes to the draft according to your suggestion.

Danish Mehraj (talk) 09:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Danish.mehraj26, I generally do not re-review drafts, as I think that having a different reviewer look at a page is beneficial to the entire process (and removes some of the bias). After a quick glance, I still think you need to add more about the award itself, but the promotional aspect has certainly been diminished. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Cmmkt

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Primeface. Thanks for [2]. I wasn't sure if the answer I gave was sufficient, or if that user wanted more info. So, I left the template open just in case unitl they responded either way. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Political parties

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Ok, I think I've fixed all links to Template:WikiProject Political parties (translucations) and I think it's ready for deletion. What do you think? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Ricky81682, from the couple I glanced at it looks good. I have no issues with deletion. Primefac (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

IMSLP2 merge

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Primefac. You mentioned at the holding cell that {{IMSLP2}} is ready to merge, but needs a bot run to do so. Could you elaborate on what a bot is needed for? If it's something that can be done with an AWB bot run, I might be able to do it. ~ Rob^Talk 02:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

BU Rob13, it's definitely an AWB fix, but with a few thousand transclusions I didn't really want to do it myself. IMSLP2 is technically a wrapper right now, so to properly turn it into a redirect/get rid of it {{{idX}}} needs to be changed to {{{workX}}} so as to meet the new params in {{IMSLP}}. Primefac (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

... is there any reason not to just make {{{idX}}} a valid parameter for {{IMSLP}}? That would be a hell of a lot less work, and I don't think we have to worry too much about proliferation of deprecated parameters in this type of template. If that's a suitable solution, then it will only take me around 2 minutes. ~ Rob^Talk 01:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

The issue is that both IMSLP and IMSLP2 originally used {{{id}}}. In order to avoid having two sets of templates to change, I allowed for {{{id}}} to be a legacy parameter in IMSLP (being an alternate to the new parameter {{{author}}}). So yes, I suppose I could make it so that {{{idX}}} is an alternate to the {{{workX}}}, but that would still leave issues with the base {{{id}}}. Primefac (talk) 02:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Got it. BRFA submitted. ~ Rob^Talk 02:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Extreme wealth navbox

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, my friend. Please see here. Cheers! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

HB Scotland header

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I saw you tried redirecting {{HB Scotland header}} a while back and had to revert. What went wrong and what still needs to be done, if you don't mind me asking? They appear to have the same parameters. Is the method of input different? ~ Rob^Talk 19:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

BU Rob13, without undoing my undo and breaking everything all over again, I can't say with 100% certainty (it was a while ago). If I remember correctly, though, it was the inputs for {{HB Scotland row}} that didn't properly transition to {{HS listed building row}} upon redirect. Primefac (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Sorry about that. Appears you moved the article into draftspace, so when I did the G13 the bot picked you up as the article's creator. ( Draft:Alcanzar Software Solutions) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

No worries, it happens. Primefac (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

speedy deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the article has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author and all users who made any revisions at all, thus meeting the criteria for U1 and G7. could you revision delete the article please? 63.240.97.125 (talk) 09:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)gord

Speedy deletion nomination of RDUINO Scope

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Primefac,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged RDUINO Scope for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Um... ThePlatypusofDoom, you do realize that R2 is a completely valid CSD tag, right? So double-tagging is kinda pointless? It obviously isn't going to have any content, because it's a soon-to-be-deleted redirect. Primefac (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for Template:Pro gamer achievements

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Pro gamer achievements. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Prisencolin (talk) 20:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for your help and reassurance that I'm entering my citations correctly. Drvalsummers (talk) 21:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Primefac! Just wanted to stop by and say thanks for the help. I'm glad I'm doing a decent job being above-board with my COI. Also, thanks for posting the Connected Contributor (paid) template on the Harrison McIntosh talk page - I just figured out how to do that today. I'll be posting proposed additions to the Harrison McIntosh page from now on, per your suggestion (I moved my userspace draft to my personal sandbox). I would appreciate your help in looking them over! 11gandhi (talk) 03:42, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you very much for all the work you put in fixing my talk page archives!! I was at a bit of a loss, and just didn't have time to deal with it. Enjoy your warm fuzzy kitty!

Chrisw80 (talk) 03:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Social Work

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

[3] How to move forward. Where to find the UI coding guide that's been used in the page. Can you give some pointers on other issues.

Off-topic

Physics mainly deals with meta-concepts right. How were you able to understand and remember them. Mathematics, how was it for you. I find it really hard to get in track. It requires either practice or remembering the particular rules and functions. I find it hard to distinguishing questions to be solved withe rules. Memorizing is also kind of an issue cant anchor those with anything. Similar is the issue with Physics. How would you say your experience was and if you had faced such an issue how would yo handle it. Where do you think the problem is or should the whole approach need a change then how. What are the career prospects for physics students other than teaching and research oriented.117.215.198.220 (talk) 13:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Peter M. Brant

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

An FYI I left you a note over at Talk:Peter M. Brant. I look forward to your input. Thanks. NinaSpezz (talk) 19:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

NinaSpezz, I saw that, thank you. I'll take a look at it soon. Primefac (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Pasi

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am going to be off-wiki for a few days now. I've reported that person to WP:AN3. - Sitush (talk) 17:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Sitush, I will (as always) keep an eye on it. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 17:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for all your help :)

CoolCanuck ^eh? 05:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

DJ Many

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please Help This Draft About Me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:DJ_Many — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:2C1:6C00:5076:5530:4968:99BC (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Regarding National Centre for Excellence Page

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi

I want to know why you have been undoing my handwork in the page 'National Centre for Excellence'. If you see the wiki page of the sister institution, National Public School, Indiranagar, there are all the sections which I had added to NCFE and to point out, with no reference. Please reconsider your decision to that and please undo it. The information is not biased and is to the point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.172.24.92 (talk) 09:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for giving me other pages to clean up. Unreferenced or non-encyclopaedic information is always removed from articles. Just because someone added in text that no one reverted doesn't automatically mean it should be kept. Your information may not be biased, but it is not necessary to know what programs a school offers(unless it's something unusual that no one else in the country is doing). Primefac (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Indian film score composers

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please see my proposal to rename/upmerge: Hugo999 (talk)

Category:Marathi film music composers to Category:Marathi film score composers

Category:Malayalam film composers to Category:Malayalam film score composers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugo999 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 16 June 2016‎ (UTC)

New York Red Riders (Professional ABA Basketball Team)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Primefac,

I was hoping you help me through the process of getting a page I made "live" -- I don't understand why you rejected it. It was a professional ABA basketball team (as referenced on Wikipedia 2009–10 ABA season under the Northeast Division). The thing I don't understand is why every other team in the division, and the ABA for that matter, got their page up on Wikipedia, with far less information and links.

Can you just walk me through the steps I need to make to get this page running? The team meant so much for our community and I think they are AT MINIMUM as deserving to have a page as the other teams in the division like the NYC Thunder, the Tri-City Suns and the Jersey Express.

Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemksy8321 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Hemksy8321, my apologies for the late reply, life has been rather busy, leaving me little time for in-depth responses like the one you deserve.

Let me first say that the existence of one page, good or bad, does not automatically mean another page (good or bad) should be created. The fact that some (and not all) of the ABA teams have pages does not mean the Red Riders automatically get one too. In fact, browsing through the ABA teams, many of them should be redirects to the ABA itself as there is insufficient information and referencing to merit a full article (see WP:BRANCH for why there's no reason to have a dozen stubs instead of one good article).

Second, you lack in-depth references. There is no doubt that the Red Riders existed, but the only references you have are rather generic coverage: team rosters and stats sheets from sites that cover every team in the ABA, rankings, and game announcements. There is a lot of information on the draft page that is simply not backed up by any reliable sources (and forums are not acceptable sources, ever).

Third, in re-reading through the draft, the tone reads part promotional, part fanpage. Phrases like "The team faced an uphill battle all night" and "a thrilling 146-137 victory" are not encyclopaedic (see WP:FLOWERY and WP:WEASEL).

In summary, you need to trim out the promotional text and add references for ALL of the paragraphs (or just remove them). To be honest, having a really solid two-paragraph stub backed up by good references is much better than a ten-paragraph page that gives no verifiable information, so shoot for the former in order to get the page to an acceptable status. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 05:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

15:41:20, 29 May 2016 review of submission by Nic4711

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Nic4711 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Antoine Suarez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Primefac,

Many thanks for your review and your comment. According to your suggestion I will rewrite the submission in a more encyclopedic format and in particular turn the bullet-list into neutral prose.

I have a question regarding “reliable sources”: According to Wikipedia:

“Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable, where the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29

It seems to me that the sources I give fit to this description. I would be thankful if you could check this point once again, and tell me which concrete sources you think I should remove.

In any case, my aim is to present an author whose work illustrates that today’s science may help to clarify crucial anthropological and theological questions, by means of “material published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses”. I think this may be of interest for the Wikipedia readers. Please tell me whether I can make such a remark or not.

Best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nic4711 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 29 May 2016‎ (UTC)

Nic4711, my apologies for the late reply, real life has kept me rather busy.

Your draft is suffering from a lack of independent references. It is strongly discouraged to use someone's own research as verification of a fact. This is not because it is unreliable (as you say, peer-reviewed academic publications are reliable), but rather the fact that it is the subject themselves making the claim. Scientists (and pseudoscientists) make wild claims all of the time; sometimes their theories end up being debunked, and other times they do something novel and important. So the fact that Suarez has published a ton of papers means absolutely nothing unless someone else comments on his research to put his papers into one of those two categories.

This draft should be about Suarez AND his research, but if no one even mentions him then how do we know anyone has taken notice of him? At the moment there is no indication that WP:PROF, one of our metrics for determining if a research professional should have a page on Wikipedia, has been met, because all you have done is say "here's all his research, and here's all the people he's worked with". Nothing has been written about him. No one is saying "his research is ground breaking" or "we're now teaching his theories".

As I said in my review, you will need to do some serious trimming of the draft before it will be acceptable. To be completely honest, if I were tasked with rewriting this draft I would delete everything from the "Quantum Physics" section downward and only keep the first three paragraphs. I would then find reliable sources that verified that information, and if I couldn't do that I would delete those paragraphs as well. Then, I would find articles that talk about him and/or his research and add that information into the draft.

A Wikipedia article does not have to be huge, but it does have to be well-referenced and encyclopaedic. I would rather see a two-paragraph stub that has good sources than a huge CV-like structure that didn't give any verifiable information. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 05:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

10:57:19, 6 June 2016 review of submission by Tropicalpineapple

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tropicalpineapple (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Catz 'n Dogz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Primefac,

Thanks for reviewing my page. However, I am still very confused about the referencing - I have used both notable and reliable sources to back up my information. I have looked into other DJs Wikipedia pages, such as The Martinez Brothers, for example, and they also use same sources as I did in my article: Mixmag, Resident Advisor, etc. These are reliable and well-respected sources in the electronic music industry. Please help me understand how can I better improve the referencing of this article.

Many thanks, Tropicalpineapple — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tropicalpineapple (talk • contribs) 11:57, 6 June 2016‎ (UTC)

Tropicalpineapple, apologies for the late reply. Referencing can be confusing, but I'll try to clarify a bit. Essentially, there are three main types of reference:

Unreliable sources: these are things like blogs, forums, Facebook, IMDb, etc, that are either user-generated or of questionable reliability. If some guy with an opinion writes something on the internet, it's generally not acceptable.
PRIMARY sources: these are sources that are directly connected to the subject. Often this is the subject's own website, but interviews also fall into this category. They are discouraged, mainly because it is the subject talking about themselves and they could be lying (so it's easier to just not use the information).
Independent reliable sources. These are articles from newspapers, magazines, and reputable websites (such as Mixmag). These references are what Wikipedia is built on - good sources of information and a place where someone can potentially learn more about a subject. There are two types of reliable source

Name drops/passing mentions: these are sources that do little more than mention the subject or give their name in a list (such as the Top 100 Widget Makers). Since they are reliable sources, they can be used to verify the facts on the page, but don't actually demonstrate notability.
In-depth sources: references that talk about the subject from a reliable source show that someone has "taken note" of the subject. If there is no in-depth coverage of a subject, they fail the Golden Rule and generally are not given a Wikipedia entry.

You have a lot of primary sources and a lot of name drops, but you have almost no good in-depth sources. You must get some for this draft to be even borderline acceptable.

Another thing (which I mentioned on the draft at the time of decline) is that you have a lot of unnecessary/trivial information in the draft. They are DJs, so it's expected that they're going to play at festivals and club nights. Unless they were a headline act or received major media coverage for performing, there's not much point in including any given appearance (and simply appearing on the "Who's showing up at XYZ Festival" doesn't count).

In short - you need more references and the page could do with a bit of a trim. It's better to have less information that is backed up by really good references than a huge page that is mostly fluff. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 06:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Section break

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Not sure I am doing this right. I am new. A couple of questions:

Bridget0727 started a page that was denied as it was written like an ad rather than an encyclopedia entry. Then the ball got dropped and no activity happened for the page for quite a while, the page was deleted. That writer is no longer involved in writing the article and I will be picking it up again. My question is this...do I need to get the old page undeleted and edit that or can I start with a new page?
The user name. Does it ever display on an article? If so, is it possible to change it as it is the old writers name and it would be better to be something that is more associated with the actual topic or person/company in the article.

Thanks!

--Bridget0727 (talk) 15:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Bridget0727. In answer to your questions:

It is possible to get the draft un-deleted, simply visit WP:DRV and make your request. If you don't want to go through that process, you are more than welcome to use the Article Wizard to create a new draft.
Yes, you need to have a different username. You should create a new account. See WP:NOSHARE.

Let me know if you have any other questions. Primefac (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Reversed Edits

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, and thanks for your response. I removed the posts because it said that if I felt the reversal was incorrect, report it, then remove the notification and resubmit the edit. My source for my edits is http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7830046/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

MsTiger08 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsTiger08 (talk • contribs) 04:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

MsTiger08, that's totally fine, and hopefully you now understand why the bot was acting as it was. As a note, IMDb isn't generally considered a reliable source, so if you can you should try to find something more substantial. See WP:RS for more information. Primefac (talk) 06:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry to interrupt Primefac Sir but i would like to add few more information, correct me if I am wrong please. Dear MsTiger08, I believe IMDb is reliable for sourcing who starred in a movie, what year it came out, or what star has starred in what productions, etc. Same goes for directors, producers, etc. The IMDb bios however are created by users you can read what part of IMDb is user generated here: WP:CITEIMDB . Cheers Catrat999 (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Request on 01:39:46, 13 June 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Mvphothits8849

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Mvphothits8849 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Where Did They Film That? Italy – The Music Journey (Album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please review new sources and let me know if this is sufficient for the moment. We will be adding more as soon as they are available. Thank you.

Mvphothits8849 (talk) 01:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Mvphothits8849, there are two main issues with the draft, the first and foremost being that the album hasn't even been released yet. This falls under what we call TOOSOON, meaning that while it may be a notable subject, it's too early to tell. This stipulation is generally aimed at films, but albums also fall into its purview. The second issue (which stems from the first) is that there doesn't seem to be much in the way of detailed coverage of the album; most of the reliable releases are simply track listings, and the rest are either unreliable (such as blogs) or PRIMARY sources like press releases.

In summary, I suggest waiting to resubmit until after the album is released and there is more press coverage. There is a possibility that no one will notice the release and it will fall into obscurity (of course, the opposite is true, and it could become a smash hit, but that's why you should wait and see). Primefac (talk) 03:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding Purplehed Records

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Primefac Sir, As per your instruction, I have added few more reliable references where Purplehed is a context other than Burn Like the Sun. Request you to kindly review my Draft:Purplehed Records and guide me further. Thanks and Best Regards Catrat999 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Dear Primefac Sir, I am writing for follow up. Hope all is well at your end, its been long. I am awaiting your feedback/reply. Thanks and Best Regards Catrat999 (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Catrat999, it looks like you've added some more sources, which is good. I see no reason not to resubmit, but I give no guarantees (as I was mainly looking at the general content of the references and not doing a full review). Good luck! Primefac (talk) 03:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

@Primefac: Thank you for the guidance sir. I am sure whenever article is ready it will be accepted (Y) and if not then for further improvement, I must correct whatever respective reviewer suggests, there is nothing to worry about any guarantee as both the cases are win win situation. Cheers Catrat999 (talk) 05:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Mayorkun edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, primefac

You know as a chart 📈, it keeps changing . A song can't remain in number one forever. His hit single "eleko" actually topped the iTunes chart at number 1, it is still currently on number 6.

Also his video hit 1000000 views in a month, these are both worth celebrating.

Please I'll resubmit now, as today is the last day for resubmission "30 days" and I am just noticing.

Thank you Eyitayo osunkoya (talk) 13:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Eyitayo osunkoya, my main issue with the #1 thing is that I simply cannot find any sources that say he got to #1 on the iTunes charts. It would appear based on my searches that iTunes does not keep a record or past #1s, but you would think that someone would have mentioned it. If a fact cannot be verified (especially if it's something like hitting iTunes #1) then it needs to be removed.

As for the YouTube hits - they are immaterial. YouTube is largely a social media platform, and how quickly someone reaches an arbitrary milestone of views is less dependent on the quality of their video and more about how well said video is shared by a network of people. To elaborate, if a popular person (like Davido) says "hey check out this video" most people will click just to see what is going on. Everyone could hate the video but it would still get the views.

As an additional note, I'm not sure what "30 day" limit you're talking about. Drafts are deleted after six months with no activity, so you still have plenty of time to find more sources and improve the draft. If you resubmit now without making any changes, it will simply be declined for not being improved. Primefac (talk) 03:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay thank you

I can't even find the draft.

I keep getting, the page does not exist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyitayo osunkoya (talk • contribs) 04:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Eyitayo osunkoya, the page is at Draft:Mayorkun. If you ever can't find a page that you've edited, go to the Contributions link (found at the top of every Wikipedia page) and scroll through your recent edits. Primefac (talk) 17:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Check this out.

http://www.nairaland.com/3057917/mayorkuns-eleko-currently-topping-itunes

Even when you Google search you'll see lots of platforms talking about it then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyitayo osunkoya (talk • contribs) 18:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Eyitayo osunkoya, as the editor primarily responsible for editing this draft page, you should add the reliable references to the draft. I did find the original twitter post to the iTunes #1, but I also left a few other comments on the draft page regarding it. My original comments are also still valid, particularly the lack of in-depth coverage of Mayorkun himself. As a minor note, please make sure to sign all of your posts with ~~~~. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Wallace vandalism

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks, Primefac, for your answer to my question. I had missed the edit, somehow. As you may be able to see, this was my first Wikipedia edit. So I am inexperienced.

Jlindcary (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Jlindcary, no worries, these things happen. I'm just glad that someone caught the vandalism. Welcome to Wikipedia! Primefac (talk) 19:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Ian Stylezz

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Fyi, the Ian Stylezz nomination was a good call. He's not notable in the least really-- just one of thousands of non-notable lower level actors without independent critical coverage. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_20#Template:RMpmc

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I must respectfully disagree with your close here. In the actual TFD, there was only ~~one~~ two actual !votes for redirect, the result of the TFD was more of a no consensus in my opinion. However, you took into account the discussion on the template's talk page as well, which is fair enough. Still, the consensus in that discussion was to change the wording back to the original {{RMnac}}, whilst keeping the link, not to redirect it. Overall, your close seems more like a WP:SUPERVOTE than an actual judge of consensus. I believe that the proper close would've been "keep, but edit to change the wording back to the text of {{RMnac}}, whilst retaining the link". Could you please clarify why you closed it this way? Omni Flames (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

@Omni Flames: A small point of correction: there were two !votes for redirecting (expressed as "retarget"). Best Regards,—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 15:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Nice catch. I've updated my post to reflect this. Omni Flames (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Hmm, you're right; I should have just closed as delete. That was my mistake. Though, respectfully, I have a feeling you would have been posting on my talk page even if I had closed as such.

As for the decision itself, there seemed to be two main arguments: to declare the user was a page mover or not, and the wording implying more power than necessary. The second became a moot point as a result of the talk page discussion (since most involved agreed that "non-admin closure" was acceptable text). For the first point, the most compelling argument for was "it lets users know the change will be enacted immediately," with the most compelling argument against being "it's redundant to {{RMnac}}". As WP:RMPMC is a currently a subsection of WP:RMNAC (meaning linking to the latter includes the former) and there is NODEADLINE, redundancy wins.

If you still feel that I have overstepped my bounds as a NAC then you are welcome to bring my decision up for review, though I do ask that you wait until the discussion at Template talk:RMnac concludes (as it might just end up re-adding the RMPMC link to the template). Primefac (talk) 19:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Higher Education Research Consortium Philippines member has been nominated for discussion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Higher Education Research Consortium Philippines member, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 05:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

23:14:56, 8 June 2016 review of submission by Khalaf Smoqi

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Khalaf Smoqi (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yazda (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Primefac,I need your help with this Draft. Can you please do what is necessary(Delete the Sources you think unnecessary, as well as any lines). If possible, Please do what ever necessary to let this Draft be accepted. The reason I'm asking this is that it has been rejected 4 times, and I really don't know what else I can do. Thank you in advance

Khalaf Smoqi, it looks like you've already resubmitted the draft, so I will keep an eye on it and if I get time I will see about potentially improving the page. Primefac (talk) 03:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Khalaf Smoqi (talk) 12:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Khalaf Smoqi , Hello again :Primefac, as You can see, my draft was rejected again, Please note that I'm not going to resubmit again hoping that you will take editing it under consideration This time. Thank you so much in advance

Draft: HuckleyBuck

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I appreciate you taking the time to review my page and suggest improvements.

This is a tricky topic since playing card games tend to be things that people do, not write about. For example, there has reportedly been a running card game at the Auburn Country Club for the last 15 years, but no references to it in the Auburn paper of the club newsletter. That's my problem, not yours.

On the other hand, the online rules cited and the article in the journal both provide a lot of details. The article has a complete description of the game on page 4. That is where I got the details about shooting the moon. As noted, the article is not online but I write to the author and he sent me a copy. Is there any way that can be of any use?

Blwhite (talk) 18:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Blwhite

Blwhite, you are correct, writing about poorly-sourced subjects can be difficult. The issue I have with the draft currently is that 3/5 of your sources are not reliable: the "official" website is just a blog run by some guy named Kraft, and forums are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia. This leaves you with the McLeod article (which I assume goes into a bit of detail) and the Pagat ref (which doesn't specifically mention the game, but does verify what is stated in the lead).

My suggestion going forward would be to remove the bad refs and add a couple more good ones (if possible); if you cannot source something, remove it. It is better to have a one-paragraph, well-sourced stub than a six page article that is all hearsay and unverified information. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 19:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:165th Air Support Operations Squadron

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you very much for your comments. I think I have edited the draft to remove flowery and weasel language. Obviously, I have never done one of these before... so I appreciate your patience. I was very surprised (disappointed) that it got recommended for deletion so quickly; I would have thought the original reviewer would have given me the opportunity to make edits.

As far as notability, I hope I have added enough to make the squadron seem notable. In the first section, I have included that the 165 ASOS is a combat support unit and that it falls under Air Combat Command (ACC). While the 165 ASOS is under the 165 AW, it is a geographically separated unit and has a different mission (the 165 AW falls under Air Mobility Command (AMC)). Please let me know if you recommend any other changes be made. I will make as many edits as necessary to have this accepted. Apologies for the advertising; I am definitely still learning.

Whopkins11 (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Whopkins11, I apologise on behalf of the AFC helpers for your recent experience. The entire purpose of the AFC process is to make mistakes and improve on them! I wouldn't worry too much about the deletion nomination; the reviewer who did that is fairly new to the group and has much to learn (so they have their own share of mistakes to learn from).

Taking a quick look at the draft it definitely reads a lot better now. I would suggest removing some of the numerous images from the draft, since a random image of a guy holding a gun or jumping out of a plane is not strictly unique to this Squadron. On a minor note, I suggest that you flesh out the references using {{cite web}} or {{cite news}} as appropriate (WP:REFB Section 3.1 has really good information about adding references quickly). The main reason for this is so users can more easily find the original source should the URL ever change in the future. Overall, though, it looks good! Primefac (talk) 20:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestions and comments! I have made additional edits, taking out a few pictures and using {{cite web}} for all the sources. I apologize if there is still something wrong with it, but please let me know what else I need to do. I truly appreciate your help!

Whopkins11 (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

PrimefacThank you for your clear explanations on how to fix the errors. I see that this is a very complicated site with many rules. I appreciate you explaining them. I have requested a new user name and will make sure to be non promotional and add paid to the page. SofiaUPaloAlto (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

13:55:01, 8 July 2016 review of submission by Pianomusic30

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pianomusic30 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:David Sulkin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I appreciate the feedback that you have given in your most recent review of David Sulkin's draft Wikipedia page. I was interested that you said it is borderline. I have already amended the Early Career section as you have suggested.

David Sulkin has been major figure in the arts for several years, and latterly has been doing important work for two major music charities. This sort of work doesn't attract press attention in the way that performers do. He was awarded an OBE in the Queen's New Years Honours list for services to the Arts, Education and Charity, which to me says he is notable. He has achieved a great deal in his career and I appreciate that for an encyclopaedia entrance, it requires reference and evidence. What I don't understand is why these two people, for example, have had their Wikipedia entries confirmed when their articles are so much slimmer:

Daniel Kramer - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kramer Genista McIntosh - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genista_McIntosh,_Baroness_McIntosh_of_Hudnall

I have identified two articles that were written by David Sulkin. Can you let me know if they will help my case? Times Educational Supplement article, 23.10.1987 entitled "Art of the State. David Sulkin looks at contrasting attitudes to young people's theatre in Russia" Drama - the Quarterly Theatre Review, 1988 - Volume 1 entitled "Behind the Iron Curtain. David Sulkin visits Moscow to find out about facilities for young people in the Soviet Union."

Many thanks for your help and advice Pianomusic30 (talk) 07:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

There's a difference between being bold and being uncivil

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I notice you redirected a number of American Basketball Association (2000–present) team pages to the main page without starting the slightest bit of discussion nor giving people the opportunity to improve these articles nor add sources. Also your edit summaries, "being BOLD, redirecting" might violate WP:CIVIL. As such, could you please explain your rationale for doing this without any discussion? Tom Danson (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Tom Danson, I am genuinely curious as to how you equate being BOLD (making a big change to an article, and then stating in the edit summary what is being done) with being unCIVIL. Honestly, please explain.

As to your request: I came across these team pages, found little to nothing in the way of significant coverage (or non-trivial information), and decided to redirect to the parent article. I will admit, I didn't do BEFORE work on every team, but after the first dozen the trend was pretty clear (and you'll notice I didn't do all of the teams). One of the nice things about being bold is that it is easy to undo. If you disagree with my changes, you are welcome (and some might argue, encouraged, per BRD) to revert them. Primefac (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

16:51:06, 19 July 2016 review of submission by Gdevasahayam

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Gdevasahayam (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Gina Devasahayam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added references to the descriptions. I also have a photo with caption, please let me know how to submit this. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdevasahayam (talk • contribs) 17:51, 19 July 2016‎ (UTC)

Gdevasahayam, I have left additional comments on the draft, but you need to add references that talk about her specifically and are not directly connected to her. Her company is obviously going to have a biography of her, so there is no indication of notability. Please see The Golden Rule for the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia. Primefac (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Some general Wiki mark-up and template doubts

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I have some doubts with the Wiki mark-up and templates. Please clarify.

What is the difference between the usage of '<br>' and '<br/>'?
What is the use of using '&nbsp' with ';' instead of a space ' '?
What is the difference between the substituting the template using {{subst:Example}} and transcluding it generally as {{Example}}?

Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 15:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, in order:

None. <br> has one fewer character (which is why I use it myself), but they do the same thing.
is a contraction for "non-breaking space". It means that the words on either side of it will always stay right next to each other. This subsection has a good example of what it does.
When you transclude a template, the page it's being used on makes reference to the template whenever it's refreshed. For example:

{{User:Primefac/RandName}} is

== categories == Last updated on Tue, 7 May 2024 14:25:19 +0000. Regenerate this table or edit the query.



Title
Page ID
Namespace
Size (bytes)
Last change


Stan Meads
354126
0
2051
20231218091844


Eric Liddell
467009
0
43749
20240506142430


Pat Howard
757847
0
9231
20240419102651


Owen Chadwick
1092949
0
17115
20240504142242


John Jeffrey
1351423
0
7864
20230913101144


David Johnston
1450803
0
5043
20230708181027


Frédéric Michalak
2081473
0
21647
20240327190758


Jerry Collins
2887623
0
14002
20240503170633


Henry Menzies
3468199
0
2039
20240303052621


Jamie Cudmore
3553682
0
7314
20240416115335


Waka Nathan
3556456
0
10697
20240506051530


Cobus Visagie
3808491
0
10791
20240417033959


Ned Haig
4384157
0
5542
20230823153810


John Rutherford
4917922
0
6208
20230913095103


Ben Tune
4940015
0
3689
20231208053138


Brendan Venter
5030087
0
12926
20240419103533


Hely Hutchinson Almond
5048972
0
5894
20220703203133


Vincent Clerc
5290189
0
13275
20240302155821


Nicholas Shehadie
5785132
0
24661
20240208155637


Thys Lourens
5788700
0
4241
20240426202432


Krynauw Otto
5813461
0
9215
20230913105200


Tiaki Omana
6309193
0
7426
20240421162747


Tommy Elliot
6908774
0
2770
20231103045923


Frank Stoker
7502292
0
16200
20231001071910


Robbie Deans
7609679
0
21104
20231218091801


Justin Fitzpatrick
7693036
0
9431
20240416090734


Matt McCullough
7693114
0
5149
20240502104009


François Steyn
8036501
0
16884
20240418014544


Chick Henderson
8368331
0
2148
20240318225209


Will Skinner
8439051
0
5440
20240213004733


David Bishop
8578650
0
9805
20230927011756


Tony Roques
9227597
0
2798
20240218032724


Nick Easter
9346840
0
12833
20231017195922


Colin Deans
9486863
0
7266
20231218185228


Alan Cardy
9847249
0
3193
20230925023819


Kenny Milne
10181250
0
6069
20230913103025


Sydney Middleton
11112880
0
15421
20231206092037


Dink Templeton
12241358
0
6253
20230718161712


Cecil Abercrombie
12526864
0
14337
20240426130242


Rory Lawson
12616104
0
4831
20240428143926


Scott Lawson
13186324
0
4752
20231108122549


John Bruce Lockhart
13208224
0
9126
20240426190957


Alan Old
13450540
0
5298
20240204081441


Alastair Biggar
14300359
0
3948
20231001071425


David Robertson
14386562
0
6255
20240220040202


George Helmore
15404962
0
5313
20240330060051


François Trinh-Duc
15542985
0
10228
20240501220138


Louisa Wall
16104130
0
61082
20240403141421


William Havard
16817971
0
12894
20230707171931


Micky Young
17024396
0
7222
20231128011355


Cameron Jowitt
17081583
0
3538
20230729083137


Charles Plumpton Wilson
17241196
0
9776
20240327182954


Maxime Médard
17470199
0
9970
20240318031248


Scott Mathie
17562013
0
4769
20240425042141


Ken Gray
19660453
0
9907
20240104145100


Dan Biggar
19908303
0
18343
20240416125545


Ciarán O'Boyle
20066679
0
3539
20230320050257


Ernest Deane
20221175
0
14032
20240314093923


John Mametsa
20235924
0
4573
20230119010902


Balie Swart
20309989
0
7579
20231208152528


James Dalton
21851679
0
9760
20240106113925


Marius Hurter
21884669
0
6572
20240417033750


Ruben Kruger
21904572
0
11752
20240322221731


Garry Pagel
21917363
0
6208
20240417033750


Hannes Strydom
21991758
0
12043
20240414131917


Edward Scott
22076242
0
5258
20231011055701


Blair Furlong
22808563
0
7143
20231218083059


Herbert Fuller
23016671
0
4144
20231001065724


Edwin Mayfield
23258395
0
4170
20240221081937


Ben Waters
23467361
0
11166
20230709045243


Harold Tyrie
23535244
0
6855
20230219002506


Ben Breeze
23630506
0
3807
20230106195247


Grant Anderson
23813177
0
1848
20230211214110


Robert Thompson
24099166
0
4071
20231001061312


Keith Robertson
24583874
0
4037
20230913084707


John Batten
24904787
0
3979
20231005120134


Granville Coghlan
25256382
0
7537
20240117142633


K. G. MacLeod
25309791
0
5796
20231108083647


Charles Edward Wilson
25334542
0
7444
20231126064856


Ronald Simson
25362776
0
5672
20231008000341


John George Will
25384995
0
6776
20240410184317


James Milne Henderson
25445229
0
5493
20220326233719


Stephen Steyn
25445239
0
4106
20231002020744


William Middleton Wallace
25445241
0
11747
20240329121015


James Pearson
25445443
0
3875
20230112181506


Junior Sifa
25472805
0
1923
20240221070411


Jacky Morkel
25612321
0
11301
20230712032902


Tommy Thompson
25612943
0
7744
20240202203748


Pierre Guillemin
25757604
0
24307
20220326100041


Edward Bannerman
26053348
0
3878
20231002020633


Alexander William Duncan
26108927
0
2524
20231002022818


Kenneth Walker Marshall
26109170
0
5742
20231220073850


Robin Chisholm
26123388
0
2171
20231104081758


David Chisholm
26123402
0
3204
20231104081756


Donald MacDonald
26123651
0
2219
20231002014127


Irvine Geddes
26148481
0
2297
20231002023032


Alastair Fisher
26148561
0
1650
20231001230302


Colin Fisher
26148568
0
3806
20231002020609


Arthur Finlay
26148720
0
2149
20231001190653


Joseph Waters
26160018
0
1938
20231002015332


William Marshall
26160059
0
1818
20231002015207


Duncan MacGregor
26160377
0
1743
20231002013923


George Buchanan McClure
26175491
0
4630
20231119145235


James Howe McClure
26175502
0
3761
20231026234319


Francis Dods
26176111
0
1884
20231002015348


Lewis MacLeod
26176184
0
2258
20220327011042


Pat Harrower
26184324
0
10362
20231001071416


Willie Kyle
26209114
0
2525
20231001071454


Dewaldt Duvenage
26233793
0
5300
20240417065036


Hugh Murray
26235451
0
1770
20231108093902


Keith Murray
26235500
0
2918
20231001233142


Ernest Brutton
26261745
0
5233
20231103030635


George Buchanan-Smith
26269020
0
4559
20231202170806


John Forrest
26273481
0
9091
20231210211530


Frank Hunter
26311006
0
7727
20231210215542


Thomas Anderson
26312618
0
4867
20231119004022


John Eric Greenwood
26397762
0
5556
20240218221102


Les Rackley
27160756
0
5828
20230219092624


Michael Stupple
28082574
0
3061
20231103002925


Coenraad Frederik Strydom
28089516
0
5982
20240226021831


Jed Rowlands
29288043
0
4373
20221231070357


Carla Hohepa
29851885
0
8830
20240430101607


Jules Malfroy
29888161
0
7991
20240131172524


James Tennent
30681094
0
2915
20231002021751


Pascal Ondarts
30824606
0
2952
20240426035405


Tommy Bedford
30886521
0
5169
20221105213400


Michel Crauste
32304127
0
2679
20240426035704


Hannes Marais
32347144
0
4960
20220427094247


Sep Visser
32424638
0
4698
20231027134032


David Mélé
33536263
0
4338
20240426033439


Andrei Ostrikov
33992822
0
5239
20240127000302


Ed Jenkins
35005165
0
6163
20240119105628


Philip Snyman
35360963
0
8968
20240401151436


Simon Hillary
35523069
0
2284
20230318052922


Fergus Aherne
35986146
0
2339
20240105213856


Derek Arnold
36275181
0
2718
20231002021839


Tim Fairbrother
36454244
0
5310
20240418051001


Viktor Kolelishvili
37695990
0
3845
20240416123901


Struan Dewar
37722442
0
2773
20220329141304


Chris Rossouw
38067342
0
5367
20230913091835


Dawie de Villiers
38352974
0
12724
20240406123418


Bungy Watson
39062992
0
4997
20231002015422


Tommy Haslam
39747323
0
7239
20240228211056


Enrico Ceccato
39815247
0
3317
20240309101151


Andrew Wolff
40661770
0
8259
20240402034732


Matt Sherman
41555161
0
4441
20240501065412


Amy Garnett
41714002
0
10726
20240314142339


John Pring
42255388
0
2992
20230427090113


Katherine Merchant
43419818
0
4711
20240507061957


Fiona Pocock
43425020
0
3233
20240314173519


Marlie Packer
43625980
0
8092
20240507061957


Beef Dancer
44328417
0
4451
20230414103545


Marcello Violi
45151368
0
6000
20240306044711


Arthur Jennings
45398523
0
4920
20231218082411


Ralph Knibbs
46269794
0
5777
20240415231025


Herbert Laxon
46813742
0
5246
20211117070243


Andrew Warwick
46908036
0
7822
20240426213229


Beka Bitsadze
47099953
0
3972
20240416124120


Albert Downing
47176949
0
23640
20240124085038


Henry Dewar
47235054
0
22321
20231218084513


Peter Williams
47243301
0
3861
20210208140608


George Sellars
47252827
0
4665
20220902193121


George Williams
47380480
0
8240
20231121215441


Levani Botia
47591301
0
8274
20240430123942


Dick Taiaroa
47618677
0
4658
20240430182317


Jock McKenzie
47678778
0
3563
20240409171531


Fred Roberts
47688891
0
7905
20231218084122


Juan Manuel Gaminara
47802262
0
2811
20230914014022


Calum MacGregor
47822822
0
8105
20230819191113


Duncan Madsen
47927646
0
1819
20230604132636


Lancelot Barrington-Ward
47940586
0
10763
20231011200507


John MacLeod
47947260
0
7306
20230325074826


Richard Cramb
48028100
0
3964
20231103044559


Douglas Wyllie
48028169
0
4605
20231222024746


Mac Cooper
48468764
0
7700
20240420082206


John Gainsford
48587192
0
18133
20240304001600


Andrew Ness
49160716
0
5300
20240227204232


Charles Harrington Broad
49287329
0
16051
20240412225055


Tal Austin
50436385
0
8014
20231127230933


Geoff Blakely
50444652
0
4531
20240227180619


Shaun Gadsby
50747864
0
2701
20220217083634


Carl Hogg
50961924
0
9789
20231130120018


Entienne Swanepoel
51196936
0
17244
20240416114504


Jock Lawrie
52324249
0
2828
20220609161833


Giorgio Bronzini
52409195
0
4614
20240306050714


Jean-Pierre Lux
52476212
0
2316
20240426035704


Bob Bennet
52557878
0
4105
20231218091137


Barney Armit
52619409
0
7179
20240506050008


Billy Warbrick
52801754
0
3606
20230530180250


Donald Scott
53060897
0
6257
20231103045923


Tommy Gray
53069892
0
4075
20220820163203


Hamish Scott
53080728
0
5700
20211213141414


Allan Cameron
53089081
0
5452
20230317053015


Hamish Inglis
53109329
0
5677
20220907001438


Iain Ross
53119655
0
4006
20230409012844


Oliver Turnbull
53128866
0
4615
20230730201118


Bob Wilson
53140085
0
3802
20230605204822


Henry Kiernan
53148319
0
5207
20231218084517


Bob Gordon
53155924
0
3278
20220604141017


Bob Taylor
53165315
0
4103
20240222083848


Ian Thomson
53169655
0
4615
20211216103502


Ken Dalgleish
53180968
0
4050
20220326102421


John Hart
53290299
0
4068
20231007131950


Jimmie Johnston
53300108
0
3520
20231104081822


Les Allan
53306938
0
3581
20240119174652


Ian Cordial
53342241
0
3178
20230703130328


John Fox
53350590
0
2937
20231104081812


Norman Munnoch
53363120
0
4885
20240112205748


Mike Walker
53374895
0
2294
20220205072514


Neil Cameron
53379610
0
3457
20220326234938


David Gilbert-Smith
53404500
0
4675
20231220025345


Jim Inglis
53415440
0
4644
20231102083447


Grant Weatherstone
53423871
0
3523
20230927223642


Jock King
53436019
0
3235
20220908101604


Keith McMillan
53444737
0
3378
20220726175403


Bruce Thomson
53453348
0
4115
20231121200117


Edwin Henriksen
53487308
0
5149
20211207194413


Walter Kerr
53537832
0
2351
20240330175820


Ian Swan
53547264
0
5535
20231012181351


John Marshall
53558603
0
4520
20231103023525


Pat MacLachlan
53568655
0
3899
20230630215804


Jimmy Docherty
53588945
0
3197
20211203172034


George Petrakos
53709221
0
4514
20240224092813


Denis Cussen
54218758
0
3135
20230605172049


Phil Healey
54457208
0
4423
20240419102649


Deon Kayser
55001606
0
6073
20240127061454


Victoria Subritzky-Nafatali
55226771
0
11895
20231222104623


Alycia Washington
55295711
0
4253
20240417032221


Ellie Miles
55761502
0
8924
20240304215630


Liam Belcher
55800882
0
3097
20240213023121


Matai Leuta
55950983
0
8179
20240430131723


Andy Ferreira
55958939
0
2768
20231216192550


Levi Aumua
56029960
0
3491
20240505115416


Jeremy Richardson
56242730
0
6029
20231106070334


Robert Lindsay-Watson
56358422
0
5235
20230828122314


Malcolm Jellicoe
56642836
0
1725
20231122122408


Morgan Morris
57057468
0
3678
20230122160620


Alex Thomson
57671986
0
3595
20220326231539


Vivian Weston
57687437
0
4475
20211216213114


Donald Grant
57709512
0
4869
20230317080142


Claude Darbos
57712697
0
3094
20240426035704


Jamie Henry
59488622
0
2791
20240418021953


Kenneth Jackson
59936359
0
8809
20231112051456


Pierre Darbos
60061715
0
6542
20240426035704


Michael Lowry
60394765
0
11488
20240426214154


Greg Jones
60398230
0
4261
20240426213655


Johan Momsen
61268875
0
3127
20240417062229


Billy Walker
61487210
0
5507
20240226025816


Clive Davis
61690193
0
4793
20231209043550


Peter Lillington
61717254
0
5145
20231103125703


Santiago Arata
61878478
0
3643
20240417064338


Archie White
62251272
0
2550
20231124205551


Waimana Riedlinger-Kapa
62322145
0
2953
20240418021140


James Boyd
62434857
0
6570
20231001234924


Ian Davies
62647744
0
2547
20240407111654


Bernard Lavigne
62680957
0
2925
20240426040352


Michel Celaya
62741793
0
3327
20240426035405


Niall Murray
62749746
0
5102
20240327100744


Andrew Flett
62938213
0
4246
20230827061507


Shaunagh Brown
63091922
0
8508
20240503025519


William St Clair Grant
63119530
0
2841
20231002021539


David Cassels
63481625
0
4748
20240117074915


David Fisher
63904382
0
4843
20230317075820


Avril Malan
63998087
0
5915
20220427093719


Roy Dryburgh
64004711
0
5958
20240225104203


Dawie Snyman
64013899
0
6698
20220427094010


Huw Davies
64045856
0
2931
20231104141520


Samuele Pace
64097222
0
4011
20240306044733


John Rogerson
64101340
0
2829
20230317092835


Jackie Snyman
64234055
0
5271
20220427094420


Roy McCallum
64248534
0
4457
20230715041145


Chris Pope
64248582
0
5240
20240113110947


Johan Oosthuizen
64248669
0
4731
20220506063230


Boland Coetzee
64254502
0
4877
20220427093750


Gilberto Pavan
64257465
0
3085
20240306045251


Dom Hardman
64283527
0
2715
20240412091038


Rory O'Sullivan
64283885
0
2684
20230520070047


Grason Makara
64283941
0
2749
20230716161223


Byron Ralston
64283981
0
4547
20240428051815


Piet du Plessis
64295870
0
3592
20220427095202


John Williams
64305640
0
5769
20220427094637


Gert Muller
64311194
0
6288
20220427094216


Niek Bezuidenhout
64312026
0
4607
20230606111854


Tonie Roux
64313462
0
4620
20240106115917


Martiens Louw
64314465
0
3555
20220427094922


Joggie Jansen
64322800
0
5329
20240109110424


Sakkie Sauermann
64323610
0
4112
20220427095359


Albie Bates
64329237
0
3947
20220729225628


Piston van Wyk
64332192
0
5420
20240113110346


Hannes Viljoen
64342500
0
3863
20240330153809


Johan Spies
64415607
0
3688
20240226021324


Tiaan Tauakipulu
64449330
0
3016
20240221203947


Ollie Callan
64520940
0
2815
20240315163359


Panashe Muzambe
64654817
0
5513
20240114153220


Ryan Manyika
64670699
0
4610
20240221042210


Andries Truscott
64693704
0
3779
20240307032856


Tommie Laubscher
64718307
0
4683
20231109192436


André Darrieussecq
64740380
0
1690
20240426035405


Guido Randisi
64775888
0
2572
20240417072221


Toks van der Linde
64780792
0
5265
20230915121437


Chris O'Brien
65147659
0
3716
20240501065412


Tom Clarkson
65154443
0
5452
20231123232112


Grant Charles Wells
65174011
0
3995
20240329200733


Guy Kebble
65214262
0
4330
20220427094234


Pierre Dospital
65295887
0
3186
20240426035143


Alfred Roques
65296059
0
2839
20240426033953


Élie Cester
65301567
0
3752
20240426032736


Kevin Putt
65321368
0
6438
20240425093814


Justin Swart
65427739
0
6191
20240225032411


Johan le Roux
65476277
0
4217
20230317184738


Edward Ewart
65836306
0
4187
20231108155310


Finlay Kennedy
66104878
0
6097
20231108081058


Archibald Stewart
66114283
0
3908
20231103050100


Billy Burnet
66155541
0
4796
20231001233324


Alan McGowan
66194702
0
2755
20230318055203


Charles Dick
66213785
0
5090
20231105092446


Ben Stevenson
66220399
0
2780
20240214012910


Sean Robinson
66220456
0
2470
20240226132839


Connor Collett
66220603
0
2202
20231127224247


Ben Morris
66223255
0
2135
20221127113905


Tom Parton
66259214
0
2437
20231118172511


Matt Williams
66259275
0
2520
20240214012903


Isaac Curtis-Harris
66260140
0
2233
20240214012358


Ross Thompson
66269097
0
10073
20240327103123


Allan Roy
66284169
0
5379
20240105074045


James Dun
66338889
0
2106
20240321104200


Charlie Powell
66338902
0
2231
20240413170924


Jacob Morris
66339326
0
2138
20240214012432


Willie Meyer
66373670
0
7435
20240427205224


Wium Basson
66404697
0
3529
20230927054545


Martín Alonso
66658663
0
3025
20240416125137


Jaime Nava
66711187
0
9671
20240504190554


Noel Elliott
66921892
0
3420
20240502101950


Gregor Brown
66937025
0
5203
20240116082318


George Macleod
67153466
0
2898
20220423070128


Errol Smith
67158908
0
2515
20220423065734


Bryce Allan
67169582
0
4638
20240205060012


Neil McPhail
67189098
0
1984
20220425180335


Arthur Marslin
67189156
0
1309
20240424021048


Fitz Harding
67207523
0
4077
20240408052825


Will Montgomery
67207801
0
2101
20231127223857


Harvey Skinner
67207996
0
2135
20230305005419


Jack Musk
67208058
0
2246
20240218032844


Ben Donnell
67208128
0
2224
20240216190040


Catherine O'Donnell
67274241
0
4740
20240318201208


James Fraser
67281447
0
4678
20230927132247


Kerin Lake
67299016
0
9487
20240119045742


Jade Knight
67301037
0
8757
20240322132640


Neville Kloppers
67350365
0
2556
20230913084454


Alex Nicholls
67350656
0
4097
20230927073000


Andre Buitendag
67350780
0
2191
20231122122516


Dirk Buitendag
67351650
0
2496
20240301014728


Beibhinn Parsons
67360411
0
10924
20240413191942


Alisha Joyce-Butchers
67370886
0
12063
20240409205105


Gwenllian Pyrs
67393784
0
10343
20231228154135


Robyn Wilkins
67395846
0
13112
20240119110751


Jack Park
67423590
0
4692
20230317091252


Emma Wassell
67461650
0
5310
20240223235013


Sarah Law
67503688
0
12543
20240306175227


Jenny Maxwell
67522898
0
7218
20231007130359


Lisa Thomson
67522941
0
11038
20240416130051


Arthur Brown
67618872
0
3777
20231030070400


James Burnett
67767978
0
2827
20240210050418


Robert Markram
67819612
0
3638
20230927054744


Harri Morris
67867351
0
3277
20231008214843


Detysha Harper
67884667
0
5612
20240319004641


Flo Long
67884741
0
3844
20221028175526


Gwenllian Jenkins
67910404
0
3365
20240507114917


Abbie Fleming
67910616
0
7712
20231017160450


Boeta Wessels
67958802
0
3342
20220427093748


Jock Allan
67977669
0
3729
20240306131451


Ronald Cumming
67991902
0
4414
20231102010952


Gordon Boyd
67999649
0
3204
20230309162108


Clovis Le Bail
68000870
0
2146
20230927165457


Davie Patterson
68029290
0
4227
20220408102107


Spence McTavish
68051810
0
2621
20240320041007


John Scoular
68062720
0
5536
20240226103217


George Barton
68098398
0
4731
20240321132843


Jack Kenningham
68098553
0
3332
20240218032834


Arthur Browning
68106347
0
6296
20230617163525


Ronnie Kavanagh
68264513
0
3781
20240422105444


Jiuta Wainiqolo
68334972
0
15123
20240416123036


Julio Álvarez
68723983
0
5055
20220523175457


Stacey Flood
68730832
0
5882
20240308042230


Eve Higgins
68731323
0
5573
20240404182716


Chris Busby
69090385
0
2396
20240414143648


Andrea Piardi
69090470
0
2942
20240224150612


Craig Evans
69090572
0
3079
20240215193943


Gianluca Gnecchi
69090663
0
2594
20231024224658


John Macphail
69179690
0
4639
20230429134900


James McKendrick
69211526
0
2408
20231217222726


Lawrence Cleminson
69227135
0
2600
20240225015621


Peter Murdoch
69300791
0
2324
20231218090101


Jack McNab
69305092
0
3330
20231218084724


Jack McNab
69305212
0
2345
20231218084721


Jim McNeece
69324947
0
2780
20231218084906


Eddie Robinson
69331797
0
1993
20231218083905


Ponty Reid
69332131
0
2902
20240223173336


Don McKay
69332652
0
2293
20240207221528


Jack Colman
69332829
0
2581
20231218084653


Walter Batty
69340638
0
3380
20231218090933


Roy White
69372031
0
2206
20231218090420


Don McIntosh
69372100
0
1916
20231218083827


Doddy Gray
69372687
0
2340
20231218083821


Jack Stohr
69373676
0
2947
20231218084739


Sal Irvine
69381583
0
2311
20231218090437


Jim Moffitt
69381816
0
2996
20231218084909


Adam Jones
69417781
0
2411
20240327094101


Jerome Paarwater
69778785
0
2394
20240224202726


Etienne Fynn
69796349
0
2825
20240108163049


Jules Favre
69812017
0
2562
20231122054314


Kevin Flynn
69819217
0
2556
20231002022754


Dale Atkins
70018950
0
2396
20240226025503


Seo Chun-oh
70070440
0
2235
20220315000123


Royce Chan
70080084
0
5141
20240503004446


Jackson Pugh
70228599
0
2823
20240312134930


Will Sankey
70498206
0
2609
20230716161302


Oleksiy Tsybko
70508680
0
2661
20240506174502


Alex Masibaka
70662526
0
2523
20240416110021


Eoghan Cross
70833143
0
2181
20230831152737


Stephan Geldenhuys
70890503
0
2267
20220601173614


Ray O'Callaghan
71282149
0
2369
20240225033012


Elia Canakaivata
71456034
0
7273
20240308062234


Doug Herman
71527161
0
3682
20240125010423


Théo Ntamack
71740643
0
5692
20231214095218


Tom Jordan
71832627
0
5017
20240418042410


Connor Anderson
72414208
0
4963
20231208053748


Jack Mann
72472283
0
4575
20240507115110


Jamie Drummond
72482956
0
6126
20231116004738


Robbie McCallum
72510478
0
6992
20230913072436


Kenneth Lawrie
72637255
0
2622
20231001231430


Ron Wilson
72647166
0
3144
20230108161536


Zenay Jordaan
72793146
0
2972
20240312074427


Bill Relph
72817414
0
3155
20230207142937


Malcolm Swan
72910389
0
3765
20230927093638


James Cotter
72911703
0
6338
20231007021149


Rob Barrie
72923416
0
5623
20231230002840


Henry Polson
72964748
0
2475
20230208192538


Bertie Lorraine
72972137
0
8383
20230713081639


Denoon Duncan
73023992
0
4977
20230218140339


Harry Sheridan
73070204
0
6382
20240426213523


Eli Caven
73138284
0
6705
20231116012203


Brian O'Brien
73169737
0
3874
20230426023806


Doug Keller
73315021
0
7684
20240430102020


Léo Drouet
73344583
0
2902
20240426031847


David Bertram
73383853
0
4160
20231001231425


John Goodfellow
73444134
0
4318
20231103045923


John Buchanan
73485281
0
5213
20231001231418


George Thom
73528549
0
8123
20231106200636


Gregor Sharp
73598533
0
4726
20231002015609


Nathan Spooner
73713923
0
4774
20240422011707


Charlie Hancock
73840247
0
3203
20240309204018


Daniel Hughes
73955803
0
3903
20231218091245


Roger Boon
74086335
0
3165
20231218090330


Oskar Rixen
74136150
0
4112
20240221064750


Mathis Ferté
74164823
0
5964
20230715123808


Léo Carbonneau
74166007
0
6797
20240426035405


Hugo Reus
74166548
0
3769
20240426040102


Baptiste Jauneau
74170776
0
3132
20240426035405


Marko Gazzotti
74306905
0
4481
20240403144013


Lewis Gjaltema
74496661
0
5132
20240417035108


Ian Hyde-Lay
74641427
0
4606
20240303053242


Dave Tucker
74678218
0
2635
20240320041420


Tim Kelaher
74887876
0
3706
20240107063203


Sam Payne
74894092
0
3081
20240416110309


Mitch Hardy
74903011
0
3118
20240416110021


Brett Johnstone
74903966
0
3611
20231007022127


Jerónimo Portela
75290303
0
3589
20240226102543


Hugo Navizet
75544385
0
1781
20231212112729


Matthias Halagahu
75833712
0
3820
20240129141810


Antoine Gibert
75834076
0
3604
20240327092337


Martin Green
75840903
0
3023
20240118101634


Lenni Nouchi
75947774
0
6503
20240426031848


Mihai Naca
76179717
0
2379
20240225053237


William Gibson Biggart
76450801
0
4022
20240327074744


Alex Callender
76470556
0
6072
20240402200859


Reg Taylor
76496595
0
2525
20240331040021


Hugo Auradou
76520605
0
3972
20240426035143


Théo Attissogbé
76520643
0
3731
20240501203019


Grégoire Arfeuil
76522786
0
3501
20240426035143


Mehdi Tlili
76524900
0
3312
20240501204118


Lucas Rey
76525238
0
6174
20240504205259


Thibault Debaes
76536700
0
4339
20240426035143


Geoffrey Lanne-Petit
76537231
0
6488
20240426035406


Thibaut Hamonou
76537476
0
3993
20240426035847


Thomas Carol
76556830
0
5643
20240415032434


Mateo Garcia
76603880
0
3250
20240501113513


Katie Corrigan
76765258
0
3681
20240503233007

{{subst:User:Primefac/RandName}} is This is a random subpage.

When I first saved the page, these two were identical. However, I will shortly be changing the code so you will see two different lines of text. A transcluded template, when changed, will change on the articles where they are used. A substituted template cannot, because it ceases to be a template (it's just text on a page).

Hope this helps! Primefac (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Primefac. Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 00:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Primefac. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

Wikipedia:Requested moves
Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, post here, or just let me know. Thank you, and happy editing! Nakon 01:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

TfD relistings

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Primefac. Thanks for helping out at TfD! Usually, when you relist discussions, you leave a copy of the entire discussion as of the relist where it originally was. There are many advantages of this, but one of the main ones is that editors can easily search for discussions they were a part of that have been relisted. Would you mind doing that going forward? Thanks! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

BU Rob13, I asked about this a few months ago, where I specifically asked about WP:RELIST and how I had seen other editors blanking before relisting. The only response I received made sense, and I have continued to see others blank/relist, so I have continued the practice. If you feel that this is incorrect, I think we should ping some of the other TFD personalities on the TFD talk page to properly gain a consensus on this issue. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 02:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Templates for hierarchy

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I want to know whether there are any templates to construct a hierarchy table. Presently, I am using direct image files to portray the hierarchy. For example: Please have a look at the 'Organisational structure' section of the Indian Naval Hydrographic Department. I am considering {{Family tree}}, but I want to whether is it correct to use that for the this purpose. Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 00:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, I think it would be best to use images. {{Chart}} (which has replaced {{family tree}}) doesn't have the level of detail you want (specifically, the arrows). Also, the image you're using is more complex than what Chart would be able to manage. Plus, the image looks really nice. Primefac (talk) 17:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Mayorkun

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Primefac,

Fixed up most you complained about.

The boy is doing really good.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyitayo osunkoya (talk • contribs) 18:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Austin Petersen again

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, not sure if you are interested, but the Austin_Petersen page is up again. Bunco man (talk) 18:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Request on 16:23:47, 16 August 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by JMWalden

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

JMWalden (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Gene Van Dyke (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

JMWalden (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

with reference to GENE VAN DYKE article:

I don’t think any changes need to be made to this article. It’s factual. It’s straight forward. And, I’d like to address your objections here so you will reconsider and/or comment:

Objections:

Lack of online
Lake Arthur (West Lake Arthur)
Peacock language – has been removed
Neutral POV – give me an example. A good example of a non-neutral article is the Wiki article for J. Howard Marshall, see below.
Reliable sources – Time magazine, Crude Continent (book) are reliable sources
Formal tone – this revision is a factual tone. Please give me a better example of a factual, formal tone.
(June 28, 2016) draft does not say he is a “great oilman” It only states his activity.

Lack of online references Unsubstantiated references

Much of Van Dyke’s career (1951-1996) is in print and not online. Would you like a PDF of the articles?
Tullow Chief Aidan Heavey has a brief Wiki article with only 9 sources. One-third of those sources (online) can no longer be referenced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aidan_Heavey
Wiki article about Daphna Kastner, wife of Harvey Keitel, has NO citations to substantiate her family, marriage and career content. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daphna_Kastner
Most of Wiki article J. Howard Marshall’s citations are in print only, like court documents. And, the lead source of information is from his autobiography. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Howard_Marshall
Another example of unsubstantiated history is the article on Everett Pierce Marshall, J. Howard Marshall’s son https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Pierce_Marshall. The first two paragraphs under Life and career refer to extensive education and employment, yet there is not one citation for the first two paragraphs. The paragraph uses language like, “led the company through a successful turnaround, saving over 300 jobs in Colorado and Oklahoma” but there are no citations to support this, and the language sound peacock.
Further, like Van Dyke’s article, E. Pierce Marshall’s article uses primarily non-online sources. Like Van Dyke, E. Pierce Marshall only uses 7 references.

Peacock language

All “peacock” language in Van Dyke article has been removed, yet it appears, unsubstantiated in Wiki article on J. Howard Marshall, which uses language like “his most influential work” and “these pioneering studies”. No footnote and no factual basis.
Marshall’s article further uses personal, non-factual and unsubstantiated references like, “Throughout many of his endeavors, Marshall turned most of his business associations into friendships; including J.R. Parten, Fred Koch and his sons, Oscar Wyatt and O.E. Buck.”

Insignificant discoveries-insignificant films: Reviewer labeled reference to Texas Gulf Coast discoveries in Van Dyke article as insignificant; yet the obscure, unknown and unsuccessful films of Harvey Keitel’s wife appear in her Wiki article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daphna_Kastner

Lake Arthur vs. West Lake Arthur

In the oil and gas business, there may be reference to a field that is in the vicinity of another field. In this case, the WEST Lake Arthur field is in the vicinity of the Lake Arthur field. Two separate finds; two separate fields. JMWalden (talk) 16:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

JMWalden, it's late and I'm tired, and I'll get back to you fully soon. However, I should give you fair warning that per OTHERSTUFFEXISTS I'm pretty much going ignore any "but this person has..." complaints. The existence of good/bad pages means absolutely nothing for the creation of a new page. If a bad page exists, it should be improved or deleted, not used as rationale for creating another potentially substandard page. That being said, it looks like you make some valid points (I'm just too tired to parse them fully); I'll read through this in the next couple of days and get back to you. Primefac (talk) 03:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I look forward to your reply and further consideration. JMWalden (talk) 13:36, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft on RL Leaders

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In reference to my article on RL Leaders....most of their work is CLASSIFIED so it's very hard to provide extensive "detailed" coverage of the company. I listed work by them that has been de-classified and can be mentioned and backed it up with legit references from the Washington Post to the NY Times as well as govt sites. I ALSO modeled it exactly after other pages that HAVE been approved and EXIST on wikipedia. Doesn't get much more legit than that. At this point I've been kind, I've been cooperartive and have followed every suggestion given to me since April (explain what they do....explain how they were born out of the 9/11 commission, explain a few of the projects they have done...take out info about the founders and talk more about the company...) I've done every single one of those things. Every single one. Robert McLenon was the nicest reviewer. Very helpful and not an elitist snob like so many. All "wikipedists" have different things to say to help my article and none of them, not one, has helped get the article approved. One last submission and I'm throwing in the towel. Evaki1972 (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Feedback on Draft:David Sulkin

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

HI Primefac I wrote to you about your review of the page about David Sulkin in July and haven't seen a reply from you yet. Do I need to check your page to see your reply? I should be really grateful for your help/feedback. Would you like me to send my query again? Thanks very much Pianomusic30 (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Pianomusic30, I do apologise. I appear to have completely missed your original post somehow (I see it in my archives), but I've been busy and haven't had much time to dedicate to Wikipedia. I'm moving in a couple of days, but after that I will take a look at your original request and get back to you. Primefac (talk) 20:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Primefac, thanks, much appreciated Pianomusic30 (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Pianomusic30, I've taken a look at your original message. First, the articles on Kramer and McIntosh may be on Wikipedia, but currently they do not appear appropriate for inclusion. Per a guideline called "other stuff exists," the fact that these two articles exist does not mean that similar articles should also be created. Sub-standard articles (a category which I believe both these fall into) should either be improved or deleted.

As for getting your draft approved: the lack of significant coverage is currently holding it back. Honestly, if you can find 1-2 sources that talk specifically about Sulkin (and aren't interviews, press releases, or other PRIMARY sources) I think it would be acceptable. A side note: the fact that he is an OBE does not automatically make him notable, as a ton of people receive that honour every year.

If you can find those sources and add them in somewhere appropriate, I'd be happy to take a second look at the page. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 01:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Primefac, thanks very much for the feedback which I understand and is very clear. I have found 8 more sources that talk about / mention Sulkin which are not press releases, interviews or primary sources. I should be most grateful if you were able to have a second look. Pianomusic30 (talk) 5 September 2016

Draft on RL Leaders

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In reference to my article on RL Leaders....most of their work is CLASSIFIED so it's very hard to provide extensive "detailed" coverage of the company. I listed work by them that has been de-classified and can be mentioned and backed it up with legit references from the Washington Post to the NY Times as well as govt sites. I ALSO modeled it exactly after other pages that HAVE been approved and EXIST on wikipedia. Doesn't get much more legit than that. At this point I've been kind, I've been cooperartive and have followed every suggestion given to me since April (explain what they do....explain how they were born out of the 9/11 commission, explain a few of the projects they have done...take out info about the founders and talk more about the company...) I've done every single one of those things. Every single one. Robert McLenon was the nicest reviewer. Very helpful and not an elitist snob like so many. All "wikipedists" have different things to say to help my article and none of them, not one, has helped get the article approved. One last submission and I'm throwing in the towel. Evaki1972 (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Feedback on Draft:David Sulkin

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

HI Primefac I wrote to you about your review of the page about David Sulkin in July and haven't seen a reply from you yet. Do I need to check your page to see your reply? I should be really grateful for your help/feedback. Would you like me to send my query again? Thanks very much Pianomusic30 (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Pianomusic30, I do apologise. I appear to have completely missed your original post somehow (I see it in my archives), but I've been busy and haven't had much time to dedicate to Wikipedia. I'm moving in a couple of days, but after that I will take a look at your original request and get back to you. Primefac (talk) 20:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Primefac, thanks, much appreciated Pianomusic30 (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Pianomusic30, I've taken a look at your original message. First, the articles on Kramer and McIntosh may be on Wikipedia, but currently they do not appear appropriate for inclusion. Per a guideline called "other stuff exists," the fact that these two articles exist does not mean that similar articles should also be created. Sub-standard articles (a category which I believe both these fall into) should either be improved or deleted.

As for getting your draft approved: the lack of significant coverage is currently holding it back. Honestly, if you can find 1-2 sources that talk specifically about Sulkin (and aren't interviews, press releases, or other PRIMARY sources) I think it would be acceptable. A side note: the fact that he is an OBE does not automatically make him notable, as a ton of people receive that honour every year.

If you can find those sources and add them in somewhere appropriate, I'd be happy to take a second look at the page. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 01:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Primefac, thanks very much for the feedback which I understand and is very clear. I have found 8 more sources that talk about / mention Sulkin which are not press releases, interviews or primary sources. I should be most grateful if you were able to have a second look. Pianomusic30 (talk) 5 September 2016

Pageswap script for convenience

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Primefac! I've noticed that at some point, you performed round-robin page moves. Thought I'd share a script I recently completed here (js) that semi-automates page swaps for convenience. You'd simply click "Swap" and enter a page destination, the script performs the 3 moves as necessary (saves time having to manually go through the move form 3 times). (It doesn't correct redirects afterwards, that's still manual) It's gotten decent feedback so far.

Oh, and a quick thing about the round-robin for Future Earth: the move order you performed left two move entries in the main page's revision history. Consider making two moves for the redirect page (now at Future Earth (environmental research) instead, so a move of the main page has one direct clean revision. Anyway, feel free to adapt that script as you see fit, and cheers :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 06:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Andy! This will definitely make things a bit nicer in the future. I'll also keep in mind the move order for next time. Primefac (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Resubmitted article on Daniel Noah

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi again. I've finished the edit, and wanted to make sure it was re-submitted properly. Is there any way you can check that for me? Also, if you have a moment to look at the edit, let me know your thoughts. Thanks again for all your help! Mek457 (talk) 01:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Mek457, you've made the edits, but you haven't resubmitted it yet. You can either click the "Resubmit" button on the previous decline notice, or place {{subst:submit}} at the top of the page and save it. A minor note regarding references: when you use something like {{cite web}}, make sure you include the closing curly brackets! Good luck! Primefac (talk) 03:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Los Alamos Scientists

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Primefac, It appears to me that there is some "cooperation" in the writing of biographies of Los Alamos scientists. So, for example, have you noticed that User:UareNumber6 and User:GoldCar have extremely similar user pages? Also, user:Alamosfan, who submitted the article on Johndale Solem, [4], but otherwise has not made any other edits. Then there is user:MCCONM, [5]], who has made lots of edits to the Charles L. Mader article, [6]. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 13:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Isambard Kingdom, I'm not overly surprised, given that they all work together. A little cooperation never hurt anyone, and (fortunately) they're all fairly neutral articles. Plus, they've disclosed their COIs (even though they might be nearly identical). Something to keep an eye on (which I think I do), but no reason to alert the authorities. Primefac (talk) 03:46, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Request on 13:09:20, 12 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Helen Larkin

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Helen Larkin (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Patrick Whelan Irish Volunteer Easter Rising 1916 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Primefac

Thanks for taking the time to review my article, but there are a few things I have issues with.

The definition of a martyr is to give your life for your country. Patrick Whelan was awarded the 1916 medal posthumously, in recognition of his sacrifice to help build the foundations of this State and allow Ireland gain her freedom. In acknowledgement of Patrick's contribution, our family is invited to attend State Commemorative Masses and Events on an annual basis. In addition Patrick Whelan's name featured as part of the 'written names logo' for the centenary of the Easter Rising this year.

In your review, you state that 'he does have a street named after him' - it's actually an entire block of flats - Whelan House - that's named after him. The flats are beside O'Rahily House and next door to St. Patrick's Church in Ringsend. Both blocks of flats were named in memory of the two men who were killed in the Rising. I've since amended the reference to this (14) in the Wikipedia article, as I found the source of this information contained in Turtle Bunbury's book 'Dublin Dockland - An Urban Voyage'.

http://www.turtlebunbury.com/published/published_books/docklands/ringsend_poolbeg/pub_books_docklands_rd_streetwise.html

I used the following as independent reliable sources:

Joseph E.A. Connell Jnr. (Who's Who in the Dublin Rising 1916)

Ray Bateson (They Died by Pearse's Side). Patrick Whelan is mentioned specifically on the back of the dust jacket.

I have made reference to the Military Archives, where Patrick's name appears on the Roll of Honour and which also stores the Witness Statement of the Captain of the 3rd Battalion, Joseph O'Byrne, who was standing beside Patrick, when he was shot dead.

Even though it only lasted six days, the Easter Rising was a seminal event in Irish history, and Patrick Whelan played his part in it. The centenary of the event this year has brought a greater interest in the various aspects of it and there is currently a writing contest (and photography contest) running on Wikipedia:

http://wikilovesmonuments.ie/?pk_campaign=Centralnotice

where one of the categories is 1916 People and Places. I think this would be a great context for Patrick Whelan’s involvement in the events of Easter week and would like to enter my article, as I believe it would be of interest in this category.

I look forward to your response and thanks again for your time

Helen Larkin (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Helen Larkin, there were multiple issues with the draft, which I left as a comment on the draft itself. I will not reiterate those points. However, I will expand upon your main concern about references: while it is clear that Whelan has been mentioned in a lot of places, brief mentions do not demonstrate notability. Articles on Wikipedia require significant coverage of a subject. He could be listed on every honour roll that they print, but if those listings never say more than "died in the Easter Rising" then they're pretty much useless.

Unfortunately, "notability" as defined by the Golden Rule is different than what most people feel is "important" or "significant." There are important and significant people who will never get an article on Wikipedia simply because they do not meet the requirements for inclusion. I am certainly not saying that Whelan is one of those people, but I am saying that at the moment (at least to me) he does not meet those requirements. As a courtesy, I will be copying this discussion over to the draft's talk page and will ping WP:MILHIST for their opinions. They might have some good suggestions. Primefac (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: I have moved this discussion to Draft talk:Patrick Whelan#Discussion about notability. Please continue the conversation there. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft of Clipperz Wikipedia article

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Primefac, thank you very much for taking the time to review my proposed article on the Clipperz password manager. I realize that you are doing your best to uphold the quality of Wikipedia entries. The rejection of the article is quite disappointing as I spent about 40 hours researching and developing this article and did my best to meet the standards, goals and format requirements of Wikipedia. In your comment you mentioned that there is only a single reliable source cited. The reason for this is that much of my original submission was removed after Bradv suggested that a description of the features of the product read as an advertisement.

In the case of Clipperz, I am just a long-time user of the product. I could appreciate the concept that a small product like Clipperz doesn't rise to the notability level of a Wikipedia entry except for the fact that many password managers listed in Wikipedia and which have entries in Wikipedia's list of Password Managers are even smaller, cite few (if any) independent references, usually run-on about their features and -- in several instances -- simply are defunct or otherwise unavailable. None of them have a (software) historical context, which Clipperz does have. A product called SaferPass appears in the Password Managers listing even though it is just a reference to a so-far rejected draft.

Even this would be OK were it not for the fact that Google and other search engines showcase the Wikipedia "List of Password Managers". No casual user would realize that this list is based on the combination of someone submitting an article and being assigned a Wikipedia editor who for whatever reason (or not) gave the article a pass. Instead they would reasonably assume that any valid password manager could be listed if someone went to the trouble to do so. In this regard I think the policy of restricting lists to items with Wikipedia entries is quite damaging to small software and other technology enterprises, especially when they are starting out.

I realize that none of this is your problem. On the other hand, it seems it is no one else's problem either. I'm sorry to have to say that that is even more disappointing than the denial of publication.

Again, thank you for the comments and assessment and continuing efforts on behalf of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddkatz (talk • contribs) 22:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft review for Doc.It article

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Primefac, thanks for your input. I have provided many sources and listed some awards that Doc.It has received, including one just now for top 100 accounting products - hopefully this addresses your concern of the software being run-of-the-mill. There are at least 2 independent, third-party reviews. Also, I have not cited the following reviews because I don't reference them at all, but they are different reviews that could satisfy what you're looking for: http://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/review/11600740/2014-review-of-docit-suite http://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/review/12236187/2016-review-of-docit-suite

If they are applicable and will help my case, let me know.

Also, consider the following Wikipedia page of another software company in the same industry. They have an article published with a lot less sources than what I'm offering now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CaseWare_International

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdowns13 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

GENUKI

Latest comment: 7 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

Hi, you have replaced Genuki references with template, for example here, but you have failed to retain the accessdate required when used as a reference. The template looks like it requires an |accessdate= to allow it to be used in references. Keith D (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Keith D, this is me being genuinely curious, but if access dates were required for all online references, wouldn't things like {{cite web}} throw errors left and right from people leaving them out? I know that an access date is valuable information, but saying that a reference would be disallowed because it doesn't have an access date parameter seems a little farfetched. Primefac (talk) 23:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

I should also probably mention that I'm pretty sure this template (well, its predecessors anyway) were never meant to be used as references, but I'd have to ask PamD about that one. Maybe it shouldn't be used in refs? Primefac (talk) 23:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

There is no code to throw an error for missing accessdates in the cite templates so that is why there are not loads of errors for this. I do not think I was saying it should be disallowed if it does not have an accessdate but that one should be present if it is to a web page as Genuki is. The reference entries to Genuki that have accessdates should not loose that information but should retain it when it is converted to the template. Keith D (talk) 23:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Keith D, you make a fair point. I'll go through my recent edits and re-add the accessdate information (be it via the template or just re-adding the information). Primefac (talk) 23:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

It's most often going to be an external link, but I suppose it could be used as a reference if someone wanted to cite info found in Genuki, perhaps citing it as source for a quote from a historic description, so it might be useful to add an optional "access date" field. PamD 23:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

PamD, the other issue I discovered is that the base names only account for about half of the actual links being used. There are a lot of subpages for the various parishes that {{genuki}} simply can't handle at the moment. I'm thinking about ways around this, but I'll have to test some things out first. Primefac (talk) 23:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm just going to revert the ref usage of the template until I can figure out the best usage of this template. Primefac (talk) 23:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Good luck! I developed the original 4 templates for use, initially my own use, as a shortcut and futureproof way to add a helpful EL for places. I can see that others might want to link to Genuki pages for other reasons. Reverting changes to refs look safest for now. PamD 05:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

TFD close error

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

When you closed the tfd for Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:ArbComBlock, you instead appear to have put the G6 tag on Template:ArbComBlock itself, rather than its editnotice. Ppp ery —Preceding undated comment added 02:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

That is a rather serious error, Pppery, thanks for letting me know. I'm not sure what happened, as I was using the TFDcloser. I'm pinging Evad37 and I'll leave a note on the talk page for the script. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Should've put it on Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee? ;) Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hello, Primefac. You have new messages at VarunFEB2003's talk page.
Message added Varun FEB2003 13:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please help improve the file you asked for - File:Toggle green v2.png Varun FEB2003 13:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Done Varun FEB2003 15:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Industrial Plankton Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Primefac

Thanks for taking the time to review my article, Industrial Plankton Inc. You wrote on June 1st "My main concern with this draft (which I have discussed with the creator on IRC) is that in five years this company has only received three press mentions, one of which being from a rather specialized publication. Apparently there should be more press generated soon, as new business ventures are underway. When that happens, I would be perfectly happy accepting this article as a stub, but until then it seems like a good idea that just hasn't been noticed yet"

I have taken the time to work on what you wrote and have published an article by the Globe and Mail titled" Feeding the seafood Farm industry" http://www.theglobeandmail.com/partners/advsbi0916/feeding-the-seafood-farm-industry/article32263942/. I believe this should satisfy you, and the Globe and Mail is one the most reliable sources here in Canada. I am working on getting more sources, as I believe this company is attending a lot of huge Aquaculture and Biotech Conferences and seminars and I honestly see a huge potential for such a company. Kindly read the most recent article. I have just resubmitted the article and I hope you can approve it.

Thank you for your cooperation.

) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Am.h121 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Am.h121, in looking at the Glove and Mail reference, it's created by Globe Edge Content Studio, which is a service where a company pays them money and they write/help write an article that can be published somewhere. I'm not quite sure it counts as a good secondary source (since it's essentially a press release/native advertising). Keep looking, though, and I'm always happy to provide feedback! Primefac (talk) 01:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Title	Page ID	Size (bytes)	Last change
Stan Meads	354126	2051	20231218091844
Eric Liddell	467009	43749	20240506142430
Pat Howard	757847	9231	20240419102651
Owen Chadwick	1092949	17115	20240504142242
John Jeffrey	1351423	7864	20230913101144
David Johnston	1450803	5043	20230708181027
Frédéric Michalak	2081473	21647	20240327190758
Jerry Collins	2887623	14002	20240503170633
Henry Menzies	3468199	2039	20240303052621
Jamie Cudmore	3553682	7314	20240416115335
Waka Nathan	3556456	10697	20240506051530
Cobus Visagie	3808491	10791	20240417033959
Ned Haig	4384157	5542	20230823153810
John Rutherford	4917922	6208	20230913095103
Ben Tune	4940015	3689	20231208053138
Brendan Venter	5030087	12926	20240419103533
Hely Hutchinson Almond	5048972	5894	20220703203133
Vincent Clerc	5290189	13275	20240302155821
Nicholas Shehadie	5785132	24661	20240208155637
Thys Lourens	5788700	4241	20240426202432
Krynauw Otto	5813461	9215	20230913105200
Tiaki Omana	6309193	7426	20240421162747
Tommy Elliot	6908774	2770	20231103045923
Frank Stoker	7502292	16200	20231001071910
Robbie Deans	7609679	21104	20231218091801
Justin Fitzpatrick	7693036	9431	20240416090734
Matt McCullough	7693114	5149	20240502104009
François Steyn	8036501	16884	20240418014544
Chick Henderson	8368331	2148	20240318225209
Will Skinner	8439051	5440	20240213004733
David Bishop	8578650	9805	20230927011756
Tony Roques	9227597	2798	20240218032724
Nick Easter	9346840	12833	20231017195922
Colin Deans	9486863	7266	20231218185228
Alan Cardy	9847249	3193	20230925023819
Kenny Milne	10181250	6069	20230913103025
Sydney Middleton	11112880	15421	20231206092037
Dink Templeton	12241358	6253	20230718161712
Cecil Abercrombie	12526864	14337	20240426130242
Rory Lawson	12616104	4831	20240428143926
Scott Lawson	13186324	4752	20231108122549
John Bruce Lockhart	13208224	9126	20240426190957
Alan Old	13450540	5298	20240204081441
Alastair Biggar	14300359	3948	20231001071425
David Robertson	14386562	6255	20240220040202
George Helmore	15404962	5313	20240330060051
François Trinh-Duc	15542985	10228	20240501220138
Louisa Wall	16104130	61082	20240403141421
William Havard	16817971	12894	20230707171931
Micky Young	17024396	7222	20231128011355
Cameron Jowitt	17081583	3538	20230729083137
Charles Plumpton Wilson	17241196	9776	20240327182954
Maxime Médard	17470199	9970	20240318031248
Scott Mathie	17562013	4769	20240425042141
Ken Gray	19660453	9907	20240104145100
Dan Biggar	19908303	18343	20240416125545
Ciarán O'Boyle	20066679	3539	20230320050257
Ernest Deane	20221175	14032	20240314093923
John Mametsa	20235924	4573	20230119010902
Balie Swart	20309989	7579	20231208152528
James Dalton	21851679	9760	20240106113925
Marius Hurter	21884669	6572	20240417033750
Ruben Kruger	21904572	11752	20240322221731
Garry Pagel	21917363	6208	20240417033750
Hannes Strydom	21991758	12043	20240414131917
Edward Scott	22076242	5258	20231011055701
Blair Furlong	22808563	7143	20231218083059
Herbert Fuller	23016671	4144	20231001065724
Edwin Mayfield	23258395	4170	20240221081937
Ben Waters	23467361	11166	20230709045243
Harold Tyrie	23535244	6855	20230219002506
Ben Breeze	23630506	3807	20230106195247
Grant Anderson	23813177	1848	20230211214110
Robert Thompson	24099166	4071	20231001061312
Keith Robertson	24583874	4037	20230913084707
John Batten	24904787	3979	20231005120134
Granville Coghlan	25256382	7537	20240117142633
K. G. MacLeod	25309791	5796	20231108083647
Charles Edward Wilson	25334542	7444	20231126064856
Ronald Simson	25362776	5672	20231008000341
John George Will	25384995	6776	20240410184317
James Milne Henderson	25445229	5493	20220326233719
Stephen Steyn	25445239	4106	20231002020744
William Middleton Wallace	25445241	11747	20240329121015
James Pearson	25445443	3875	20230112181506
Junior Sifa	25472805	1923	20240221070411
Jacky Morkel	25612321	11301	20230712032902
Tommy Thompson	25612943	7744	20240202203748
Pierre Guillemin	25757604	24307	20220326100041
Edward Bannerman	26053348	3878	20231002020633
Alexander William Duncan	26108927	2524	20231002022818
Kenneth Walker Marshall	26109170	5742	20231220073850
Robin Chisholm	26123388	2171	20231104081758
David Chisholm	26123402	3204	20231104081756
Donald MacDonald	26123651	2219	20231002014127
Irvine Geddes	26148481	2297	20231002023032
Alastair Fisher	26148561	1650	20231001230302
Colin Fisher	26148568	3806	20231002020609
Arthur Finlay	26148720	2149	20231001190653
Joseph Waters	26160018	1938	20231002015332
William Marshall	26160059	1818	20231002015207
Duncan MacGregor	26160377	1743	20231002013923
George Buchanan McClure	26175491	4630	20231119145235
James Howe McClure	26175502	3761	20231026234319
Francis Dods	26176111	1884	20231002015348
Lewis MacLeod	26176184	2258	20220327011042
Pat Harrower	26184324	10362	20231001071416
Willie Kyle	26209114	2525	20231001071454
Dewaldt Duvenage	26233793	5300	20240417065036
Hugh Murray	26235451	1770	20231108093902
Keith Murray	26235500	2918	20231001233142
Ernest Brutton	26261745	5233	20231103030635
George Buchanan-Smith	26269020	4559	20231202170806
John Forrest	26273481	9091	20231210211530
Frank Hunter	26311006	7727	20231210215542
Thomas Anderson	26312618	4867	20231119004022
John Eric Greenwood	26397762	5556	20240218221102
Les Rackley	27160756	5828	20230219092624
Michael Stupple	28082574	3061	20231103002925
Coenraad Frederik Strydom	28089516	5982	20240226021831
Jed Rowlands	29288043	4373	20221231070357
Carla Hohepa	29851885	8830	20240430101607
Jules Malfroy	29888161	7991	20240131172524
James Tennent	30681094	2915	20231002021751
Pascal Ondarts	30824606	2952	20240426035405
Tommy Bedford	30886521	5169	20221105213400
Michel Crauste	32304127	2679	20240426035704
Hannes Marais	32347144	4960	20220427094247
Sep Visser	32424638	4698	20231027134032
David Mélé	33536263	4338	20240426033439
Andrei Ostrikov	33992822	5239	20240127000302
Ed Jenkins	35005165	6163	20240119105628
Philip Snyman	35360963	8968	20240401151436
Simon Hillary	35523069	2284	20230318052922
Fergus Aherne	35986146	2339	20240105213856
Derek Arnold	36275181	2718	20231002021839
Tim Fairbrother	36454244	5310	20240418051001
Viktor Kolelishvili	37695990	3845	20240416123901
Struan Dewar	37722442	2773	20220329141304
Chris Rossouw	38067342	5367	20230913091835
Dawie de Villiers	38352974	12724	20240406123418
Bungy Watson	39062992	4997	20231002015422
Tommy Haslam	39747323	7239	20240228211056
Enrico Ceccato	39815247	3317	20240309101151
Andrew Wolff	40661770	8259	20240402034732
Matt Sherman	41555161	4441	20240501065412
Amy Garnett	41714002	10726	20240314142339
John Pring	42255388	2992	20230427090113
Katherine Merchant	43419818	4711	20240507061957
Fiona Pocock	43425020	3233	20240314173519
Marlie Packer	43625980	8092	20240507061957
Beef Dancer	44328417	4451	20230414103545
Marcello Violi	45151368	6000	20240306044711
Arthur Jennings	45398523	4920	20231218082411
Ralph Knibbs	46269794	5777	20240415231025
Herbert Laxon	46813742	5246	20211117070243
Andrew Warwick	46908036	7822	20240426213229
Beka Bitsadze	47099953	3972	20240416124120
Albert Downing	47176949	23640	20240124085038
Henry Dewar	47235054	22321	20231218084513
Peter Williams	47243301	3861	20210208140608
George Sellars	47252827	4665	20220902193121
George Williams	47380480	8240	20231121215441
Levani Botia	47591301	8274	20240430123942
Dick Taiaroa	47618677	4658	20240430182317
Jock McKenzie	47678778	3563	20240409171531
Fred Roberts	47688891	7905	20231218084122
Juan Manuel Gaminara	47802262	2811	20230914014022
Calum MacGregor	47822822	8105	20230819191113
Duncan Madsen	47927646	1819	20230604132636
Lancelot Barrington-Ward	47940586	10763	20231011200507
John MacLeod	47947260	7306	20230325074826
Richard Cramb	48028100	3964	20231103044559
Douglas Wyllie	48028169	4605	20231222024746
Mac Cooper	48468764	7700	20240420082206
John Gainsford	48587192	18133	20240304001600
Andrew Ness	49160716	5300	20240227204232
Charles Harrington Broad	49287329	16051	20240412225055
Tal Austin	50436385	8014	20231127230933
Geoff Blakely	50444652	4531	20240227180619
Shaun Gadsby	50747864	2701	20220217083634
Carl Hogg	50961924	9789	20231130120018
Entienne Swanepoel	51196936	17244	20240416114504
Jock Lawrie	52324249	2828	20220609161833
Giorgio Bronzini	52409195	4614	20240306050714
Jean-Pierre Lux	52476212	2316	20240426035704
Bob Bennet	52557878	4105	20231218091137
Barney Armit	52619409	7179	20240506050008
Billy Warbrick	52801754	3606	20230530180250
Donald Scott	53060897	6257	20231103045923
Tommy Gray	53069892	4075	20220820163203
Hamish Scott	53080728	5700	20211213141414
Allan Cameron	53089081	5452	20230317053015
Hamish Inglis	53109329	5677	20220907001438
Iain Ross	53119655	4006	20230409012844
Oliver Turnbull	53128866	4615	20230730201118
Bob Wilson	53140085	3802	20230605204822
Henry Kiernan	53148319	5207	20231218084517
Bob Gordon	53155924	3278	20220604141017
Bob Taylor	53165315	4103	20240222083848
Ian Thomson	53169655	4615	20211216103502
Ken Dalgleish	53180968	4050	20220326102421
John Hart	53290299	4068	20231007131950
Jimmie Johnston	53300108	3520	20231104081822
Les Allan	53306938	3581	20240119174652
Ian Cordial	53342241	3178	20230703130328
John Fox	53350590	2937	20231104081812
Norman Munnoch	53363120	4885	20240112205748
Mike Walker	53374895	2294	20220205072514
Neil Cameron	53379610	3457	20220326234938
David Gilbert-Smith	53404500	4675	20231220025345
Jim Inglis	53415440	4644	20231102083447
Grant Weatherstone	53423871	3523	20230927223642
Jock King	53436019	3235	20220908101604
Keith McMillan	53444737	3378	20220726175403
Bruce Thomson	53453348	4115	20231121200117
Edwin Henriksen	53487308	5149	20211207194413
Walter Kerr	53537832	2351	20240330175820
Ian Swan	53547264	5535	20231012181351
John Marshall	53558603	4520	20231103023525
Pat MacLachlan	53568655	3899	20230630215804
Jimmy Docherty	53588945	3197	20211203172034
George Petrakos	53709221	4514	20240224092813
Denis Cussen	54218758	3135	20230605172049
Phil Healey	54457208	4423	20240419102649
Deon Kayser	55001606	6073	20240127061454
Victoria Subritzky-Nafatali	55226771	11895	20231222104623
Alycia Washington	55295711	4253	20240417032221
Ellie Miles	55761502	8924	20240304215630
Liam Belcher	55800882	3097	20240213023121
Matai Leuta	55950983	8179	20240430131723
Andy Ferreira	55958939	2768	20231216192550
Levi Aumua	56029960	3491	20240505115416
Jeremy Richardson	56242730	6029	20231106070334
Robert Lindsay-Watson	56358422	5235	20230828122314
Malcolm Jellicoe	56642836	1725	20231122122408
Morgan Morris	57057468	3678	20230122160620
Alex Thomson	57671986	3595	20220326231539
Vivian Weston	57687437	4475	20211216213114
Donald Grant	57709512	4869	20230317080142
Claude Darbos	57712697	3094	20240426035704
Jamie Henry	59488622	2791	20240418021953
Kenneth Jackson	59936359	8809	20231112051456
Pierre Darbos	60061715	6542	20240426035704
Michael Lowry	60394765	11488	20240426214154
Greg Jones	60398230	4261	20240426213655
Johan Momsen	61268875	3127	20240417062229
Billy Walker	61487210	5507	20240226025816
Clive Davis	61690193	4793	20231209043550
Peter Lillington	61717254	5145	20231103125703
Santiago Arata	61878478	3643	20240417064338
Archie White	62251272	2550	20231124205551
Waimana Riedlinger-Kapa	62322145	2953	20240418021140
James Boyd	62434857	6570	20231001234924
Ian Davies	62647744	2547	20240407111654
Bernard Lavigne	62680957	2925	20240426040352
Michel Celaya	62741793	3327	20240426035405
Niall Murray	62749746	5102	20240327100744
Andrew Flett	62938213	4246	20230827061507
Shaunagh Brown	63091922	8508	20240503025519
William St Clair Grant	63119530	2841	20231002021539
David Cassels	63481625	4748	20240117074915
David Fisher	63904382	4843	20230317075820
Avril Malan	63998087	5915	20220427093719
Roy Dryburgh	64004711	5958	20240225104203
Dawie Snyman	64013899	6698	20220427094010
Huw Davies	64045856	2931	20231104141520
Samuele Pace	64097222	4011	20240306044733
John Rogerson	64101340	2829	20230317092835
Jackie Snyman	64234055	5271	20220427094420
Roy McCallum	64248534	4457	20230715041145
Chris Pope	64248582	5240	20240113110947
Johan Oosthuizen	64248669	4731	20220506063230
Boland Coetzee	64254502	4877	20220427093750
Gilberto Pavan	64257465	3085	20240306045251
Dom Hardman	64283527	2715	20240412091038
Rory O'Sullivan	64283885	2684	20230520070047
Grason Makara	64283941	2749	20230716161223
Byron Ralston	64283981	4547	20240428051815
Piet du Plessis	64295870	3592	20220427095202
John Williams	64305640	5769	20220427094637
Gert Muller	64311194	6288	20220427094216
Niek Bezuidenhout	64312026	4607	20230606111854
Tonie Roux	64313462	4620	20240106115917
Martiens Louw	64314465	3555	20220427094922
Joggie Jansen	64322800	5329	20240109110424
Sakkie Sauermann	64323610	4112	20220427095359
Albie Bates	64329237	3947	20220729225628
Piston van Wyk	64332192	5420	20240113110346
Hannes Viljoen	64342500	3863	20240330153809
Johan Spies	64415607	3688	20240226021324
Tiaan Tauakipulu	64449330	3016	20240221203947
Ollie Callan	64520940	2815	20240315163359
Panashe Muzambe	64654817	5513	20240114153220
Ryan Manyika	64670699	4610	20240221042210
Andries Truscott	64693704	3779	20240307032856
Tommie Laubscher	64718307	4683	20231109192436
André Darrieussecq	64740380	1690	20240426035405
Guido Randisi	64775888	2572	20240417072221
Toks van der Linde	64780792	5265	20230915121437
Chris O'Brien	65147659	3716	20240501065412
Tom Clarkson	65154443	5452	20231123232112
Grant Charles Wells	65174011	3995	20240329200733
Guy Kebble	65214262	4330	20220427094234
Pierre Dospital	65295887	3186	20240426035143
Alfred Roques	65296059	2839	20240426033953
Élie Cester	65301567	3752	20240426032736
Kevin Putt	65321368	6438	20240425093814
Justin Swart	65427739	6191	20240225032411
Johan le Roux	65476277	4217	20230317184738
Edward Ewart	65836306	4187	20231108155310
Finlay Kennedy	66104878	6097	20231108081058
Archibald Stewart	66114283	3908	20231103050100
Billy Burnet	66155541	4796	20231001233324
Alan McGowan	66194702	2755	20230318055203
Charles Dick	66213785	5090	20231105092446
Ben Stevenson	66220399	2780	20240214012910
Sean Robinson	66220456	2470	20240226132839
Connor Collett	66220603	2202	20231127224247
Ben Morris	66223255	2135	20221127113905
Tom Parton	66259214	2437	20231118172511
Matt Williams	66259275	2520	20240214012903
Isaac Curtis-Harris	66260140	2233	20240214012358
Ross Thompson	66269097	10073	20240327103123
Allan Roy	66284169	5379	20240105074045
James Dun	66338889	2106	20240321104200
Charlie Powell	66338902	2231	20240413170924
Jacob Morris	66339326	2138	20240214012432
Willie Meyer	66373670	7435	20240427205224
Wium Basson	66404697	3529	20230927054545
Martín Alonso	66658663	3025	20240416125137
Jaime Nava	66711187	9671	20240504190554
Noel Elliott	66921892	3420	20240502101950
Gregor Brown	66937025	5203	20240116082318
George Macleod	67153466	2898	20220423070128
Errol Smith	67158908	2515	20220423065734
Bryce Allan	67169582	4638	20240205060012
Neil McPhail	67189098	1984	20220425180335
Arthur Marslin	67189156	1309	20240424021048
Fitz Harding	67207523	4077	20240408052825
Will Montgomery	67207801	2101	20231127223857
Harvey Skinner	67207996	2135	20230305005419
Jack Musk	67208058	2246	20240218032844
Ben Donnell	67208128	2224	20240216190040
Catherine O'Donnell	67274241	4740	20240318201208
James Fraser	67281447	4678	20230927132247
Kerin Lake	67299016	9487	20240119045742
Jade Knight	67301037	8757	20240322132640
Neville Kloppers	67350365	2556	20230913084454
Alex Nicholls	67350656	4097	20230927073000
Andre Buitendag	67350780	2191	20231122122516
Dirk Buitendag	67351650	2496	20240301014728
Beibhinn Parsons	67360411	10924	20240413191942
Alisha Joyce-Butchers	67370886	12063	20240409205105
Gwenllian Pyrs	67393784	10343	20231228154135
Robyn Wilkins	67395846	13112	20240119110751
Jack Park	67423590	4692	20230317091252
Emma Wassell	67461650	5310	20240223235013
Sarah Law	67503688	12543	20240306175227
Jenny Maxwell	67522898	7218	20231007130359
Lisa Thomson	67522941	11038	20240416130051
Arthur Brown	67618872	3777	20231030070400
James Burnett	67767978	2827	20240210050418
Robert Markram	67819612	3638	20230927054744
Harri Morris	67867351	3277	20231008214843
Detysha Harper	67884667	5612	20240319004641
Flo Long	67884741	3844	20221028175526
Gwenllian Jenkins	67910404	3365	20240507114917
Abbie Fleming	67910616	7712	20231017160450
Boeta Wessels	67958802	3342	20220427093748
Jock Allan	67977669	3729	20240306131451
Ronald Cumming	67991902	4414	20231102010952
Gordon Boyd	67999649	3204	20230309162108
Clovis Le Bail	68000870	2146	20230927165457
Davie Patterson	68029290	4227	20220408102107
Spence McTavish	68051810	2621	20240320041007
John Scoular	68062720	5536	20240226103217
George Barton	68098398	4731	20240321132843
Jack Kenningham	68098553	3332	20240218032834
Arthur Browning	68106347	6296	20230617163525
Ronnie Kavanagh	68264513	3781	20240422105444
Jiuta Wainiqolo	68334972	15123	20240416123036
Julio Álvarez	68723983	5055	20220523175457
Stacey Flood	68730832	5882	20240308042230
Eve Higgins	68731323	5573	20240404182716
Chris Busby	69090385	2396	20240414143648
Andrea Piardi	69090470	2942	20240224150612
Craig Evans	69090572	3079	20240215193943
Gianluca Gnecchi	69090663	2594	20231024224658
John Macphail	69179690	4639	20230429134900
James McKendrick	69211526	2408	20231217222726
Lawrence Cleminson	69227135	2600	20240225015621
Peter Murdoch	69300791	2324	20231218090101
Jack McNab	69305092	3330	20231218084724
Jack McNab	69305212	2345	20231218084721
Jim McNeece	69324947	2780	20231218084906
Eddie Robinson	69331797	1993	20231218083905
Ponty Reid	69332131	2902	20240223173336
Don McKay	69332652	2293	20240207221528
Jack Colman	69332829	2581	20231218084653
Walter Batty	69340638	3380	20231218090933
Roy White	69372031	2206	20231218090420
Don McIntosh	69372100	1916	20231218083827
Doddy Gray	69372687	2340	20231218083821
Jack Stohr	69373676	2947	20231218084739
Sal Irvine	69381583	2311	20231218090437
Jim Moffitt	69381816	2996	20231218084909
Adam Jones	69417781	2411	20240327094101
Jerome Paarwater	69778785	2394	20240224202726
Etienne Fynn	69796349	2825	20240108163049
Jules Favre	69812017	2562	20231122054314
Kevin Flynn	69819217	2556	20231002022754
Dale Atkins	70018950	2396	20240226025503
Seo Chun-oh	70070440	2235	20220315000123
Royce Chan	70080084	5141	20240503004446
Jackson Pugh	70228599	2823	20240312134930
Will Sankey	70498206	2609	20230716161302
Oleksiy Tsybko	70508680	2661	20240506174502
Alex Masibaka	70662526	2523	20240416110021
Eoghan Cross	70833143	2181	20230831152737
Stephan Geldenhuys	70890503	2267	20220601173614
Ray O'Callaghan	71282149	2369	20240225033012
Elia Canakaivata	71456034	7273	20240308062234
Doug Herman	71527161	3682	20240125010423
Théo Ntamack	71740643	5692	20231214095218
Tom Jordan	71832627	5017	20240418042410
Connor Anderson	72414208	4963	20231208053748
Jack Mann	72472283	4575	20240507115110
Jamie Drummond	72482956	6126	20231116004738
Robbie McCallum	72510478	6992	20230913072436
Kenneth Lawrie	72637255	2622	20231001231430
Ron Wilson	72647166	3144	20230108161536
Zenay Jordaan	72793146	2972	20240312074427
Bill Relph	72817414	3155	20230207142937
Malcolm Swan	72910389	3765	20230927093638
James Cotter	72911703	6338	20231007021149
Rob Barrie	72923416	5623	20231230002840
Henry Polson	72964748	2475	20230208192538
Bertie Lorraine	72972137	8383	20230713081639
Denoon Duncan	73023992	4977	20230218140339
Harry Sheridan	73070204	6382	20240426213523
Eli Caven	73138284	6705	20231116012203
Brian O'Brien	73169737	3874	20230426023806
Doug Keller	73315021	7684	20240430102020
Léo Drouet	73344583	2902	20240426031847
David Bertram	73383853	4160	20231001231425
John Goodfellow	73444134	4318	20231103045923
John Buchanan	73485281	5213	20231001231418
George Thom	73528549	8123	20231106200636
Gregor Sharp	73598533	4726	20231002015609
Nathan Spooner	73713923	4774	20240422011707
Charlie Hancock	73840247	3203	20240309204018
Daniel Hughes	73955803	3903	20231218091245
Roger Boon	74086335	3165	20231218090330
Oskar Rixen	74136150	4112	20240221064750
Mathis Ferté	74164823	5964	20230715123808
Léo Carbonneau	74166007	6797	20240426035405
Hugo Reus	74166548	3769	20240426040102
Baptiste Jauneau	74170776	3132	20240426035405
Marko Gazzotti	74306905	4481	20240403144013
Lewis Gjaltema	74496661	5132	20240417035108
Ian Hyde-Lay	74641427	4606	20240303053242
Dave Tucker	74678218	2635	20240320041420
Tim Kelaher	74887876	3706	20240107063203
Sam Payne	74894092	3081	20240416110309
Mitch Hardy	74903011	3118	20240416110021
Brett Johnstone	74903966	3611	20231007022127
Jerónimo Portela	75290303	3589	20240226102543
Hugo Navizet	75544385	1781	20231212112729
Matthias Halagahu	75833712	3820	20240129141810
Antoine Gibert	75834076	3604	20240327092337
Martin Green	75840903	3023	20240118101634
Lenni Nouchi	75947774	6503	20240426031848
Mihai Naca	76179717	2379	20240225053237
William Gibson Biggart	76450801	4022	20240327074744
Alex Callender	76470556	6072	20240402200859
Reg Taylor	76496595	2525	20240331040021
Hugo Auradou	76520605	3972	20240426035143
Théo Attissogbé	76520643	3731	20240501203019
Grégoire Arfeuil	76522786	3501	20240426035143
Mehdi Tlili	76524900	3312	20240501204118
Lucas Rey	76525238	6174	20240504205259
Thibault Debaes	76536700	4339	20240426035143
Geoffrey Lanne-Petit	76537231	6488	20240426035406
Thibaut Hamonou	76537476	3993	20240426035847
Thomas Carol	76556830	5643	20240415032434
Mateo Garcia	76603880	3250	20240501113513
Katie Corrigan	76765258	3681	20240503233007

User talk:Primefac/Archive 5

Notice

You corrected my reference syntax for me.

Article for Deletion: Michigan State Miracle

Deletion review for Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 18

Banned means banned

AFC list

Happy New Year Primefac!

Thanks

About the decline of Draft:Vineeth_Mohan

01:20:23, 6 January 2016 review of submission by Jchambers1984m

A barnstar for you!

Ahmad Shah Khan Crown Prince Of Afghanistan.

Image upload

Non-free files related to scouting/guilding

03:02:36, 26 January 2016 review of submission by Willbam

ANI notice

nasty p article

Non-admin closures

Thanks

Template:Nuneaton Town F.C. squad

Notability - Thank you

WikiProjectBanners

Your edits to Draft:Armand Cucciniello article

{{Lists of 21st-century state leaders}}

WikiLove

{{Arcade History}}

Review my Draft:Energising Bharat Awards

User talk:Cmmkt

Template:WikiProject Political parties

IMSLP2 merge

Extreme wealth navbox

HB Scotland header

Speedy deletion tag

speedy deletion

Speedy deletion nomination of RDUINO Scope

Deletion review for Template:Pro gamer achievements

Thanks

Thank you

A kitten for you!

WikiProject Social Work

Off-topic

Peter M. Brant

Pasi

A cookie for you!

DJ Many

Regarding National Centre for Excellence Page

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

Indian film score composers

New York Red Riders (Professional ABA Basketball Team)

15:41:20, 29 May 2016 review of submission by Nic4711

10:57:19, 6 June 2016 review of submission by Tropicalpineapple

Section break

Reversed Edits

Request on 01:39:46, 13 June 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Mvphothits8849

Regarding Purplehed Records

Mayorkun edit

Wallace vandalism

Ian Stylezz

Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_20#Template:RMpmc

Category:Higher Education Research Consortium Philippines member has been nominated for discussion

23:14:56, 8 June 2016 review of submission by Khalaf Smoqi

Draft: HuckleyBuck

Draft:165th Air Support Operations Squadron

Thank you

13:55:01, 8 July 2016 review of submission by Pianomusic30

There's a difference between being bold and being uncivil

16:51:06, 19 July 2016 review of submission by Gdevasahayam

Some general Wiki mark-up and template doubts

Page mover granted

TfD relistings

Templates for hierarchy

Mayorkun

Austin Petersen again

Request on 16:23:47, 16 August 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by JMWalden

Draft on RL Leaders

Feedback on Draft:David Sulkin

Draft on RL Leaders

Feedback on Draft:David Sulkin

Pageswap script for convenience